25/08/2026
𝗔𝗖𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗧𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗖𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗗 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗔𝗥𝗦𝗢𝗡 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗚𝗘 𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗦𝗧 𝗛𝗜𝗠 ⚖️
In 2018, our client, Mr. J, was charged with 𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 and 𝗮𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 in separate cases filed in different territorial jurisdictions, in connection with the death of a military serviceman.
A few years ago, the murder charge against Mr. J was dismissed after the 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 that we filed was 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱.
This time, the arson charge against him has likewise been dismissed after the new 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 that we filed was also 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱.
The Honorable Court ruled that the prosecution’s evidence 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗯𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝘂𝗯𝘁 any participation on the part of Mr. J in the crime of arson.
In its ruling, the Honorable Court cited 𝘗𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘷. 𝘎𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘳, wherein the Supreme Court held that 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱’𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗮𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗮𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝗱𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘀𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗶𝗿𝗰𝘂𝗺𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝗮𝗻 𝘂𝗻𝗯𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁. 𝗠𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗱, 𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁.
In short, 𝗠𝗿. 𝗝 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗮𝗰𝗾𝘂𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘀.
𝗗𝗘𝗢 𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗔𝗦.
———————————
[BISAYA TRANSALATION]
𝗡𝗔-𝗔𝗕𝗦𝗪𝗘𝗟𝗧𝗢 𝗦𝗔 𝗞𝗔𝗦𝗢 𝗦𝗔 𝗔𝗥𝗦𝗢𝗡 𝗡𝗚𝗔 𝗚𝗜𝗣𝗔𝗦𝗔𝗞𝗔 𝗕𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗞 𝗞𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗬𝗔 ⚖️
Niadtong 2018, ang among kliyente nga si Mr. J gikasuhan og 𝗽𝗮𝗴𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗮𝘆 (murder) ug 𝗽𝗮𝗴𝘀𝘂𝗻𝗼𝗴 (arson) sa managlahing mga kaso nga gisang-at sa lain-laing territorial jurisdictions, kalabot sa pagkamatay sa usa ka miyembro sa militar.
Pipila ka tuig ang milabay, ang kaso sa murder batok kang Mr. J gi-dismiss human gi-uyonan sa korte ang 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 nga among gipasa/gisumite.
Karong higayona, ang kaso sa arson batok kaniya gi-dismiss usab human gi-uyonan sa RTC ang bag-ong 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 nga among gipasa/gisumite.
Gihukman sa RTC nga ang ebidensya sa prosecution 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗼𝗱 𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗮𝘄 𝘀𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘂𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗮𝗴𝗱𝘂𝗵𝗮𝗱𝘂𝗵𝗮 (beyond reasonable doubt) nga adunay partisipasyon si Mr. J sa krimen nga arson.
Sa iyang desisyon, gikutlo sa RTC ang kaso nga 𝘗𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘷. 𝘎𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘳, diin niingon ang Supreme Court nga 𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘆𝗮 𝘀𝗮 𝗮𝗸𝘂𝘀𝗮𝗱𝗼 𝘂𝗯𝗮𝗻 𝘀𝗮 𝗶𝘆𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗴𝗮 𝗸𝗮𝘂𝗯𝗮𝗻 𝘀𝗮 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗮 𝗽𝗮 𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲, 𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘆𝗮 𝗱𝘂𝗼𝗹 𝘀𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗻𝗼𝗴 𝗻𝗴𝗮 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗸𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮, 𝗱𝗶𝗹𝗶 𝗶𝗴𝗼 𝗮𝗿𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗱-𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗸𝘂𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗮𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗸𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗯𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘆𝗮 𝗻𝗴𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗹𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗼𝘆 𝗻𝗮𝗴𝘀𝘂𝗴𝗼𝗱 𝘀𝗮 𝘀𝘂𝗻𝗼𝗴 𝘂𝗴 𝗸𝘂𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗴𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗿𝗸𝘂𝗺𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘆𝗮 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗮𝗽𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮 𝗼𝗴 𝘀𝘂𝗻𝗼𝗱-𝘀𝘂𝗻𝗼𝗱 𝗻𝗴𝗮 𝗲𝗯𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘆𝗮 𝗻𝗴𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗽𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗼𝗱 𝘀𝗮 𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗮. 𝗔𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗮𝗴𝗱𝘂𝗱𝗮 𝗹𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗶𝗹𝗶 𝗶𝗴𝗼 𝗮𝗿𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗱-𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗮𝗴𝗸𝗮𝘀𝗮𝗱-𝗮𝗻.
Sa laktod nga pagka-istorya, 𝙨𝙞 𝙈𝙧. 𝙅 𝙣𝙖-𝙖𝙗𝙨𝙬𝙚𝙡𝙩𝙤 𝙣𝙖 𝙠𝙖𝙧𝙤𝙣 𝙨𝙖 𝙙𝙪𝙝𝙖 𝙠𝙖 𝙠𝙖𝙨𝙤.
𝗗𝗘𝗢 𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗔𝗦.