UNP College of Law Legal Aid Clinic

UNP College of Law Legal Aid Clinic Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from UNP College of Law Legal Aid Clinic, Legal Service, University of Nothern, City of Vigan.

13 Claw students take oath as Level II CLEP PractitionersThirteen law students of the UNP College of Law (CLaw) formally...
19/02/2026

13 Claw students take oath as Level II CLEP Practitioners

Thirteen law students of the UNP College of Law (CLaw) formally sworn in as Level 2 Certified Law Student Practitioners before Executive Judge Hon. Leah Agripina R. Florendo on February 18, 2026 at the Family Court, Branch 7, Vigan City, Ilocos Sur.

Newly certified law student practitioners comprised of Jonellyn S. Albano, Francis Lois A. Arcaina, Ace Danielle C. Avero, Tricia Mae Cruz, Precious R. Embat, Debbie Ann M. Leoncion, Jairemn B. Macabeo, Loren Jane L. Mina, Girlie H. Pasia, Jemmina Piano, Marwin F. Piedad, John Mark P. Rafanan, and Roma Ann Lizel P. Somera. They are under the supervision of Atty. Mirela A. Verzosa, UNP-CLaw CLEP Director.

The level 2 certification of the students is part of the Clinical Legal Education Program (CLEP) mandated by the Revised Law Student Practice Rule of the Supreme Court, premised on inculcating the value of legal education in shaping the knowledge and skills of future lawyers through experiential learning.

Under said certification, law students practitioners will be immersed to actual legal practice as they are permitted to appear before any court or quasi-judicial body, examine witnesses, present evidence, make oral arguments, file pleadings, and handle cases referred to the clinical program, with the continuous supervision of their clinical professor.

08/03/2025

IT’S A WRAP!

March 8. 2025 – The last day of the HUMSS Lecture Series, titled “Becoming a Responsible Citizen: Understanding Democracy and the Bill of Rights,” which held at Ilocos Sur National High School was led by the following third-year law students from UNP-Law: Leiah Janine R. Delizo, Francis Lois A. Arcaina, Dax B. Arrogante, Jon Symon J. Tubon and Audie Anthony Q. Palpal-latoc.

This lecture series seeks to instill in the students the importance of democracy and the rights of the people enshrined under the 1987 Constitution that will help them become more responsible citizens not only for their benefits but also for our country.

06/03/2025

“Unlocking the Power of Citizenship: Law Student Practitioners Dive into Democracy & the Bill of Rights on Day 2 of HUMSS Lecture Series”

March 6, 2025 – The second day of the HUMSS Lecture Series, titled “Becoming a Responsible Citizen: Understanding Democracy and the Bill of Rights,” was led by the following third-year law student practitioners from UNP-Law: Tricia Mae Cruz, Reanne Marithe Taborda, Elaine Lucendo, Girlie Pasia, and Mighta Zerie Nolasco. The lecture was held at Ilocos Sur National High School.

The lecture sought to deepen students' understanding of democratic processes and the essential rights protected under the Bill of Rights of the Philippine Constitution. The law student practitioners emphasized how these concepts are crucial for fostering active, informed, and responsible citizenship. Through dynamic discussions and real-life examples, the practitioners made these complex topics accessible and relevant to the students, encouraging them to critically reflect on their roles and responsibilities within a democratic society.

05/03/2025

Law Student Practitioners Spearhead HUMSS Lecture Series entitled Becoming a Responsible Citizen: Understanding Democracy and the Bill of Rights.

March 5, 2025 – Clinical Legal Education Program (CLEP) Law Student Practitioners, Ranz Dominique Dameg, John Mark Rafanan, Edrian Alonzo, Marianne Faye Rafanan, and Riccia Vicente, spearheaded the first day of the HUMSS Lecture Series, delivering an insightful discussion on democracy and the Bill of Rights to ISNHS Grade 12 students.

The Supreme Court En Banc has approved The Rules on Unified Legal Aid Service (ULAS Rules) which mandates covered lawyer...
27/11/2024

The Supreme Court En Banc has approved The Rules on Unified Legal Aid Service (ULAS Rules) which mandates covered lawyers to render at least 60 hours of pro bono legal aid every three years in favor of indigent Filipinos.

Under the said rules, any person who has no sufficient means to afford adequate legal services, as assessed by a covered lawyer in accordance with guidelines to be issued by the ULAS Board, may be a qualified beneficiary.

The legal service will be free for such qualified beneficiary and the necessary expenses for the rendering of the service will be borne by the Court through the ULAS Fund, to be set up for this purpose. Beneficiaries who are qualified shall be exempt from payment of docket fees and other fees.

Pro bono legal aid services may be in the form of representation in court, legal counseling, drafting legal documents, documental legal assistance, and participation in accredited legal outreach programs.

The Supreme Court has officially released the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 11691 or the Judici...
26/11/2024

The Supreme Court has officially released the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 11691 or the Judiciary Marshals Act (Judiciary Marshals IRR) to ensure the full implementation of the law and the operationalization of the Office of the Judiciary Marshals.

Enacted in 2022, the Judiciary Marshals Act addresses the alarming increase in violent crimes targeting members of the Judiciary, many of which remain unresolved. The law aims to safeguard judges, court personnel, and court properties while maintaining the integrity of court proceedings.

Under the Judiciary Marshals Act, the Office of the Judiciary Marshals is tasked with ensuring the security, safety, and protection of Judiciary members, officials, personnel, and assets. It operates under the direct control and supervision of the Supreme Court and is empowered to investigate threats, conduct lawful arrests and seizures, and assist in the enforcement of writs and court processes.

The operationalization of the Office of the Judiciary Marshals is a key component of the Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027, specifically under the target outcome of Efficiency. The SPJI acknowledges that the safety and security of the judiciary are vital to maintaining judicial independence and effective court operations.

Judiciary Marshals will be deployed to secure court premises, including halls of justice, courthouses, and official judiciary events such as conferences, seminars, and meetings. They are also tasked with providing protection to witnesses, including the secure transportation of accused individuals or witnesses when ordered by the court.

Additionally, the Office of the Judiciary Marshals is empowered to investigate crimes committed against members of the Judiciary, as well as allegations of graft and corruption within the judicial system. To perform these functions, marshals can issue subpoenas, apply for search warrants, administer oaths, and access public records from other government agencies, all while adhering to the provisions of the Data Privacy Act.

The Judiciary Marshals IRR shall take effect 15 days following its publication in the Official Gazette, or in two newspapers of general circulation.

Read the full text of the Press Release: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-issues-implementing-rules-for-the-judiciary-marshals-act/

Read the full text of A.M. No. 24-04-09-SC: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/24-04-09-sc-implementing-rules-and-regulations-of-republic-act-no-11691-or-the-judiciary-marshals-act/

Originally published by the Supreme Court Public Information Office

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/12D5WxNrMyq/

The Supreme Court has released a A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC(Rules on Expedited Procedures in the First Level Courts) where you c...
25/11/2024

The Supreme Court has released a A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC
(Rules on Expedited Procedures in the First Level Courts) where you can file a small claims case without the need of a legal representation and spending a lot of money.

The Small Claims Rule is an expedited way of claiming debts arising from loans, leases, services and sale of personal property.
Under this Rule, monetary claims which do not exceed ₱1,000,000 can be filed by the plaintiff without the need of a lawyer before the Metropolitan Trial Courts (MeTCs), Municipal Trial Courts in Cities (MTCCs), Municipal Trial Courts (MTCS), or Municipal Circuit Trial Courts (MCTCS).

All you need to do is to file with the court an accomplished Statement of Claim/s with Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping, Splitting a Single Cause of Action, and Multiplicity of Suits (Form 1-SCC) and duly certified photocopies of the actionable document/s subject of the claim, affidavits of witnesses, and other evidence to support the claim, with as many copies thereof as there are defendants.

The Supreme Court held that Philippine courts may exercise jurisdiction over an offense constituting psychological viole...
23/11/2024

The Supreme Court held that Philippine courts may exercise jurisdiction over an offense constituting psychological violence under Republic Act R.A. No. 9262, otherwise known as the Anti-Violence Against Women and their Children Act of 2004, committed through marital infidelity, even though the alleged illicit relationship occurred or is occurring outside.

What may be gleaned from Section 7 of R.A. No. 9262 is that the law contemplates that acts of violence against women and their children may manifest as transitory or continuing crimes; meaning that some acts material and essential thereto and requisite in their consummation occur in one municipality or territory, while some occur in another. In such cases, the court wherein any of the crime's essential and material acts have been committed maintains jurisdiction to try the case; it being understood that the first court taking cognizance of the same excludes the other. Thus, a person charged with a continuing or transitory crime may be validly tried in any municipality or territory where the offense was in part committed.

In a decision penned by Associate Justice Jose Midas P. Marquez, the Court emphasized that it “has always protected poli...
22/11/2024

In a decision penned by Associate Justice Jose Midas P. Marquez, the Court emphasized that it “has always protected political speech as one of the most important expressions guaranteed by the Constitution, and freedom of speech and expression is at the core of civil liberties and must be protected at all costs for the sake of democracy.” While acknowledging “the zeal and dedication with which the COMELEC performs its duties and fulfills its mandate to ensure free and fair elections,” the Court stressed that “the best intentions cannot justify impermissible infringements on constitutional rights.”

In closing, the Court held that “the COMELEC’s implementation of “Oplan Baklas” as against St. Anthony et al., is unconstitutional as it exceeded the bounds of permissible regulation under RA 9006 and COMELEC Resolution No. 10730.”

In a decision penned by Justice Lazaro-Javier, the Court held that when an Employer creates a hostile work environment t...
21/11/2024

In a decision penned by Justice Lazaro-Javier, the Court held that when an Employer creates a hostile work environment that compels the Employee to resign, such constitutes constructive dismissal, as a reasonable person in Employee's position would have been compelled to give up their employment.

G.R. No. 254465, April 03, 2024
Bartolome v. Toyota Quezon Avenue, Inc., et al.

In the landmark case of "Mazda Quezon Avenue vs. Alexander Caruncho" (G.R. No. 232688, April 26, 2021), the Supreme Cour...
21/11/2024

In the landmark case of "Mazda Quezon Avenue vs. Alexander Caruncho" (G.R. No. 232688, April 26, 2021), the Supreme Court of the Philippines delivered a significant decision upholding consumer rights. This case serves as a pivotal example for buyers facing similar challenges with defective products. Alexander Caruncho's struggle began after purchasing a brand-new Mazda 6 sedan, only to discover a persistent defect. Despite multiple attempts by Mazda Quezon Avenue to rectify the issue during the warranty period, the problem remained unresolved, leading Caruncho to seek a full refund. The case escalated through various legal channels, highlighting the importance of consumer protection and warranty obligations.

The Supreme Court reaffirmed the Consumer Act's stance in supplier liability for product imperfections and clarified the prescriptive period for filing consumer complaints. This ruling is a cornerstone in Philippine jurisprudence, emphasizing the responsibility of suppliers to ensure product quality and adhere to warranty agreements. It sends a strong message to the automotive industry and other sectors about the importance of honoring consumer rights and providing quality products.

This case is not only a victory for Caruncho but also a milestone for all consumers in the Philippines asserting their rights against defective products and substandard services. It's a reminder to suppliers to uphold their obligations and to consumers to be vigilant and assertive in protecting their interests.

The governing principle of prius tempore, potior jure “first in time, stronger in right”.Knowledge by the first buyer of...
20/11/2024

The governing principle of prius tempore, potior jure “first in time, stronger in right”.

Knowledge by the first buyer of the second sale cannot defeat the first buyer's rights except when the second buyer first registers in good faith the second sale (Olivares vs. Gonzales, 159 SCRA 33).

Conversely, knowledge gained by the second buyer of the first sale defeats his rights even if he is first to register, since such knowledge taints his registration with bad faith (see also Astorga vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No 58530, 26 December 1984).

Registration, however, by the first buyer under Act 3344 can have the effect of constructive notice to the second buyer that can defeat his right as such buyer in good faith (see Arts. 708-709, Civil Code; see also Revilla vs. Galindez, 107 Phil. 480; Taguba vs. Peralta, 132 SCRA 700)

In Cruz vs. Cabana (G.R. No. 56232, 22 June 1984; 129 SCRA 656), it was held that it is essential, to merit the protection of Art. 1544, second paragraph, that the second realty buyer must act in good faith in registering his deed of sale (citing Carbonell vs. Court of Appeals, 69 SCRA 99, Crisostomo vs. CA, G.R. 95843, 02 September 1992).

Address

University Of Nothern
City Of Vigan
2700

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 5pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 5pm

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when UNP College of Law Legal Aid Clinic posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category