Lopez-Baluyut Law Office

Lopez-Baluyut Law Office Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Lopez-Baluyut Law Office, Lawyer & Law Firm, Ground Floor, Biag Bldg. , Mc Arthur Highway, Sto. Domingo II, Capas.

LEGAL SERVICES RELEVANT TO:

CIVIL, PROPERTY, AND FAMILY LAW
CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ELECTION AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
LAND TRANSFER

11/04/2025

READ : Ipinababatid ng Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) na maaari nang magpa-Apostille ng mga sumusunod na dokumento mula sa Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) online at hindi na kinakailangang magtungo sa tanggapan ng DFA upang magsumite ng mga kinakailangang dokumento.

โœ… Birth Certificate
โœ… Marriage Certificate
โœ… Advisory on Marriage
โœ… Certificate of No Marriage Record (CENOMAR)

Read full advisory ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿป https://tinyurl.com/38yn2f26

Received two favorable decisions! ๐Ÿ“ƒOne as counsel for the plaintiffs and one as counsel for the defendants! Thank you Lo...
12/12/2022

Received two favorable decisions! ๐Ÿ“ƒOne as counsel for the plaintiffs and one as counsel for the defendants! Thank you Lord! ๐Ÿ™

07/12/2022

Meeting your lawyer is easy!

For those who cannot personally visit our office, you may schedule your legal consultation with us through videconference.

You can set your appointment by sending us a message! ๐Ÿ“š๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ’ผ

All about scanned signature.
17/10/2022

All about scanned signature.

Did you know that a scanned copy of your handwritten signature is not necessarily a valid electronic or digital signature? We have prepared an FAQ to help you learn more about the legal and proper use of electronic and digital signatures under Philippine law.

18/08/2022

USAPANG CYBERLIBEL:

PWEDE MO BA KASUHAN ANG PANINIRA SAYO SA PRIVATE MESSAGE? SA GROUP CHAT?

May kaso ba na cyberlibel kung ang paninira at ginawa sa private message? Kung sa group chat?

Baka cyberlibel yan! Case-to-case basis yan kaya kailangan na magconsult sa lawyer. DOWNLOAD Now at: http://bit.ly/LexMeetbeta

Read more sa LexMeet post.....

Under Article 354 of the RPC, which states that;

โ€œEvery defamatory imputation is presumed to be malicious, even if it be true, if no good intention and justifiable motive for making it is shown, except in the following cases:

1. A private communication made by any person to another in the performance of any legal, moral or social duty; and

2. A fair and true report, made in good faith, without any comments or remarks, of any judicial, legislative or other official proceedings which are of confidential nature, or of any statement, report or speech delivered in said proceedings, or of any other act performed by public officers in the exercise of their functions.โ€ (emphasize ours)

Malinaw sa batas na ang private communication o pribadong usapan ay isa sa mag depensa sa libel o cyberlibel kung meron siyang legal, moral at social duty sa pagsasabi nito. Ang private chat sa internet o text message ay masasabing depensa kung dalawa lamang sila na nasa chat. Kung ito ay group chat, ito ay maitutring na isang "public chat" kung saan ang libel at cyberlibel ay applicable.

Ayon sa Supreme Court case na Alcantara vs. Ponce, G.R. No. 156183, February 28, 2007:

"Publication in libel means making the defamatory matter, after it has been written, known to someone other than the person to whom it has been written. There is publication if the material is communicated to a third person. What is material is that a third person has read or heard the libelous statement, for "a manโ€™s reputation is the estimate in which others hold him, not the good opinion which he has of himself."

Kung ang private message ay sa pagitan lamang ng nagpadala at pinadalhan, hindi ito masasabing na publish dahil walang third party na nakabasa nito at hindi ito masasabing cyberlibel. Ngunit, ang mga nasabing private message ay pwede ring magamit bilang ebidensiya ng isang krimen, ang krimen na "unjust vexation". Ang "unjust vexation" o hindi makatarungang pang-aasar o pang-iinis sa isang tao na walang dahilan na ipinahayag mula sa salita o kilos ay isang krimen under Article 287 Par. 2 ng Revised Penal Code. Ito ay pinaparusahan ng kulong ng Revised Penal Code:

ART. 387. Par. 2 "Any other coercions or unjust vexations shall be punished by arresto menor (imprisonment of one day to 30 days) or a fine ranging from 5 pesos to 200 pesos, or both."

Sabi sa desisyon ng Supreme Court, ang "unjust vexation exists even without the element of restraint or compulsion for the reason that the term is broad enough to include any human conduct which, although not productive of some physical or material harm, would unjustly annoy or irritate an innocent person." [Baleros vs. people, G.R. No. 138033, January 30, 2007] Sabi sa nasabing desisyon, as long as nakakairita o nakaka-inis ang ginagawa sa isang inosenteng tao, ito ay isang unjust vexation.

Kung ang private message ay hindi makatarungang pang-aasar o pang-iinis sa isang tao na walang dahilan, pwedeng kasuhan ang nagpadala ng private message ng unjust vexation.

Kung biktima ka o akusado, mag register ka sa www.lexmeet.com para madiscuss sa lawyer at mabigyan ng solusyon

Alamin mo ang rights at obligation mo sa batas as a victim o akusado sa cyberlibel at paano mo ipatutupad ito.

Register at www.lexmeet.com and submit your legal problem. I-LexMeet mo na yan! Sa aming mobile app!

DOWNLOAD Now at: http://bit.ly/LexMeetbeta

17/08/2022
MAG-INGAT PO SA POSER NA ITO. ๐Ÿ‘บMay nagpapanggap po na office staff ng aming opisina at nakikipagtransaksiyon ukol sa lup...
17/08/2022

MAG-INGAT PO SA POSER NA ITO. ๐Ÿ‘บMay nagpapanggap po na office staff ng aming opisina at nakikipagtransaksiyon ukol sa lupa o pagpapatitulo ng lupa. Huwag pong magtitiwala dito at hindi kami kumokontak sa mga kliyente upang mag-alok ng serbisyo online kundi nagpapa-appointment ang mga kliyenteng nangangailangan sa mismong abogado at personal niyang hinaharap ito. Wala rin po kaming branch sa labas ng Capas, Tarlac.

Update: Deactivated na po ang Facebook Account na ginamit.

Sa nakakakilala sa lalaking nasa larawan ng ID at sa pangalan ng babaeng nasa G-cash transaction na makikita rito, ipagbigay alam po sa amin ang anumang impormasyon tungkol sa kanila.

Maraming salamat po.

Legal bang tanggalin sa trabaho ang isang empleyado kung ang kadahilanan ay hindi nito nakakasundo ang mga kasamahan?
04/06/2022

Legal bang tanggalin sa trabaho ang isang empleyado kung ang kadahilanan ay hindi nito nakakasundo ang mga kasamahan?

Ang pagtalikod sa pangakong pakakasalan ang isang karelasyon ba ay isang kaso? Hindi po. Ngunit papaano kung marami ka n...
31/05/2022

Ang pagtalikod sa pangakong pakakasalan ang isang karelasyon ba ay isang kaso? Hindi po.

Ngunit papaano kung marami ka ng ginasta sa preparaston sa kasal? Alamin.

In a Decision penned by Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen, the Court discouraged legal actions brought about by a broken heart and a broken promise as it reiterated that a mere breach of a promise to marry is not an actionable wrong as long as it does not palpably and unjustifiably contradict good customs.

The Court found that Jhonna Guevarra was NOT liable for damages to her former fiancee, Jan Banach, a German national, after breaking up with him when she discovered that he was not a divorcee, but was still married to a third wife.

The Court ruled that there was no legal basis to order Guevarra to return the PHP 500,000.00 sent by her ex-fiance for a supposed conjugal home since she was justified in breaking off their engagement and Banachโ€™s actions were tainted with fraud and deceit since he lied about his marital status and even hid his true name from Guevarra.

Furthermore, the Court explained that since the money was given as a gift to help Guevarra and her family with their possible eviction from their home, the legal principle of unjust enrichment cannot be applied to compel her to return the cash to Banach.

Read the full text of the decision at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/26981/.

This is a good case! May mga balidong kadahilanan kung bakit minsan ay hindi nakakapagbigay ng pinansiyal na suporta ang...
26/05/2022

This is a good case! May mga balidong kadahilanan kung bakit minsan ay hindi nakakapagbigay ng pinansiyal na suporta ang isang lalaki. Kung kaya, kung hindi naman ito intensiyonal na nagawa upang abusuhin ang isang babaeng nararapat na tumanggap ng pinansiyal na suporta ay sinasabi ng Korte Suprema na hindi ito paglabag ng R.A. 9262 o VAWC law.

CASE LAW UPDATE:
Acharon v. People, G.R. No. 224946, 9 November 2021 [https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/27269/]

Address

Ground Floor, Biag Bldg. , Mc Arthur Highway, Sto. Domingo II
Capas
2315

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 5pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 5pm
Saturday 8am - 12pm

Telephone

+639519720024

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Lopez-Baluyut Law Office posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Lopez-Baluyut Law Office:

Share