02/09/2025
The (SC) has reiterated the rules in determining the appropriate legal actions for recovery of possession and/or ownership of land and the corresponding prescriptive periods in filing them. These remedies are: ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ก or ejectment, ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐, and ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐.
In a Decision written by Associate Justice Ricardo R. Rosario, the SC ๐๐ฃ ๐ฝ๐๐ฃ๐ held that Lea Victa-Espinosa (Espinosa) correctly filed an ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ to recover possession of her land within a year from dispossession. It explained that ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ may be filed not only when the dispossession lasted for a year but also when it lasted for a year or less when there is no allegation that the deprivation is by force, intimidation, threat, strategy, or stealth.
The SC also ruled that Espinosaโs action is not ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐ as she did not seek in her complaint the recovery of ownership of the land.
After purchasing the property, Espinosa found that Spouses Noel and Leny Agullo were occupying a part of it. When they refused to leave despite her demand, Espinosa filed a complaint for recovery of possession in the Regional Trial Court (RTC).
The RTC dismissed the complaint for being filed too early. It explained that Espinosa may still file forcible entry, an ejectment suit, within one year from the time she learned of the deprivation of physical possession of the land. Since an ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ can only be filed after that one-year period, RTC ruled that her complaint was premature.
The Court of Appeals reversed the RTCโs decision, finding that Espinosaโs complaint was not an ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ but an ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐, as she sought to recover possession based on her ownership of the property.
In their Petition before the SC, Spouses Agullo sought to reinstate the ruling of the RTC dismissing the case and insisted that Espinosaโs case was an ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ that was filed prematurely, as less than a year had passed since the alleged dispossession.
The Court denied the Petition but clarified that the action is not accion reivindicatoria but accion publiciana. It reiterated the actions available for recovery of possession and/or ownership of land:
โข ๐ผ๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ก or a summary ejectment case;
โข ๐ผ๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐; and
โข ๐ผ๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐.
๐ผ๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ก or summary ejectment proceeding is filed to recover physical possession of land when the dispossession was due to force, intimidation, threat, strategy, or stealth and has not lasted for more than a year.
๐ผ๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ is filed when the dispossession lasted for more than a year, or even for a year or less, if it is not due to force, intimidation, or similar means.
๐ผ๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐ is filed to recover both ownership and possession based on that ownership.
The Court explained that in ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐, the issue is who has the better right to possess the land, without necessarily claiming ownership. In contrast, ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐ involves determining who owns the land, with possession granted to the rightful owner.
As what is sought in the complaint is recovery of possession and not ownership, and there is no allegation that Spouses Agullo disputed Espinosaโs title, the action is ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ and not ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ง๐๐.
The Court also held that contrary to the findings of the RTC, the action was not premature, because ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ may be filed even within one year from dispossession if no force, intimidation, threat, strategy, or stealth was used. Since Espinosa did not claim that Spouses Agullo used any of these means, the action was correctly filed not as ejectment suit but ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐.
The SC thus ordered the RTC to proceed to trial and decide the case.
Read the full text of the press release at https://tinyurl.com/y7nr9hzx
Read the full text of the Decision at https://tinyurl.com/38e2xzfa
Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIOโs Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution-policy/.
