SIN LIM & DON

SIN LIM & DON Legal solution for an ever changing environment.

16/06/2026

ORANG ASLI WIN APPEAL AGAINST FIRM
FOR DESECRATION OF ANCESTRAL GRAVES

Ho Kit Yen | FreeMalaysiaToday
16 June 2026

PUTRAJAYA: Seven Orang Asli villagers from Pekan won their appeal before the Federal Court today in a lawsuit against a private firm over the destruction of their ancestral graves for agricultural development.

The panel, led by Justice Nordin Hassan, reinstated the High Court’s 2023 ruling in favour of Rosli Jedut, Atan Baro, Melah Hamid, Awang Bako, Esah Wir, Kasim Awang, and Majib Kasim.

The court also upheld the award of RM140,000 in damages to the seven individuals.

On the panel with Nordin were Justices Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera and Lee Swee Seng.

The villagers sued Agrobest (M) Sdn Bhd and its two employees, seeking compensation after the graves in Kampung Batu 20 were overrun by bulldozers eight years ago.

In 2024, the Court of Appeal dismissed the lawsuit, citing a lack of legal standing. In reading the court’s decision today, Lee said the appeals court had erred in holding that the seven villagers lacked the legal standing to file the suit.

He said some of the plaintiffs had produced photographic evidence of the destruction of their ancestors’ tombstones, the personal items buried with them, and death certificates to prove their relationship to the deceased.

“The defendants did not dispute the presence of those graves, and even prepared a sketch plan to mark the locations.

“It was more a case of their impatience in commencing work of developing the area into the biggest aquaculture park in Asia, as stated in their apology letter to the plaintiffs, that they had commenced the clearing works including clearing away the cemeteries and tombstones,” Lee said.

The court noted that the villagers lodged around 20 police reports after seeing the ancestral graves destroyed, the judge said, adding that the reports could not be treated as spurious or speculation.

CUSTOMARY RIGHTS CANNOT BE CANCELLED

Lee also said the Orang Asli had communal and proprietary rights over the land where they lived and foraged, farmed and fished, despite not owning land titles.

“The usufructuary rights of the community would include the right to visit their ancestors’ grave sites as part of their cultural and spiritual connection with the land on which they have been.

“Issuance of land titles (by the state to individuals or organisations) cannot simply cancel or extinguish their customary rights to their land.

“The desecration of graves strikes at the core of their dignity and infringed their constitutional rights,” he said, adding that they were entitled to bring a claim against the trespassers.

Lawyers Steven Thiru, Dr Yogeswaran Subramanian, Hon Kai Ping and Ananthan Moorthi appeared pro bono for the seven Orang Asli while Henry Ngok and Ng Si Hui appeared for the company and employees.

COAC | 16 June 2026

04/06/2026

The agreements reflect the strong ties between the countries' legal and dispute resolution communities, said Edwing Tong. Read more at straitstimes.com. Read more at straitstimes.com.

08/02/2026

🏛️ 𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤 𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠: 𝐍𝐨 "𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞" 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐉𝐌𝐁
The Court of Appeal recently delivered a definitive judgment in the Gurney Paragon case, clarifying the "One Development, One Management" principle under the Strata Management Act 2013 (SMA).

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐮𝐭𝐞:
A developer and commercial owners established a separate management regime for the commercial component of a mixed development, leaving the Joint Management Body (JMB) to manage only the residential towers. The High Court initially allowed this, citing "fairness."

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐥'𝐬 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧:
The Court unanimously set aside the High Court's ruling, establishing several critical precedents:
✅ No "Contracting Out": Parties cannot use Sale and Purchase Agreements (SPAs) or AGM resolutions to bypass the law. The SMA mandates a single JMB and one set of accounts for a development area.
✅ Ultra Vires Actions: Any resolution to separate management or exclude the JMB from the commercial component is null and void.
✅ COB Limits: The Commissioner of Buildings (COB) has no power to validate a management structure that the law expressly prohibits.
✅ Retrospective Liability: Commercial owners remain statutorily liable for charges. The JMB must now regularise accounts by holding a fresh AGM to determine a "just and reasonable" 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐬 retrospectively.
✅ Common Property Control: All common property (including commercial facades and car parks) must be surrendered to the JMB's control.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲:
This ruling is a major win for JMBs/MCs nationwide, reinforcing that statutory duties take precedence over private contracts. Mixed-use developments must be managed as a single entity during the JMB period, regardless of developer arrangements.

Counsel for JMB: Lai Chee Hoe , Deyvinah and Low Yen Hau (Messrs Chee Hoe & Associates)
Counsel for Respondents: Ashok Kumar and Lim Chin Lun (Messrs Skrine)

24/01/2026
12/12/2025

Jin Sheng Technology directors apologize after Malaysian raid for selling counterfeit 3M respirators; pay damages to 3M and cease all infringing activity.

07/12/2025

E invoice new updates

1) Abolishment of Phase 5

2) Exemption on E Invoice implementation for company having sales below RM 1million.

Address

Melaka

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when SIN LIM & DON posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to SIN LIM & DON:

Shortcuts

Share