http://companeroAttyBoyCuenco.ph/

Compañero Boy Cuenco CPA Lawyer, Quezon City And Rizal, Quezon City (2026)

24/08/2026

POST NG PANINIRA SA SOCIAL MEDIA BINURA

OO, PWEDE MO PA RIN SILANG IPAKULONG KAHIT BURAHIN NILA YUNG POST KUNG MAPATUNAYAN MO ANG MAPANIRANG PARATANG.

Ang pagbura ng post ay hindi nag-aalis ng criminal liability dahil consummated na ang cyber libel nang mabasa o makita ito ng ibang tao. Gayunman, kailangan mo pa ring magprisinta ng sapat na ebidensiya. I-save agad ang screenshots, URL, pangalan at profile ng account, petsa at oras, comments, shares, at mga testigong nakabasa.

Maaari kang magsampa ng complaint-affidavit sa Office of the City Prosecutor at humingi ng tulong sa NBI Cybercrime Division o PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group. Ang pagkakakulong o pagpapataw ng multa ay nasa hukuman pagkatapos ng paglilitis.

Legal na basehan:

¹ Revised Penal Code, arts. 353–355; Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, § 4(c)(4).
² Disini v. Secretary of Justice, G.R. No. 203335, February 18, 2014; ### v. People, on the necessity of proving authorship of the Facebook post.

24/08/2026

CYBER LIBEL ILAN TAON NGA BA KULONG

MAAARI SIYANG MAKULONG MULA 4 NA TAON HANGGANG 8 NA TAON.

Kung mapatunayang guilty at pagkakulong ang ipapataw, ang parusa sa cyberlibel ay 4 taon, 2 buwan at 1 araw hanggang 8 taon. Ito ay batay sa Article 355 ng Revised Penal Code, kaugnay ng Sections 4(c)(4) at 6 ng Republic Act No. 10175, na nagtataas ng parusa nang isang degree.

Gayunman, maaaring multang ₱40,000 hanggang ₱1,500,000 lamang ang ipataw sa halip na pagkakulong, depende sa mga pangyayari ng kaso.

24/08/2026

DADAAN PA BA SA BARANGGAY KASONG CYBER LIBEL

HINDI MO NA KAILANGAN DUMAAN SA BARANGAY BAGO MAGFILE NG KASO.

Hindi sakop ng barangay conciliation ang kasong may parusang lampas isang taon na pagkakakulong. Ang cyberlibel ay maaaring parusahan ng pagkakakulong mula apat na taon, dalawang buwan at isang araw hanggang walong taon. Dahil lampas sa isang taon ang maaaring ipataw na pagkakakulong, hindi ito sakop ng mandatory barangay conciliation.

Maaari kang direktang magsampa ng complaint-affidavit sa Office of the City/Provincial Prosecutor, NBI Cybercrime Division, o PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group.

Legal basis: Section 408(c), Local Government Code, in relation to Sections 4(c)(4) and 6, Republic Act No. 10175.

13/06/2026

Articles 1650 and 1651 of the Civil Code of the Philippines

Article 1650
Rule: If the lease contract does not expressly prohibit subleasing, the lessee may sublet the property, in whole or in part.

Condition: The lessee remains responsible to the lessor for fulfilling the original lease obligations.

Implication: Even if subleasing is allowed, the lessee cannot escape liability to the lessor.

Article 1651
Rule: The sublessee, aside from obligations to the sublessor, is also bound directly to the lessor.

Scope: This binding applies to all acts concerning the use and preservation of the leased property, as stipulated in the original lease contract.

Implication: The lessor gains a direct right against the sublessee, ensuring that the property is properly maintained.

Practical Meaning
For Lessors (Property Owners):
They retain control and protection even if their tenant sublets.
They can enforce obligations directly against the sublessee regarding property care.

For Lessees (Tenants):
They can sublet unless the lease contract explicitly forbids it.
They remain primarily liable to the lessor, even if a sublessee is in place.

For Sublessees:
They must comply with the original lease terms on property use and preservation.
They are accountable not only to the tenant (sublessor) but also to the property owner (lessor).

Subleasing is generally permitted unless the lease contract prohibits it.
Both lessee and sublessee are accountable to the lessor, ensuring that the property is protected and obligations are met.

Article 1652 – Sublessee’s Liability for Rent
Rule: The sublessee is liable to the lessor only up to the amount of rent owed by the lessee at the time of the sublease.

Condition: This liability is limited to what the sublessee actually owes under the sublease agreement.

Implication: The lessor cannot demand more from the sublessee than what the lessee is obligated to pay under the original lease.

Practical Meaning
For Lessors (Property Owners):
They can collect rent directly from the sublessee, but only up to the amount due under the original lease.
This ensures they are not disadvantaged by the sublease arrangement.
For Lessees (Tenants):
They remain primarily responsible for rent.
Subleasing does not relieve them of their obligation to the lessor.

For Sublessees:
They must pay rent to the sublessor, but if the lessor steps in, they are liable only within the limits of the original lease rent.
They cannot be forced to pay more than what was agreed in the sublease.

Articles 1650–1652 together establish a balanced framework for subleasing in the Philippines:
Subleasing is allowed unless prohibited.
The sublessee is directly accountable to the lessor for property care.
Rent obligations are limited to what the lessee owes, preventing unfair burdens.

Article 1653 – Rent Payment Obligation
Rule: The lessee is obliged to pay rent as agreed in the contract.
Implication: Rent is the primary obligation of the lessee, and failure to pay can lead to termination of the lease or legal action.

Article 1654 – Lessor’s Obligations
Rule: The lessor must:
Deliver the property in a condition suitable for the agreed use.
Maintain the property so the lessee can enjoy it peacefully during the lease.
Ensure the lessee’s legal and peaceful possession.
Implication: The lessor cannot simply collect rent; they must also guarantee the property is usable and protect the lessee’s rights.

Article 1655 – Lessee’s Obligations
Rule: The lessee must:
Pay rent on time.
Use the property as agreed (e.g., residential, commercial).
Preserve the property with the diligence of a good father of a family (meaning careful and responsible use).
Implication: Misuse or neglect of the property can make the lessee liable for damages.

1653–1655 establish the core obligations in a lease: rent payment, property upkeep, and proper use.
Together with 1650–1652, they create a balanced framework where both lessor and lessee have clear responsibilities.
Article 1656 – Lessee’s Liability for Damages
Rule: If the lessee fails to comply with obligations (like paying rent, proper use, or preservation), they are liable for damages.
Implication: The lessor can demand compensation for losses caused by the lessee’s breach.

Article 1657 – Specific Obligations of the Lessee
Rule: The lessee must:
Pay rent at the agreed time and place.
Use the property only for the purpose agreed upon.
Take good care of the property.

Notify the lessor of any damage or need for urgent repairs.
Return the property upon termination of the lease.
Implication: This article lays out the concrete duties of the lessee, reinforcing accountability.
Rule: If the lessee fails to pay rent, the lessor may judicially eject them.
Condition: The lessor must follow proper legal procedures to terminate the lease and recover possession.
Implication: Non-payment of rent is a ground for eviction, protecting the lessor’s financial interest.

RENTAL LAW ARTICLES
Articles 1650 and 1651 of the Civil Code of the Philippines
ARTICLE" AS FOLLOWS
1653 RENT PAYMENT
1654 LESSOR'S DUTIES
1655 LESSEE'S DUTIES
1656 LIABILITY
1657 DUTIES
1658 NON PAYMENT
1659 LESSOR LIABLILITY
1660 RENT SUSPENSION
1661 LEASE RECISSION
1662 NECESSARY REPAIR
1663 USEFUL REPAIRS
1664 LUXURIOUS IMPROVEMENTS
1665 FRUITS
1666 SUBLEASE
1667 ASSIGMENT
1668 RECISSIONS
1669 TOTAL DISTRUCTIONS
1670 PARTIAL DESTRUCTIONS
1671 LEASE DURATION
1672 TACITA RECONDUCTION
1673 JUDECIAL EJECTMENT

14/05/2026

RECLUTION PERPETUA VERSUS LIFE IMPRESONMENT - Article 27 & 41 Revised Penal Code, RA 9165, RA 7080

Reclusion perpetua and life imprisonment are not the same in Philippine law. Reclusion perpetua is a penalty under the Revised Penal Code with a fixed duration of 20 years and 1 day to 40 years, while life imprisonment is imposed under special laws and lasts for the convict’s natural life without a definite term. They also differ in accessory penalties and parole eligibility.

Reclusion Perpetua
Revised Penal Code (RPC)
Fixed: 20 years and 1 day to 40 years
Eligible for pardon after 30 years (unless disqualified)
Includes civil interdiction (loss of parental authority, property rights) and perpetual absolute disqualification (loss of right to vote, hold office, practice profession)
Can be reduced by one or two degrees under RPC rules
Murder, parricide, robbery with homicide

Life Imprisonment
Special Penal Laws (e.g., Dangerous Drugs Act, Anti-Plunder Act)
Indefinite: lasts for the convict’s natural life
No fixed parole eligibility unless provided by the special law
Generally no accessory penalties, unless the special law specifies
Cannot be reduced by degrees
Drug trafficking, plunder, other crimes under special laws

Practical Implications
Judicial Confusion: Courts sometimes mistakenly use the terms interchangeably, but the Supreme Court has clarified they are distinct.

Civil Rights Impact: A convict sentenced to reclusion perpetua automatically loses civil rights (e.g., voting, holding office), while life imprisonment does not carry these penalties unless explicitly stated.

Release Prospects: Someone serving reclusion perpetua may be considered for pardon after 30 years, while life imprisonment offers no guaranteed timeline for release.

Key Takeaway
Reclusion perpetua = fixed term (20–40 years) + accessory penalties.

Life imprisonment = indefinite term (natural life) without accessory penalties.

Reclusion Perpetua
Defined in the Revised Penal Code (RPC)

Specifically found in Article 27 of the RPC, which lays out the duration of penalties.

Duration: 20 years and 1 day to 40 years.

Carries accessory penalties under Article 41 (civil interdiction and perpetual absolute disqualification).

📖 Life Imprisonment
Not in the RPC.

Imposed under special laws (e.g., Republic Act No. 9165 – Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act, Republic Act No. 7080 – Anti-Plunder Law).

No fixed duration; it means imprisonment for the convict’s natural life.

Does not carry accessory penalties unless the special law explicitly provides them.

⚖️ Summary
Reclusion perpetua → Article 27 & Article 41 of the Revised Penal Code.

Life imprisonment → Found in special penal laws (e.g., RA 9165, RA 7080).

👉 So, if you’re looking at the exact article or section:

Reclusion perpetua is codified in the Revised Penal Code (Articles 27 & 41).

Life imprisonment is statutory, depending on the special law that prescribes it.

Special Laws with Life Imprisonment
Republic Act No. 9165 – Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002
Life imprisonment for drug trafficking, manufacturing, and other major drug offenses.
Republic Act No. 7080 – Anti-Plunder Law
Life imprisonment for public officials guilty of plunder involving ill-gotten wealth of at least ₱50 million.
Republic Act No. 7659 – Death Penalty Law (later repealed)
When the death penalty was abolished, certain crimes under this law were downgraded to life imprisonment.

Republic Act No. 9208 – Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003 (as amended by RA 10364)
Life imprisonment for qualified trafficking cases.
Republic Act No. 8042 – Migrant Workers Act (amended by RA 10022)
Life imprisonment for illegal recruitment in large scale or by a syndicate.

Republic Act No. 9745 – Anti-Torture Act of 2009
Life imprisonment for torture resulting in death.
Republic Act No. 10175 – Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012
Certain aggravated cybercrimes may carry life imprisonment.
Republic Act No. 10364 – Expanded Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act
Life imprisonment for qualified trafficking offenses.

Reclusion perpetua is always under the Revised Penal Code (Articles 27 & 41).
Life imprisonment is always under special laws, like RA 9165 (drugs) or RA 7080 (plunder).

Key Supreme Court Rulings
1. People v. Pagal (G.R. No. 241257, Sept. 29, 2020)
2. People v. Olpindo (G.R. No. 252861, Feb. 15, 2022)
3. Supreme Court Clarifications (Various Cases)
Life imprisonment is imposed under special laws (e.g., RA 9165 – Dangerous Drugs Act, RA 7080 – Anti-Plunder Law).
Unlike reclusion perpetua, life imprisonment has no fixed duration and no automatic accessory penalties.

✅ Takeaway
Reclusion perpetua = Article 27 & 41 of the RPC (20–40 years + accessory penalties).
Life imprisonment = Special laws (natural life, no accessory penalties unless stated).
Supreme Court rulings (e.g., People v. Pagal, People v. Olpindo) reinforce this distinction to avoid confusion in sentencing..

09/04/2026

ANG PANGANGASIWA NG WATER SUPPLY SA ISANG SUBDIVISON Philippines is Republic Act No. 9904 SEC 10(G)

The Magna Carta for Homeowners and Homeowners’ Associations in the Philippines is Republic Act No. 9904 (R.A. 9904).
Key Points of R.A. 9904
• Title: An Act Providing for a Magna Carta for Homeowners and Homeowners’ Associations, and for Other Purposes.
• Date of Approval: January 7, 2010.
• Purpose: To recognize, strengthen, and regulate homeowners’ associations (HOAs) in subdivisions, villages, and communities.
Main Provisions
• Legal Recognition: Grants HOAs juridical personality once registered with the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB, now part of the Department of Human Settlements and Urban Development).
• Rights of Homeowners:
• Right to form, join, and participate in HOAs.
• Right to vote and be elected in HOA elections.
• Right to access subdivision facilities and services.
• Duties of HOAs:
• Maintain peace, order, and security within the subdivision.
• Manage maintain subdivision facilities (water, electricity, drainage, etc.
• Collect dues and enforce subdivision rules.
• Government Support: Encourages partnerships between HOAs and local government units (LGUs) for community development.
Why It Matters
• Provides a legal framework for how subdivisions are managed.
• Ensures accountability of HOA officers.
• Protects the rights of homeowners while balancing responsibilities.
• Strengthens community governance in residential areas.
R.A. 9904, which empowers HOAs to manage subdivisions, safeguard homeowners’ rights, and partner with government for community welfare.

Breakdown of Section 10 (Rights and Powers of HOAs)
Section 10 of R.A. 9904 enumerates the rights and powers of homeowners’ associations. Subsection (g) is particularly important because it deals with control over subdivision facilities and services.

Section 10(g) Key Points
• Authority to regulate access: HOAs may establish rules on the use of subdivision roads, utilities, and common areas.
• Limitations: Regulation must not:
• Prevent homeowners from accessing their own property.
• Deny entry to essential public services (e.g., police, fire, medical, utility providers).
• Violate constitutional rights such as freedom of movement.
• Practical Application: HOAs often implement gate passes, stickers for vehicles, or visitor registration systems to maintain security and order.

Why Section 10(g) Matters
• Security: Allows HOAs to control entry and exit, reducing risks of crime.
• Maintenance: Ensures proper use of facilities, preventing damage misuse.
• Community Order: Provides a legal basis for rules like speed limits inside subdivisions, parking regulations, or restrictions on commercial use of residential roads.

Risks & Considerations
• Abuse of authority: Some HOAs may overreach, restricting access unfairly.
• Legal disputes: Homeowners can challenge HOA rules if they violate R.A. 9904 or constitutional rights.
• Balance of power: Section 10(g) emphasizes that HOA authority is not absolute—it must align with public interest and homeowners’ rights.

Subsections of Section 10 of R.A. 9904 (Magna Carta for Homeowners and Homeowners’ Associations) so you can see the full scope of HOA powers:

Section 10 – Rights and Powers of Homeowners’ Associations
(a) Maintain peace and order
• HOAs can organize security measures (guards, patrols, CCTV) to keep the subdivision safe.
(b) Provide basic community services
• They may manage garbage collection, street lighting, drainage, and other shared facilities.
(c) Regulate use of facilities
• HOAs can set rules for parks, clubhouses, swimming pools, and other common areas.
(d) Collect dues and fees
• They can impose and collect membership fees, dues, or assessments to fund operations.
(e) Enforce subdivision rules
• HOAs can adopt and enforce rules and regulations for the community’s welfare.
(f) Represent homeowners
• They act as the official representative of the subdivision in dealings with government agencies, utilities, and developers.
(g) Regulate access to subdivision facilities
• HOAs may control entry and use of roads, utilities, and common areas.
• Limitations: They cannot block essential public services (police, fire, medical, utilities) or deny homeowners access to their property.
(h) Promote community welfare
• HOAs can initiate projects for education, health, livelihood, and environmental protection.
(i) Enter into contracts
• They can sign agreements with service providers, contractors, or government agencies for subdivision needs.
(j) Sue and be sued
• HOAs have legal personality to file cases or defend themselves in court.
Why This Matters
Section 10 essentially gives HOAs quasi-governmental powers within the subdivision, but always with limits:
• They cannot override constitutional rights.
• Their authority is limited to the subdivision and must align with public interest.
• Homeowners retain the right to challenge HOA actions that are abusive or unlawful.

12/03/2026

SPANISH MORTGAGE LAW

Dear Atty Cuenco
Nagmamay ari ako ng lupa at eto ay naka rehistro sang ayon sa spanish mortgage law may bisa pa ba eto at Ano po dapat kung gawin - HB

Dear HB,
Ayon sa section 3 ng presedential decree 1529 o mas kilala na PROPERTY REGISTRATION DECREE ang lupang narehistro pa noong lumang panahon ay hinde na kinikilala kung eto ay hinde na ipatala sang ayon sa kasalukuyang batas ayon yan section 3

Presidential Decree No. 1529, also known as the Property Registration Decree, is a Philippine law enacted in 1978 to streamline and strengthen the country's land registration system under the Torrens system.
Here’s a breakdown of what it’s all about:
🏛️ Purpose and Background
• Enacted on June 11, 1978 by then-President Ferdinand E. Marcos.
• It repealed Act No. 496, the old Land Registration Act, to modernize and consolidate various laws on land registration.
• Aimed to simplify, codify, and strengthen the legal framework for registering land titles in the Philippines.
📜 Key Features
• Torrens System of Registration: The decree upholds the Torrens system, which guarantees the indefeasibility of registered land titles—meaning once a title is registered, it cannot be challenged after one year.
• Judicial and Administrative Processes: It outlines both court-based and administrative procedures for registering land, including original registration, subsequent transfers, and dealings with registered land.
• Safeguards Against Fraud: Introduces measures to prevent anomalous or fraudulent titling of real property.
• Land Reform Integration: Incorporates provisions related to land reform, such as the registration of emancipation patents and certificates of land transfer issued under Presidential Decree No. 27.
🧾 Practical Implications
• Ensures security of land ownership and facilitates real estate transactions.
• Provides a centralized and authoritative record of land ownership.
• Helps resolve land disputes by providing clear legal procedures for title registration and adjudication.
If you're dealing with land ownership, buying property, or studying property law in the Philippines, PD 1529 is a foundational legal reference. Would you like a summary of its specific chapters or how it applies to a particular case?

12/03/2026

PAGBIBIGAY NG LUPA SA PAMAMAGITAN NG MANA

ACT OF LIBERALITY Donation of Property
Deed of Donation – Article 725 to 773 of the Civil Code
Deed of Donation – Article 725 to 773 of the Civil Code
Chapter 1. Nature of Donations
Art. 725. Donation is an act of liberality whereby a person disposes gratuitously of a thing or right in favor of another, who accepts it. (618a)
Art. 726. When a person gives to another a thing or right on account of the latter’s merits or of the services rendered by him to the donor, provided they do not constitute a demandable debt, or when the gift imposes upon the donee a burden which is less than the value of the thing given, there is also a donation. (619)
Art. 727. Illegal or impossible conditions in simple and remuneratory donations shall be considered as not imposed. (n)
Art. 728. Donations which are to take effect upon the death of the donor partake of the nature of testamentary provisions, and shall be governed by the rules established in the Title on Succession. (620)
Art. 729. When the donor intends that the donation shall take effect during the lifetime of the donor, though the property shall not be delivered till after the donor’s death, this shall be a donation inter vivos. The fruits of the property from the time of the acceptance of the donation, shall pertain to the donee, unless the donor provides otherwise. (n)
Art. 730. The fixing of an event or the imposition of a suspensive condition, which may take place beyond the natural expectation of life of the donor, does not destroy the nature of the act as a donation inter vivos, unless a contrary intention appears. (n)
Art. 731. When a person donates something, subject to the resolutory condition of the donor’s survival, there is a donation inter vivos. (n)
Art. 732. Donations which are to take effect inter vivos shall be governed by the general provisions on contracts and obligations in all that is not determined in this Title. (621)
Art. 733. Donations with an onerous cause shall be governed by the rules on contracts and remuneratory donations by the provisions of the present Title as regards that portion which exceeds the value of the burden imposed. (622)
Art. 734. The donation is perfected from the moment the donor knows of the acceptance by the donee. (623)

Chapter 2. Persons Who may Give or Receive a Donation
Art. 735. All persons who may contract and dispose of their property may make a donation. (624)
Art. 736. Guardians and trustees cannot donate the property entrusted to them. (n)
Art. 737. The donor’s capacity shall be determined as of the time of the making of the donation. (n)
Art. 738. Al those who are not specially disqualified by law therefor may accept donations. (625)
Art. 739. The following donations shall be void:
(1) Those made between persons who were guilty of adultery or concubinage at the time of the donation;
(2) Those made between persons found guilty of the same criminal offense, in consideration thereof;
(3) Those made to a public officer or his wife, descendants and ascendants, by reason of his office.
In the case referred to in No. 1, the action for declaration of nullity may be brought by the spouse of the donor or donee; and the guilt of the donor and donee may be proved by preponderance of evidence in the same action. (n)
Art. 740. Incapacity to succeed by will shall be applicable to donations inter vivos. (n)
Art. 741. Minors and others who cannot enter into a contract may become donees but acceptance shall be done through their parents or legal representatives. (626a)
Art. 742. Donations made to conceived and unborn children may be accepted by those persons who would legally represent them if they were already born. (627)
Art. 743. Donations made to incapacitated persons shall be void, though simulated under the guise of another contract or through a person who is interposed. (628)
Art. 744. Donations of the same thing to two or more different donees shall be governed by the provisions concerning the sale of the same thing to two or more different persons. (n)
Art. 745. The donee must accept the donation personally, or through an authorized person with a special power for the purpose, or with a general and sufficient power; otherwise, the donation shall be void. (630)
Art. 746. Acceptance must be made during the lifetime of the donor and of the donee. (n)
Art. 747. Persons who accept donations in representation of others who may not do so by themselves, shall be obliged to make the notification and notation of which Article 749 speaks. (631)
Art. 748. The donation of a movable may be made orally or in writing.

Art. 749. In order that the donation of an immovable may be valid, it must be made in a public document, specifying therein the property donated and the value of the charges which the donee must satisfy.
The acceptance may be made in the same deed of donation or in a separate public document, but it shall not take effect unless it is done during the lifetime of the donor.

12/03/2026

INTEREST SA UTANG NA WALA SA USAPAN

Article 1956 of the Civil Code of the Philippines states: “No interest shall be due unless it has been expressly stipulated in writing.”

Explanation of Article 1956
1. Core Principle
• This provision establishes that interest on loans or debts cannot be charged unless there is a written agreement between the parties.
• Oral agreements or implied expectations of interest are not legally enforceable.
2. Purpose
• Protects borrowers from unfair or hidden interest charges.
• Ensures transparency and fairness in financial transactions.
• Prevents lenders from imposing interest retroactively or without consent.
3. Scope
• Applies to all kinds of loans and monetary obligations under civil law.
• Covers both simple interest and compound interest.
• Even if parties verbally agree, it must be documented in writing to be valid.
4. Practical Implications
• For lenders: They must prepare a written contract specifying the interest rate. Without it, they can only demand repayment of the principal.
• For borrowers: They are protected from being forced to pay interest unless they signed a written agreement.
• For courts: Judges will not award interest unless a written stipulation exists, except in cases where the law itself provides for legal interest (e.g., damages, default).

⚖️ Related Provisions
• Article 1957: If interest is agreed upon, it must also be lawful; usurious rates are prohibited.
• Usury Law: Although the Usury Law’s ceilings were lifted, courts still strike down unconscionable interest rates.
• Jurisprudence: The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that interest must be in writing; otherwise, only the principal amount is recoverable.

Aspect in Article 1957
Interest without writing Not enforceable
Oral agreement Invalid
Written stipulation Valid and enforceable
Type of interest Covers both simple and compound

✅ Key Takeaway: Article 1956 is a borrower-protection rule. No written agreement = no interest due. Only the principal can be demanded unless the law itself provides otherwise.

Would you like me to also explain how Philippine courts handle cases where lenders impose very high interest rates (even if written)? That’s where Article 1957 and jurisprudence become crucial.

12/03/2026

Key Facts About EO 209 (Family Code of the Philippines)
• Date signed: July 6, 1987
• Signed by: President Corazon C. Aquino
• Purpose: To update and modernize family law provisions in the Civil Code of 1950.
• Scope: Governs marriage, property relations between spouses, parental authority, adoption, support, and family rights.

Executive Order No. 209 of 1987 is the Family Code of the Philippines. It modernized family law by redefining marriage, updating property regimes, strengthening parental authority, and clarifying grounds for annulment and separation.

Key Innovations of EO 209 (Compared to Civil Code)
• Shifted default property regime from Conjugal Partnership of Gains to Absolute Community of Property.
• Recognized psychological incapacity as a ground for annulment.
• Strengthened joint parental authority (not just paternal).
• Lowered age of majority from 21 to 18.
• Expanded grounds for legal separation.

ACP is broader—almost everything is pooled into community property.
CPG is narrower—only gains and fruits during marriage are shared, while original properties remain exclusive.
Rental proceeds are always considered part of the community or conjugal property. Upon separation or annulment, they are liquidated, debts are settled, and the net proceeds are divided equally—unless one spouse forfeits their share due to being at fault.

Division of Rental Proceeds Upon Separation
1. Absolute Community of Property (ACP)
• All rental proceeds (net income after expenses) are part of the community property.
• Upon legal separation or annulment, the community property is liquidated:
• Debts and obligations of the community are paid first.
• Remaining assets (including rental proceeds and property itself) are divided equally between spouses.
• If one spouse is guilty of the cause of separation (e.g., infidelity), they may lose their share of the net profits, which instead go to the innocent spouse and children.

2. Conjugal Partnership of Gains (CPG)
• Only the fruits and income (like rental proceeds) of properties acquired during marriage are conjugal.
• Upon liquidation:
• Each spouse gets back their exclusive property.
• The net rental proceeds (after expenses and debts) are divided equally.
• Again, if one spouse is guilty of the cause of separation, they may forfeit their share of the net profits.

3. Death of a Spouse
• The surviving spouse keeps their share of the community property (including rental proceeds).
• The deceased spouse’s share goes to their heirs (children, parents, or others under succession law).
Rental income is taxed as part of community property while married. After separation or annulment, only the spouse who retains ownership declares it. After death, rental income is split between the surviving spouse and heirs, each declaring their share.

Absolute Community of Property (ACP)
Conjugal Partnership of Gains (CPG)

Property Type
Rental Income (from property acquired during marriage)
ACP Belongs to the community, shared equally
CPG Considered a “fruit” of conjugal property, shared equally

Property owned before marriage
ACP Included in community property (unless excluded by law or prenuptial agreement)
CPG Remains exclusive property of the spouse who owned it

Inheritance or donation to one spouse only
ACP Exclusive property of that spouse
CPG Exclusive property of that spouse

Inheritance or donation to both spouses jointly
ACP Becomes community property
CPG Becomes conjugal property

Personal items (clothing, personal effects)
ACP Exclusive property
CPG Exclusive property

Jewelry
ACP Considered community property
CPG Considered conjugal property

Income, fruits, and earnings (e.g., dividends, farm produce)
ACP Belong to the community
CPG Belong to the conjugal partnership

Liquidation upon separation/annulment
ACP Community assets divided equally after debts
CPG Conjugal gains divided equally; exclusive property returned to each spouse

Default property regime
1950 Conjugal Partnership of Gains
1987 Absolute Community of Property

Marriage definition
1950 Contract
1987 Permanent union, inviolable institution

Parental authority
1950 Primarily father
1987 Joint authority of both parents

Grounds for annulment
1950 Limited
1987 Expanded (e.g., psychological incapacity)

Outline of the Family Code (EO 209, 1987)
Title I – Marriage
Title II – Legal Separation
Title III – Rights and Obligations Between Husband and WifE
Title IV – Property Relations Between Husband and Wife
• Default regime: Absolute Community of Property (ACP).
• Rules for Conjugal Partnership of Gains (CPG)
Title V – The Family
Title VI – Paternity and Filiation
Title VII – Adoption
Title VIII – Support
Title IX – Parental Authority
Title X – Emancipation and Age of Majority

Compañero Boy Cuenco CPA Lawyer

24/08/2026

24/08/2026

24/08/2026

13/06/2026

14/05/2026

09/04/2026

12/03/2026

12/03/2026

12/03/2026

12/03/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request