https://www.facebook.com/104267071441185/

RAZA LAW Associates RLA, AL-Fajar Plaza, 1st Floor, Jail Road, Allied Moor, Faisalabad (2026)

15/10/2024

ایف بی آر کا سیلز ٹیکس فراڈ کرنے والوں کے خلاف ملک بھر میں کریک ڈاون ، پانچ افراد گرفتار ۔

on Accusation for alleged Sales Tax Fraud.

In the wake of the country-wide against alleged beneficiary businesses of fake/flying invoices & their CFOs involved in tax malpractices, some Directorates of FBR arrested five accused on 14-10-2024 across the country including one of the leading alleged fraudsters engaged in creating chains of dummy businesses and four members of top management of End users/beneficiaries (CFOs) responsible for the tax fraud.

In a registered FIR involving billions of , a Directorate of from Hyderabad, has arrested the & Purchase Officer of a leading Lahore-based Battery Manufacturer on charges of abetment/connivance in Sales Tax fraud by claiming fake input tax on Lead.

In another operation, a Directorate FBR in Faisalabad, has arrested CFOs of TWO sister concerns & leading Faisalabad-based textile unit on the charges of abetment/connivance in Sales Tax fraud by claiming fake input tax on coal. An had already been registered against the suppliers, beneficiaries, connivers, and others.

26/06/2024

فائلر بننے والے لیٹ فائلرز متوجہ ہوں*

بجٹ مالی سال 2024-25 کے مطابق، اب اگر آپ اپنی ٹیکس ریٹرن بروقت یعنی ہر سال ماہ جولائی سے ستمبر کے درمیان فائل کیا کریں گے تو آپ فائلر تصور ہوں گے،

اگر اسکے بعد فائل کریں گے یا گزشتہ سال کی ریٹرن فائل کر کے سرچارج جمع کروائیں گے تو آپ لیٹ فائلر تصور ہوں گے اور

اگر صرف نیشنل ٹیکس نمبر لے کر ٹیکس ریٹرن فائل نہ کیا کریں گے تو آپ نان فائلر ہوں گے۔

لہذا اب بجٹ کے مطابق جائیداد کی خرید و فروخت پر ایڈوانس ٹیکس تقریبا

Single Tax on *Filers*
Double Tax on *Late Filers*
Tripple Tax on *Non Filers*

07/03/2024

HOW TO GET A 7E CERTIFICATE FOR PROPERTY SALE IN PAKISTAN.

March 3, 2024
Write a Commenton How to Get a 7E Certificate for Property Sale in Pakistan
This article explains the importance of obtaining a 7E certificate in Pakistan when selling property.

WHAT IS A 7E CERTIFICATE?

A 7E certificate is a document issued by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) that verifies a property owner has paid their taxes. It’s mandatory for selling a property in Pakistan.

WHO NEEDS A 7E CERTIFICATE?

All property sellers, regardless of the property value. Even if the property value is below 25 million rupees, a certificate is needed to prove this to the Land Record Department.

CONSEQUENCES OF NOT HAVING A 7E CERTIFICATE:

The Land Record Department won’t process the sale without the certificate.You’ll have to pay additional tax based on the fair market value, potentially a significant amount.You might face penalties for not filing tax returns on time.

HOW TO OBTAIN A 7E CERTIFICATE:

Declare The Property In Your Tax Return:

Ensure the property is declared in your income tax return under the “Capital Assets” section.
If you haven’t filed your return yet, do so as soon as possible. You can revise a return filed within next 60 days.

APPLY FOR THE CERTIFICATE (if not declared earlier):

Even if you haven’t declared the property or filed a return, you can still apply for the certificate

ADDITIONAL POINTS:

The Lahore High Court recently ruled that a 7E certificate is mandatory for all property sales, including those previously under court orders.

The FBR provides a computerized document number to verify property tax payment for properties below 25 million rupees.
Conclusion:

Obtaining a 7E certificate is crucial for a smooth property sale in Pakistan. Ensure you declare your property in your tax return and apply for the certificate if needed.

05/12/2023

Today Awesome and beautiful click By Ustade Mohatram Raza Mohay Ud Din Advocate high court..............................................
❤🧡💛💚💙💜🤍❤🧡💛💚💙💜🤍❤🧡

16/10/2023

Glims of annual dinner for honourable Judiciary of Faisalabad..
With Mr. MUHAMMAD JAVAID UL HASSAN CHISHTI District and session judge Faisalabad

29/08/2023

Exception from 236K on transfer of immovable property for gift deed (only blood relation)

21/08/2023

*بریکنگ نیوز*

چئیرمین عمران خان کے ساتھ اٹک جیل میں کس نوعیت کی بدسلوکی اور کیا کیا مظالم ڈھائے جا رہے ہیں.

ایڈیشنل سیشن جج شفقت اللہ نے بھانڈا پھوڑ دیا

ایڈیشنل سیشن جج اٹک شفقت اللہ خان نے 15اگست کو جیل کا دورہ کیا

چیئرمین عمران خان کے سیل کے عین باہر سی سی ٹی وی کیمرہ نصب ہے، ایڈیشنل سیشن جج

چیئرمین عمران خان کے ٹوائلٹ کی L شکل کی دیوار محض اڑھائی سے تین فٹ اونچی ہے، ایڈیشنل سیشن جج

پانچ سے چھ فٹ کی بلندی پر لگے سی سی ٹی وی کیمرہ کی وجہ سے چیئرمین عمران خان کو ٹوائلٹ کے استعمال اور دورانِ غسل بھی کوئی پرائیویسی میسر نہیں، ایڈیشنل سیشن جج

چیئرمین عمران خان کی شکایات مکمل طور پر درست ہیں اور انہیں اس حالت میں رکھنا پاکستان پریزن رولز 257 اور 771 کی صریح خلاف ورزی ہے، ایڈیشنل سیشن جج

وکلاء اور اہلیہ کی چئیرمین عمران خان تک رسائی میں بھی مشکلات ہیں ، ایڈیشنل سیشن جج

29/07/2023

آئرس اپ گریڈ کرنے کی آڑ میں کروڑوں ضائع کئے گئے ھوں گے ورنہ کچھ تو بہتری آتی یہ کیا بدتمیزی ھے کہ ٹرائل کی بنیاد پر آپشن دینے کی بجائے انتہائی مصروف دنوں میں فضول قسم کا سافٹویئر ھم پہ تھونپ دیا گیا جس میں آسانی کی بجائے بے جا سرچنگ کرنا پڑتی ھے چند ضروری ٹیب سائڈ پر چھپے ھوئے ہیں جو کلر سکیم کے باعث نظر بھی نہیں آ رھے۔ ایڈجسٹ ایبل ٹیکس کا پرانا فارمیٹ بہتر کرنے کی بجائے نیا فارمیٹ انتہائی بھونڈا ھے۔ بہت سے اھم ٹیب فرنٹ سے غائب کر دیے گئے نیا آئرس پرانے سے بہتر ھونا چاہئے تھا۔ آمدن اور اثاثہ جات ایک صفحے پر ھونا چاہئیں جنہیں اپ ڈاؤن کر کے دیکھا جا سکے ۔ پرنٹڈ گوشوارہ اچھے خاصے پڑھے لکھے ٹیکس گزار کی سمجھ میں نہیں آتا ۔ ٹیکس بار کو احتجاج کرنا چاہئے۔ کوئی بھی نیا سافٹ وئیر ٹرائل آپشن کے لئے دیا جانا چاہئے ۔ استعمال کرنے والوں کی تجاویز سے اسکو فائنل کرنا چاہیئے۔ ایٹریبیوٹ attribute میں بہت سی اکنامک ایکٹیویٹیز میسر نہ ہیں۔ ضروری دستاویزات کو منسلک کرنے کے لئے ماسوائے p&L اور مینوفیکچرنگ اکاؤنٹ کے کوئی آپشن نہیں دی گئی ۔

01/06/2023

Online Registration
Method

28/04/2023

The vehicle of tampered chassis and engine number cannot be allowed to be given on superdari to the claimant if he has no proof otherwise.

Crl. Misc.
60827/22
Ahmed Ali Vs A.S.J. etc.
Mr. Justice Muhammad Waheed Khan
17-04-2023
2023 LHC 2353

26/04/2023

Supreme Court has enunciated the following principles for cancellation/recalling of bail:-

“i) If the bail granting order is patently illegal, erroneous, factually incorrect and has resulted into miscarriage of justice.

ii) That the accused has misused the concession of bail in any manner.

iii) That accused has tried to hamper prosecution evidence by persuading/pressurizing prosecution witnesses.

iv) That there is likelihood of absconsion of the accused beyond the jurisdiction of court.

v) That the accused has attempted to interfere with the smooth course of investigation.

vi) That accused misused his liberty while indulging into similar offence.

vii) That some fresh facts and material has been collected during the course of investigation with tends to establish guilt of the accused.

“ordinarily the superior courts are reluctant to interfere into the order extending concession of bail. The rationale behind is that once concession of bail is granted by a court of competent jurisdiction then very strong and exceptional grounds would be required to hamper with the concession extended to a person who is otherwise clothed with free life, any contrary action of the court would be synonymous to curtailing the liberty of such person, which otherwise is a precious right guaranteed under the Constitution of the country. Our judicial system has evolved beside others the concept of "benefit of reasonable doubt" for the sake of safe administration of criminal justice which cannot only be extended at the time of adjudication before the trial court or court of appeal rather if it is satisfying all legal contours, then it must be extended even at bail stage which is a sine qua non of a judicial pronouncement, hence, any unjustified action by the court of law intruding into the affairs would certainly frustrate the free life of an accused person after availing the concession of bail. It is not beyond the legitimate expectations that in our society mere levelling of accusation basing upon trumped-up charges is not something beyond imagination. Therefore, false implication/ exploitation which has become epidemic in our society has to be safeguarded by the majesty of the courts.”

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1145-L OF 2020
Zafar Iqbal, Mazhar Hussain & Muhammad Saleh VERSUS The State etc
11th of October, 2021
Regards Mirza Ahmad advocate

26/04/2023

Order XVI Rule 1 of the Code requires the parties to provide list of witnesses within seven (07) days of settlement of issues. If omission in this regard has taken place, it is imperative to obtain permission of the Court. The concerned Court is required to see availability of ‘good cause’ for excuse from such omission, keeping in view fact of each case and the attending circumstances. If the Court is satisfied as to availability of good cause then the permission can be granted for which reasons are required to be recorded.

It seems that after conclusion of evidence of respondent / plaintiff and one year after the given time, a list of witnesses is sought to be produced on a plea, which on the face of it appears to be false and which remained unsupported by anything on record or any affidavit of the relevant person. There is no cavil to the proposition, after the law settled in cases titled “Amjad Khan v. Muhammad Irshad (Deceased) through LRs” (2020 SCMR 2155) and “Muhammad Anwar and others v. Mst. Ilyas Begum and others” (PLD 2013 SC 255), that a party seeking such permission has to show ‘good cause’ on the basis of which the omission can be excused, which the Court has to see while keeping in view the facts and circumstances of each case. The parties cannot be granted such permissions, at belated stage, as a matter of right or as a matter of course, without assigning or establishing ‘good cause’. Admittedly, the litigants cannot be made to suffer due to fault of Court or its staff but such attribution cannot be accepted on the basis of unfounded and groundless or unjustifiable statements and which even otherwise remain unsupported by affidavit of the relevant person. A similar plea, of misplacing list of witnesses by Court-staff, when remained unconfirmed by anything from record.

Civil Revision No. 50670 of 2020
Muhammad Azam Versus Muhammad Anwar Khan and 6 others

Date of hearing: 03.04.2023

RAZA LAW Associates RLA

15/10/2024

26/06/2024

07/03/2024

05/12/2023

16/10/2023

29/08/2023

21/08/2023

29/07/2023

01/06/2023

28/04/2023

26/04/2023

26/04/2023

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category