Musadiqaliliskani&co

Musadiqaliliskani&co Competition law and State aid law
4. Business law

Our aim is to provide legal services at the highest professional level, capable rendering effective solutions mainly in the following areas:
1. 1.Litigation (Criminal and civil)
2. 2.Corporate Law
3.

14/06/2021

The Sindh government has done a tremendous job. It is really easy and efficient to get vaccinated in Karachi. We were done in just 20 minutes on a Sunday mor...

UK Qualified Barristers, Lawyers.Specialist in Family laws, Services, Taxation, Company, Banking, Rent laws, Property, C...
24/03/2021

UK Qualified Barristers, Lawyers.
Specialist in Family laws, Services, Taxation, Company, Banking, Rent laws, Property, Custom, Nab, & Criminal law
call for appointments or what's app 03330229955

18/02/2021

Legitimate Implications of Su***de in Pakistan

Self destruction and endeavored self destruction are seen as criminal offenses under Section 325 of the Pakistan Penal Code, culpable with detainment which may stretch out to one year, or fine of up to PKR 10,000, or both.[8,16] By law, self destruction and endeavored self destruction ought to be accounted for to the police for additional examination. Such cases ought to be evaluated at government-doled out medico-lawful focuses (MLCs) commanded to manage scientific cases.[2,4]

Families and people try not to go to MLCs on account of the fear of incitement, mortification and demonization by the police and the general public. Moreover, because of intricacies related with police announcing, cases including self destruction and conscious self-hurt (DSH) are taken to private clinics rather where they are neither tended to appropriately nor brought to the consideration of the specialists. Thus, the marvel of self destruction and endeavored self destruction stays undiscovered and understudied.[2,8,17] Patients should be given treatment for mental issues as opposed to being punished.[9]

In 2001, a Mental Health Ordinance (MHO) was declared in Pakistan to supplant the "Lunacy" Act of 1912. In like manner, since the entry of the Eighteenth Amendment which declines the subject of wellbeing to the regions, Sindh, Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have sanctioned laws (in 2013, 2014 and 2017 individually) to address mental prosperity.

As indicated by Section 49 of MHO,

"A person who endeavors self destruction will be reviewed by a certified advisor and at whatever point found to encounter a mental issue will be managed properly under the game plans of this command."

A Bill to decriminalize endeavored self destruction was additionally introduced in the Senate, however it was conceded because 'endeavored self destruction was a wrongdoing' and 'illegal in Islam'.

18/02/2021

Defamation suit rejected on non sending legal notice

Defamation Ordinance (LVI of 2002)---

----Ss. 3 & 8---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VII, R.11---Defamation---Notice of action---Failure to send notice---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Appellant assailed order passed by Trial Court whereby his plaint was rejected under O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C.---Appellant had instituted a suit for defamation against the respondent on the ground that he had got lodged an FIR against him which was disposed of in class "C" and that he had also written a letter to panchayat with false and baseless allegations---Validity---Section 8 of the Defamation Ordinance, 2002, provided that no action would lie unless the plaintiff had given to the defendant fourteen days' notice in writing of his intention to bring an action with particulars of defamatory matter complained of and that too within two months of the publication of the defamatory matter or from the date of gaining knowledge thereof---Appellant had sent notice after one year of the order passed by the Magistrate disposing of the subject FIR under Class "C" and the alleged complaint made by respondent to the panchayat against the appellant---Trial Court had not committed any illegality while passing the impugned order---Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.

2021 M L D 1
[Sindh (Huderabad Bench)]
Before Khadim Hussain M. Shaikh, J

PREETAM---Appellant

Versus

MADHU DAS GODWAL and another---Respondents

1st Appeal No. 59 of 2018, decided on 2nd April, 2019.

Address

Office No. 321, 3rd Floor, Clifton Center, Block 5, Clifton
Karachi
76500

Opening Hours

Monday 10:00 - 18:00
Tuesday 10:00 - 06:00
Wednesday 10:00 - 06:00
Thursday 10:00 - 06:00
Friday 10:00 - 06:00
Saturday 10:00 - 06:00

Telephone

+923330229955

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Musadiqaliliskani&co posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Musadiqaliliskani&co:

Shortcuts

Share

Category