Help and Protect Justice

16/05/2021

All Acts, Codes, Rules are still intact in Pakistan that were enacted by East India Company for English Master, under SLAVERY ACT 1843 Dated 7th April 1843, (search on Google) Its’ Section 1 state that “no public officer shall in ex*****on of any decree or order of Court”, and this act is still intact, and some laws enacted under slavery act are intact in Pakistan on Peoples, as under:-
i) Pakistan Panel Code 1860;
ii) The Police Act 1861;
iii) Divorce Act 1869;
iv) Special Marriage Act 1872 (age 21);
v) Married Women’s Property Act 1874;
vi) Majority Act 1875;
vii) Birth, Death, & Marriage Registration Act 1880;
viii) Trust Act 1882;
ix) Transfer of Property Act 1882;
x) Commissioner Functionaries Act 1887;
xi) Tenancy Act 1887;
xii) Guardian Ward Act 1890;
xiii) General Clause Act 1897;
xiv) Small Causes Act 1897;
xv) Criminal Procedure Code 1898;
xvi) Civil Procedure Code 1908;
xvii) Limitation Act 1908;
xviii) Maintenance Orders Enforcement Act 1920;
xix) Succession Act of 1925;
xx) Divorce Rules 1927;
xxi) Child Marriage Restraint Act 1929;
xxii) Police Rules 1934;
xxiii) Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Arbitration Act1937;
xxiv) Dissolution of Muslims Marriage Act 1939
xxv) Sindh Chief Court Rules 1944; etc.,
That want change according to are ethics, now we are not slave

06/09/2014

We want such like leader who plays at center forward position, and truth full follower of Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) and Believer of ALLAH

06/09/2014

02/09/2014

SUMMARY of COURTS OBSERVATIONS, JUDGMENTS OR ORDERS
On depriving any person from his valuable rights, in Civil, Revenue or Criminal Courts, through illegal methods, misrepresentation, forgeries, by manufactured documents, by tampering with the record of Honourable Court, by a person or any person of any authority. Summaries as under:-

1) Under section 194. Cr.P.C. High Court after taking cognizance of the offence under P.P.C. would be competent to try offence as per section 28, Cr.P.C., as per mandate the Court of Session have concurrent Jurisdiction along with subordinate Courts to try the offences under the Pakistan Penal Code, is committed during the judicial proceedings try accused under Chapter XXII-A, Cr.P.C. “Thus, in suchlike situation when documentary evidence was available on record the learned Judge in Chambers of High Court rightly decided to proceed with the mater under section 194, Cr.P.C. by directly taking cognizance of the offence.” (2001 SCMR 1615).
2) Those offences have been selected for the Court’s control, because of their direct impact on the judicial process, in other words, the administration of public Justice, which is the direct victim of those offences, only by misleading the Courts, the Court is considered to be the only party to consider the complainant against the guilty party. The interpretation of clause (c) section 195 (1), that clause applies to only those offences, that have close nexus between the offence and the proceeding, in other words, tempering with the documents or earlier forged documents, on the record of a Court or forged documents used as genuine in certain proceedings. Only the concerned Court has right to file the complain, no criminal Court can take cognizance of those offences mentioned in section 195 Cr.P.C. (2000 SCMR 1904).
3) The false and fabricated evidence which diverts the course of justice or misuse the process of law and Court, shakes the confidence of people in the administration of justice guarded by section 476, Cr.P.C. so provides procedure mentioned in section 195, Cr.P.C., and authorizes the Court to try the case itself. “Produced” means produced for the purpose of being tendered to evidence or for some other purpose. (1994 SCMR 1103) Full Bench.
4) Where the Court becomes aware of the commission of any of the offences mentioned in S 195 (1), cls(b) and (c) it fails in its duty, if it does not itself take action but waits for the aggrieved party to come forward with an application or he fails in his duty if he takes no action at all but merely waits for some aggrieved party to complain. [(1980 PCr.LJ 710 [SC(A.J & K)], (’41) AIR 1941 Sind 217 (218) : 43 Cri L Jour 259 (DB).
5) In case the forged document is used in a Court for any purpose, only the Court, before which the document was produced, and used or wanted to be used, can prosecute, the maker of such document or the person using such document. (PLD 1974 Karachi 403)
6) Section 476 Cr.P.C. provides that the complaint may be made by a Court either on an application or otherwise. Therefore it is immaterial whether the present application is made by a person who was not a party to the suit. There is no reason to refuse to take action, because he brings the fact to the notice of the Court. [1980 PCr.LJ 710 [SC(A.J & K)].
7) Case was considered in second appeal under section 476 Cr.P.C. “ We would, therefore, accept the appeal set aside the Judgment and decree of the learned Civil Judge and decree the suit with costs throughout” (PLD 1991 Lahore 8).
8) Now in this case the offence had been committed by a person, the Court desires to prosecute under section 476 with section 195 prescribed the procedure to be followed on complaint, other wise the civil Courts will become a place for the protection of criminals, if hold the provisions of section 195 of the Cr.P.C. would encourage fraud and forgery and to allow the Civil Courts to be used as a place for the protection of criminals. “Unfortunately civil suits usually take very long to decide and, in practical terms, it may amount to completely defeating the ends of Justice. On this view, therefore, the civil Courts will become a place for the protection of criminals” PLD 1992 Lahore 178 (FB) Writ Petition No1727 of 1989

30/08/2014

Struggle for students rights, as, get them rid from bribes, specially in secondary and higher secondary board, where the students face the bribe on each step, on small corrections, what the CHAIRMEN of BOARDS are giving to the future of Pakistan, as violating Article 25-A of Constitution Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973, (THE STATE SHALL PROVIDE FREE AND COMPULSORY EDUCATION TO ALL CHILDREN OF THE AGE OF FIVE TO SIXTEEN YEARS IN SUCH MANNER AS MAY BE DETERMINED BY LAW) but the CHAIRMEN of BOARDS and their staff members trying to teach the young generation “enter to give bribe and go forth to take bribe”, the CHAIRMEN of BOARDS and their staff members, come in the target of Article 6 of Constitution Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973, because they are distracting the future of PAKISTAN, they are not honest to PAKISTAN as violating the Constitution Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973.

17/03/2014

If any body is facing in any Court, if a person or party produced against you forged and fake documents in any Court, go to the Court with an application under section 476 CrPC read with 195 CrPc, and read them, also Section 28 CrPC, and Section 194 CrPC, and go accordingly as under:-

That the Honourable Court may be pleased to take cognizance on offences, may be pleased to take appropriate action on forgery of record for purpose of cheating, fabrication of forged document using as true or genuine, case of tampering with the record of Court, filled impugned affidavits by accused, that sufficient documentary evidence is on the record of the Court, that High Court may please, Under Mandate of Section 28 CrPC, Lodge the Complain Under Section 194 CrPC, for Suo Motu Action Under Section 476 CrPc read with 195 CrPc, that cause of action still subsist and continued.

1. 2001 SCMR 1615; “Thus, in suchlike situation when documentary evidence was available on record the learned Judge in Chambers of High Court rightly decided to proceed with the mater under section 194, Cr.P.C. by directly taking cognizance of the offence.”

2. 2000 SCMR 1904; Only the concerned Court has right to file the complain, no criminal Court can take cognizance of those offences mentioned in section 195 Cr.P.C.

3. 1980 P.Cr.L.J 710 [SC(A.J & K)] : 43 Cri L Jour 259 (DB) : (’41) AIR 1941 Sind 217 (218) :- “Where the Court becomes aware of the commission of any of the offences mentioned in S 195 (1), cls(b) and (c) it fails in its duty, if it does not itself take action but waits for the aggrieved party to come forward with an application.”

4) Accordingly to 1987 SCMR 1962, It may be mentioned that the applicant, who is not a practicing lawyer.

5) Accordingly to 1994 SCMR 1103 Full Bench : ('12) 13 CriL Jour 6 (7) (DB) (Cal) : “Produced” means produced for the purpose of being tendered to evidence or for some other purpose. Under P.P.C. offences mentioned in S 195 (1), cls(b) and (c).ordingly to PLD 1992 Lahore 178, 1998 P.Cr.L.J. 1126 Lahore “the civil Courts will become a place of protection of criminals”.

6) Accordingly to PLD 1991 Lahore 8, case was considered in second appeal under section 476 Cr.P.C

PPC 193.Punishment for false evidence. Whoever intentionally gives false evidence in any stage of a judicial proceeding, or fabricates false evidence for the purpose of being used in any stage of a judicial proceeding, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a terms which may extends to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine;
and whoever intentionally gives or fabricates false evidence in any other case, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a terms which may extends to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.

PPC 475. Counterfeits device or mark used for authenticating documents described in section 467 or possessing counterfeit marked material. Whoever counterfeits upon, or in the substance of, any material, any device or mark used for the purpose of authenticating any document described in section 467 of this Code, intending that such device or mark shall be used for the purpose of giving the appearance of authenticity of any document then forged or therefore to be forged on such material, or who, with such intent, has in possession any material upon or in the substance of which any such device or mark has been counterfeited shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to be fine.

PPC 476. Counterfeits device or mark used for authenticating documents other than those described in section 467 or possessing counterfeit marked material. Whoever counterfeits upon, or in the substance of, any material, any device or mark used for the purpose of authenticating any document other than the documents described in section 467 of this Code, intending that such device or mark shall be used for the purpose of giving the appearance of authenticity to any document then forged or thereafter to be forged on such material, or who, with such intent, has in possession any material upon or in the substance of which any such device or mark has been counterfeited shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to be fine.