SUSG Judiciary

27/02/2026

𝐒𝐔𝐒𝐆 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧

In an effort to adopt relevant rules, exchange best practices, and improve the current system, the SUSG Judiciary will conduct its first benchmarking session with the University of St. La Salle Student Court.

​📍 Silliman University Moot Court
📅 February 28, 2026 | 8:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.

25/02/2026

𝐒𝐔𝐒𝐆 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐩𝐭𝐬 𝐚 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭.

The SUSG Judiciary formally adopts a new Rules of Court to govern the conduct of its proceedings. This development marks a significant step toward strengthening the administration of student justice and ensuring that processes before the Judiciary are clear, consistent, and accessible.

Among its salient features is the consolidation of cases falling under the jurisdiction of the Judiciary pursuant to the SUSG Constitution and existing resolutions passed by the SUSG Student Assembly. By integrating these governing provisions into a single procedural framework, the Rules promote uniformity and prevent confusion in the handling of cases.

The new Rules of Court also lay down the procedures applicable to each type of case, providing guidance on the filing of complaints, submission of answers, motions, presentation of evidence, and other stages of the proceedings. To further assist students, the Rules include templates of common legal forms—such as a complaint, answer, and motion for extension of time to file an answer. In keeping with the principle of accessibility, the Rules provide that substantial compliance with these forms is sufficient, ensuring that cases are resolved on their merits rather than dismissed on mere technicalities.

Through this initiative, the SUSG Judiciary reaffirms its commitment to fairness, efficiency, and transparency. May this Rules of Court pave the way for a more responsive and equitable system of student justice.

𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐔𝐒𝐆 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞:
https://bit.ly/4rEvTPo

Footnotes for the 1st and 2nd posters
[1] Section 1, SUSG Judiciary Jurisdiction Act
[2] Section 2, SUSG Judiciary Jurisdiction Act
[3] Section 6, Article IX, 2024 SUSG Constitution
[4] Section 7, Article IX, 2024 SUSG Constitution
[5] Section 5 (e), SUSG Judiciary Jurisdiction Act
[6] Section 2 (c), Article IV, SUSG Omnibus Election Code
[7] Section 5, Article XI, SUSG Omnibus Election Code
[8] Section 3, par 2, Article IV, SUSG Omnibus Election Code
[9] Section 1 (b), Article XI, SUSG Omnibus Election Code

23/02/2026

SUSG STATEMENT ON BOT INVITATION TO COMMITTEE MEETINGS
The Silliman University Student Government (SUSG) expresses its appreciation to the Silliman University Board of Trustees (BOT) for hearing, seeing, and valuaing student representation through the formal invitation extended to SUSG to participate as a resource person in relevant BOT committee meetings.
This gesture underscores the BOT's recognition of the vital role student voices play in shaping policies and initiatives that impact the University community. Additionally, this arrangement aligns with SUSG's mandate to advocate for the welfare and development of Silliman students.
As student representatives, we will be gathering the most pressing student concerns and ensuring these grievances are communicated to the committee meetings. We are eager to engage constructively, fostering meaningful dialogue that advances our shared vision for a vibrant and inclusive Silliman University.

23/02/2026

𝐒𝐔𝐒𝐆 𝐉𝐔𝐃𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐑𝐘 𝐂𝐀𝐒𝐄 𝐔𝐏𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐒

The Silliman University Student Government (SUSG), through SUSG Judiciary, serves in an ex-officio capacity in the University Disciplinary Board (UDB). In this role, the Prime Justice actively participates in the Board’s proceedings and assists in the careful drafting of its decisions, ensuring that they are well-reasoned, clear, and consistent with University rules and principles of due process.

During the months of November and December, the UDB conducted a series of hearings and deliberations concerning a case of sexual harassment. After careful evaluation of the evidence and observance of due process, the Board rendered its decision and imposed the appropriate penalties in accordance with University rules and regulations.

In January, the Board likewise heard a case involving verbal abuse committed by a student against a University staff member. Following proper proceedings and deliberation, the corresponding sanctions were imposed.

Given the sensitive nature of these cases and the confidential information involved, the full text of the decisions cannot be publicly disclosed. Nonetheless, the outcomes affirm the University’s commitment to accountability, respect, and the maintenance of a safe academic environment.

These cases serve as a reminder that justice is upheld within the institution—firmly, fairly, and with due regard for the rights and dignity of all parties concerned.

02/02/2026

27/12/2025

𝐒𝐔𝐒𝐆 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐃𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭.

On December 27, 2025, the Silliman University Student Government (SUSG) Judiciary held its first online deliberation on the proposed SUSG Judiciary Rules of Court. The meeting marked an important step toward strengthening judicial procedures and improving the administration of justice within the student government.

During the meeting, the members carefully and systematically reviewed the draft Rules of Court. Each provision was discussed seriatim, allowing the Judiciary to closely examine every section and provide focused and constructive input.

A second deliberation is scheduled on December 28, 2025. These discussions reflect the Judiciary’s commitment to refining the Rules of Court to ensure they are clear, practical, and responsive to the needs of the students.

10/12/2025

𝐇𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐇𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐑𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 𝐃𝐚𝐲!

Today, we commemorate the International Human Rights Day, a reminder that human dignity must always be upheld regardless of changes in government leadership or global conditions. While laws, policies, and political landscapes may shift, human rights remain constant. They serve as the foundation and guiding standard of every government actions and regulations.

In the Philippines, human rights can be summarized in Section 1, Article III of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, which states: “𝙉𝙤 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙣 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙡𝙞𝙛𝙚, 𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙮, 𝙤𝙧 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙮 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙙𝙪𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙡𝙖𝙬, 𝙣𝙤𝙧 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙣 𝙗𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙞𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙚𝙦𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙬𝙨.” This provision captures the heart of human rights, which requires both substantive and procedural due process of law.

As we commemorate this day, we remind the State that power must always be exercised within the bounds of law and justice. Otherwise, we will demand accountability. Today, we are reminded that huma rights are not merely legal texts. They must be defended, protected, and practiced every day. It is a shared responsibility and essential part of building a just, humane, and democratic society.

03/12/2025

𝐒𝐔𝐒𝐆 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐥𝐲 𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐲 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐒𝐔𝐒𝐆 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬

College of Law Representatives Macarubbo and Maputi, together with Speaker of the House Amante, met with Prime Justice Bulado and Justice Elum on December 13, 2025, for a consultation held at the Villareal Hall student lounge.

The discussion focused on clarifying the scope of the SUSG Judiciary’s jurisdiction, particularly in relation to student misconduct, student organizations, and election-related offenses. It was emphasized that the SUSG Judiciary does not possess motu proprio authority—meaning it cannot take action on any misconduct unless a formal complaint is filed.

During the consultation, it was also revealed that the SUSG Judiciary currently has 𝐭𝐰𝐨 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐬 before the University Disciplinary Board (UDB).

The dialogue reflects a continuing effort to promote a more transparent, responsive, and accountable student justice system.

30/11/2025

Look: Justice Roselyn Pascobello explained the duties of student representatives and outlined the SUSG Judiciary’s structure as defined in the SUSG Constitution.

28/11/2025

SUSG Judiciary representative Hon. Ivan B. Elum urged a reevaluation of current tuition payment schemes as they are “very limited and subject to conditional circumstances.”

BFO representative Marcia Luz Salcedo responded that the payment schemes are necessary for their salaries and operations.

Read the full article here: https://www.twsillimanian.com/tuition-other-concerns.../

: Tuition, other concerns surface at SUSG TAPOK

The topics were discussed during “TAPOK” or “Talks Aimed at Progress, Openness, and Knowledge,” one of SUSG’s bannered platforms focused on voicing student inquiries to key university offices.

Full story is linked in the comments and in our IG bio.