03/06/2020
There is a Writ (PIL) in SCI, which prays to quash a part of article 2 of Indian constitution, which gives Union of India, its names, Hindustan, India and Bharat, the prayer says since India is a greek name, therefore, the only acceptable names are Bharat and Hindustan. the SCI has asked Center for Representation in the matter. However, the interesting fact is that India word is derived from Indie, which referred to Indus river, hence the name for people of Indus river, Indie. geographically and legally both ways, Pakistan is more or less the same land of Indus or the ancient India, hence the legacy of the ancient India belongs to Pakistan, We the people of Pakistan are the true owners of the name India, whereas the Union of India is a legacy of British India, or if they wish Bharat as their part is referred as Bharat in history. I understand India is an impostor name for Bharat/Hindustan and they do not have the geography or legacy to take the name. One must remember that Mr. Jinnah also took up this issue at time of Independence. Should we not have a claim on our ancient name?