10/07/2025
The (SC) has ruled that a doctor who offers proper medical advice, clearly explains the risks of a procedure, and secures proper consent from the patient is not liable for medical malpractice.
In a Decision written by then Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez, the SC’s Second Division upheld the dismissal of a complaint against Dr. Avelino P. Aventura (Dr. Aventura), Head of the Philippine Heart Center Surgery Department, for the death of his patient, Quintin Que (Quintin).
Records of the case show that Elpidio Que filed a lawsuit for damages against Dr. Aventura, accusing him of medical malpractice in connection with the death of his father, Quintin, following a failed stenting procedure.
Quintin was first brought to Dr. Aventura due to an aneurysm in his aortic arch, a life-threatening condition. Dr. Aventura advised Quintin to first undergo a heart bypass operation and then address the aneurysm after. The bypass operation was successful.
However, Quentin’s aneurysm worsened. Dr. Aventura offered his family two options: an open-chest surgery or a newer, less invasive stenting procedure.
Dr. Aventura also informed the Que family that neither procedure guaranteed success and that stenting still posed the risk of death. He clarified he would not be the one performing the stenting, as it was outside his expertise. After introducing Quintin to visiting Belgian specialist Dr. Eric Verhoeven, who would do the stenting procedure, Quintin consented.
During the procedure, Dr. Verhoeven attempted to insert the custom stent three times but failed due to a bend in Quintin’s artery. As a result, Quintin suffered a stroke and never woke up.
Ruling that Dr. Aventura was not negligent and did not commit medical malpractice, the SC explained that medical malpractice occurs when a doctor fails to deliver the standard of care expected from other doctors in similar circumstances, resulting in harm to the patient.
A basis for malpractice is the lack of informed consent, which occurs when a patient agrees to a procedure without being fully informed about its risks and potential outcomes.
In this case, the SC found that Dr. Aventura clearly informed Quintin and his family about the risks associated with the stenting procedure, including the risk of death. He also clarified that another doctor would perform the procedure, and Quintin signed the consent forms.
Read the full text of the Press Release at https://tinyurl.com/jjjx4k7b.
Read the full text of the Decision at https://tinyurl.com/5n6a6e7p
Read the Concurring Opinion of Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen at https://tinyurl.com/yzmhvbbn.
Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution-policy/.