25/03/2022
Conversion to Islam does not operate to exculpate the parties from bigamy.
An interesting, albeit not novel, case.
The Supreme Court (SC) has held that a party to a civil marriage who converts to Islam and contracts another marriage, despite the first marriage's subsistence, is guilty of bigamy. The spouse in the subsequent marriage is also guilty of bigamy.
The following elements of bigamy are attendant in such a case, namely: a) that the offender has been legally married; b) that the first marriage has not been legally dissolved or in case his or her spouse is absent, the absent spouse could not yet be presumed dead, according to the Civil code; c) that he contracts a second or subsequent marriage; and d) that the second or subsequent marriage has all the essential requisites for validity.
The SC likewise instructed that:
✅ Civil Code/Family Code governs marriages where either party is non-Muslim and which were not solemnized in Muslim rites.
✅ Muslim Code applies to marriages, their nature, consequences, and incidents between fellow Muslims, between a male Muslim and a non-Muslim solemnized in Muslim rites, between spouses who both converted to Islam after their marriage, and between a male Muslim and a non-Muslim entered into prior to the Code's effectivity.
✅ Under the Muslim Code, as a rule, a married Muslim cannot marry another. In exceptional cases, a married Muslim man may do so, not more than four at a time, if "he can deal with them with equal companionship and just treatment enjoined by Islamic law."
✅ If a Muslim man did intend to marry another, the Muslim Code requires his wife's/wives' knowledge of the impending subsequent marriage. If the wife/wives objects, an Agama Arbitration Council and, subsequently, the Shariah Court shall decide whether or not to sustain such objection.
✅ In effect, a Muslim man's subsequent marriage without the knowledge of his wife is likewise constitutive of bigamy.