12/07/2023
𝐻𝑜𝑦 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝐻𝑜𝑦 𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑦 𝑢𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑟 ᴇɴ ʟᴏs ᴅᴇʟɪᴛᴏs ᴅᴇ ᴏᴍɪsɪᴏ́ɴ ᴀ ʟᴀ ᴀsɪsᴛᴇɴᴄɪᴀ ғᴀᴍɪʟɪᴀʀ (OAF) 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛 ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑙𝑎 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑝𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎́𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜́𝑛 𝑐𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑙.
𝑆𝑖 𝑏𝑖𝑒𝑛 𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜, 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑜 𝑎 𝑙𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑒𝑙 𝑗𝑢𝑒𝑧 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑙𝑎 𝑒𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜́𝑛 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑑 (𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎), 𝑦 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎 (𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑢𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑎, 𝑐𝑢𝑦𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑 𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑟 𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑙 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑢𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎).
☝️𝙀𝙡 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙗𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙖 𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙜𝙚, 𝑐𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑙 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑢𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎, 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎, 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑙𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑒 𝑒𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜 59 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝐶𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑃𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑙𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑛̃𝑎𝑙𝑎: “𝑠𝑖 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜́𝑛, 𝑒𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑜𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑒𝑙 𝑗𝑢𝑒𝑧 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑟𝑎́: 1.- 𝐴𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟; 2.- 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖́𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜́𝑛 ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑙𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑧𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑗𝑎𝑑𝑜. 𝐸𝑛 𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢́𝑛 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛̃𝑜𝑠; 𝑜, 3.- 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑙𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜́𝑛 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎.”
👉 𝙀𝙣 𝙨𝙞́𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙞𝙨, 𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑛 𝑐𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑒𝑙 𝑗𝑢𝑒𝑧 𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑙𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜́𝑛 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑂𝐴𝐹.
