The Mercado Law

The Mercado Law The Mercado Law is a full-service firm providing legal solutions fueled by empathy.

We integrate legal excellence with human understanding—because we don’t just know the law, we value the people we serve.

Our office will be physically closed from December 20 to January 04 as our team takes time to rest for the holidays and ...
01/12/2025

Our office will be physically closed from December 20 to January 04 as our team takes time to rest for the holidays and be with family.

During this period, all face-to-face and online consultations will be by appointment only. If you need guidance on your ongoing matters, just send us a message and we’ll help set a schedule.

Wishing everyone a warm and meaningful Christmas season!

Schedule your legal consultation with The Mercado Law and our lawyers will meet you through videconference (Zoom/Google ...
15/01/2025

Schedule your legal consultation with The Mercado Law and our lawyers will meet you through videconference (Zoom/Google Meet), teleconference, or in our office --at your preferred date and time!
You can set your appointment through the following links:
Facebook: The Mercado Law
Instagram:
Text/WhatsApp/Viber: 0968-850-8850
Landline: (046)885-7152

Our office will be physically closed from December 16, 2024 to January 05, 2025 for the holidays.For urgent assistance, ...
03/12/2024

Our office will be physically closed from December 16, 2024 to January 05, 2025 for the holidays.

For urgent assistance, please call 0968-850-8850.

Online legal consultations will still be available. Send us a message to schedule your appointment.

Happy holidays!

Happy holidays from The Mercado Law!Our office will be physically closed on 20 December to 07 January. There will be no ...
19/12/2023

Happy holidays from The Mercado Law!

Our office will be physically closed on 20 December to 07 January. There will be no phone calls, walk-ins, or face-to-face meetings and consultations.

Although we will remain available online, please expect some delay on our response during this break as we try to spend some quality time with our families as well.

Wishing you and your family the magic of Christmas and hope of the New Year! 💚💚💚

13/11/2023

SC Upholds Disability Claims of Seafarer Injured while Playing Basketball |

The Supreme Court has ordered a ship management company and its corporate officers to pay US$90,000 as total and permanent disability benefits to its seafarer employee who suffered an injury while playing basketball on board a ship during his free time.

In a 21-page Decision penned by Associate Justice Samuel H. Gaerlan, the Court granted the petition under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court filed by Rosell R. Arguilles (Arguilles) which sought to annul and set aside the January 24, 2020 Decision and November 9, 2020 Resolution of the Court of Appeals (CA). The said issuances of the CA affirmed the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) Resolution which, in turn, reversed the Decision of the Labor Arbiter in favor of Arguilles in a complaint for disability benefits against his former employer, respondents Wilhelmsen Smith Bell Manning, Inc., its principal Wilhelmsen Ship Management Ltd., and Fausto R. Preysler, Jr.

Arguilles, a Seaman, suffered an ankle injury on December 26, 2016, while playing basketball on board the vessel M/V Toronto. Despite medical repatriation and surgery, his disability claims which were initially granted by the Labor Arbiter was later reversed by the NLRC, a decision affirmed by the CA. The Supreme Court, however, ruled in favor of Arguilles, emphasizing that playing basketball was an employer-sanctioned activity and not a reckless or deliberate act, making the injury compensable. The Court emphasized the relevance of the 2010 Philippine Overseas Employment Administration Standard Employment Contract and the collective bargaining agreement in determining Arguilles' claims, stating that the injury fell within the definition of a work-related injury. Additionally, the Court highlighted the duty of employers to provide a seaworthy ship and take precautions to prevent accidents and injuries to the crew, as outlined in the POEA SEC.

The Court also held that Arguilles' entitlement to full disability benefits had lapsed due to the absence of a certification within specified periods, and it declared the corporate officers jointly and severally liable with the ship management company for the total judgment award, citing the Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995.

Read more at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-upholds-disability-claims-of-seafarer-injured-while-playing-basketball/. Read the Decision in full at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/254586-rosell-r-arguilles-vs-wilhelmsen-smith-bell-manning-inc-wilhelmsen-ship-management-ltd-and-fausto-r-preysler-jr/.

03/11/2023

SC Reiterates that Courts May Allow Plea Bargaining Despite the Prosecution’s Objections |

The dividing line between prosecutorial prerogatives and judicial discretion is why courts may overrule objections on plea bargaining on certain groups.

Thus reiterated the Supreme Court’s Third Division in a Resolution penned by Associate Justice Maria Filomena D. Singh granting the petition for review on certiorari filed by Erwin Alvero. The petition assailed the Decision of the Court of Appeals (CA) which had found that the Regional Trial Court of Roxas City, Branch 16 (RTC) acted with grave abuse of discretion when it accepted Alvero’s proposal for plea bargaining despite the prosecution’s objection.

The Court, in granting Alvero’s petition, found that no grave abuse of discretion was committed by the RTC. Applying its ruling in the 2022 case of People v. Montierro, the Court held that a trial court has the authority to allow plea bargaining even when the prosecution objects to the plea bargain and thus withholds consent.

The Court also held that the prosecutor's discretion is primarily about deciding whom to prosecute and what charges to bring, but the court's discretion comes into play in determining the case's outcome. Therefore, courts have the authority to overrule objections to plea bargaining, provided that such objections lack merit or infringe upon the court's exclusive constitutional prerogative. However, the Court made it clear that a court's authority to permit plea bargaining is not unlimited and should align with established rules and guidelines.

In Erwin Alvero's specific case, the Court found that his plea bargain proposal was in accordance with the Plea Bargaining Framework for drug cases, which specified acceptable plea bargains for various offenses. The Court however found that the RTC failed to show in its Decision that it assessed specific factors, particularly if (a) he is a recidivist, habitual offender, known in the community as a drug addict and a troublemaker, has undergone rehabilitation but had a relapse, or has been charged many times, or (b) the evidence of guilt is strong, in determining if it will grant Alvaro’s plea bargain. The case was thus remanded to the trial court to determine Alvero's eligibility for plea bargaining and the RTC was further mandated to hear the prosecution's objection and rule on the merits. If the RTC finds the prosecution's objection meritorious, it shall order the continuation of the criminal proceedings.

Read more at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-reiterates-that-courts-may-allow-plea-bargaining-despite-the-prosecutions-objections/.

25/10/2023

Good day! Our office will be physically closed from today until November 05 for inventory and general cleaning. Although we can still accept online inquiries, please expect some delay in our responses during this time.

We look forward to see you on November 06 as we go back to our regular office operations! Thank you.

We are back to our regular schedule for your online legal consultation!Staying late was sure fun but that night shift wa...
02/09/2023

We are back to our regular schedule for your online legal consultation!

Staying late was sure fun but that night shift was something else. 😅

Starting today, we are available for your online legal consultation from 8AM to 10PM. See you!

Note: As we value the confidentiality between lawyers and clients, we encourage you to send us a private message to book your consultation. All public posts/reviews containing any information pertaining to your consultation will be deleted to protect your interest. Thank you!

We heard you!There were requests to extend our online legal consultation beyond office hours. For this month of August, ...
09/08/2023

We heard you!

There were requests to extend our online legal consultation beyond office hours. For this month of August, we are going night shift -- from Mondays to Fridays!

Online Legal Consultation Hours for August:
Monday-Friday: 7PM to 12MN
Saturday and Sunday: 8AM to 7PM

See you tonight!

14/07/2023

Good morning! Due to heavy rains, our physical office will be closed today and tomorrow, 15-16 July 2023, Saturday and Sunday.

We will remain open to serve you virtually through this page. Thank you and keep safe!

Address

Unit 309 Plazuela De Molino, 9006 Bacoor Boulevard , Brgy. Bayanan
Bacoor
4102

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm
Saturday 1pm - 5pm
Sunday 1pm - 5pm

Telephone

+639688508850

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Mercado Law posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to The Mercado Law:

Share