08/05/2017
A foreigner may still file a petition to recognize a foreign divorce
Although a foreigner has no substantive rights under the second paragraph of Article 26 of the Family Code in favor of aliens, this conclusion is not sufficient basis to dismiss a foreigner's petition before the courts. In other words, the unavailability of the second paragraph of Article 26 of the Family Code to aliens does not necessarily strip foreigners of legal interest to petition the court for the recognition of his foreign divorce decree. The foreign divorce decree itself, after its authenticity and conformity with the aliens national law have been duly proven according to our rules of evidence, serves as a presumptive evidence of right in favor of the foreigner, pursuant to Section 48, Rule 39 of the Rules of Court.
A direct involvement or being the subject of the foreign judgment is sufficient to clothe a party with the requisite interest to institute an action before our courts for the recognition of the foreign judgment. In a divorce situation, the divorce obtained by an alien abroad may be recognized in the Philippines, provided the divorce is valid according to his or her national law.
If both the foreign divorce decree and the national law of the alien, recognizing his or her capacity to obtain a divorce, purport to be official acts of a sovereign authority then Section 24, Rule 132 of the Rules of Court comes into play. This Section requires proof, either by (1) official publications or (2) copies attested by the officer having legal custody of the documents. If the copies of official records are not kept in the Philippines, these must be (a) accompanied by a certificate issued by the proper diplomatic or consular officer in the Philippine foreign service stationed in the foreign country in which the record is kept and (b) authenticated by the seal of his office.
The recognition of the foreign divorce decree may be made in a Rule 108 proceeding itself, as the object of special proceedings (such as that in Rule 108 of the Rules of Court) is precisely to establish the status or right of a party or a particular fact. Moreover, Rule 108 of the Rules of Court can serve as the appropriate adversarial proceeding by which the applicability of the foreign judgment can be measured and tested in terms of jurisdictional infirmities, want of notice to the party, collusion, fraud, or clear mistake of law or fact.
Corpuz vs. Sto. Tomas G.R. No. 186571, 11 August 2010.