28/09/2023
Is using a firearm always an unreasonable means of self-defense?
No, using a firearm is not always an unreasonable means of self-defense, but it depends on the circumstances of the case. Under Philippine law, a person may use a firearm for self-defense if he/she meets the following conditions:
1. He/she has a valid License and Permit to Own and Possess the firearm, which means he/she is at least 21 years old, has passed a mental health and criminal background check, has taken a fi****ms training and safety course, and has provided a reason for owning and carrying a firearm.
2. He/she acts in defense of his/her person or rights, or the person or rights of his/her spouse, ascendants, descendants, or legitimate, natural or adopted brothers or sisters, or his/her relatives by affinity in the same degrees, against an unlawful aggression that puts his/her life or limb in actual or imminent danger.
3. He/she uses the firearm with reasonable necessity to prevent or repel the unlawful aggression, meaning that there is no other less harmful or more effective way to defend himself/herself or others.
4. He/she does not have any sufficient provocation on his/her part that may have incited unlawful aggression, meaning that he/she did not initiate or escalate the conflict or violence.
If these conditions are met, then using a firearm MAY be considered a reasonable means of self-defense under Philippine law.