Cybercrime Lawyer

30/04/2025

The (SC) has reaffirmed that testimonies from a spouse’s family and friends can help prove psychological incapacity in cases seeking to nullify a marriage.

In a Decision written by Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen, the SC’s Second Division declared the marriage of Jeffery A. Green (Jeffery) and Rowena Manlutac Green (Rowena) null and void due to Rowena’s psychological incapacity.

Jeffery filed a petition to nullify their marriage, claiming that both he and Rowena were psychologically incapacitated. As evidence, Jeffery submitted a psychiatric evaluation report based on standard tests and interviews with himself, Rowena, a mutual friend, and Rowena’s mother.

According to the said report, Rowena frequently mismanaged their finances, accumulating debts of up to PHP 4 million. She was also accused of cheating on Jeffery and lying about the paternity of their child.

Ruling that Rowena was psychologically incapacitated to comply with her marital obligations, the SC emphasized that in nullity of marriage cases, psychological incapacity can be evaluated using statements from people other than the spouses, especially from those close to the allegedly incapacitated spouse. This approach helps avoid potential bias in favor of the spouse who filed the petition.

The SC also reiterated that so long as the totality of the evidence can prove a spouse’s psychological incapacity at the time the marriage was celebrated, the marriage can be nullified under Article 36 of the 𝘍𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘊𝘰𝘥𝘦.

In this case, Jeffery presented documentary evidence on Rowena’s debt and gambling history, dishonesty, and infidelity, and the psychiatric evaluation report. All of these show Rowena suffers from continuing and incurable 𝘉𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘋𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 and 𝘈𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘋𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳, which prevent her from performing her spousal obligations, justifying the dissolution of their marriage.

Read the full text of the Press Release at https://tinyurl.com/36crdfhb.

Read the full text of the Decision at https://tinyurl.com/3c3t54b7.

Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution-policy/.

23/02/2025

MANILA, Philippines – A center manned by 80 people in Quezon City is solely tasked with immediately assisting victims of scams and cybercrime, centralizing communications for various government agencies in charge of law enforcement and regulation.

To reach this center, just dial 1326.

The Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center recorded over 10,000 complaints of online scams through its hotline in 2024. Here's how the response center works and how to report.

03/12/2024

03/12/2024

Salamat po, PCOL Quijano at PMaj Gaston sa mainit na pagtanggap ❤

16/09/2024

On my way...

13/09/2024

🚨👏 Congratulations to QCPD Director Rederico Maranan and the entire cybercrime team led by Maj. Eric Casabal for their outstanding achievement! 👏🚨

Under their leadership, the Quezon City Police District recorded a 33% drop in cybercrime cases for the months of July and August. Thanks to their relentless efforts in tackling online scams, identity theft, credit card fraud, online threats, and more, 146 out of 159 cases were successfully resolved. 💪

Your dedication and commitment to protecting the public from the dangers of cybercrime is truly commendable. Keep up the great work in making our digital spaces safer for everyone! 🙌

THE Quezon City Police District (QCPD) has recorded a 33-percent decline in the number of cybercrime cases in July and August. QCPD director Rederico Maranan cited the success of their anti-cybercrime operations led by Maj. Eric Casabal over the past two months. He said the team continued to respond...

06/09/2024

I am delighted by people who are naturally kind. God is manifested in them.

12/08/2024

Today's Seminar Topics...
Morning Session: Effective Online Reputation Management Techniques.
Afternoon Session: MALWARE Exposures, Threats, Prevention, and Remedies (against One-Time Password Hacking and more...)
DICT, UP Diliman, Quezon City.
See you!

30/07/2024

Region IV-A - Done... Region IV-B ongoing...

22/07/2024

If your reputation is under attack online through a libelous article on a website, use the WHOIS domain tool. If the attack is from a social media platform like a Facebook post, then follow the Three-URL rule.

To file a criminal complaint for libel (or unjust vexation), follow the Three-URL Rule. This means you must obtain and examine the URL of the libelous post and the URL of the person who created the post and compare these with the URL of the accused in the criminal action. If the URL of the Facebook account from which the libelous post originated does not match the URL of the Facebook account of the accused, then the accused is a victim of Identity Theft.

However, if the URL of the Facebook account from which the libelous post originated matches the URL of the accused's Facebook account, then it can be said that the libelous post came from the accused's account (although it is possible that someone else may have used their account).

(The Three-URL Rule was coined by me).
https://cybercrimeconsultant.com

17/07/2024

AI Apologizes...

Mali-mali yung mga info na binibigay ng paid version ko ng AI. Sorry ng sorry. Di naman nasasaktan everytime na sinisita ko.