04/10/2025
WHAT HUMANITARIAN REASONS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT?
Just when public opinion was starting to look kindly on them, the Senate, voting in favor of the Resolution asking the International Criminal Court (ICC) to approve house arrest for former President Rodrigo Duterte flushed that newfound trustworthiness down the drain. The 15-3 vote (with 2 abstentions) in favor of recommending to the ICC to place Duterte under house arrest instead of keeping him in detention was upheld for humanitarian reasons. In truth, it was a travesty of the worst kind, a slap in the face for victims of extrajudicial killings and their families. You cannot associate Duterte with humanitarian reasons and pretend it’s acceptable despite the thousands who died.
The Duterte administration disrespected humanitarian principles at every turn when he was in power. As president, he demonstrated a strong disdain for human rights and weaponized the so-called anti-drugs campaign to harrass activists and political dissenters who dared to speak about the human rights record of his strongman rule.
Today, the flood control investigation somehow restored public confidence that the Senate as an institution had chosen to remain faithful to its commitment to honest and decent governance. Indeed some of the senators have stepped up in a rare demonstration of courage and integrity, especially those at the forefront of the flood control fund investigation who didn’t hesitate to burn bridges with their own colleagues to expose their wrongdoings. However, the Senate’s shining moment was only as good as it lasted, or until the day that votes were cast overwhelmingly in favor of Duterte’s house arrest. With that, the Senators made known where they stand, and what true colors they wear. If this is the equivalent of a loyalty check, the pro-Duterte Senators staged a mighty show of force and solidarity reminding us that they still have the numbers. At the end of voting, Senators Rissa Hontiveros, Bam Aquino and Kiko Pangilinan were left to their lonesome, as usual.
The crossing of party-lines that beautifuly transpired at rare times in the Senate inspired public perceptions that thankfully the majority had taken the side of the good. In truth however there was nothing more to it beyond perceptions. When all is said and done, the pro-Duterte bloc never changed at all in as much as the serpent no matter how many times it changes skin does not stop being a serpent.
That’s why we should not allow ourselves to get too carried away by false hopes, not to put too much trust on the Duterte enablers. Instead, people should be constantly reminded of how Sen. Panfilo Lacson sponsored the Anti-Terrorism Law that helped legitimize red-tagging and warrantless arrests when Duterte was President. Also, how Sen. Tito Sotto fiercely opposed the ICC investigation on Duterte’s war on drugs behind the government narrative that it undermines Philippine sovereignty. Let us not forget that the Tulfo brothers were staunch Duterte supporters who held government positions under his administration and stayed untouched despite being linked to corruption. Let us not forget how Duterte enablers conspired to jail Sen. Leila de Lima while letting the sacred cows get away because the government wouldn’t act on the Philhealth and Pharmaly scandals.
So after that little dallyance with looking credible and independent, the Senate is back to where it started – a Duterte-dominated sort of unholy alliance – the reason that Vice Pres. Sara Duterte would not be impeached and why she continues to receive her salary despite practically becoming a full-time caregiver to her father at The Hague. It means Inday Sara’s presidential hopes are far from dead, but seemed more like awaiting revival. In fact more and more people now being charged of corruption are riding high on her political comeback remembering how they had it so good during Duterte’s time.
WHAT HUMANITARIAN REASONS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT?
October 02, 2025
At home, the computer room
4:30 p.m.