Batapa-Sigue & Sigue Law Office

Call Directions Website Contact the practice

Batapa-Sigue & Sigue Law Office Former DICT Usec. Atty. Jocelle Batapa-Sigue-Senior and Founding Partner
Atty.

Arnel Sigue, LPT, JD, CRB-Senior and Managing Partner
& Associate Lawyers

The Supreme Court PH said it will officially operationalize its electronic notarization (eNotarization) service on Octob...
19/08/2026

The Supreme Court PH said it will officially operationalize its electronic notarization (eNotarization) service on October 19, 2026.

The rollout follows the implementation of A.M. No. 24-10-14-SC, or the Rules on Electronic Notarization, which establishes the legal framework for electronic notarial acts. The rules were promulgated by the court on February 4, 2025.

Follow the link below for the full article!



https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19V2X2FRkZ/

The Supreme Court PH said it will officially operationalize its electronic notarization (eNotarization) service on October 19, 2026.

The rollout follows the implementation of A.M. No. 24-10-14-SC, or the Rules on Electronic Notarization, which establishes the legal framework for electronic notarial acts. The rules were promulgated by the court on February 4, 2025.

Follow the link below for the full article!

The   announces the start of the application for commission as ๐„๐ฅ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ข๐œ ๐๐จ๐ญ๐š๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐›๐ฅ๐ข๐œ today, ๐€๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ, ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”.For more ...
10/08/2026

The announces the start of the application for commission as ๐„๐ฅ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ข๐œ ๐๐จ๐ญ๐š๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐›๐ฅ๐ข๐œ today, ๐€๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ, ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”.

For more information, you may refer to the Electronic Notary Services (ENS) microsite at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/enotarization/.

For concerns and questions, you may submit them through the ENS Helpdesk Form at https://tinyurl.com/ENSHelpdeskForm

You may access the Rules on Electronic Notarization at https://tinyurl.com/RulesOnElectronicNotarization

08/08/2026

Notarization Services Schedule:
Monday - Friday
๐Ÿ•˜ 9:30 AM-12:00 NN
๐Ÿ• 1:30 PM - 4:30 PM

06/08/2026

PWEDE NA ANG ELECTRONIC NOTARIZATION ๐Ÿ“„

Maaari nang magpanotaryo ng mga dokumento na nasa PDF o PDF/A format sa pamamagitan ng electronic notarization, ayon sa Supreme Court (SC).

Inilunsad ng SC ang eNotarization para sa pagpapanotaryo ng mga electronic documents. Layon nitong gawing mas accessible at efficient ang legal services sa mga Pilipino.

Sa ilalim ng electronic notarization, haharap ang signatories sa isang electronic notary public. Maaari itong gawin nang personal, sa pamamagitan ng videoconferencing, o kombinasyon ng dalawa.

READ: https://news.tv5.com.ph/breaking/read/how-to-avail-of-supreme-courts-new-e-notarization-service

03/08/2026

NEW ISSUANCE: The Legal Education Board issues the Memorandum from the Office of the Chairperson No. 030, Series of 2026, inviting all Clinical Legal Education Program (CLEP) Supervising Lawyers to participate in the National CLEP Supervising Lawyers Survey in support of the Supreme Court's continuing initiative to assess the implementation of the CLEP.

As mentors and supervisors of law student practitioners, your insights are essential in evaluating the current implementation of CLEP, identifying its strengths and challenges, and shaping future enhancements that will further strengthen experiential legal education in the Philippines. Your valuable feedback will help ensure that the Program remains responsive to the evolving needs of legal education and the justice system while advancing its mission of promoting reflective legal practice, public service, and access to justice.

Supervising lawyers are encouraged to accomplish the survey on or before 10 August 2026. The questionnaire takes approximately thirty (30) minutes to complete and may be accessed through the link below:

Survey Link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/W2N3SZ5

All responses will be treated with the strictest confidentiality in accordance with the Data Privacy Act of 2012.

For questions or further clarification, please contact the LEB Secretariat through Ms. Anna Luisa O. Rosallosa of the Standards Development Unit at (02) 8231-1875 or [email protected].

Full issuance: https://bit.ly/MOCH-No-030s2026

RULING ALERThttps://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EZn9wVgQd/?mibextid=wwXIfr
16/07/2026

RULING ALERT
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EZn9wVgQd/?mibextid=wwXIfr

The (SC) has ruled that the infliction of psychological violence, if done through Facebook, is considered done through information and communications technology, which warrants the imposition of a higher penalty pursuant to Section 6 of RA 10175 or the ๐˜Š๐˜บ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ค๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ ๐˜—๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ˆ๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง 2012.

In a Resolution penned by Associate Justice Ramon Paul L. Hernando, the SCโ€™s First Division affirmed with modification its October 22, 2025 Decision (assailed Decision), which upheld the conviction of an individual (###) for committing psychological violence under Section 5(i) of Republic Act (RA) No. 9262, or the ๐˜ˆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช-๐˜๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ˆ๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ณ ๐˜Š๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ˆ๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง 2004 (Anti-VAWC Act) against his ex-girlfriend (AAA) by posting derogatory statements about her on Facebook.

The SC, however, resolved to raise the penalty by one degree, considering that the offense was committed through Facebook, as adequately alleged in the Information and established during trial.

AAA filed the VAWC case against her former partner ### after he posted a statement on Facebook calling her a dirty woman and an animal, and threatening to box her when he sees her. He repeated the insults in the comments to the post, which was public.

During trial, AAA presented screenshots of the Facebook post and testified that she had created for ### the Facebook account which made the post. Her two siblings testified that the account was ###โ€™s and that they received messages from him through the same account.

Despite ###โ€™s denial, the SC, in its assailed Decision, affirmed the decisions of the Family Court and the Court of Appeals (CA) convicting ###, stressing that in criminal cases, the prosecution must prove not only the elements of the crime but also the identity of the offender. The SC also upheld the penalty imposed by the CA, consisting of imprisonment for six months and one day to eight years and one day, a fine of PHP 100,000, and psychological counseling or psychiatric treatment.

Resolving ###โ€™s Motion for Reconsideration, the SC held that ###โ€™s authorship of the Facebook post was established beyond reasonable doubt, using the guideposts it established in its assailed Decision:

๐Ÿ. ๐€๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ ๐จ๐ซ ๐š๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ;
๐Ÿ. ๐๐ž๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฌ๐ž๐ž๐ง ๐š๐œ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐š๐œ๐œ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ ๐จ๐ซ ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ;
๐Ÿ‘. ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ค๐ง๐จ๐ฐ๐ง ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ ๐š ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ฐ ๐ฉ๐ž๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž;
๐Ÿ’. ๐‹๐š๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐š๐ ๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ง๐๐ž๐ซโ€™๐ฌ ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ซ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐ฌ;
๐Ÿ“. ๐‘๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฌ ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ž๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ž๐ซ, ๐ญ๐ž๐ฅ๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐œ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐š๐ง๐ฒ, ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐จ๐œ๐ข๐š๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐ž๐๐ข๐š ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ž, ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ž๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐œ ๐š๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฐ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ ๐ž๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐œ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐Ÿ๐ž๐š๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ, ๐š๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐›๐ฎ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ค๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐š๐œ๐œ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ;
๐Ÿ”. ๐€๐œ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฌ; ๐จ๐ซ
๐Ÿ•. ๐Ž๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฐ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ, ๐š๐œ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ, ๐จ๐ซ ๐š๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ.

The authorship of the Facebook post and all the elements of psychological violence having been established, the SC said Section 6 of the ๐˜Š๐˜บ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ค๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ ๐˜—๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ˆ๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง 2012 applies, which mandates the imposition of a penalty higher by one degree for crimes and offenses committed using ICT. The use of ICT can enable offenders to evade liability, reach more victims, or cause greater harm.

Citing the definition of ICT, the Court ruled that social media platforms, such as Facebook, qualify as ICT systems because they allow users to generate, send, receive, store, and process electronic data messages through computers, mobile phones, or similar electronic devices.

In this case, the Information alleged that ### made the Facebook post using his "Facebook Messenger Accountโ€ฆ which was set to public view." The SC ruled that this statement constitutes a sufficient allegation of the use of ICT as a qualifying circumstance. Even if the term "ICT" was not stated, the Information adequately informed ### that he is being charged of inflicting psychological violence upon AAA through Facebook, which falls under the contemplation of an ICT system.

The allegation was established by the prosecution during trial.

Thus, the Court increased the penalty by one degree from six months and one day to eight years and one day to imprisonment of six years and one day to 14 years, eight months, and one day, but retained the fined PHP 100,000. He was likewise ordered to undergo psychological counseling or psychiatric treatment.

Read the full text of the press release at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=168987

Read the full text of the Decision at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=168968

Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIOโ€™s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution

Address

Bacolod City
6100

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Telephone

+63347096135

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Batapa-Sigue & Sigue Law Office posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Batapa-Sigue & Sigue Law Office:

Shortcuts

Share