13/10/2026
Someone is typing your best product into Google right now with their card out. Now open your ad account and check how much of last month's budget was waiting there to meet her. For a lot of stores, the honest answer is none of it.
And I get why it all ends up on social, right? That's where the attention is, the platforms make it easy, and the creative is more fun to make. But there's a difference the budget split ignores. Someone scrolling is in browsing mode; you're interrupting them and hoping. Someone typing your product category plus "NZ" into a search bar is in buying mode. They've raised their hand, today. And plenty of stores spend almost everything interrupting browsers while nobody's there to catch the hand-raisers.
And on a small budget that split matters more, not less, because interrupting people is a volume game, and volume is the one thing a smaller budget doesn't have. Catching intent isn't.
Now, to be fair, it's not either-or. Social builds the wanting, search catches the wanting. Both have a job. It's just that the split is rarely a decision anyone actually made. It's a default.
So run the boring check. Take your best product, find the exact phrase someone ready to buy it would type, and price what five hundred dollars would do there. Then set your split like it's a decision, because right now it's probably just a default you inherited.
Follow for budget decisions made on purpose. Save this for your next ad review.