Atty. Winna Oroncillo-Tan, CPA

14/02/2026

WHEN MARRIAGE HAS NO INTIMACY — IS IT STILL VALID? ✨

Not all love stories end with “happily ever after.” Some end in court — and sometimes, the issue is not betrayal or abandonment, but the absence of intimacy itself.

⚖️ Chi Ming Tsoi v. Court of Appeals

FACTS:
In this case, a couple married, lived together… but their marriage was never consummated. The wife claimed her husband persistently refused marital relations despite her efforts to build a normal marital life.

Later, she filed a petition to declare the marriage void under Article 36 of the Family Code, arguing psychological incapacity.

ISSUE:
Can refusal to engage in marital intimacy make a marriage legally void?

RULING:
YES — under certain circumstances.

The Court held that marriage involves essential marital obligations, including mutual love, respect, and intimacy. Persistent refusal to perform these obligations, when rooted in psychological incapacity, may render a marriage void from the beginning.

KEY TAKEAWAY: 💡

Psychological incapacity is not mere unwillingness or incompatibility. It must involve:

✔️ A serious psychological condition
✔️ Existing at the time of marriage
✔️ Rendering a spouse truly incapable of fulfilling essential marital duties.

This case reminds us that:

Marriage is more than ceremony — it is a partnership requiring emotional, psychological, and physical commitment.

Law recognizes that absence of genuine marital union may reflect deeper incapacity, not just personal choice.

Love is not only about romance — it carries responsibility, respect, and shared human connection.

HAPPY VALENTINES DAY! ❤️

13/02/2026

10/02/2026

𝗚𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗜𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗰 𝗖𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 (𝗲𝗖𝗔𝗥) 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗢𝗻𝗲-𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 (𝗢𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗧)
RMC #56-2024, RMC #133-2024, and OM #20-2025

With the passage of the Ease of Paying Taxes (EOPT) Act, taxpayers can now file returns and pay taxes at any Authorized Agent Bank (AAB) or Revenue Collection Office (RCO). However, while payment is flexible, the jurisdiction for processing the eCAR remains specific to the type of transaction.

📌 Sale of Real Property: The RDO with jurisdiction over the location of the property.

📌 Sale of Personal Property: The RDO with jurisdiction over the seller's registration OR the RDO of the seller's residence.
📌 Donations (Individual): The RDO with jurisdiction over the residence of the donor.
📌 Donations (Non-Individual): The RDO where the donor-corporation is registered.

Note: If the address on the submitted documents (e.g., Deed of Donation/Sale, Barangay Certificate) differs from the address in the BIR’s system (ITS/IRIS), the residential address in the BIR system prevails.

The taxpayer, however, may process the eCAR at the RDO having jurisdiction over their actual and current residence, provided that the residence information in the BIR system is updated to reflect the current address. The Client Support Section of the RDO with jurisdiction over the current address shall initiate the transfer or update of the registration information.

📌 Estate Tax: The RDO with jurisdiction over the TIN of the Estate.
Note: If the decedent had a registered business, it is the RDO of that business. If not, it is the RDO where the heirs intend to apply for the eCAR.

06/02/2026

What is the crime committed — ESTAFA or QUALIFIED THEFT? ✨

Many people confuse estafa with qualified theft, especially in cases involving money or trust. The key difference lies in how possession of the property was given and whether fraud was involved.

⚖️ ESTAFA is committed when a person voluntarily gives money or property because of deceit or fraud.

WHAT IS JURIDICAL POSSESSION IN ESTAFA?

It means money or property is legally entrusted to a person — meaning they are given authority to control or use it for a specific purpose or condition, not just hold it physically.

📌 Example: Someone borrows ₱200,000 claiming it will be used for a business that does not exist, then disappears after receiving the money.

Because the money was given due to deception, the crime may be estafa.

⚖️ QUALIFIED THEFT is committed when a person takes money or property without the owner’s consent, usually abusing trust or a special relationship (employee, helper, agent, etc.)

WHAT IS MATERIAL POSSESSION IN QUALIFIED THEFT?

It means ONLY PHYSICAL CUSTODY of money or property is given; legal control remains with the owner. (Taga-hawak lang.)

The person is allowed to hold or handle the property but does NOT have legal authority to control or use it.

📌 Example: A collection agent keeps the cash collected from clients instead of remitting it to the employer.

Since the agent only had custody, keeping the money may constitute qualified theft.

💡Simple takeaway:

✔ If voluntarily GIVEN because of DECEPTION — likely Estafa.

✔ If TAKEN WITHOUT CONSENT despite trust — likely Qualified Theft.

⚠️ Disclaimer: This is general legal information for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Each case depends on its specific facts and applicable law.

01/02/2026

MONEY DEBT SURVIVES, BUT HEIRS ARE LIABLE ONLY UP TO THE AMOUNT OF INHERITANCE RECEIVED. ✨

Under the Civil Code, money debts survive death, but they are charged against the ESTATE, not the heirs’ own pockets.

What is an “ESTATE”?

In simple terms, the estate is everything the deceased left behind — like land, house, savings, vehicles, or other property. Ito ang mga ari-arian na naiwan ng yumao. At ito ang gagamitin pambayad ng kanyang mga utang.

Heirs may pay but only up to what they inherit —
No inheritance? No payment.
May minana? Hanggang doon lang.

Key takeaway:

The debt is still valid — but it is charged against the ESTATE of the deceased, not automatically against the heirs.

⚠️ Disclaimer: This post is for general information only and is not a legal advice.

30/01/2026

CIVIL STATUS IS A MATTER OF FACT AND LAW — not a personal choice. ✨

Once a woman is validly married, her civil status automatically changes from “single” to “married” by operation of law. This is true regardless of:

• whether she continues using her maiden name
• whether her IDs have been updated yet
• whether she lives with her spouse or not

Key takeaway:
💡 Marriage changes civil status, not a woman’s name.

That distinction matters—especially in official records and sworn documents.

The Personal Data Sheet (CSC Form No. 212) is a sworn document. It requires the declarant to state true and correct personal circumstances as of the date of accomplishment. And Civil status of a person is not discretionary.

Disclaimer:
This post is for general information only and is not legal advice. Application of the law may vary depending on specific facts and applicable rules. ⚖️

27/01/2026

As they say, Excess is no accident when it is engineered. 😅

A landmark social media addiction trial in which top tech executives are expected to testify begins on Tuesday in California.

Read more about the case: https://bbc.in/4k3A1p8

26/01/2026

Starting the year right! ✨
Here are some reminders to all government employees! ☺️

DID YOU KNOW? 💡

Under the Policy on Undertime (CSC MC 16-2010),

Any government officer or employee shall be liable for Simple Misconduct and/or Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service, IF:

1. He/She incurs undertime — regardless of the number of minutes or hours — ten (10) times in a month for at least two (2) months in a semester; OR
2. He/She incurs undertime ten (10) times per month for two (2) consecutive months during the year.

‼️However, timing in and out without rendering actual service is a grave administrative offense, far more serious than undertime.

The CSC has consistently ruled that:

“The act of reporting for work only to log attendance without rendering actual service constitutes dishonesty and falsification of official records.”

🤔🤔🤔

Sources:
CSC MC No. 16, s. 2010 | RACCS | Omnibus Rules on Leave | CSC & SC Jurisprudence

📌 DISCLAIMER:
This post is for general information and awareness purposes only. It is not a legal opinion and does not constitute legal advice.
The applicability of the rules and possible administrative liability may vary depending on the specific facts, circumstances, evidence, and applicable laws, rules, or issuances, as well as official findings by the proper authority.

24/01/2026

MALL GUARD CONVICTED OF ANIMAL CRUELTY FOR THROWING PUPPY FROM FOOTBRIDGE

The mall security guard who threw a puppy from a footbridge in 2023 has been found guilty by the Quezon City Court.

In a decision promulgated January 22 but made public Friday, the former mall guard Jojo Malicdem has been found guilty of violating Republic Act 8485 or the Animal Welfare Act of 1998.

The court meted out the penalty of one year, six months, and one day, up to two years in prison and ordered to pay a fine of P100,000.

In case he is unable to pay the fine due to insolvency, subsidiary imprisonment shall be applied in lieu of payment of the fine.

The Court also ordered Malicdem to pay Browny’s owner P20,000 in moral damages, subject to six percent legal interest per annum until. fully paid.

The incident occurred in July 2023 when Malicdem tried to shoo away a group of children, one of whom was holding Browny.

A witness said the guard snatched the puppy from one of the children and threw it from a pedestrian footbridge, resulting in the dog’s death.

20/01/2026

PRC in Catarman!! 👀

𝐀𝐍𝐍𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓

Please be informed that the 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 (𝐏𝐑𝐂) 𝐂𝐚𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐂𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫 will have its 𝐬𝐨𝐟𝐭 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧 𝐉𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝟐𝟏, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔, 𝐖𝐞𝐝𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐲, 𝟖:𝟎𝟎 𝐚.𝐦. 𝐭𝐨 𝟓:𝟎𝟎 𝐩.𝐦.

During this initial operation, we will accommodate clients with transactions via 𝐋𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐒 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 𝐮𝐩 𝐭𝐨 𝐉𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝟐𝟏, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔, and whose appointment place is 𝐏𝐑𝐂 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐛𝐚𝐲𝐨𝐠 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐂𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫.

Thank you.

18/01/2026

2016 Trend — My CPA Journey Era! ✨

April 2016, I graduated from UEP Main Campus. From May to October 2016, I entered formal CPA review mode — a test of discipline and consistency. Then came the CPALE, followed by oath-taking at PICC and the honor of being welcomed as a newly licensed CPA. While I’m no longer actively practicing in the accounting field, I remain grateful for the foundation it gave me and am always thrilled to extend help as a financial advisor to family and friends, and to assist in preparing financial analysis & compliance reports for our law firm clients whenever needed. Thank You, Lord, for every grace that made this journey possible. 🙏

12/01/2026

WHEN DOES PARENTAL DISCIPLINE CROSS THE LINE INTO CHILD ABUSE? 🧑‍🍼

Under Section 3(b) of Republic Act No. 7610, otherwise known as the Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination Act, any act that debases, degrades, or demeans the dignity of a child constitutes child abuse.

In this case, the Supreme Court emphatically ruled that the father’s acts transcended the bounds of reasonable parental discipline, clearly revealing a deliberate and specific intent to harm the children’s dignity - an act the law neither excuses nor tolerates. Although, the Supreme Court (SC) reiterated that disciplining children, even if it results in physical injuries, does not automatically amount to child abuse.

The Supreme Court has reiterated that disciplining children, even if it results in physical injuries, does not automatically amount to child abuse. For such to be considered abuse, there must be clear intent to harm a child’s dignity.

This was the ruling of the Court in a Decision upholding the conviction of a father for child abuse after subjecting his 12-year-old daughter and 10-year-old son to violent and excessive discipline.

Under Section 3(b) of RA 7610, or the 𝘚𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘈𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘈𝘣𝘶𝘴𝘦, 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘰𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘋𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘈𝘤𝘵, any act that debases, degrades, or demeans a child’s dignity is considered child abuse.

The Supreme Court ruled that the father’s actions went beyond reasonable discipline, 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗻’𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆.

The Court emphasized that while parents have the right to discipline their children, such measures must not be violent, excessive, or disproportionate to their misbehavior.

The Court also noted that without the clear intent to harm a child’s dignity, the offender cannot be held liable for child abuse but can be charged with other crimes under the Revised Penal Code.

The Decision is from the Second Division of the Supreme Court, penned by Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez.

Read the full text of the press release at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-excessive-discipline-that-harms-a-childs-dignity-is-child-abuse/.

Read the full text of the Decision at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/268457-###-vs-people-of-the-philippines/.



Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution-policy/