M/s Al-Hazoor Law Associates Jamshoro

18/08/2023

شناخت پریڈ میں ایک ملزم کے ساتھ کم از کم دس قیدیوں کا شامل کرنا لازم ہے.

(2014 YLR 584)

18/08/2023

حق مہر کے عوض گھر کا قبضہ لینے کے لیے دعویٰ کا اختیار سماعت فیملی کورٹ کو ہو گا.

2010 CLC 87

18/08/2023

عدالتی فیصلہ کا اطلاق فوجداری مقدمہ میں نہ ہوگا۔
1991 SCMR 1928
____________ ____________
ملزم کی 249A ض ف میں بریت کے خلاف نگرانی 439A کے تحت ہوگی۔
2012 PCRLJ 30 Lah
____________ ____________
عدالت 227 ض ف کے تحت فرد جرم کی تبدیلی کا اختیار رکھتی ہے۔
2012 PCRLJ 91 Lah
____________ ____________
ملزموں کی طلبی کے بعد استغاثہ عدم پیروی خارج نہ ہو سکتا ھے۔
2012 PCRLJ 1595
____________ ____________
ماتحت عدالت اعلی عدلیہ کی ضمانت منسوخ نہ کر سکتی ہے۔
2013 PCRLJ
____________ ____________
درخواست منسوخی ضمانت کی معیاد مقرر نہ ھے۔
1996 MLD. 37
____________ ____________
سماعت مقدمہ شروع ہونے کے بعد زیر دفعہ 497(5) منسوخ نہ ہو گی۔
2011 SCMR. 815
____________ ____________
فوجداری عدالت کا فیصلہ دیوانی عدالت،دیوانی مقدمات پر اثر انداز نہ ہوتا ہے۔
2006 CLC. 289
____________ ____________
30 سالہ پرانی دستاویزات کے ساتھ خود بخود صداقت نہ ہوتی ہے اسے بھی ثابت کرنا ضروری ہے۔
2007 SCMR 497
____________
30 سالی پرانی دستاویزات صداقت پر منحصر ہوتی ہے اس کو ثابت کرانے کیلئے گواہان کی ضرورت نہ ہے۔
2005 CLC 658
____________ ____________
اگر مخصوص نقاط پر گواہ پر جرح نہ کی گیئ تو وہ درست تسلیم ہوں گے۔
2001 SCMR 1700
____________ ____________
جب ایک حق پیدا ہو گیا کسی قانون میں تو چاہے وہ قانون کالعدم ہو جائے وہ حق ختم نہ ہو گا۔قانون میں دیا گیا حق برقرار رہتا ہے۔
2005 CLC 759

17/08/2023

6179554: نکاح نامہ میں شوھر پر بیوی کو طلاق دینے کی صورت میں ہرجانہ کی ادائیگی کی شرط غیر شرعی اور غیر قانونی ھے۔ اور عدالت طلاق دینے کی صورت میں نکاح نامہ میں درج معاوضہ طلاق شوہر کے خلاف ڈگری نہ کرسکتی ھے
2022 CLC 963/729 Lahore
PLJ 2021 Lahore 485
PLD 2021 SC 449
Conditions mentioned in Column No. 16 of Nikahnama--Claim of recovery of Rs.500,000/- by the respondent/plaintiff from the petitioner/defendant on the ground of second marriage--it was mentioned in the Clause 19--Allah Almighty in Holy Qur’an has delegated uncovenanted powers to the husband to pronounce Talaq to his wife in order to avoid any transgression of Islamic bounds--A husband has an absolute right to divorce his wife and in this regard no condition is described in the Sharia as well as in the codified
law--The husband has a right to divorce his wife from his free will and no condition can be imposed in this regard--The judgments of the learned Courts below to the extent of Issue No. 4 suffer from patent illegality and are liable to be set aside-- Claim of amount in case of divorce mentioned colum of nikahnama is not maintainable
2015 CLC 138
PLD 2011 SC 260,
2008 SCMR 186,
2012 CLC lah 837,
PLD 2007 lah 515.

17/08/2023

✅ *2018 SCMR 911 SUPREME-COURT*
S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Reappraisal of evidence---Accused-lady was alleged to have inflicted dagger injuries to the deceased and the complainant---Trial Court convicted the accused under S. 302(b), P.P.C. and sentenced her to death---High Court upheld the conviction and sentence recorded by the Trial Court; [Per Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, J (Majority view): Occurrence had taken place in broad daylight and inside the house of complainant---First Information Report in respect of the alleged occurrence had been lodged with reasonable promptitude wherein the accused was named as the sole perpetrator of the alleged murder---Complainant was a natural witness of the occurrence being an inmate of the house wherein the occurrence had taken place and the time of occurrence was such that the complainant was likely to be present in her house at that time---Complainant had absolutely no reason to falsely implicate the accused in the murder of the complainant's daughter who was also a friend of the accused---Record of the case showed, and it was so recorded in the FIR itself, that the accused had been apprehended at the spot inside the relevant house and was later on handed over to the local police---Blood-stained dagger had also been recovered from the place of occurrence---Medical evidence had provided full support to the ocular account furnished by the complainant---Prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that accused was responsible for the murder of the deceased--- Appeal against conviction was dismissed accordingly]---[Per Dost Muhammad Khan, J (Minority view): First Information Report was lodged after more than two hours for which no plausible explanation was offered---Complainant waited for the arrival of the police and did not take any step to shift the dead body---Prosecution did not answer the question as to who informed the police about the crime and place of crime---Admittedly deceased and the accused were friends since long---No logic was offered as to for why the accused brought a four months' suckling baby with her when she allegedly had a clear intention to commit murder and the baby was placed within the reach of the complainant, putting his life at grave risk---Deceased was married but she frequently deserted her husband's house and stayed away with the mother (complainant) for no reason---Access of outsiders in the complainant's house raised the possibility of objectionable activities taking place in the complainant's house---Probability could not be ruled out that the husband of the deceased or some close blood relative after getting knowledge of such objectionable activities got annoyed and out of family honour acted so ruthlessly and caused multiple stab wounds to the deceased also slitting her throat, which under no circumstances could be the job of a young and fragile lady like the accused---Inescapable inference was that the accused was made a scapegoat to screen out the real culprit because of the highly objectionable family affairs of the complainant party---Furthermore the prosecution could not explain as to why the accused stayed for more than two hours in the crime house with blood-stained knife and her suckling baby after committing a heinous crime and fell into the hands of the police after its much delayed arrival---From the facts of the case it appeared that the accused was either arrested from her own house or being a fast and close friend of the deceased when she rushed to the crime house with the suckling baby and was present there, then with deliberate intention or otherwise suspicion she was randomly implicated for the murder---Sentence of death awarded to the accused was set aside in circumstances and she was acquitted of the charge of murder].

30/11/2022

پياري دوست محمد يوسف کوهارو سان گڏ سيشن ڪورٽ ساگهڙ ۾

14/09/2021

09/11/2016