MFCrisostomo Law Office

MFCrisostomo Law Office Legal Services

18/07/2026

SUPREME COURT IMPOSES HARSHER PENALTY FOR VAWC OFFENSES COMMITTED ONLINE

The Supreme Court (SC) has imposed a harsher penalty on a man convicted of committing psychological violence against his former girlfriend through social media, emphasizing that the use of information and communication technology aggravates the penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

In a 20-page decision authored by Associate Justice Ramon Paul Hernando, the SC's First Division affirmed the man's conviction for violating Republic Act No. 9262, or the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children (VAWC) Act of 2004, but increased his prison term after partially granting his motion for reconsideration.

The case involved a couple who had been in a relationship for three years and had a daughter together. After the woman rejected the man's marriage proposal because of problems in their relationship, he raised their child with the help of his parents.

During one visit to see their daughter, the man allegedly grabbed and groped the woman, prompting her to block him on Facebook and other social media platforms.

Years later, the woman's siblings received Facebook Messenger messages from an account they recognized as belonging to the man. The messages blamed the woman for causing his mother's heart attack.

The following day, the woman learned that the same account had posted a public Facebook message calling her a "dirty woman" and an "animal" and threatening to physically assault her. The insults were repeated in the comments section. Fearing for her safety, the woman filed a complaint for violation of the Anti-VAWC Act.

The Regional Trial Court, acting as a Family Court, found the man guilty, a ruling later affirmed by the Court of Appeals and subsequently by the Supreme Court.

Initially, the High Court upheld the P100,000 fine imposed by the lower courts and ordered the offender to undergo psychological counseling or psychiatric treatment.

It rejected the bare denial of the accused that he was not the one using the social media account, ruling that the prosecution established beyond reasonable doubt that he controlled the account and authored the posts.

In filing his motion for reconsideration, the accused argued that the mere appearance of his name and photograph on the Facebook account was insufficient to prove that he authored the posts.

It emphasized that the use of information and communication technology in committing a crime constitutes a qualifying circumstance under Section 6 of Republic Act No. 10175, or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012.

"By virtue of Section 6 of Republic Act No. 10175, the use of an ICT in the commission of a crime or offense is a qualifying circumstance warranting the imposition of a higher penalty," the resolution stated.

The Court, however, emphasized that the qualifying circumstance must be specifically alleged in the criminal complaint or information, as required under the Rules of Court. Otherwise, it cannot be appreciated even if proven during trial.

It added that the statute stands even if the criminal Information does not expressly mention "information and communications technology" (ICT), as long as the use of the social media platform is clearly alleged and proven during trial.

The SC also reiterated the factors that may be considered in proving ownership or control of a social media account, including admissions of authorship, eyewitness accounts of account access, information known only to the accused, writing style, records from internet service providers or social media platforms, digital forensic evidence, patterns consistent with previous posts, and other circumstances linking the account to the offender.

The Court raised the prison sentence of the offender from six months and one day to eight years to six years and one day to 14 years, eight months and one day, while retaining the P100,000 fine and ordering the accused to undergo psychological counseling or psychiatric treatment.

IBP Isabela Chapter Standard Minimum Notarial Rates
02/06/2026

IBP Isabela Chapter Standard Minimum Notarial Rates

Attending the 2026 IBP Isabela Chapter Legal Forum โš–๏ธ
31/01/2026

Attending the 2026 IBP Isabela Chapter Legal Forum โš–๏ธ

Renewal of Notarial CommissionTuloy na po muli ang aking notarial services.Ang aking opisina ay matatagpuan sa National ...
12/01/2026

Renewal of Notarial Commission
Tuloy na po muli ang aking notarial services.
Ang aking opisina ay matatagpuan sa National Highway, Barangay Mabini, Santiago City (harap ng Robinsons Place Santiago).

05/01/2026

๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐Ÿณ ๐—๐—”๐—ก๐—จ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ฌ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฒ

Almighty God, Source of all wisdom and justice, we humbly come before Your divine presence, bearing in our hearts the fervent hopes and profound anxieties of those who have traversed the arduous path to the Philippine Bar.

For the examinees, who have poured their very essence into the mastery of ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ, the intricacies of ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž, and the foundational principles of our ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, we pray. Grant them, in this period of anxious waiting, a profound sense of peace that transcends all understanding. May their spirits be fortified, knowing they have given their utmost, demonstrating their dedication to the ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ฅ๐š๐ฐ and their unwavering commitment to the pursuit of ๐ž๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ and ๐Ÿ๐š๐ข๐ซ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ.

As the dawn of January 7, 2026, approaches, bringing with it the revelation of their ๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฅ๐ž๐ ๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง, we implore Your divine guidance upon the esteemed Supreme Court and all those tasked with the solemn duty of releasing the Bar Examination results. May the process be imbued with absolute integrity, transparency, and precision, reflecting the meticulous effort invested by each candidate.

For those whose names shall be called, signifying their entry into the noble ranks of ๐œ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ฌ๐ž๐ฅ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ-๐š๐ญ-๐ฅ๐š๐ฐ, we pray for an outpouring of gratitude and humility. May they forever uphold their ๐จ๐š๐ญ๐ก, championing the cause of the oppressed, defending the rights of the vulnerable, and serving as beacons of ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก and ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐ž in our society. Instill in them the courage to practice with unwavering ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ, profound ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง, and unyielding ๐š๐๐ฏ๐จ๐œ๐š๐œ๐ฒ, always remembering that the law is a tool for human flourishing.

And for those who may face temporary setbacks, grant them resilience, renewed strength, and an unshakeable faith in Your perfect timing. May they find grace in https://bit.ly/07242025, understanding that their journey towards becoming a legal luminary is but a testament to their enduring spirit.

May this new generation of lawyers, forged in the crucible of the Bar, be instruments of positive change, contributing significantly to the strengthening of our nation's legal framework and the advancement of a just and orderly society.

All these we pray, with hearts full of hope and anticipation, in Your most holy and righteous name.

๐€๐Œ๐„๐.

๐ŸŒฑโœจ

Office location:National Highway Mabini, Santiago City (in front of Robinsons Place Santiago)My new office  for my notar...
03/08/2025

Office location:
National Highway Mabini, Santiago City
(in front of Robinsons Place Santiago)

My new office for my notarial services ๐ŸŽ‰
For my other legal services beyond government office hours, I can still assist you at my home office located at
92 Maharlike Highway Dubinan West, Santiago City (in front of Floor Center)
Contact me: 09561362739


MFCrisostomo Law Office
Christian Crisostomo

06/06/2025

๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—จ๐—ฝ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—š๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐——๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ด ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€

In view of its rule-making power, the Supreme Court deems it proper to promulgate the following guidelines supplementary to those set forth in the Montierro ruling, for the guidance of the Bench, the Bar, and the public.

Upon this point, the following comprehensive guidelines shall be observed in plea bargaining in cases involving dangerous drugs:

1. Offers for plea bargaining must be initiated in writing by way of a formal written motion filed by the accused in court.

2. The lesser offense which the accused proposes to plead guilty to must necessarily be included in the offense charged.

3. Upon receipt of the proposal for plea bargaining that is compliant with the provisions of the Plea Bargaining Framework in Drugs Cases, the judge shall order that a drug dependency assessment be administered. If the accused admits drug use, or denies it but is found positive after a drug dependency test, then they shall undergo treatment and rehabilitation for a period of not less than six months. Said period shall be credited to their penalty and the period of their after-care and follow-up program if the penalty is still unserved. If the accused is found negative for drug use/ dependency, then they will be released on time served, otherwise, they will serve his/her sentence in jail minus the counselling period at rehabilitation center.

4. As a rule, plea bargaining requires the mutual agreement of the parties and remains subject to the approval of the court. Regardless of the mutual agreement of the parties, the acceptance of the offer to plead guilty to a lesser offense is not demandable by the accused as a matter of right, but is a matter addressed entirely to the sound discretion of the court. Although the prosecution and the defense may agree to enter into a plea bargain, it does not follow that the courts will automatically approve the proposal. Judges must still exercise sound discretion in granting or denying plea bargaining, taking into .. account the objections raised by the prosecution and other relevant circumstances, including theยท character of the accused.

5. ๐™„๐™ฃ ๐™˜๐™–๐™จ๐™š๐™จ ๐™ฌ๐™๐™š๐™ง๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™ค๐™จ๐™š๐™˜๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ, ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™จ ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ข๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™ค๐™ง ๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™จ๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™–๐™˜๐™˜๐™ช๐™จ๐™š๐™™โ€™๐™จ ๐™ข๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™š๐™– ๐™—๐™–๐™ง๐™œ๐™–๐™ž๐™ฃ, ๐™ง๐™–๐™ž๐™จ๐™š๐™™ ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™– ๐™›๐™š๐™ฌ ๐™—๐™ช๐™ฉ ๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™ฉ ๐™–๐™ก๐™ก ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™จ๐™จ๐™ž๐™—๐™ก๐™š ๐™œ๐™ง๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™™๐™จ ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง ๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™จ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ข๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ, ๐™ž๐™ฉ ๐™ข๐™ช๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™—๐™š ๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™™๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ค๐™ค๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™–๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™ค๐™จ๐™š๐™˜๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™๐™–๐™จ ๐™ฌ๐™–๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™™ ๐™จ๐™ช๐™˜๐™ ๐™œ๐™ง๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™™๐™จ ๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™ฉ ๐™ง๐™–๐™ž๐™จ๐™š๐™™, ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ข๐™ž๐™ก๐™–๐™ง ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™ž๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™š ๐™—๐™š๐™๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™Š๐™ข๐™ฃ๐™ž๐™—๐™ช๐™จ ๐™ˆ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™๐™ช๐™ก๐™š.

6. The court shall not allow plea bargaining if the objection to the plea bargaining is valid and supported by evidence to the effect that:

a. the offender is a recidivist, habitual offender, known in the community as a drug addict and a troublemaker, has undergone rehabilitation but had a relapse, or has been charged many times; or

b. when the evidence of guilt is strong.

7. Plea bargaining in drugs cases shall not be allowed when the proposed plea bargain does not conform to the Court-issued Plea Bargaining Framework in Drugs Cases.

8. Judges may overrule the objection of the prosecution if it is based solely on the ground that the accused's plea bargaining proposal is inconsistent with the acceptable plea bargain under any internal rules or guidelines of the DOJ, although in accordance with the Plea Bargaining Framework issued by the Court, if any.

9. If the prosecution objects to the accused's plea bargaining proposal due to the circumstances enumerated in item no. 6, the trial court is mandated to hear the prosecution's objection and rule on the merits thereof. If the trial court finds the objection meritorious, it shall order the continuation of the criminal proceedings. ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™ž๐™–๐™ก ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™จ๐™๐™–๐™ก๐™ก ๐™๐™š๐™–๐™ง ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™ง๐™š๐™˜๐™š๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š ๐™š๐™ซ๐™ž๐™™๐™š๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฎ ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™–๐™ก๐™ก ๐™œ๐™ง๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™™๐™จ ๐™ง๐™–๐™ž๐™จ๐™š๐™™ ๐™—๐™ฎ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™ค๐™จ๐™š๐™˜๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง ๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™จ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ข๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™š๐™– ๐™—๐™–๐™ง๐™œ๐™–๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™ข๐™ช๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™ง๐™ช๐™ก๐™š ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™š๐™–๐™˜๐™ ๐™œ๐™ง๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™–๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ๐™ก๐™ฎ.

10. If an accused applies for probation in offenses punishable under Republic Act No. 9165, other than for illegal drug trafficking or pushing under Section 5 in relation to Section 24 thereof, then the law on probation shall apply.

11. ๐™’๐™๐™š๐™ง๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™ค๐™จ๐™š๐™˜๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™๐™–๐™จ ๐™ง๐™–๐™ž๐™จ๐™š๐™™ ๐™ข๐™ช๐™ก๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™š ๐™œ๐™ง๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™™๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™จ ๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™จ๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ, ๐™—๐™ช๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™ž๐™–๐™ก ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™ง๐™ช๐™ก๐™š๐™™ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™š ๐™—๐™ช๐™ฉ ๐™ฌ๐™–๐™จ ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ก๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ ๐™ง๐™š๐™œ๐™–๐™ง๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ง๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ, ๐™š๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™๐™š๐™ง ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™–๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ก๐™ก๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™ค๐™ง ๐™ฉ๐™๐™ž๐™จ ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™จ๐™๐™–๐™ก๐™ก ๐™™๐™ž๐™ง๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™ž๐™–๐™ก ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ง๐™ช๐™ก๐™š ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™จ๐™ช๐™˜๐™ ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™™๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™ช๐™š๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™–๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ง๐™™๐™–๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š ๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™ž๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™š๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™ˆ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™š๐™ง๐™ง๐™ค ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™ž๐™จ ๐™˜๐™–๐™จ๐™š.

12. ๐™’๐™๐™š๐™ง๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ง๐™š๐™˜๐™ค๐™ง๐™™๐™จ ๐™—๐™š๐™›๐™ค๐™ง๐™š ๐™š๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™๐™š๐™ง ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™–๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ก๐™ก๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™ค๐™ง ๐™ฉ๐™๐™ž๐™จ ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™–๐™ง๐™š ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™š๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™™๐™š๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™ข๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™š ๐™ž๐™› ๐™ž๐™ฉ ๐™›๐™–๐™ก๐™ก๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฎ ๐™ค๐™› ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™˜๐™š๐™™๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™จ๐™˜๐™š๐™ฃ๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™ค๐™จ, ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™ž๐™–๐™ก ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™จ๐™๐™–๐™ก๐™ก ๐™—๐™š ๐™™๐™ž๐™ง๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™š๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ง๐™ช๐™ก๐™š ๐™–๐™œ๐™–๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง ๐™›๐™ค๐™ก๐™ก๐™ค๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™ž๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™š๐™จ ๐™ก๐™–๐™ž๐™™ ๐™™๐™ค๐™ฌ๐™ฃ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™ˆ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™š๐™ง๐™ง๐™ค ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™ž๐™จ ๐™˜๐™–๐™จ๐™š.

13. ๐˜ผ๐™จ ๐™– ๐™ง๐™š๐™จ๐™ช๐™ก๐™ฉ ๐™ค๐™› ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง๐™š๐™œ๐™ค๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ง๐™ช๐™ก๐™š, ๐™ž๐™› ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™ž๐™–๐™ก ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™ค๐™ง ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™–๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ก๐™ก๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™๐™–๐™จ ๐™ง๐™ช๐™ก๐™š๐™™ ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ง๐™ง๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™ช๐™š, ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ง๐™ง๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ ๐™Ÿ๐™ช๐™™๐™œ๐™ข๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™จ๐™๐™–๐™ก๐™ก ๐™—๐™š ๐™ง๐™š๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š๐™™ ๐™ค๐™ง ๐™–๐™›๐™›๐™ž๐™ง๐™ข๐™š๐™™, ๐™–๐™จ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™˜๐™–๐™จ๐™š ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฎ ๐™—๐™š.

14. ๐™„๐™ฃ ๐™˜๐™–๐™จ๐™š๐™จ ๐™ฌ๐™๐™š๐™ง๐™š ๐™—๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™ž๐™–๐™ก ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™–๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ก๐™ก๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™ง๐™ช๐™ก๐™š๐™™ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ง๐™ง๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™ช๐™š (๐™ž.๐™š., ๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™ฉ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™–๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ง๐™™๐™–๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š ๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ ๐™ˆ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™š๐™ง๐™ง๐™ค), ๐™– ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ฌ ๐™Ÿ๐™ช๐™™๐™œ๐™ข๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™จ๐™๐™–๐™ก๐™ก ๐™—๐™š ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™š๐™™ ๐™—๐™ฎ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™™๐™ž๐™ง๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™ž๐™–๐™ก ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™–๐™ก๐™ก๐™ค๐™ฌ ๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™š๐™– ๐™—๐™–๐™ง๐™œ๐™–๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™–๐™˜๐™˜๐™ช๐™จ๐™š๐™™โ€™๐™จ, ๐™˜๐™–๐™จ๐™š, ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ง๐™š๐™ฃ๐™™๐™š๐™ง ๐™– ๐™œ๐™ช๐™ž๐™ก๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™ซ๐™š๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™˜๐™ฉ ๐™–๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ๐™ก๐™ฎ.

READ Full Text of the Decision in Rodulfo Ferraren Aquino a.k.a. โ€œYoyonโ€ v. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 259094 January 28, 2025.


Address

92 Maharlika Highway Dubinan West
Santiago
3311

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when MFCrisostomo Law Office posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category