27/05/2023
Case Laws
Menu
SKIP TO CONTENT
HOME
Search Case Law.....
SEARCH
Automated Cryptocurrency Investing
Automated trading of crypto dividends. Awesome passive income every day. Join!
inertix.co
Ss. 302, 324 148 & 149--Post-arrest bail--grant of--The role ascribed to made two fire shots with pistol, one landed on hand of deceased, whereas the second fire hit one passer-by-
PLJ 2023 Cr.C. (Note) 137
[Lahore High Court, Multan Bench]
Present: Ali Zia Bajwa, J.
ASHIQ MUHAMMAD and 2 others--Petitioners
versus
STATE and another--Respondents
Crl. Misc. No. 8471-B of 2022, decided on 31.1.2023.
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)--
----S. 497--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 324 148 & 149--Post-arrest bail--grant of--The role ascribed to made two fire shots with pistol, one landed on hand of deceased, whereas the second fire hit one passer-by--Neither any MLC of said passer-by injured nor his statement u/S. 161 Cr.P.C. attributing such injury to petitioner are available on record--No fire-arm injury exits on the person of the deceased, rather all the injuries to the deceased were caused with blunt weapons--The instant bail petition to the extent of petitioner is allowed. [Para 4 & 5] A & B
2021 SCMR 2011 ref.
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)--
----S. 497--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 324 148 & 149--Post-arrest bail--Dismissal of--Petitioners are well named in cross-version--One petitioner inflicted injury with kassi on right hand of deceased, as a result thereof, his hand was fractured--Other petitioner has been ascribed role of inflicting injuries with dagger on right arm of injured PW and head of deceased--The medical evidence is in line with ocular account--The eyewitnesses and injured have fully implicated both the petitioners in their statements--The case of petitioners falls within the ambit of prohibition contained in section 497(1) Cr.P.C--Sufficient incriminating material is available on the record--Bail petition to the extent of petitioners having no merits is hereby dismissed.
[Para 6] C & D
Mr. James Joseph, Advocate for Petitioners.
Malik Riaz Ahmad Saghla, Addl. Prosecutor General for State.
Khawaja Qaiser Butt, Advocate for Complainant.
Date of hearing: 31.1.2023.
Order
Through this petition filed under Section 497 Cr.P.C, the petitioners seek their post-arrest bail in cross-version registered under Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149, PPC in case FIR No. 659/2022, dated 04.05.2022, registered under Sections 324, 148 & 149, PPC with police station Muzaffarabad, District Multan.
2. Precisely the allegation against the petitioners as per contents of the cross-version is that on 04.05.2022, at 7:00/8:00 a.m., they along with their co-accused while armed with lethal weapons launched murderous assault upon the complainant party, committed murder of Muhammad Akram and caused injuries to Imam Bakhsh.
3. Arguments heard and record perused. ‘
4. The role ascribed to Muhammad Farooq/petitioner No. 2 as per contents of the cross-version is that he made two fire shots with pistol, one landed on hand of Muhammad Akram deceased, whereas the second fire hit Muhammad Munir passer-by. It is an admitted position that neither any MLC of said Muhammad Munir injured nor his statement under Section 161, Cr.P.C. attributing such injury to Petitioner No. 2 are available on the record in support of above allegation. The learned Law Officer and learned counsel for the complainant have also frankly conceded that no fire-arm injury exits on the person of the deceased, rather all the injuries to the deceased were caused with blunt weapons. In view of above the ocular account to the extent of Petitioner No. 2 is not supported by medical evidence. In case titled “Resham Khan and another versus The State through Prosecutor General Punjab, Lahore and another’’ (2021 SCMR 2011), the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan has enunciated the following principle:
“It is well settled exposition of law that at bail stage deeper appreciation of evidence couldn’t be made out but the Court has to get the picture through tentative assessment of prosecution story, however in order to reach even a tentative assessment, whether the petitioners have made out a case of further inquiry or not, the Court has to glean and congregate the composite effect of incriminating material brought on record by the prosecution, inconsistency or contradiction if any in the Statement made in the F.I.R. vis-a-vis postmortem report and or the situation where ocular evidence is not supported by the medical evidence.”
The aforementioned facts make the case against Petitioner No. 2 one of further inquiry into his guilt falling within the ambit of sub-section (2) of Section 497, Cr.P.C. The vicarious liability of the petitioner as’ well as evidentiary value of recovered weapon of offence on his pointing out, would be determined by the learned trial Court after recording of evidence.
5. Petitioner No. 2 is behind the bars since his arrest and no more required to the police for the purposes of further investigation. No useful purpose would be served by detaining Petitioner No. 2 behind , the bars for indefinite period. Resultantly, the instant bail petition to the extent of Petitioner No. 2 is allowed and the petitioner is admitted to post-arrest bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-(Rupees one hundred thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.
6. So far as Ashiq Muhammad/Petitioner No. 1 and Fayyaz Ahmad-Petitioner No. 3 are concerned, they are well named in the cross-version. The role ascribed to Petitioner No. l is that he inflicted injury with kassi on right hand of Muhammad Akram deceased, as a result thereof, his hand was fractured, whereas Fayyaz Ahmad has been ascribed role of inflicting injuries with dagger on right arm of Imam Bakhsh injured and head of Muhammad Akram deceased. The medical evidence is in line with ocular account. The eyewitnesses and injured have fully implicated both the petitioners in their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been found guilty by the investigating officer during the course of investigation. The petitioners have failed to point out any mala fide or ulterior motive on the part of the complainant find police for their false involvement in this case. The case of Petitioners No. 1 and 3 falls within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497(1) Cr.P.C. Sufficient incriminating material is available on the record; which prima facie connects the said petitioners with the commission of the alleged offence.
7. For the foregoing reasons, the instant bail petition to the extent of Petitioners No. 1 and 3 having no merits is hereby dismissed.
(K.Q.B.) Bail dismissed
Email This
BlogThis!
Share to Twitter
Share to Facebook
May 26, 2023
Law Blogger
Leave a comment
Case Law with Complete Judgment
Older PostHome
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Powered by Blogger.
Report Abuse
About Me
Law Blogger
View my complete profile
Pages
Home
About
Search
Search
Categories
109 PPC
123 PPC
124 PPC
132 PPC
133 PPC
133 QSO
134 CrPC
148 PPC
149 PPC
154 CrPC
161 Cr.P.C
161 CrPC
161 PPC
164 Cr.P.C
170 CrP.C.
172 CrPC
177
179 & 180 CR.P.C.
185 COP
190 CrPC
193 & 202 CR.P.C.
193 CrPC
193 QSO
199 COP
1997 (XXV of 1997)
1997 (XXVII of 1997)
200 CrPC
201 PPC
2014 (XX of 2014)
204 CrPC
22-A
22-B
22A CrPC
265c CrPC
295 c PPC
300 PPC
302 b PPC
302 c PPC
302 PPC
304 PPC
307 PPC
323 PPC
324 PPC
325 PPC
326 PPC
34 PPC
342 CrPC
344 Cr.P.C.
345 CrPC
36 CrPC
376 PPC
379 CrPC
380 PPC
381 A PPC
392 PPC
397 PPC
406 PPC
409 PPC
411 PPC
417 CrPC
419 PPC
420 PPC
428 CrPC
435 PPC
439 CrPC
440 PPC
448 PPC
454 PPC
46 QSO
467 PPC
468 PPC
471 PPC
491 PPC
497 Cr.P.C.
497 CrPC
497 PPC
497(2)
498 CrPC
498 F PPC
4Cr.P.C. 63 Cr.P.C
511 PPC
528 CrPC
561 CrPC
91 CrPC
96 PPC
97 PPC
accused acquitted
AMENDMENT
and 149 PPC
Anti-Terrorism Act
Art. 185(3))
bai
Bail
Bail Granted
Benefit of doubt
cas
Case Law with Complete Judgment
Case Laws
Child Witness
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
Control of Narcotic Substances Act
Conviction
Corruption Act S.5
Cr.P.C
Cr.P.C.
CrPC
CrPcC 103
Delay in FIR
Draft/Application
Evidance
Evidence
Extra-Judicial Confession
Financial Institutions
Gazette
Identification prade
Important Judgment
limitation
Marginal Wittness
Murder
Police Rules (1934)
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979)‑
Punjab Overseas Commission Act
Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)
Recovery
Revision
SECTION 169 Cr.P.C.
SECTION 173 CR.P.C.
Section 24
Section 489-F PPC.
SECTION 63 Cr.P.C.
SECTIONS 190
SECTIONS 2
The talk of the town
Topic
Topics
Witness
witness statement
Popular Posts
ایف آئی آر(FIR) کو ختم کروانے کا طریقہ کار !! ایف آئی آر کس طرح خارج کرائی جائے؟
Quashment of FIR مخالفین کو پھنسانے کیلئے جھوٹی اور فرضی کہانیوں پر مبنی ایف آئی آرز درج کرانا پاکستان میں عام ہے۔کسی کیخلاف جھوٹی ایف ا...
رپورٹ زیر دفعہ 173 ض ف (چالان) داخل کرنے میں تاخیر ، وجوہات، پولیس اور عدالت کا کردار۔ لاہور ہائیکورٹ کی جاری کردہ ہدایات
2022 LHC 6257 Judement about late submission of reports under section 173 Cr.P.C. and directions issued by the Lahore High Court. Late sub...
میڈیکل بورڈ بارے ایک اچھی ججمنٹ
اس کا لازمی پڑھیں کافی ریسیریچ پر مبنی ججمنٹ ہے خاص کرکے فوجداری پریکٹس کرنے والے اس کو لازمی پڑھیں 2022 LHC 2305 2022 PCr.LJ 1293
Blog Archive
May 2023 (42)
April 2023 (55)
March 2023 (85)
February 2023 (81)
January 2023 (65)
December 2022 (65)
November 2022 (59)
October 2022 (63)
September 2022 (67)
August 2022 (64)
July 2022 (56)
June 2022 (56)
May 2022 (59)
April 2022 (58)
March 2022 (61)
February 2022 (57)
January 2022 (62)
December 2021 (60)
November 2021 (54)
October 2021 (61)
September 2021 (60)
August 2021 (64)
July 2021 (60)
June 2021 (60)
May 2021 (58)
April 2021 (60)
March 2021 (62)
February 2021 (56)
January 2021 (54)
December 2020 (31)
November 2020 (30)
October 2020 (31)
September 2020 (31)
August 2020 (27)
July 2020 (31)
June 2020 (30)
May 2020 (28)
April 2020 (30)
March 2020 (31)
February 2020 (29)
January 2020 (31)
December 2019 (31)
November 2019 (29)
October 2019 (31)
September 2019 (29)
August 2019 (30)
July 2019 (24)
June 2019 (16)
May 2019 (25)
April 2019 (28)
March 2019 (31)
February 2019 (50)
January 2019 (38)
December 2018 (32)
Home
Copyright © 2023 Case Laws | Powered by Blogger
Design by Automattic | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com
close
Free Blogger Templates for your blog. Download New Blogger Themes,Professional XML Blogspot Templates with in 1, 2 or 3 columns layouts for Free.
