Evidente Abunales Ramos Bustamante & Delmo Law Offices

Evidente Abunales Ramos Bustamante & Delmo Law Offices Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Evidente Abunales Ramos Bustamante & Delmo Law Offices, Lawyer & Law Firm, Imus.

29/05/2026

LOOKING FOR WAYS TO EARN ULAS SERVICE HOURS?

The IBP National Center for Legal Aid invites lawyers to take part in its various legal aid advocacies and programs. Choose the initiative that best matches your interest and area of service, and help advance access to justice for those in need.

Scan the QR codes to register for any of the following NCLA programs:

DMW • NLRC • LODI • Human Rights • IGIB • NCLA Pool of Pro-Bono Litigators • PSE • Senior Citizens • BUCOR • IC • ARTA

Serve the Country, Hail the IBP!

25/05/2026

Judge Remiebel U. Mondia of Branch 110 Regional Trial Court Pasay City, member of the Supreme Court Technical Working Group that drafted the 𝘙𝘶𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘍𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘰 𝘚𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘓𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘑𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘺, Filipino Sign Language interpreter, and Board Member and Legal Head of the Philippine Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf, discusses the fundamental role of consent in sexual acts and its impact on establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt in #𝐒𝐂𝐩𝐡𝐏𝐨𝐝𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝟏𝟏𝟖: 𝐃𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐛𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚 𝐃𝐞𝐚𝐟 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐑𝐚𝐩𝐞 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐬.

What challenges do d/Deaf persons face in accessing justice in the Philippines? How does the Judiciary balance the protection of victims of sexual violence with the rights of the accused, particularly in cases involving persons with disabilities?

This week's podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube, Facebook, and the website.

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/2xlWEQuX5zEC5jxcymGehv?si=UPdRcZLYQT-GM59-6f5zJQ

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ph/podcast/supreme-court-ph-podcast/id1852172756?i=1000769054513

YouTube: https://youtu.be/bnGeZqj4C68

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1AoaQBHmXH/

SC website: http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/podcasts/

05/05/2026

📌 #𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞: 𝐇𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐢 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐚𝐧𝐠 𝐑𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐚 𝐏𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐬!

𝐀𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐨 𝐯. 𝐆𝐨𝐧𝐳𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐬-𝐁𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜, 𝐆.𝐑. 𝐍𝐨. 𝟐𝟑𝟐𝟐𝟔𝟗 (𝐉𝐮𝐥𝐲 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒)

Sa petition para sa decree sa ilalim ng Article 26(2) ng Family Code, kailangang i-allege at patunayan ang:

1. Nasyonalidad ng dayuhang asawa sa oras ng divorce, at
2. Batas ng kanyang bansa na kumikilala sa divorce at nagbibigay sa kanya ng kakayahang magpakasal muli.

Kung wala ang mga “ultimate facts” na ito, fatal defect at dapat i-deny ang petition.

Mga Pangyayari:

• Si Asilo (Filipino) at si Appling (foreign national) ay nagpakasal sa Hong Kong noong 2002.
• Naghiwalay sila noong 2011 at nag-divorce sa Hong Kong.
• Nag-file si Asilo ng petition sa RTC para kilalanin ang divorce.
• RTC at CA parehong nag-deny dahil kulang ang ebidensya at mali ang remedy (certiorari imbes na appeal).
• Umabot sa Supreme Court ang kaso.

Isyu:
Dapat bang kilalanin ang foreign divorce decree kahit may procedural at substantive deficiencies?

Pasya ng Korte Suprema:

• Hindi.
• Ang divorce na in-initiate ng Filipino spouse ay maaari sanang kilalanin (Republic v. Manalo), pero kulang ang pleadings at ebidensya ni Asilo.
• Hindi niya na-allege at napatunayan ang national law ng foreign spouse.
• Ang simpleng remarriage ng foreign spouse ay hindi sapat na patunay.

𝘙𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘢: 𝘗𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘦𝘥. 𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘫𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘢, 𝘱𝘶𝘸𝘦𝘥𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘨-𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘯𝘢 𝘬𝘶𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘧.

“Hindi porke may foreign divorce, automatic na recognized sa Pilipinas! Sa ilalim ng Article 26(2) Family Code, kailangan patunayan ang batas ng bansa ng dayuhang asawa at ang kanyang nasyonalidad. Kung kulang ang pleadings at ebidensya, maaring madeny ang petition.

Foreign divorce recognition is a matter of law and proof, not shortcut. |

29/04/2026

Thank you for the overwhelming number of applications we have received for the position of Office Assistant. We will duly notify those who will be scheduled for interview once initial screening has been made.

14/04/2026

📣 𝐒𝐄𝐂 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐯𝐢𝐚 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐥

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is preparing new guidelines that will allow paperless filing for specific amendment applications through the Electronic Application for Modification of Entity Data (eAMEND), as it seeks to improve regulatory efficiency and promote sustainability.

The Commission on March 31 issued for public comment the draft memorandum circular providing for the guidelines on the implementation of paperless filing for select amendment applications through eAMEND, further advancing the Commission’s digital transformation and sustainability push.

The proposed rule will supplement SEC Memorandum Circular No. 3, Series of 2024, and SEC Memorandum Circular No. 3, Series of 2026, which prescribe the guidelines on the use of the eAMEND portal.

Under the draft guidelines, paperless filing will be offered as an optional processing lane. Corporations may still opt to file through the Simple or Regular processing lanes, which require the submission of hard copies of the amendment documents.

Paperless filing will cover amendments to both the Articles of Incorporation (AOI) and By-Laws. For AOI, the covered amendments include Prefatory Clause, Change in the Principal Office Address, Term of Existence, Increase or Decrease in the Number of the Board of Directors/Trustees, and Fiscal Year for One Person Corporations.

For By-Laws, covered amendments include the Date of Annual Meeting of the Stockholders/Members, and Fiscal Year.

Read full press release here: https://www.sec.gov.ph/pr-2026/sec-to-allow-paperless-filing-for-amendments-via-online-portal/

14/04/2026

Atty. Maria Zarah R. Villanueva-Castro, Bar Examiner in Commercial Law (2022) and in Commercial and Taxation Laws (2024), and Vice-President and Head of Corporate Legal of MERALCO, discusses stock ownership and intra-corporate disputes in Episode 112: Corporate Control Amid Intra-Corporate Disputes.

How do you establish yourself as a stockholder of the corporation? What kind of evidence does the court consider necessary to prove stock ownership? What constitutes a valid quorum in a stockholders' meeting?

This week's podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube, Facebook, and the website.

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/7oLJmuQOyvHec4no3kcrTK?si=EGwO7e2GRvubFSaJD1QBNQ

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ph/podcast/supreme-court-ph-podcast/id1852172756?i=1000760621341

YouTube: https://youtu.be/JwaxsV2RICw

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1bvZUHYshq/

SC website: http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/podcasts/

14/04/2026
25/03/2026

The (SC) 𝘌𝘯 𝘉𝘢𝘯𝘤 has dismissed the petition questioning the constitutionality of a Manila City ordinance that updated the city's garbage collection fees

In a Resolution, the SC 𝘌𝘯 𝘉𝘢𝘯𝘤 ruled that the petition filed by John Barry T. Tayam against Manila City Mayor Francisco M. Domagoso and the City Council failed to meet the basic requirements of judicial review as Tayam lacked legal standing. The SC also said that the petition violated the doctrine of hierarchy of courts as it did not present an exceptional case involving purely questions of law.

Tayam, a resident of Las Piñas City, sought to invalidate 𝘖𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘕𝘰. 9151 enacted by the Manila City Council in November 2025 imposing a revised schedule garbage collection fees in the city.

Tayam argued that the Ordinance was invalid because it was approved without publication, in violation of Article 2 of the 𝘊𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭 𝘊𝘰𝘥𝘦 and Section 187 of the 𝘓𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘎𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘊𝘰𝘥𝘦 (LGC).

He also claimed that the Ordinance violated Section 13(b)(3) of the LGC because the increased fees exceed the cost of waste regulation in Manila. He further argued that the measure violated the 𝘌𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘚𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘥 𝘞𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘔𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘈𝘤𝘵 by disregarding the role of barangays in waste management and the policy promoting waste reuse and recycling.

The SC rejected these arguments, ruling that Tayam’s petition failed to meet the requirements of judicial review.

The SC reiterated that before judicial review may be exercised, petition must present that: (1) an actual case or controversy exists, (2) the petitioner possesses the standing to file the case, (3) the constitutionality of the governmental act has been raised at the earliest possible opportunity, and (4) the constitutionality of the said act is the very lis mota of the petition.

The SC declared that Tayam had no legal standing to file the petition. To have legal standing, a petitioner must show a personal and substantial interest in the case, such that they will suffer because of the government act being questioned.

In this case, the Ordinance applies only to businesses, service agencies, and residences in Manila. Tayam does not live in Manila and does not operate a business or service agency there. He is not among those who may be directly affected by the Ordinance's implementation.

The SC also held that the petition cannot be treated as a taxpayer's suit, which is an exception to the standing requirement. A taxpayer's suit is allowed only when there is a claim of illegal disbursement of public funds or an unconstitutional tax measure. The SC emphasized that the Ordinance is a regulatory measure, not a tax or revenue measure, so the exception does not apply.

Read the full text of the press release at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=161984

Read the full text of the Resolution at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=161972

Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution

23/03/2026

The En Banc has approved the Governance Framework on the Use of Human-Centered Augmented Intelligence in the Judiciary, marking a significant step toward modernizing court operations and improving the administration of justice through new technologies.

In a Resolution dated February 18, 2026, in A.M. No. 25-11-28-SC, the SC issued a comprehensive guide on the responsible use of human-centered augmented intelligence in the judicial system, based on three ethical principles: fairness, accountability, and transparency. These principles support “the ethical and responsible use of human-centered augmented intelligence tools in the Judiciary” and “reinforce the public’s faith and confidence in the independence and impartiality of the judicial system.”

The Framework was developed by a working group chaired by Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen, with Associate Justices Ramon Paul L. Hernando and Rodil V. Zalameda as vice chairpersons. It was created with the help of other members of the Judiciary, subject matter experts, lawyers, and the academe, and further refined through consultations with the SC En Banc, the SC’s Management Information Systems Office, and the Office of the Chief Attorney. It also draws from global best practices, including the Council of ASEAN Chief Justices Governance Framework on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for the ASEAN Judiciaries and UNESCO Guidelines for the Use of AI Systems in Courts and Tribunals, ensuring alignment with international standards.

A key feature of the Framework is the use of the term “human-centered augmented intelligence,” which emphasizes that technology must remain centered on humans and should only support, not replace, human reason and judgment.

Read the press release at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=162306.

Read the full text of A.M. No. 25-11-28-SC at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/25-11-28-sc-re-proposed-governance-framework-on-the-use-of-human-centered-augmented-intelligence-in-the-judiciary-2/

23/03/2026

Sandiganbayan Associate Justice Maria Theresa V. Mendoza-Arcega, who serves as Vice President of the International Association of Women Judges, discusses the application of Republic Act No. 9262 or the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act in le***an relationships in Episode 110: Does RA 9262 (Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act) Extend to Le***an Relationships?

What is Republic Act No. 9262? Why was there a need for the Anti-VAWC Act, and what purpose does it serve? Which acts are considered abuse?

This week's podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube, Facebook, and the website.

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/3t0HyurCfKb0fqGPOY82tx?si=jI1XEQ4ZQNqmVtvETeYIaQ

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ph/podcast/supreme-court-ph-podcast/id1852172756?i=1000756283334

YouTube: https://youtu.be/rvQvwHtH8Wo

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CWPuvqbje/

SC website: http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/podcasts/

Address

Imus
4103

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 6pm
Tuesday 9am - 6pm
Wednesday 9am - 6pm
Thursday 9am - 6pm
Friday 9am - 6pm

Telephone

+639190747894

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Evidente Abunales Ramos Bustamante & Delmo Law Offices posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Evidente Abunales Ramos Bustamante & Delmo Law Offices:

Share