LawReservior

LawReservior LawReservior is all about law research ,publishing and review of issues in the legal profession. It about adding value to the practice of law.

PJA: THE STORY OF THE FIRST FEMALE PROFESSOR OF LAWSince we debut with the Series of Legal Luminaries about 10 years ago...
11/02/2026

PJA: THE STORY OF THE FIRST FEMALE PROFESSOR OF LAW

Since we debut with the Series of Legal Luminaries about 10 years ago precisely in 2016 , the first female lawyer to feature in the Series is no other than the late Professor Jadesola Akande (PJA). She is the first among the 30 late Luminaries we have treated so far. What is common with all the 30 Luminaries is that although they are no longer in our midst, but their names continue to ring bell whenever they are mentioned in the circle of the legal profession.

Many new entrants to the legal profession may not be aware that the late Professor Jadesola Akande (PJA) was the first female Professor of law in Nigeria. She was the pioneer and founding Dean of the Faculty of Law, Lagos State University (LASU) established by Alhaji Lateef Jakande, the first executive Governor of the State during the Second Republic.She later became the first female Vice Chancellor of the university.

When she completed her legal education abroad and returned to Nigeria, she later applied as a legal officer to the Federal Ministry of Justice, but Dr. T. O. Elias , the then Federal Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice turned down her application.

Why did the great Elias turned down her application? What was the cold war that later ensued between her and Elias as the Dean of Law at the University of Lagos ?Why did late Hon. Justice Akinola Aguda choose her as the right person for the job at LASU?How did she put LASU in the world map?

Nowhere will you find answers to all the questions except in the Legal Luminaries Series 3. According to Dr. Monday Ubani, SAN that wrote the FOREWORD to the book:

"In an era when the ideas of the legal profession are increasingly challenged by societal change and internal decay,this book serves as a beacon, a reminder that true greatness in law is achieved not merely by learning,but by character,and not solely by success, but by service"

To place order for copies of the book , please call , text or Whatsapp 08055476823

HON JUSTICE JIBOWU: A CJN THAT NEVER WASAccording to the late Hon. Justice Sodeinde Sowemimo, a former Chief Justice of ...
11/02/2026

HON JUSTICE JIBOWU: A CJN THAT NEVER WAS

According to the late Hon. Justice Sodeinde Sowemimo, a former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Olumuyiwa Jibowu was one of the makers of what is today known as the "Nigerian Legal System". Apart from being the first African to be appointed as a Magistrate under the colonial rule, he was also the first Nigerian to become a High Court Judge.

In the words of the late Hon. Justice Atanda Fatayi-William, also a former CJN: " Of the few Nigerian Judges in those days, Mr. Justice Jibowu,later Sir Olumuyiwa Jibowu, Chief Justice of the Western Region , was easily the most brilliant and most hardworking. Being the first Nigerian ever to be appointed a Magistrate, he had to work much harder than his expatriate colleagues. An Oxford graduate with kind heart and deep consideration for the feelings of others, he made us all appreciate the value of hard work in the early days of our career at the Bar."

Before eventually becoming the Chief Justice of the Western Region, he had sat on the bench of the Supreme Court and even on many occasions acted as the CJN. Despite being the first to sit among many non-Nigerian jurists on the Supreme Court bench, why and how did he lose the race to become the first indigenous Chief Justice of Nigeria? How did Chief Obafemi Awolowo,SAN assess Sir Jibowu,Sir Mbanefo and Sir Ademola?

What were the things this great legal luminary did differently as a Magistrate, as a Judge of the High Court and that of the West African Court of Appeal (WACA)?

The answers are provided in the book "Legal Luminaries Series 3". Series 1 and 2 of the book is also available. These are the Series that teach you how to walk on the tight rope in the legal profession.

If you are interested in obtaining copies, please call ,text or Whatsapp 08055476823

NNAMDI KANU: THE IRONY OF SELF-DEFENCING IN LEGAL BATTLEBy : Abdulrasheed IbrahimIf you are faced with criminal charge b...
26/11/2025

NNAMDI KANU: THE IRONY OF SELF-DEFENCING IN LEGAL BATTLE

By : Abdulrasheed Ibrahim

If you are faced with criminal charge before a court and you are fortunate to have the trio of Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN, Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN and Paul Erokoro, SAN as your defence team, you can confidently step into the dock to face the legal battle. With the judgement of the Federal High Court delivered on the 20th November 2025, Nnamdi Kanu has denied many of us the privilege of listening to the robust defence and arguments the defence team would have put forward on his behalf coupled with the fact that you equally had Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN on the other side leading the prosecution. How I wish Nnamdi Kanu had allowed us to witness the great legal battle between the prosecution and the defence teams. Nnamdi Kanu spoilt the show by coming up with his theory of defending himself despite the appeal by the trial judge to him to reconsider his position. When the news broke out earlier that Kanu had disengaged his formidable defence team and elected to defend himself , I had no doubt in mind that he was embarking on a su***de mission.

There are cases in our law reports where some lawyers and non-lawyers had decided to handle their cases by themselves. It may not be a big deal when a lawyer decides to defend himself in a case in which he is personal involved, although, Lord Denning had warned against that. But when a person that is not a lawyer decides to do that in court, that may generate great interest as many people will like to see a person trying to embark on a journey of no return. There was a case of a Medical Doctor who believed himself to very learned and so intelligent that he decided to handle his case himself from the trial court to the Supreme Court where he was eventually told by OGUNDARE ,JSC of blessed memory in the case of IWEKA Vs. SCOA (2000) 15 WRN Pg. 128 Lines 5-10 that :

“I must pause here to make a short observation. It may be that the plaintiff is an intelligent and able medical practitioner. One thing is clear to me; he is not wise in the nuances of the legal profession. It is not enough to read up cases in the law reports and to cram up rules and legal principles read in the books, the correct application of these cases, rules and principles to a given situation is what makes the difference between the legal practitioner and the able medical practitioner. I doubt it much if the plaintiff is doing justice to his cause by conducting these proceedings himself given the intricate of the questions he has himself raised. His notice and grounds of appeal and other papers that have since been filed by him and his prolix and for most part irrelevant, arguments in his “brief” of arguments both in this court and in the court below bear testimony to this observation.”

That was in a civil case. Will it be a wise decision for a defendant who is not a lawyer opting to defend himself in a criminal case that bother on the issue of life and death? Although Nnamid Kanu is not a lawyer , but by his conducts in court, he always wants to prove to the world that he is more learned in law than the judges and the lawyers that are involved in his cases. When a client or defendant told his lawyer in court that “you keep quite while am talking” or telling the judge that “you do not know the law”, what do we call this kind of attitude? The judgment was delivered on 20th November 2025 in case that started at the Federal High Court in 2015. Ten years was spent at the trial court. Since this is a case that may not end at the trial court except it is resolved politically, this may be another long walk to the Court of Appeal and thereafter to the Supreme Court that will have the final saying just like the other case involving Nnamdi Kanu and the Federal Government which had earlier travelled the same way which the trial judge cited extensively in his judgment. To read through the 144 page judgment requires patience, endurance and the flair for reading. The judgment is not meant for those who do not like reading long essay because to appreciate the issues involved you must create time to read the entire judgment. At a stage ,I was wondering why the Defendant, Nnamdi Kanu would insist on defending himself in such a serious case ,even despite the appeal made to by the trial judge to have a rethink and allowed law experts to come in for him but the defendant remained adamant.

After the withdrawal by the defence team led by Chief Kanu Agabi (SAN) ,the trial judge said in his judgment that the : “Defendant confirmed this development and informed the court that he wished to represent himself in the trial”. The trial judge went further on the same page 45 of the judgment that:

“Upon exercising his right to defend himself , the Defendant came on the next adjourned date and his excuse was that he was not given his case file by his departing counsel .This is was no doubt another case of delay on his part. The following day, the Defendant appeared for himself and began challenging the jurisdiction of the court arguing that there was no charge against him and that the medical report certifying him fit was allegedly doctored. The court patiently explained to him that some of the issues he was raising had been treated in the no case submission and some other issues could be raised during final address. The court then advised him to engaged counsel who are experts in criminal litigation due to the seriousness of the charge against him. The Court also offered to secure the services of counsel from the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria or a private legal practitioner willing to take the matter pro bono which were all rejected by the Defendant. The Court continued to appeal to him and even went as far as begging him in the name of God to please engage Counsel and open his defence all of which fell on deaf ears”

This has shown one of the differences between a lawyer learned in law that opts to defend himself and a non-lawyer not learned in law but elects to defend himself just like Nnamdi Kanu in this case. Ordinarily a lawyer defending himself that has earlier raised a point which has been ruled upon by the court will have no business raising the issue again for it to be ruled upon again as that court has become functus officio and lacks the power to deal with that issue again. A defendant defending himself and who does not know the law will always think anything can go in our courts which is not so. There was a story of a defendant who was once charged for a criminal offence before a High Court and insisted on defending himself and just like being given enough rope to hang himself, he began to bring and file applications under the High Court Civil Procedure Rules to the amazement of every lawyer in court. In this part of the world people are unnecessarily abusing the constitutional right to defend themselves.

There are people including lawyers that am very sure are yet to read the full judgment of the trial judge but have unfortunately began to give negative remarks on the judgment which I consider to be very unfair to the trial judge. Some of our colleagues have been writing the likes of seminar papers as if they are sitting on appeal on that judgment rather than waiting for what may eventually be the verdicts of the appellate court if the case finally goes on appeal. Most of the issues they are wrongly canvassing have been dealt with by the trial judge in his judgment and this can only be set aside by the appellate court superior to that trial court. Without prejudice to the right possesses by Nnamdi Kanu to appeal the judgment in question, has he, if one may ask , done justice to himself in the cause of the proceedings before the trial court when he had the opportunity of being defended by law experts who are brilliant Senior Advocates of Nigeria whose services he discountenanced with ? Is he ready and still going to argue his appeal himself at the Court of Appeal through to the Supreme Court particularly in a case where he had rested his case on that of the prosecution?

Different narratives have been going round which are more of blackmailing than facing the reality. The wrong narratives are not confined to Nigeria alone as there are also foreign interests trying to mislead people. How does one explain or interpret this online news’ caption that says: “US Lawmaker James Cites Nnamdi Kanu’s Life Sentence As Evidence of Religious Persecution in Nigeria During Fiery Congressional Hearing”? Has that US lawmaker read the judgment in question to justify such position? It is only those that are wicked and very unreasonable that will be happy about what has been going on in this country for years as far as security situation is concerned. I had a cold war with some colleagues when I reacted to that misleading caption as follow:

“I personally have written extensively on how terrorism can be tackled through intelligence and technology but when you have leaders that behave like deaf and dumb, the problem will continue to persist. My worry on the position of some US lawmakers and Trump is that they continue to bring religious flavor into their hypocrisy as if it is only one particular group that has been victim of terrorists’ madness in this country. If they really meant well , their concern should be about how to assist the country with technology and intelligence to nip the madness of the terrorists in the bud. At least US was said to have once entered into this country to liberate their citizens from the terrorists.”

One continues to be disturbed the rate at which terrorists are making lives difficult for people in different parts of this country and the government is yet unable to nip all these irrational killing in the bud. Since the likes of Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, former Governor of Kaduna State and Dr. Dauda Lawal, Governor of Zamfara State have disclosed that the terrorists’ hideouts are known, why the government’s refusal to move against them? Is the government comfortable with the killings being unleashed on the people irrespective of the ethnic and religious affiliation? Is it not worrisome and disheartened that school children and their teachers have become the main target of the terrorists? The terrorists have been over pampered in this country with ransom and negotiations. They have now constituted themselves as the kings of the jungles. There was an unfortunate story of a retired military officer that was kidnapped by bandits and his colleagues had to open a whatsapp group to mobilize ransom for his release. If this could happen to a military officer, what will be the fate of an ordinary Nigerian?

The burden of getting rid of terrorism in this country squarely lies on the desk of the President who must be bold, courageous and very daring in the interest and security of the Nigerian people who elected him. There must not be any sacred cow. Let those sponsoring terrorism be exposed and be made to face the law. If Nnamdi Kanu can be jailed for terrorism, let those others sponsoring terrorists be named and faced the law. The President must heed the advice of Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN that :

“The problems have been there, but we should stop pretending. There are people who claim to be citizens but do not love this country. You cannot sabotage your country and get away with it .Why are we not naming names? Why are we describing a spade as an agricultural instrument when we know who is desecrating the house? People talk in this country as if they are above the law.”

The rhetoric has been on for years that the sponsors of terrorists are known but why then the fear or refusal to name and arrest them. Under the military setting if certain people no matter how high they are and are known for sponsoring a failed coup, they are immediately arrested and put on trial. Why the fear all these years to expose the sponsors of the terrorists? Nobody should be allowed to take this country for granted. Since Justice Omotosho has declared that Nnamdi Kanu cannot arrogate any power to himself, clear warning must also be sent to the sponsors of the terrorists. The learned jurist was very instructive on page 102 of his judgment:

“The Defendant is not the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and lacks any power to so declare a sit-at-home in any part of the country. The Defendant arrogated to himself powers he lacks and with the threat of violence ordered the residents of the South Eastern states to stay at home or face the consequences of their disobedience .This an unconstitutional act which is subversive and amounts to nothing more than a terrorist act. It is a notorious fact that the people of the South East have been subjected to sit-at –home threats on Mondays for years”.

Let those condemning the trial judge for his judgment debunk this obvious fact. It is those living in another planet that will accuse the jurist of crying more than the people of the South East. I dare say Nnamdi Kanu should consider himself lucky for being sentenced to life imprisonment. One just hopes that if he eventually files his appeal against that judgment, the prosecution will not be forced to file a counter-appeal that he deserves more than what he got before the trial judge. It was in a situation similar to this in the case of ODULAMI Vs. NIGERIAN NAVY (2018) AFLR (Pt. 3) Pg. 174, Paras 20-35, that made AKAAHS , JSC to wonder that:

“I am surprised that the respondent did not file a cross-appeal against the verdict of the Court-Martial in not finding the appellant guilty of murder but manslaughter and sentencing him to life imprisonment .The facts as revealed by the prosecution is a case of pre-mediated murder borne out of pride, arrogance and lack of respect for human life. The appellant valued his car more than the life of the deceased. He therefore did not realize the heinous crime he had committed and instead of thanking his God from saving him from the hangman’s noose, has had the temerity to ask for an order of this court to set aside the order dismissing him from the Nigeria Navy and directing his re-instatement to his rank without loss of seniority, promotion and other privileges to which he is entitled. The only privilege he is entitled to , is to be kept away for the rest of his life in prison in the hope that he will show remorse for what he did to unjustly take away a precious life and beg God for forgiveness.”

Unlike in the above case where it was not only a single soul that fell victim of the arrogant Navy officer, in that of Nnamdi Kanu numerous souls fell victims particularly in the South East, of the Defendant’s “ threat of violence ordered the residents of the South Eastern states to stay at home or face the consequences of their disobedience” to borrow from the words of the trial judge who must be commended for his wonderful comportment in the face of insults and arrogance hauled and displayed by the Defendant throughout the proceedings. The Defendant was appealed to , to allowed to be defended by great lawyers who are experts in the law of criminal litigation but the Defendant insisted that he is more learned in law to defend himself. But where has that his knowledge of law taken him to? Unlike the Achebe proverbial fly that had no one to advise it and to follow the co**se to the grave, but Nnamdi Kanu got advice but deliberately decided to follow his own wish. Wishing him the best in his planned appeal to the appellate court!

NOTE: Anyone is at liberty to disagree with my above submissions as I will surely appreciate a balanced, fair and objective rebuttal

08055476823, 08164683735
:[email protected]

26th November 2025

STILL AVAILABLE LAW PRACTICE KIT (Second Edition)By: Abdulrasheed Ibrahim,LL.M, Notary Public INSIDE THE BOOK :*2161 Leg...
31/07/2025

STILL AVAILABLE

LAW PRACTICE KIT (Second Edition)

By: Abdulrasheed Ibrahim,LL.M, Notary Public

INSIDE THE BOOK :

*2161 Legal Issues
*2161 Settled Principles of Laws
*117 Remarkable Pronouncements by the Supreme Court Jurists
*128 Justices of the Supreme Court
*272 Justices of the Court of Appeal
*916 Pages in Hard Cover
*A Practice Book like no other!

To place order for your copy or copies , please contact: 08055476823, 08164683735

30k per copy excluding delivery charge

STILL SELLING LAW PRACTICE KIT (Second Edition)By: Abdulrasheed Ibrahim,LL.M, Notary PublicRESEARCH MADE EASYInside the ...
28/06/2025

STILL SELLING

LAW PRACTICE KIT (Second Edition)

By: Abdulrasheed Ibrahim,LL.M, Notary Public

RESEARCH MADE EASY

Inside the book👇

Action
Administration of Estate
Administrative Law
Admiralty Law
Agency
Attorney General
Appeal
Arbitration
Banking
Chieftaincy Matters
Civil Procedure & Practice
Company Law & Practice
Constitutional Law & Practice
Contempt of Court
Contract
Court
Criminal Law & Practice
Customary Law & Practice
Damages
Defamation
Documents
Election Petition & Matters
Estoppel
Evidence
Fair Hearing
Family Law & Practice
Fundamental Rights
Injunction
Interpretation of Statute
Islamic Law & Practice
Judgment & Order
Judicial Precedent
Jurisdiction
Labour Law & Practice
Land Law & Practice
Land Use Act
Landlord & Tenant
Lease
Legal Practitioner
Locus Standi
Mortgage
Negligence
Parties
Petroleum Law & Practice
Preliminary Objection
Public Protection Act & Law
Registration of Title
Statue of Limitation
Stay of Ex*****on
Stay of Proceeding
Trust
Tort

117 JJSC's Remarkable Pronouncements.

A practice book like no other!

All in 916 Pages in Hard Cover

N30,000 per copy excluding delivery charge to your doorstep.

To place order for your copy or copies contact: 08055476823;08164683735

LAW PRACTICE KIT (Second Edition)By: Abdulrasheed Ibrahim,LL.M, Notary Public A PRACTICE BOOK LIKE NO OTHER A WEAPON TO ...
30/04/2025

LAW PRACTICE KIT (Second Edition)

By: Abdulrasheed Ibrahim,LL.M, Notary Public

A PRACTICE BOOK LIKE NO OTHER

A WEAPON TO WIN LEGAL BATTLE

Action
Administration of Estate
Administrative Law
Admiralty Law
Agency
Attorney General
Appeal
Arbitration
Banking
Chieftaincy Matters
Civil Procedure & Practice
Company Law & Practice
Constitutional Law & Practice
Contempt of Court
Contract
Court
Criminal Law & Practice
Customary Law & Practice
Damages
Defamation
Documents
Election Petition & Matters
Estoppel
Evidence
Fair Hearing
Family Law & Practice
Fundamental Rights
Injunction
Interpretation of Statute
Islamic Law & Practice
Judgment & Order
Judicial Precedent
Jurisdiction
Labour Law & Practice
Land Law & Practice
Land Use Act
Landlord & Tenant
Lease
Legal Practitioner
Locus Standi
Mortgage
Negligence
Parties
Petroleum Law & Practice
Preliminary Objection
Public Protection Act & Law
Registration of Title
Statue of Limitation
Stay of Ex*****on
Stay of Proceeding
Trust
Tort

117 JJSC's Remarkable Pronouncements.

All in 916 Pages in Hard Cover

N30,000 per copy excluding delivery charge to your doorstep.

To place order for your copy or copies contact: 08055476823;08164683735

LAW PRACTICE KIT (Second Edition)GROUNDS COVERED Action Administration of EstateAdministrative LawAdmiralty LawAgencyAtt...
02/04/2025

LAW PRACTICE KIT (Second Edition)

GROUNDS COVERED

Action
Administration of Estate
Administrative Law
Admiralty Law
Agency
Attorney General
Appeal
Arbitration
Banking
Chieftancy Matters
Civil Procedure & Practice
Company Law & Practice
Constitutional Law & Practice
Contempt of Court
Contract
Court
Criminal Law & Practice
Customary Law & Practice
Damages
Defamation
Documents
Election Petition & Matters
Estoppel
Evidence
Fair Hearing
Family Law & Practice
Fundamental Rights
Injunction
Interpretation of Statute
Islamic Law & Practice
Judgment & Order
Judicial Precedent
Jurisdiction
Labour Law & Practice
Land Law & Practice
Land Use Act
Landlord & Tenant
Lease
Legal Practitioner
Locus Standi
Mortgage
Negligence
Parties
Petroleum Law & Practice
Preliminary Objection
Public Protection Act & Law
Registration of Title
Statue of Limitation
Stay of Ex*****on
Stay of Proceeding
Trust
Tort
117 JJSC's Remarkable Pronouncements.

All in 916 Pages in Hard Cover

A Practice Book Like No Other !

N30,000 per copy excluding delivery charge to your doorstep.

To place order for your copy or copies contact: 08055476823;08164683735

NOW AVAILABLE LAW PRACTICE KIT (Second Edition)INSIDE THE BOOK :*2161 Legal Issues *2161 Settled Principles of Laws *117...
27/03/2025

NOW AVAILABLE

LAW PRACTICE KIT (Second Edition)

INSIDE THE BOOK :

*2161 Legal Issues

*2161 Settled Principles of Laws

*117 Remarkable Pronouncements by the Supreme Court Jurists

*128 Justices of the Supreme Court

*272 Justices of the Court of Appeal

*916 Pages in Hard Cover

*A Practice Book like no other!

N30,000 per copy per copy excluding the delivery charge to your doorstep.

To place order for your copy or copies ,call or text 08055476823, 08164683735

IBB'S MEMOIR, HIS DISCIPLE AND THE REST OF USBy : Abdulrasheed IbrahimSince the public presentation of General Ibrahim B...
23/03/2025

IBB'S MEMOIR, HIS DISCIPLE AND THE REST OF US

By : Abdulrasheed Ibrahim

Since the public presentation of General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida (IBB)'s memoir, the former military leader’s book has continued to generate one reaction or the other. I also joined in the reactions with what I called: “IBB: A Critiques of A Journey in Service” expressing disagreement on some of the narratives contained in the memoir. Mr Adam Adedimeji, the incumbent Chairman of the Lawyers in the Media (LIM) of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), who happens to be a very good friend of mine thereafter sent me a link to the rebuttal written by Mr Kassim Afegbua titled : “ Babangida, His Memoir, And His Critics” which I read with keen interest . I must confess I admire Mr Afegbua for being a very loyal disciple of IBB and the defence he has put forward on behalf of his boss. Any leader whether in or out of power needs the like of Mr Afegbua. He is not the type that will flee when his boss finds himself in a very difficult situation. His arguments in defence of his boss are very power and revealing. This my rejoinder becomes necessary to ask questions on some of the issues raised by him in defence of IBB. Mr Afegbua said this about IBB which I do not have any issue with:

“Indeed, what is written in his 420-page memoirs are snippets of who IBB truly is , what he actually represents, and the totality of his roles in the leadership of Nigeria, dictated by his career in the military throughout his military presidency of Nigeria for eight years. Babangida is a colossus; an encyclopaedia of idea and knowledge; and he applied these, when he called the shots.”

The brilliance of IBB when in power was not in doubt but the fact still remains that it is one thing to be brilliant and it is another thing to be honest and sincere. IBB was opportune to work with great and wonderful Nigerians who were among the best in their respective professions who offered to serve under IBB as Ministers and advisers without knowing that the transition program piloted by IBB would end up in a mess .When you cast back your mind into history and check IBB’s list of those he assigned responsibilities during his reign, you will not fail to see the likes of Prince Bola Ajibola who was once put in charge of the Ministry of Justice; Dr Olukoye Ramsome Kuti in charge of Health ;Professor Babatunde Fafunwa in charge of Education not even to talk about the likes of Professors Omo Omoruyi and Humphery Nwosu. Let us add Hon. Justice A.N. Aniagolu as Chairman of the Constituent Assembly who later wrote a book titled: “ The Making of the 1989 Constitution of Nigeria” under the prolonged IBB’s transition program. But what did we have at the end of that long eight year? I read somewhere long time ago that the late Professor Fafunwa later expressed regret serving under the IBB.

Mr Afegbua has stated in his defence that he was : “ amused by the claims of one Mr Femi Falana who boasted of seeking legal redress for the noisy recognition ,saying that he remains an actor for the civil society groups. We are still waiting for his litigation”. This is unfortunately the kind of response you get in this part of the world where leaders are not made to be accountable for their misdeeds when in office and this is more the reason why most leaders misbehave when in offices. For those of us that may not be interested in going to the court of law to ventilate our grievances, we will prefer to stay in the court of public opinion to continue expressing our views for the sake of history. Pen, they say is mightier than the gun or sword! One of the blunders of history I discovered in Mr Afegbua’s defence of IBB was where he stated that :

“IBB ran a military government after a successful coup on 27 August 1985. Late Abacha was his accomplice during the operation .Late M.K.O Abiola was one of the sponsors of the coup and was also the one who reportedly told his friend King Abdallah of Saudi Arabia to extend an invitation to General Tunde Idiagbon and his eleven year old son to come for Holy Pilgrimage as his personal guests. That was how they got Idiagbon out of the scene, making it easy to remove General Muhammadu Buhari as Head of State, in a bloodless manner. Earlier, M.K.O. Abiola had gotten involved in the 1983 coup that ousted President Shehu Shagari”

While one may not again doubt the brilliance of IBB in the art of coup planning as depicted in the above conspiracy, one fact that the IBB’s disciple got wrong was that as at the time Idiagbon left the country for Saudi Arabia in 1985, King Fahd was the King of Saudi Arabia and Abdallah did not become King of Saudi Arabia until 2005 and that was about 20 years thereafter. Another irony in the above assertion is that both Abiola and Idiagbon are today dead men that cannot speak to defend themselves from their respective graves. I remember reading it in the Newswatch Magazine during the 20 months detention of Buhari and Idiagbon after the overthrow of their government that Idiagbon then was writing a book (probably his autobiography) which no one now may be able to say anything about what eventually became of the book manuscripts excerpt members of Idiagbon’s his family.

Another critic of IBB’s memoir, Dr. Nelson Ogbemudia, a son of the late Brigadier Samuel Ogbemudia, a former military governor of Midwest State, also in his critique expressed disappointment on the IBB’s memoir when he said: “ I have been very curious to see some secret documents coming out to light during the book launch , but I got really disappointed by Gen. IBB. What is IBB afraid of, death or what? You are at the twilight of your days on earth. Nigeria is in a Blackpool, there are international conspiracies that must be shared or revealed to enlighten this generation of future leaders. If not, the need to unearth and put the facts out to the public is sacrosanct. Some secret should not die with these men”. I became baffled when Dr. Ogbemudia went further to say :

“From what I read; Karma caught up with Abiola who facilitated the meeting of Col. S**a Buka Dimka . Who met with the CIA and British Intelligence, in London to mastermind and facilitate the assassination of Murtala Muhammad in 1976, because both nations interest were being undermined and side lined by General Murtala.”

But the question I asked myself when I came across the above assertion was that then: why did Dimka refuse to mention Abiola in his confession where he indicted the likes of Bisalla and General Gowon who was stripped of his rank and all his entitlements because of that indictment?

It was IBB that during his reign that restored General Gowon’s full rank and paid all his entitlements. From the IBB’s story of Dimka coup on the Pages 99- 103 of his memoir , no reference was made to Abiola. The only civilian said indicted and executed for the coup was one Abdulkarim Zakari. Brigadier Samuel Ogbemudia and Moses Gowon who were also tried for the coup were acquitted. Was there any cover up or any attempt to blackmail the dead?

I observed there are different narratives about Abiola including being said to be a serial sponsor of coups with a view to discourage any sympathy for him on the annulment of the June 12 by IBB who once proclaimed during his reign that : “ We don’t know who will succeed us but we know those who will not succeed us ”. If IBB truly knew that Abiola was in the list of those he would not want to succeed him, why did he allow him to take part in the June 12 election in the first place? It is on the record that Abiola contacted IBB earlier to know whether he was committed to the returning the country to the civil rule before he joined the electoral race.IBB during his transition program employed to a great extent his power to ban and unban politicians under the impression that he wanted to allow only newbreed politicians into the political system rather than those they called old breed politicians.

Abacha family was taken to the dry cleaner's laundry by Mr. Afegbua for daring to call IBB a liar and weakling .He assisted the public with enough information about Abacha regime particularly on the atrocities he committed against the Nigerian people and his looting of the country’s treasury. If a spade must be called by its true name, the reality was that Abacha happened to Nigeria for about another five years because IBB refused to do the right thing for the country as he promised for the good eight years because he said he found himself between the devil and the deep blue sea. This was what IBB told the nation on 26th June 1993 :

“It is true that the presidential election was generally seen to be free, fair and peaceful. However , there was in fact a huge array of electoral malpractice virtually in all states of the federation before the actual voting began .About 2.1 billion naira was spent by both presidential candidates. We have authenticated reports of electoral malpractice against party agents, NEC officials and the electorates, who were manipulated through offer and acceptance of money and other forms of inducement…The conduct of the election , the behaviour of the candidates and post- election responses continued to elicit signals which the nation can only ignore at its peril…To proclaim and swear in a president who has encouraged a campaign of divide and rule amongst our various ethnic groups would have been detrimental to the survival of the third republic.”

But ironically about 32 years after we are now being told different things of apology and taking responsibility as if that will remedy the unjust atrocities that had been perpetrated against innocent Nigerians during that dark period of IBB and Abacha regimes .I concur with Dr. Nelson Ogbemudia when he said : “Your Book launch was a camouflage, distortion, half-baked truth ,misleading ,deceptive and unfortunate .We are not idiots”. But Mr Afegbua, wants the world to believe that IBB was the best thing that ever happened to the country. I completely disagree with him. Colonel Abubakar Dangiwa Umar in an interview with the Weekend Concord of 27th April 1996 had this to say:

“The history of this country will be written one day ; it would not be written on the pages of newspapers. Some people will write books in the future and you will get to know who did what. You will even get to know that IBB himself was a victim. But to just annul the election, hand over to a civilian and go back to Minna , there must be something to it .I advised researchers to find out, who took him hostage? Who advised him to annul the election and what was the role of the individual members of the National Defence and Security Council in the annulment?”

I believe IBB by his memoir has answered some of these questions. I do not want to agree that IBB was a victim of someone but rather a victim of his own personal ambition that he would one day become an unelected President of this country as revealed by General Abubakar Abdulsalami during the book launch that a soothsayer once predicted that to them. No wonder that Lasisi Olagunju , a columnist and another critic of IBB’s memoir was trying to spot the difference between Shakespearean Macbeth and the IBB when he said : “Like Macbeth , IBB joined the army and rose to become a General .Again, like Macbeth , the Thane of Cawdor prophecy came true for Babangida and he became Chief of Army Staff .Finally ,like Macbeth, he became king and pronounced himself president and proceeded to do as Macbeth did until he left almost the Macbeth way. If you had been wondering why the amiable General from Minna chose ‘president’ as his official title, now you know it was in fulfilment of a prophecy.”

As a student of history, my findings from the study of IBB was that he had the ambition and would have been more comfortable becoming a life President in power rather than being a mere president. If such experiment was successful in countries like Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea for instance among some other African countries where the dictators have had their ways, then why not in Nigeria? This was probably where friction set in between IBB and his co-travellers particularly Abacha in the ship of purported transition program to civil rule that was not really meant to be. We live in the country where everybody is interested in power to lead the country.

If you disagree with this my thought or theory, please answer these questions: IBB having blamed Gowon for breaking his promise to return the country to the civil rule, why did IBB himself follow the same path? IBB having blamed Obasanjo for organizing a hasty transition to civil rule, why did IBB in eight years not able to organize a successful transition to civil rule? IBB specifically referred to these two incidents in his memoir and said he would try to avoid those mistakes , then why did he fail to do that ? I hope Mr. Kassim Afegbua, the disciple will assist us with convincing and cogent answers!

In all honesty, unlike many Nigerians, there was a great political sage in the country then who had seen it all coming and refused to get excited. In 1986, IBB inaugurated what has come to be known in history as Professor Samuel Cookey Political Bureau to fashion out a new political order for Nigeria. Remember I mentioned Hon. Justice A.N. Aniagolu earlier who later served as Chairman of the Constituent Assembly put together by IBB. In Professor Cookey’s wisdom, he extended an invitation to the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo, who in his reply stated as follows:

“…I received your letter of February 28, 1986, and sincerely thank you for doing me the honor of inviting me to contribute to the National Political Debate. The purpose of the debate is to clarify our thoughts in our search for a new social order. It is therefore neat and proper that all those who have something to contribute should do so. I do fervently and will continue fervently to pray that I may be proved wrong. FOR SOMETHING WITHIN ME TELLS ME, LOUD AND CLEAR, THAT WE HAVE EMBARKED ON A FRUITLESS SEARCH.AT THE END OF THE DAY, WHEN IMAGINE THAT THE NEW ORDER IS HERE, WE WOULD BE TERRIBLY DISAPPOINTED. In other words , at the threshold of our New Social Order, we would see for ourselves that , as long as Nigerians remains what they are, nothing clean , principles , ethical , and idealistic can work with them. And Nigerians will remain what they are , unless the evils which now dominate their hearts, at all levels and sectors of our political , business and governmental activities are exorcised. But I venture to assert that they will not be exorcised and indeed they will be firmly entrenched ,unless God Himself imbues a vast majority of us with a revolutionary change of attitude to life and politics or, unless the dialectic processes which have been at work for some twenty years now, perforce ,make us perceive the abominable filth that abounds in our society , to the end that an inexorable abhorrence of it will be quickened in our hearts and impel us to make drastic changes for the better. There is of course , an alternative option open to us. To succumb to permanent social instability and chaos. In the premises, I beg to decline your invitation”.

Who says Awo who died the following year, 1987 was not great? In 1986, he talked about “for something within me tells me ,loud and clear, that we have embarked on a fruitless search. At the end of the day ,when imagine that the new order is here ,we would be TERRIBLY DISAPPOINTED”. About 7 years later, IBB came to the air to prove the late Sage right when he said to the Nigerians :

“I address you today with deep sense of world history and particularly of the history of our great country. In the aftermath of the recently annulled President election, I feel, as I believe you yourself feel , a profound sense of DISAPPOINTMENT at the outcome of our efforts at laying the foundation of a viable democratic system of government in Nigeria. I therefore wish, on behalf of myself and members of the National Defence and Security Council and indeed of my entire administration, to feel with my fellow countrymen and women for the cancellation of the election. It was a rather DISAPPOINTING EXPERIENCE in the course of carrying through the last election of the transition to the civil rule programme.”

The IBB’s memoir is not without great lesson in leadership. The actions of leaders will surely be judged by their intentions. In Leadership, there must be sincerity of purpose which must not be about oneself but about what is good for the entire nation. There may not be anything bad in aspiring for leadership but such must be guided with true spirit of service to the people rather than desperation to be selfish. It is not the number of years spent in power that matters but the positive and enduring legacies that leaders are able to leave behind with which they will continue to live positively in the hearts of the people even when the leaders are no longer alive. In leadership , brilliance is one thing ,honesty and sincerity is another. Leaders in whatever position must be ready to learn from history as those who refuse to learn from history will surely become victims of history. God bless Nigeria!

NOTE: Anyone is at liberty to disagree with my above submissions as I will surely appreciate a balanced, fair and objective rebuttal.

08055476823, 0816468375

[email protected]

23rd March 2025

Address

Abdulrasheed Ibrahim & Associates (Legal Practitioners) , 208, Ikorodu Road, Palm Grove
Lagos

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when LawReservior posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to LawReservior:

Share