LIBOON LAW OFFICE

LIBOON LAW OFFICE We offer legal, accounting, and consultancy services. And, serving the people and being the last bastion of hope are what we always aspire for.

Mission

Our mission is to be the top law firm in Misamis Occidental with known probity and integrity in providing quality and dedicated legal services to the clients whether paying or not. Vision

Our vision is to offer the best, innovative, and quality legal services to the clients and to be guided by the principle of honesty as lawyering is definitely not about lying or thwarting the truth bu

t to ensure that human rights of everyone are protected, especially those coming from the least, the last, and the lost members in the community, and that justice is to always prevail.

13/05/2026

“This is without prejudice to the Court taking any interim or urgent measures, as prayed for by Senator Dela Rosa, should it become necessary.” (Duterte Vs. Bersamin, G.R. No. 278747, Resolution dated May 13, 2026)

11/05/2026

“A sudden and unexpected attack under circumstances which render the victim unable to defend himself by reason of the suddenness and severity of the attack constitutes alevosia. In the instant case, the attack on the victim was deliberate, sudden and unexpected. The victim was totally unaware of the impending attack, sustaining wounds on his back. All these indicate that the accused employed means and methods which tended directly and specially to insure the ex*****on of the offense without risk to the offenders arising from the defense which the offended party might have made.” [People of the philippines, appellee, vs. dionisio santos, appellant, (General Register No. 127492, January 16, 2004)]

11/05/2026

“ "Dating relationship" refers to a situation wherein the parties live as husband and wife without the benefit of marriage or are romantically involved over time and on a continuing basis during the course of the relationship. A casual acquaintance or ordinary socialization between two individuals in a business or social context is not a dating relationship. ###

[I]t seems clear that the law did not use in its provisions the colloquial verb "romance" that implies a sexual act. It did not say that the offender must have "romanced" the offended woman. Rather, it used the noun "romance" to describe a couple’s relationship, i.e., "a love affair."” (Ang vs. CA, G.R. No. 182835, April 20, 2010)

11/05/2026

"Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than removal from office and disqualification to hold any office under the Republic of the Philippines, but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to prosecution, trial, and punishment according to law." (Article XI, Section 3 (6), 1987 Constitution, February 2, 1987)

11/05/2026

RA 9851 does NOT say that an ICC warrant automatically results in arrest and surrender in the Philippines—and it also does NOT mean the person “cannot be arrested.”

What RA 9851 says is this: PH authorities may (discretionary) stop local investigation or prosecution if an international tribunal is already investigating or prosecuting, and may instead surrender or extradite—but only “pursuant to applicable extradition laws and treaties.” (Section 17, Philippine Act on Crimes Against International Humanitarian Law, Genocide, and Other Crimes Against Humanity, Republic Act No. 9851, [December 11, 2009])

The Supreme Court has confirmed that the word “may” in Sec. 17 is permissive, not mandatory—so there is no automatic legal duty under RA 9851 to surrender someone to an international tribunal. (Bayan Muna v. Romulo, G.R. No. 159618, (01 February 2011), 656 Phil 246-336)

11/05/2026

"SECTION 17. Jurisdiction. — The State shall exercise jurisdiction over persons, whether military or civilian, suspected or accused of a crime defined and penalized in this Act, regardless of where the crime is committed, provided, any one of the following conditions is met:

(a) The accused is a Filipino citizen;

(b) The accused, regardless of citizenship or residence, is present in the Philippines; or

(c) The accused has committed the said crime against a Filipino citizen.

In the interest of justice, the relevant Philippine authorities may dispense with the investigation or prosecution of a crime punishable under this Act if another court or international tribunal is already conducting the investigation or undertaking the prosecution of such crime. Instead, the authorities may surrender or extradite suspected or accused persons in the Philippines to the appropriate international court, if any, or to another State pursuant to the applicable extradition laws and treaties.

No criminal proceedings shall be initiated against foreign nationals suspected or accused of having committed the crimes defined and penalized in this Act if they have been tried by a competent court outside the Philippines in respect of the same offense and acquitted, or having been convicted, already served their sentence." (Section 17, Philippine Act on Crimes Against International Humanitarian Law, Genocide, and Other Crimes Against Humanity, Republic Act No. 9851, [December 11, 2009])

10/05/2026

"Under Articles 1477 and 1496 of the Civil Code, ownership of the thing sold is vested in the buyer upon delivery. Article 1582 of the same Code obligates the buyer to accept delivery and pay the price of the thing sold. Benedicto and Daisy's testimonies, coupled with the undisputed fact of their possession, clearly show that the disputed lot had been delivered to them. Like Almirol and Heirs of Alido, the case at bar involves an executed unwritten sale of real property where the seller delivered the muniments of title and possession of the property to the buyer upon payment of the purchase price. Still akin to Almirol, delivery of title and possession was made after partial payment of the purchase price, with the seller passing away thereafter. However, in Almirol, it was proven that the buyer eventually paid the full price to a person authorized to receive payment, after the seller's demise. Here, when Marcos passed away, Benedicto paid the balance of the purchase price to Marcelo because the latter was Noblesa's de facto guardian; however, there is no other evidence or circumstance on record, written or otherwise, to show Marcelo's express or implied authority to receive the installment payments on behalf of Marcos or his heirs....Under Article 1497 of the Civil Code, the object of a sale contract is deemed delivered when it is placed in the control and possession of the vendee, in this case, the year 1982. Article 1589 of the same Code further provides that the buyer shall owe interest for the period between delivery of the thing and payment of the purchase price if the thing sold and delivered produced fruits or income. The law imposes interest on the unpaid purchase price to prevent unjust enrichment of buyers who enjoy the fruits of the thing sold without fully complying with their obligation to pay the purchase price.Here, Benedicto and Daisy testified that upon taking possession, they cleared the lot and planted crops thereon. They further claim having "receiv[ed] the agricultural fruits thereof for forty (40) years or more uninterrupt[ed]ly." Applying guideline B.1. of Our ruling in Lara's Gifts & Decors, Inc. v. Midtown Industrial Sales, Inc., Benedicto and Daisy must pay the balance of the purchase price, in the amount of PHP37,000.00, with interest at the legal rate, reckoned from the end of the year when they took possession of the lot, in accordance with Article 1589 (2) of the Civil Code, until full payment of the purchase price. The interest due on the unpaid balance shall also earn interest at the legal rate from the same date until full payment, as the judgment award is considered a forbearance of credit during such time. Upon full payment of the purchase price, Noblesa and Ernesto must fully implement the contract entered into by their father by executing a deed of sale in favor of Benedicto." (Ocampo v. Batara-Sapad, G.R. No. 256343, (02 April 2025))

09/05/2026

“Pursuant to the approval of the Honorable Chief Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo of the Memorandum dated May 4, 2026 of this Office on May 5, 2026, recommending the lifting of the WFH arrangement in the trial courts and reversion to normal court operations to ensure the unimpeded exercise of their functions in the administration of justice and dispensation of judicial services, along with the corresponding Internal Guidelines on the Continued Adoption and Implementation of Energy Conservation Protocols in All First-and Second-Level Courts Notwithstanding the Reversion to Normal Court Operations, all first- and second-level courts are hereby DIRECTED TO REVERT to the regular five-day workweek schedule, with 100% on-site reporting of all court personnel, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (NCJR) and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Regions 1-12), EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY.” (OCA Circular No. 82-2026, dated May 8, 2026)

09/05/2026

"SECTION 2. Grounds for a New Trial. — The court shall grant a new trial on any of the following grounds:

(a) That errors of law or irregularities prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused have been committed during the trial;

(b) That new and material evidence has been discovered which the accused could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial and which if introduced and admitted would probably change the judgment." (Rule 121, Section2, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, A.M. No. 00-5-03-SC, [October 3, 2000])

09/05/2026

"SECTION 1. New Trial or Reconsideration. — At any time before a judgment of conviction becomes final, the court may, on motion of the accused or at its own instance but with the consent of the accused, grant a new trial or reconsideration." (Rule 121, Section 1, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, A.M. No. 00-5-03-SC, [October 3, 2000])"

09/05/2026

"SECTION 24. Reopening. — At any time before finality of the judgment of conviction, the judge may, motu proprio or upon motion, with hearing in either case, reopen the proceedings to avoid a miscarriage of justice. The proceedings shall be terminated within thirty (30) days from the order granting it." (Rule 119, Section 24, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, A.M. No. 00-5-03-SC, [October 3, 2000])

Address

Plaridel
7209

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 5pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 5pm
Saturday 8am - 5pm

Telephone

+639167854301

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when LIBOON LAW OFFICE posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to LIBOON LAW OFFICE:

Share