Fola Awonusi & Co. Legal Practitioners and Arbitrators

Fola Awonusi & Co. Legal Practitioners and Arbitrators A General Practice Law Firm

Legally yours &Co
10/07/2026

Legally yours
&Co

*“Hijab Right Waived By School Undertaking” — Court Of Appeal In Split 2-1 Ruling Holds ISI Private School Not Bound By ...
03/07/2026

*“Hijab Right Waived By School Undertaking” — Court Of Appeal In Split 2-1 Ruling Holds ISI Private School Not Bound By Public-School Hijab Precedent*

_Justice Fadawu Umar dissented from the majority decision, delivering a minority judgment that upheld the Oyo State High Court's decision granting the use of hijab by female Muslim students of ISI._

_*For Innovative NBA Secretariat, Vote Okey Leo Ohagba 4 NBA General Secretary✅*_
______
_*For a BOLDER BAR that puts MEMBERS FIRST Vote Oyinkansola Badejo-Okusanya, SAN for PRESIDENT✅*_

The Court of Appeal sitting in Ibadan has overturned a judgment of the Oyo State High Court that permitted female Muslim students of the University of Ibadan International School (ISI) to wear hijab with their school uniforms, holding in a split 2-1 decision that the school is a private institution....

*TAKE NOTE: It is a criminal offence in Nigeria to accept cash payment for the sale of a Car or a landed property*Thus i...
01/07/2026

*TAKE NOTE: It is a criminal offence in Nigeria to accept cash payment for the sale of a Car or a landed property*

Thus in the case of ALIYU v. FRN (2026) LPELR-83493(SC).

"It is apropos, perforce, to place on record that the appellant was charged with accepting cash payment for the sale of landed property contrary to the provision of Section 22(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act.

It is germane to pluck it out, verbatim ac litteratim, whence it is domiciled quietly in the statute book.

It states:
22. Payments for certain goods
(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any enactment or law and except as provided in Subsection (2) of this Section, no person shall, in Nigeria, make or accept cash payment, whether denominated in foreign currency or not, for the purchase of acquisition of the following:
(a) landed properties;
(b) securities, including stocks, shares, debentures and all forms of negotiable instruments; and
(c) motor cars, including other vehicles of any description whatsoever.
(2) Payments for the items specified in Subsection (1) of this Section shall, as from the commencement of this Act, be made by means of bank transfers or cheques drawn on banks in Nigeria only.

The elements of the offence preferred against the appellant can be harvested from the provision catalogued supra.

Thus, the ingredients of the offence, which the respondent has the bounden duty to establish beyond reasonable doubt, are, videlicet: (a) The defendant must be a person, whether juristic or natural person. (b) There must be a landed property. (c) "The landed property must have been sold for valuable consideration i.e money. (d) The defendant received/accepted cash payment for the sale of the landed property.".

Per OGBUINYA ,J.S.C

09/06/2026

*The law will not protect what you didn’t read*

In 2019, Damilola Savage was the most promising young lawyer in Lagos.

Sharp. Hungry. Beautiful mind.

She had one dream: to make partner at Okonkwo & Associates before 35.

What she didn’t know was that the firm had already decided her fate — before she walked through the door on her first day.

Okonkwo & Associates occupied the entire 14th floor of a glass tower on Adeola Odeku Street, Victoria Island.

Senior Partner — Chief Emeka Okonkwo, SAN.

62 years old. Silver-haired. Yale-educated. A man who had drafted legislation that shaped modern Nigeria.

And a man who did not lose.

Damilola had joined straight from Lagos Law School. First class. Best graduating student.

Chief Okonkwo had personally recruited her.

“You remind me of myself,” he told her at the hiring dinner at Nok by Alara.

She should have asked what he meant by that.

She didn’t.

For four years, she worked like the building would collapse if she left.

Nights. Weekends. Public holidays.

She billed more hours than any associate in the firm’s 30-year history.

Her name was on every major deal. Her fingerprints were on a ₦4.2 billion acquisition that made the front page of BusinessDay.

She was untouchable.

Or so she thought.

In March 2023, Chief Okonkwo called her into his corner office.

Floor-to-ceiling windows. A view of the Lagos Lagoon that made you feel like God.

“Damilola,” he said, leaning back in his leather chair.

“We’re making you partner.”

She felt her eyes burn. Held it together. Barely.

“Effective when?” she asked.

“June 1st,” he said.

She walked out of that office and cried in the bathroom for seven minutes.

The partnership agreement arrived on her desk two weeks later.

47 pages.

She was tired. She was happy. She trusted Chief Okonkwo.

She signed on page 47 without reading pages 1 through 46.

This is where the story truly begins.

The clause was on page 31.

Paragraph 14(c).

“In the event of dissolution, departure, or termination — voluntary or otherwise — the Partner hereby waives all rights to client relationships, matters originated, and revenue generated from accounts introduced to the firm during the period of association.”

In plain English?

Every client she had brought. Every deal she had built. Every relationship she had cultivated for four years.

Belonged to Okonkwo & Associates.

Not to her.

She didn’t know.

For eight months, everything was perfect.

Her name was on the letterhead.
Partner. Corporate & Commercial.

She had an office now — not a cubicle.
She had an assistant named Rotimi who brought her green tea without being asked.

She was, by every measure, winning.

Then in February 2024, she got a call.

Dangote Agro. One of her oldest clients — she’d been their outside counsel since they were a ₦200 million startup.

They were now worth ₦11 billion.
And they wanted her to lead a landmark merger.

The fee: ₦180 million.

She called Chief Okonkwo to discuss resource allocation.

He listened quietly.

Then he said: “I’ll be handling Dangote Agro personally from now on.”

Silence.

“I’m sorry?” she said.

Page 31, paragraph 14(c),” he said.

Not unkindly. Almost gently. The way a man says something he has rehearsed.

“All client relationships belong to the firm, Damilola. You agreed to that.”

She sat very still.

Outside her window, Lagos hummed and moved and did not care.

She called Dangote Agro directly that evening.

Their CFO — a woman named Amaka who Damilola had mentored — picked up.

“Amaka, they’re trying to take you off my portfolio—”

“Dami.” Amaka’s voice was careful. Apologetic. “Chief Okonkwo called our MD this morning. Apparently there are contractual issues.”

“There are no contractual issues. Those are my clients—”

“Dami.” A pause. “They showed us the agreement.”

She hung up.

Sat in her car in the parking garage for 45 minutes.

Then she called the only person she knew who could help.

His name was Babatunde Coker.

73 years old. Retired now. But in his prime, Tunde Coker had been the most feared commercial litigator in Nigeria.

He had beaten the Federal Government twice.
He had once cross-examined a sitting state governor into a breakdown on the stand.

And he was Damilola’s godfather.

“Send me the agreement,” he said.

She sent it at 11pm.

He called back at 1am.

“Are you sitting down?”

The clause is enforceable,” Baba Tunde said.

Her stomach dropped.

“But.” He paused. Long enough to make her hold her breath. “They made a mistake.”

“What mistake?”

“Page 31, paragraph 14(c) covers clients introduced during the period of association.”

“Yes—”

“Dangote Agro became your client in 2018.”

She blinked.

“You joined the firm in 2019.”

Silence.

“They were your client before you joined, Damilola. The clause doesn’t cover them.”

She started to cry again. But differently this time.

She filed suit at the Federal High Court, Lagos Division, on a Monday morning.

By Tuesday, Chief Okonkwo’s personal lawyer — a SAN with an office larger than most courtrooms — had filed a counter-claim.

By Wednesday, the story was on the front page of the Punch.

“Partner Sues Founding Partner of Top Lagos Firm in ₦180m Brief Dispute”

Her phone did not stop ringing for three days.

The case turned on one question:

Was Dangote Agro a client she introduced to the firm — or a client she brought with her to the firm?

Two different things.
One sentence apart.
₦180 million in the balance.

Chief Okonkwo’s lawyer was brilliant.

He argued that Damilola had first engaged Dangote Agro on the firm’s letterhead.

That the client relationship was formalised — formalised — under the firm’s name.

That even if the relationship predated her employment, the legal relationship belonged to the firm.

The judge, a woman named Justice Adaeze Nwosu, listened without expression.

Damilola watched her face and felt nothing.

Baba Tunde had one move.

He called one witness.

Amaka — the CFO of Dangote Agro.

“When did you first engage Miss Savage as your legal counsel?”

“2018,” Amaka said. “She was freelancing. Before she joined any firm.”

“Did you follow her to Okonkwo & Associates because of her — or because of the firm?”

Amaka looked directly at Chief Okonkwo.

“I followed her,” she said. “I have always followed her.”

The courtroom went very quiet.

Justice Nwosu ruled six weeks later.

14 pages. Precise. Surgical.

Paragraph 14(c) was valid and enforceable — for all clients Damilola had originated after joining the firm.

But Dangote Agro was a pre-existing relationship.

It was hers.

The ₦180 million brief was hers.

And the firm was ordered to pay her legal costs.

She resigned the same day the judgment was handed down.

Effective immediately.

She left her access card on Chief Okonkwo’s desk.

He was not in the office.

Rotimi — her assistant — was crying in the corridor.

“Will you take me with you?” Rotimi asked.

She looked at him.

“Pack your things,” she said.

Savage & Co. opened its doors on July 1st, 2024.

Two lawyers. One paralegal. A modest office in Ikoyi.

Dangote Agro was their first client.

By December, they had eleven.

I’ve told you a story.

Now let me tell you what the story means.

Because this isn’t fiction. This happens every week in Nigeria. The names change. The numbers change. The firms change.

But the trap — the trap is always the same.

The trap is a contract you didn’t read.

Not because you’re careless.
But because you were tired.
Because you trusted someone.
Because you were so close to what you wanted that you couldn’t slow down.

Damilola was a lawyer and she signed without reading.

What does that tell you about the rest of us?

Here’s what paragraph 14(c) should have taught all of us:

→ Every word in a contract has a price.
→ Trust is not a legal substitute for reading.
→ “Standard agreement” is the most dangerous phrase in Nigerian business.
→ The clause that will destroy you is never on the first page.
→ A lawyer who doesn’t read their own contract is a doctor who doesn’t take their own prescription.

Read. Everything. Always.

Access to legal knowledge shouldn’t be a privilege.
It should be infrastructure.

If you don’t have a lawyer you trust — find one.
If you don’t know your rights — learn them.
If you’re about to sign something — pause.

The law will not protect what you didn’t read.

09/06/2026

10 Important Legal facts you must understand before you post online 👇

1. Freedom of speech is not absolute. The freedom does not shield a person from liability.

2. A post you made online can be used as Evidence in Court.

3. One sentence made carelēssly can amount to defamãtion.

4. Fãlse accūsation can lead to criminal case.

5. Using a child for content without the consent of the parents has legal consequences.

6. Deleting a post does not always delete the evidence.

7. "It was only a joke" is not always a defence.

8. Online thrèat can become a criminal case.

9. Adding "allegedly" to a post does not automatically shields you from liability.

10. Posting private information about someone without their consent may amount to breach of privacy.

Remember the internet never forgets.

Even a post made 5 years ago can still have legal consequences.

So before you make the post, always verify the truth and get consent when necessary.

Copied

Good morning, this I must confess is a sensational take or better still a captivating headline from yesterday's proceedi...
22/05/2026

Good morning, this I must confess is a sensational take or better still a captivating headline from yesterday's proceedings at the Court of Appeal Ibadan Division on the Hijab appeals where I represented the traditional worshippers.

Agbẹjọ́rò tó ṣojú àwọn ẹlẹ́sìn àbáláyé nílé ẹjọ́ sọ pé láti ọdún 2017 tí ọ̀rọ̀ náà ti bẹ̀rẹ̀ ni wọn ti lé àwọn ọmọ ẹlẹ́sìn àbáláyé kúrò nílé ẹ̀kọ́ ISI lọ́gbà fásítì UI n'Ibadan torí wọ́n wọ ìlẹ̀kẹ̀.

Ẹ̀kúnrẹ́rẹ́ ìròyìn náà wà níbí:https://www.bbc.com/yoruba/articles/c142r6653pko

PUBLIC APOLOGY AND AN APPLICATION TO REVISIT THE MURDER CASE OF DEBORAH SAMUEL:-My fellow Nigerians, I am a Legal Practi...
19/05/2026

PUBLIC APOLOGY AND AN APPLICATION TO REVISIT THE MURDER CASE OF DEBORAH SAMUEL:-

My fellow Nigerians, I am a Legal Practitioner and a dedicated defence Counsel in a number of criminal cases.

However, while I believe that our criminal justice system and the Legal Profession is not perfect and can only be improved upon, I strongly believe that in the case of the Late Miss Deborah Samuel, an unparalleled injustice has been committed not only to that young lady, or her parents and immediate family, but to every Nigerian and more importantly the Legal Profession as a whole.

The general facts of the case are already out there in the media space, but the real injustice is that the murder of the young lady was never properly closed and/or resolved in that her alleged killers never really had their day in Court for the "avenger of blood" which in our day is the Government through the judiciary to purge this case properly from our collective psyche as a nation and to let the soul of the departed rest properly in the knowledge that the nation having failed to protect her own at the least rose up to defend her dignity in death.

I hereby tender an unreserved apology for thae poor, shoddy and shabby way that murder case was handled and call on the Attorney General of the Federation and the Attorney General of Sokoto State to revisit this unparalleled injustice done to a seemingly powerless and defenceless soul.

Furthermore, I am calling on the
Attorney General of the Federation and the Attorney General of Sokoto State to initiate the necessary steps with a view to ensuring both the arrests and prosecution of the perpetrators of the dastardly act of Murder of Deborah Samuel.

I will be willing to work with any Non-Governmental Organisation or Human Rights Group that is ready to apply the necessary pressure on the respective Attorneys General of the Federation and Sokoto State with a view to bringing Justice to the name and soul of Deborah Samuel.

Whether we will admit it or not, Deborah Samuel is every helpless Nigerian out there whether dead or alive who has been a victim of similar grave injustice.

Fola Awonusi Esq.

Amnesty International has decried the failure of the Nigerian government to hold to account, killers of Deborah Samuel Yakubu.

Address

Oyo Road, Mokola-Sango
Ibadan

Opening Hours

Monday 09:00 - 17:00
Tuesday 09:00 - 17:00
Wednesday 09:00 - 17:00
Thursday 09:00 - 17:00
Friday 09:00 - 17:00

Telephone

+2349019520277

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Fola Awonusi & Co. Legal Practitioners and Arbitrators posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Fola Awonusi & Co. Legal Practitioners and Arbitrators:

Shortcuts

Share

Category