20/07/2023
Let me start by saying that whereas a Legislature may be a "rubber stamp" of the Executive, the Judiciary NEVER is.
Even during the darkest days of the worst military dictatorship, the Judiciary stood firm and upright in its constitutional role of remaining fearlessly independent.
Why is this so?
I make bold to say that it is because every Judge understands that his/her Judgement is subject to scrutiny. This scrutiny is unlimited. It includes the scrutiny of the general public and one's own peers. The public and peers here referred to may not even be limited to one's country or locality. They could be international. Law reports are read worldwide. Someone in New Zealand or India or Canada could stumble across the Judgement of a Judge sitting at the Federal High Court in Port Harcourt. If it isn't well written, if it isn't transparently honest, eventually the entire world will know!
Which is why, certain rules have been formulated to guide Judges in writing a "Good Judgement".
In the Supreme Court decision in the case of ADEYEYE v AJIBOYE (1987) 3 NWLR (pt.61) 432, 451 pp. A - C as per Aniagolu JSC, these rules were summarised as follows;
1. Set out the claims of the parties
2. Set out the issues arising
3. Put the case on an imaginary scale
4. Consider the evidence in proof of each issue, then
5. Decide which side to believe based on the preponderance of credible evidence and the probabilities of the case
6. Record logical and consequent findings of fact
7. Discuss the applicable law against the background of findings of fact.
Whenever these rules are followed and applied, the result would be referred to by the public and one's peers locally and internationally as a "good Judgement".
Conversely, where these rules are not observed and applied, such Judgement would be met with disapproval and raised eyebrows by one's peers locally and internationally.
It is respectfully submitted in conclusion therefore that a "good Judgement" will not rubber stamp the claim of a party before it, where such a claim has been contested by the other party.
I submit accordingly.