https://www.facebook.com/118770791234144/

Regent Consulting, Garki, Area 11, Abuja (2026)

29/05/2026

The year was 2012.

Two occupants of Federal Government houses were disqualified from exercising their right of first refusal to purchase the houses they lived in under the monetization policy. The government went ahead and sold the properties to third parties.

Naturally, the aggrieved occupants headed to court. But how they handled it from there made all the difference.

Let's name the first set of parties Team A.
The parties in Team A decided to look beyond the courtroom walls and agreed to settle amicably. Offers were made, negotiated, and accepted. The disqualified occupant accepted a fair monetary compensation and used it to purchase another property.

The case was closed, and everyone moved on with their lives within just three months.
As counsel, I was incredibly happy I didn't have to keep traversing the distance to Lagos! ☺️

Team B initially tried to resolve amicably, but it fell through because the claimant's counsel made unreasonable demands. They chose to fight it out in the trenches of the courtroom.

The case went to trial, and the High Court entered judgment for the Claimant. The Defendants appealed to the Court of Appeal—the judgment was upheld. They pushed further to the Supreme Court. Finally, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal this May, 2026!

After 14 years of legal battle, the Claimant finally got "justice."

But wait a moment… because it is not yet Uhuru.
There's a snag, and "Justice" for the Claimant might just be cracked!

Yeah, the Supreme Court held that the Claimant was indeed qualified to be offered the property in the first instance, and only if she couldn't pay could the government offer it to someone else.

But, here is the ultimate catch- At what value will the government offer the property today?Is it the value from 14 years ago, or the current skyrocketed market value? 🤔
If the government prices it at today's value, the successful party may not be able to afford it, or she might end up right back at the High Court to challenge the valuation. And just like that, the vicious cycle continues!

Litigation di egwu oh!

So, while Team A has been enjoying peace of mind for over a decade, Team B is left facing:
- 14 years of time wasted
-Massive legal fees across three tiers of court.
- Years of bitter animosity.

Do you even know who the real winner is in Team B? The lawyer who bagged a major landmark case to qualify for elevation to Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) ☺️.

I love litigation, but I cherish amicable dispute resolution. While litigation gives you a judgment, ADR gives you a resolution.

Once you have a dispute to settle with another party, , be at liberty to ask your lawyer about the options available for resolution.

All cases must not go through trial in court. In some situations, try ADR. 🤝

18/02/2026

It’s one thing to see the struggle of the Nigerian job market; it’s another to see a blatant violation of the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) playing out on a street corner.

Imagine buying guguru and epa only to find that your snack is wrapped in a copy of someone's CV. This isn't just "recycling paper"—it is a massive breach of data privacy.

Recruitment agencies and corporate bodies have a fiduciary duty to protect the personal data entrusted to them. Handing over CVs (containing addresses, phone numbers, and sensitive history) to scrap paper vendors is a punishable offense under our current laws.

We need to move beyond "business as usual" and hold these data controllers accountable. Privacy is a right, not a suggestion. ⚖️🇳🇬

04/09/2025

Women property ownership rights.

The discussion about the property ownership rights of women is centered on the issues that go to the heart of women’s financial security and legal protection which we have encountered severally in the course of work.

The following questions begs answers:

🔹 Why would a woman who has worked hard and earned her money choose to purchase a property and register the title in her husband’s name rather than her own?

🔹 Why do some women who purchase property in their own names with their earnings surrender the title documents to their husbands instead of keeping them safe personally?

🔹 Why do some women prefer to pass money through their husbands to buy property, instead of purchasing directly in their own names?

As lawyers who have seen firsthand the disputes and losses that arise when women do not protect their property rights, we cannot overemphasize how important it is to address these issues early and decisively, because they have serious legal consequences.

What do you think drives these decisions?
If you could advise your younger self—or another woman—what would you say?

On this table, your voice matters. Sometimes the experience of one woman could be the light another woman needs. 🌸

12/06/2025

Two inseparable friends, Mgbeke and Mgborie, dreamed of establishing a school in their neighborhood at Mpape.

Their agreement was that if they ever dissolved their partnership, they'd divide the investment into two.

So, they registered Brilliant Minds Academy, Mpape, as an enterprise, bought land, and built the first classroom. The school thrived, more classrooms added and the business waxed stronger.

But somewhere along the way, things went awry and Mgbeke decided to pull out.
"I want the school divided into two," she said , referencing the original agreement between the parties.

Mgborie was devastated. "How can we divide a school?, she asked. She offered to buy out Mgbeke 's share of the business. But Mgbeke would not agree, insisting on the literal interpretation of their agreement.

Their mutual friend, Mgbafo and other people have intervened in resolving the issue and pleaded with Mgbeke to reason with Mgbafo, but she remains adamant. Parties are at a deadlock!

Mgborie has run to us for advice.

How do we divide a school into two? How about the students? And the reputation built over the years?

Let's look at their agreement 🤝

The first and fundamental flaw with this type of partnership is that they don't have a well written agreement detailing their intentions.
A robust partnership agreement that will spell out the terms of their contribution, participation, profit and risk sharing, dispute resolution and very importantly, a comprehensive exit strategy is what they ought to have considered.

We have assisted Mgbeke and Mgborie to resolve their conflict. Unfortunately, the friendship has ended, though the school is saved.

Ever been in a similar situation with Mgborie?

Don't be like Mgborie.

Normalise having the terms of your partnership or collaboration penned down and endorsed.

Every partnership needs a formal, detailed partnership agreement drafted by a legal professional.

08/05/2025

So, last week, the news of the death of a woman due to domestic violence was everywhere on the internet with some people calling for justice for her.

Unfortunately, there is no justice for the dead. She died for nothing. The children, the property and whatever else she allowed to keep her kwechiri in that hell hole marriage do not matter anymore. She passed away in pain, sorrow and regret.

Her painful death highlights the complex intersection of domestic violence, property rights, and safety of women in marriages.

We mourn her unfortunate death, but today we are going to talk to the living; the living who is going through the same thing she passed through.

Her case exemplifies several common challenges faced by victims of domestic violence such as;
1. Economic entrapment: When a woman has invested significantly in matrimonial property, leaving can mean abandoning her financial contributions and security.
2. Legal uncertainty: Many women fear losing their share of marital property if they leave an abusive marriage.
3. Cultural and social pressures: The society often places significant emphasis on marriage preservation, potentially discouraging women from leaving abusive situations.

The good news is that victims of domestic or spousal abuse have some legal options available to them.

*Under the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act (VAPP Act), a victim can obtain protection orders that:
Prohibit the abuser from further violence
Prevent the abuser from evicting the victim from the matrimonial home.
Grant temporary custody of children if applicable.

*Document all financial contributions to property acquisition and development.

*Ensure joint names appear on property titles where applicable and have them registered at the land registry.

*Write to the land registry to place a caveat on the property and also make publications in national dailies.

*File for judicial separation while maintaining property rights.

*Seek court orders for maintenance and exclusive possession of matrimonial home during proceedings.

*Pursue divorce with equitable property distribution claims.

Further recommendations:
Safety first: Develop a safety plan before taking legal action.
Contact domestic violence organizations.
Consider temporary relocation to a safe house if immediate danger exists.
Documentation: Gather evidence of both:
The abuse (medical reports, witness statements, police reports)
Financial contributions to matrimonial property (receipts, bank transfers, witness statements)
Legal consultation: Seek advice from a lawyer experienced in both domestic violence and property law.

Court protection: Apply for protection orders that specifically address:
Personal safety
Property rights
Exclusive possession of the matrimonial home during legal proceedings.

Financial independence

Remember to love yourself first before you love your neighbor. If you read to the end, let us know by commenting and liking the post. Questions are also welcome.

26/04/2025

This information is for those who have landed properties within any of the area councils in the FCT

25/04/2025

Few weeks ago, a sister dear to my heart was heartbroken because her brothers had shared the chunk of the money realized from the sale of her late father’s landed property and grudgingly ‘dashed’ her and her sisters some crumbs. According to the guys, women are not relevant and have no say in the affairs of the family.

The truth is that this claim that a woman cannot inherit from her father's estate because of her gender, contradicts Section 42 of the Nigeria constitution, and the Administration of Estate Laws of some states. And this has been proved by several cases filed by women who made up their minds not to be deprived of their rights.

In the case of Ukeje v. Ukeje (2014) - The Supreme Court struck down Igbo customary law that prevented female children from inheriting their father's estate, declaring it unconstitutional. The court held that "no matter the circumstances of the birth of a female child, such a child is entitled to an inheritance from her late father's estate."

You see, the only qualification for a person whether male or female to inherit a share of the estate of his/her father is the filial relationship, that is, the legal connection between parents and their children, be it biological, by adoption or by recognition.

Under Nigerian law, children have automatic inheritance rights when a parent dies intestate. The Administration of Estates Law provides that a deceased's estate is divided among the spouse and children (not among the siblings). Also, the biological children have equal inheritance rights regardless of gender or birth circumstances.

If the deceased made a will, he has testamentary freedom to distribute assets but cannot discriminate based on gender. Any of the children can contest the will that attempt to disinherit her based on gender.

Hence, while some customary practices historically excluded women from inheritance, these customs have been repeatedly invalidated by Nigeria's highest courts when they conflict with constitutional provisions guaranteeing equal rights.

The Supreme Court has established that a female child has an automatic right of inheritance to her father's property, and any customary law that excludes women from inheritance rights is void as it conflicts with the constitution.

This position represents the current legal status in Nigeria regardless of ethnic group or religious affiliation, as constitutional provisions supersede customary practices that violate fundamental human rights.

It is advised that you engage a lawyer specializing in estate and family law to represent your interests if you have been disinherited or at the risk of being disinherited.

There are legal remedies available to you of course.

11/04/2025

The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory has created a unit to help victims of gender based violence to file complaints directly in the court without first reporting to the police and other agencies.

Filing fees are waived for such cases!

Victims are encouraged to walk into the process unit of the court in Maitama and speak with the desk officer for further information.

It is expedient that victims get and preserve their evidence of violence to prove their complaints.

20/03/2025

The overall aim of the Violence Against Persons Prohibition (VAPP) Act is to provide a legal framework for the prevention of all forms of violence against vulnerable persons, especially women and girls.

Let's look at these three key provisions:

1. FORCEFUL EVICTION FROM HOME.
The Act contains provisions that address forceful eviction and aspects of separation from the family. The Act specifically prohibits forceful eviction from one's home, particularly concerning spouses. This means that it is illegal for a person to forcefully eject their spouse or deny them access to their shared home.

2. ABANDONMENT OF DEPENDANTS.
The VAPP Act also addresses the abandonment of children, spouses, and other dependents without providing means of sustenance. This can lead to a form of separation where individuals are left without support.

3. FORCEFUL ISOLATION AND SEPARATION FROM FAMILY.
The VAPP Act specifically prohibits "forced isolation or separation from family and friends" as a form of violence. This recognizes that isolating individuals from their support networks is a tactic often used in abusive relationships.

It is important to note that the act provides penalties for those who commit these offenses.

The National Agency For the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP) is empowered to implement the provisions of VAPP, and this includes arrest prosecution of offenders.

18/03/2025

NYSC BYE-LAWS (Revised 2011)

III. DURING THE PERIOD OF PRIMARY ASSIGNMENT
Every member shall:

8. Not be rude to constituted authority. Any member who is rude to constituted authority shall be tried by the Corps Disciplinary Committee and, if found guilty, be liable to extension of service for a period not less than thirty (30) days with half pay.

Assuming, but without conceding that she was rude to constituted authority, let the Corps Disciplinary Committee try her. That's all. 🤔

But then, she's entitled to express her frustration with the way and manner the leadership of her country is run by a "very unskilful" President Tinubu 🚶🚶.

It is called FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION and is guaranteed by the Constitution.

Regent Consulting

29/05/2026

18/02/2026

04/09/2025

12/06/2025

08/05/2025

26/04/2025

25/04/2025

11/04/2025

20/03/2025

18/03/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category