OOI'S Chambers - 黄雪仪律师事务所

OOI'S Chambers - 黄雪仪律师事务所 We are a team of lawyers based in Kuala Lumpur.

Our scope of legal services includes goods sold delivered, family & divorce, probate, civil disputes, criminal, litigation, conveyancing and corporate matters.

07.08.2020: 今天我们到 医院去,给一个客户签署遗书,当客户给我们做最后的交代,对我们说,一切就拜托你,这份委托超过了一份工作的重量。她的小孩今年才6岁,一直最担心的就是如果她走了,小孩子没有地方居住。我们想用一张照片来告诉你,好...
20/01/2021

07.08.2020: 今天我们到 医院去,给一个客户签署遗书,当客户给我们做最后的交代,对我们说,一切就拜托你,这份委托超过了一份工作的重量。

她的小孩今年才6岁,一直最担心的就是如果她走了,小孩子没有地方居住。我们想用一张照片来告诉你,好好规划的重要性,意外和疾病,我们都无法控制,一张遗书,可以让你一辈子努力的成果好好交付于你一辈子守护的人。

07.08.2020: We went to hospital today to have our client signs off her last will & testament. When she said to us, "I shall leave this in your good hands". The trust exceeds the weight of a job.

She had a child who is only 6 year old, and her biggest concern was that, the child has no place to stay after her passing. We uploaded this photo to remind you again the importance of planning. Accidents and illnesses are beyond our control. A Will & Testament allows that the fruits of your life time efforts, to be in the hands of whom you care most.

Stay tuned!!See you guys at 8:30PM tomorrow!!
24/05/2020

Stay tuned!!
See you guys at 8:30PM tomorrow!!

15/05/2020

Why is it important to sign an employment agreement?

An Employment Agreement is also known as Contract of Service (in legal sense). It is a legally binding agreement whereby an employer agrees to hire an employee thereby, establishing an employment relationship between both of them.

A contract of service may be brought into existence by way of an ex*****on of a written agreement, orally or may also be implied from the conducts of the employer and employee. Nevertheless, it is advisable to prepare a written employment agreement setting out the details terms and conditions of employment relations because the terms and conditions will provide security, clarity and safeguard interests of both the employer and employee.

Of course, this is not to say that oral agreements are unenforceable but should any disputes arise. Oral Agreement shall need substantial work to prove its existence and content transpired.

The Employers and employees should also be aware that even if a term of an employment agreement is not written down, it can still be binding upon the employer and employee as it can be considered as an ‘implied term’.

The rights of employees fall those who are earning below RM2000 per month, or those who are working in certain services such as manual labour or as a domestic servant fall under the categories of employees under the Employment Act 1956 are governed by the Act and its regulations. The Employment Act 1955 protects the rights of these employees. For example, the right to be paid within 7 days after the end of the salary period, termination benefits, paid maternity leaves etc. Even-though the rights of these employees are protected by the Act, it is necessary to have a written employment agreement if the parties agree to a term and condition which is more favorable that those prescribed by the Act.

But, pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, any terms and conditions in an employment agreement which is less favourable than the relevant law in the Act is null and void. The relevant provision in the Act will prevail over that particular term in the employment agreement which is less favourable.

Meanwhile, employees who do not fall under the categories of employees as defined in the Employment Act 1955, ie. those who are earning more than RM2000 and not engaging in manual labour services, their rights will be governed by the terms and conditions in their employment agreement. An employment agreement becomes even more important for these employees because it determines the responsibilities of employers and employees (parties), termination, confidentiality, benefits, holidays etc .For example, if an employee is terminated, whether he will receive any compensation is depended on the existence of such term in the employment agreement.

However, consider in a situation where there is no written employment agreement spelling out the dismissal of termination of employment and an employee is dismissed unfairly. This is where the common laws and rules comes in and assist employees. These Employees without a written Employment Agreement may file a representation to the Director general of industrial relations (“DGIR”) to seek for redress pursuant to Section 20. So even though employees outside the scope of EA are not protected by the Act, there are still applicable laws, like IRA, to protect certain rights of employees even if it is silent in the written agreement.

A written employment agreement may not eliminate all the risks in an employment relationship but it will certainly reduce it. Therefore, it is important to have a written employment agreement so that the in the event that conflicts arise, the agreement can assist in dissolving the conflicts. Employers and employees should not let the formalities of an agreement intimidate them from signing a written employment agreement, they should always seek professional advice in preparing or reviewing an employment agreement. It might save employees and employers from some problems in the long run.

15/05/2020

就业协议/雇佣合同的重要性!

就业协议/雇佣合同在法律上也称为服务合同(Contract of Service)。 它是具有法律约束力的协议,据此雇主同意雇用一名雇员,从而在两者之间建立雇佣关系。

服务合同可以通过执行书面协议或口头形式订立,或者也可以由雇主和雇员的行为隐含。尽管如此,我们始终强烈建议当雇佣关系确立,应该准备一份书面的雇佣协议/雇佣合同,以列出雇佣关系的详细条款和条件,因为这些条款和条件将为雇主和雇员提供保障,明确指示及维护的利益。

当然,这并不是说口头协议不可执行,而是在发生任何争议时,口头协议需要证明其存在和说过的内容,这些无疑会增加困难程度和影响胜算的机率。

雇主和雇员还应该明白和了解到,即使未写下雇佣协议的条款,由于雇佣关系可以被视为“隐含条款”,因此雇佣关系仍然对雇主和雇员具有约束力。

那些雇员属于月收入低于2000令吉的人,或从事某些服务(例如体力劳动或作为家庭佣人)的人,属于1956年《雇佣法》所规定的雇员类别,因此受该法及其法规的约束。 1955年《就业法》保护了这些雇员的权利。例如,在工资期结束后的7天内有权获得支付的权利,解雇津贴,带薪产假等。尽管这些雇员的权利受到该法案的保护,如果双方同意的条款和条件比该法规定的条款和条件更有利,我们仍然建议这些雇员需签订书面雇佣协议/雇佣合同。
但是,根据该法第7条的规定,雇佣协议/雇佣合同中任何比1955年《就业法》更不利的条款都是无效的。

同时,不属于1955年《就业法》所定义的雇员类别的雇员。那些收入超过RM2000且没有从事体力劳动服务的人,其权利将受其雇佣协议中的条款和条件约束。雇佣协议对这些员工而言变得更加重要,因为它决定了雇主和员工(当事方)的职责,解雇,保密性,福利,假期等。例如,如果员工被解雇,则取决于他是否会获得任何补偿。雇用协议中是否存在该条款。

但是,基于在没有书面雇佣协议说明解雇并且雇员被不公平解雇的情况下,可实行的办法在于,这些员工可以根据第20条Industrial Relations Act(IRA)而向DGIR提出申诉以寻求帮助。因此,即使EA范围以外的员工不受该法保护,即使在书面协议中未作规定,IRA等仍然适用的法律仍可保护员工的某些权利。

书面雇佣协议可能无法消除雇佣关系中的所有风险,但肯定会减少风险。因此,十分重要的是要有一份书面雇用协议,以便在发生冲突的情况下,该协议可以帮助解决冲突。雇主和雇员不应让协议的手续威胁他们签署书面雇佣协议,而应在准备或审查雇佣协议时始终寻求专业意见。从长远来看,它可以使员工和雇主免于某些问题。

09/05/2020

Salary cut? Retrenchment? Find out more in our latest article on employment matters!

First and foremost, Employment Act 1955 Section 24(2) to 24(6) of the Employment Act 1955 states that deduction of wages is only permissible under certain circumstances such as for the recovery of any advanced paid or overpaid, indemnity, deductions in respect for the value of food and accommodation provided by an employer and etc. Nevertheless, it is only prudent for an employer to deduct an salary if the employee has agreed and consented in written agreement. Simply put, an employer is restrained to cut an employee’s wages unilaterally and it may amount to breach of Employment Act 1955.

Secondly, in the event that breach of employment contract by the employer takes place, (ie. In most circumstances the employee is compelled to resign) employee may consider to seek for a constructive dismissal claim after his prompt resignation in response to the unacceptable conduct of the employer.

Next, as the Covid-19 remains its destructive nature to the economy, it is unavoidable that some employers might consider retrenchment in order to keep their businesses afloat. Before stepping into the drastic course, employers are advisable to consider other measures, for example salary cut, deduct annual leave and etc because retrenchment is always the last option. Legally speaking, the law even requires employers to select fairly which employees to be retrenched. If employees are terminated or retrenched unfairly, they may bring a claim for unfair dismissals.

It is to be noted that employees covered under the Employment Act 1955 and in pursuant to Employment (Termination And Lay-Off Benefits) Regulations 1980 are entitled to termination or lay-off benefits if they have been employed under a continuous contract of employment for at least 12 months. Meanwhile, employees who are not covered under the Employment Act 1955 are entitled to retrenchment benefits based on their employment agreements.

In conclusion, employers are advised to take appropriate and cautious measures in cost-saving structure. On the other hand, employees are advised to pursue applicable course to protect their rights. Both employees and employers are encouraged to have considerable and understandable arrangement to ensure the durability of the business and the survival of personal living during this undesirable period.

Hi, we are conducting a live on criminal law on restrictions and cheating cases related to Movement Control Order.Stay t...
30/04/2020

Hi, we are conducting a live on criminal law on restrictions and cheating cases related to Movement Control Order.

Stay tuned to the live at 8.30PM on this Friday, 01.05.2020.!

Thank you.

大家好,我們將在線上討論行動管制令相關的限制和詐騙案件。

請大家敬請留守星期五(01.05.2020)晚上八點半的直播!

謝謝大家。

27/04/2020

*行动管制令 - 租约问题 (Part 2)*

如果实在无法交付租金,我们又有什么方法去解决?

如何沿用Force Majure Clause或让Force Majure Clause生效?

我的租约/租金协议上存在这个Force Majure Clause的条文,我是否就可以直接不缴付租金长达6个月?

当每一份合同出现争议,或是当合同的一方想要执行/沿用某一个条款/条文,而另一方是不同意或者对某一个条款/条文持有不一样的理解,比如租客不能缴付租金,想沿用Force Majure Clause而屋主不太愿意或不明白,传统上,这些都必须交由法庭做一个判决来定下各方的权益还是对错。

如果不通过法庭,我是否也可以沿用Force Majure Clause?
如果私人的租约/租金协议涉及的是一间房子或一间房间,租金可以是几百令吉到几千令吉以内,如果需要上法庭来取得一个判决,所需要花费的律师费和堂费或许会是可观的,所以我们建议可以先发一封信或者书面通知屋主,关于租客想要沿用Force Majure Clause因为无法定时缴付租金的一个情况,协商即将会拖欠租金为多少个月,如何可以在双方都会获益的情况下解决这个窘境(可以考虑多延长租约之类的选项)。

书面通知/发信函给屋主,说明需要沿用/启用Force Majure Clause 是十分重要的,Force Majure Clause虽然可以以目前有行动管制令的情况而生效,可是为免引起不还租金而终止合同这种情况,通知屋主是必须的。

Force Majure Clause 虽然存在,可是在大多的租约/协议里,它并不会阐明Force Majure Clause 沿用的期限会是多久,是只限于行动管制令期间的两个月,还是因为行动管制令后影响收入的数个月,这些都需要和屋主协商。

如果屋主并不愿意暂缓收取租金?

Force Majure Clause因为是一些不可预测事情的发生,而导致租约的租约/租金协议无法进行,启用Force Majure Clause也可以意味着合同无法再进行下去,当合同因为Force Majure Clause而无法进行下去,各方都将回到原本合同没有实行的情况下,也就是说,剩下的租期已经可以说是无效,屋主必须归还抵押金和水电抵押金等给租客,当然租客也需要在合理的时间里归还屋子。

当然我们还是以人性化的角度探讨这个问题,和屋主的协商而达到一个双方都满意的解决方案还是我们会推崇的一个方法。

如果我的租约里并没有Force Majure Clause的条文?

如果租约上并没有Force Majure Clause, 需要暂缓缴付租金的租客可以通过普通法(Common Law) 的一个法律原则, Doctrine of Frustration, 和屋主协商,而达到可以暂缓缴付租金,可是Doctrine of Frustration是需要证明租客的收入来源被切断,和需要针对个别的案件寻求法律咨询。

Note:以上的信息属于基本法律常识和资讯,不属于法律咨询和意见,若有任何法律咨询欢迎联络我们,谢谢大家。

黄雪仪律师 曾成源律师

27/04/2020

*行动管制令 - 租约问题 (Part 1)*

在行动管制令期间,大家想必会遇到关于租金的问题,今天我们会分成两个部分,分享有关于这方面的法律资讯。

一个人的绝大花费相信都围绕在衣食住行这些基本的需求上,而行动管制令造成的压力,尤其是在金钱上,在支付衣食住行上的消费,相信许多人是有共鸣的。

而最让人吃不消的费用应该都是那些付与住和行的费用,房屋贷款和汽车贷款。所以马来西亚银行也大多都响应了国家银行推行的延长偿还贷款长达6个月的制度(“Moratorium”), 可是这项举措并不概括私人的租金协议。

所以今天文章分享主要讨论的两个问题:-

1. 行动管制令和其影响的时间里,租金是否需要根据租金协议上地继续交付?
2. 如果实在无法交付租金,我们又有什么方法去解决?

我们所讨论的租金协议,是那些私人租约,不涉及政府租约,或者和地方政府或市政局的租约。

在我们接下去讨论上述的问题,我们需要在这里强调,当你决定要进行一些交易,无论是租借,租房子店面,买卖,甚至应聘工作,一纸合同,白纸黑字在一定程度上可以给双方一定的保障,这是非常重要的。

行动管制令和其影响的时间里,租金是否需要根据租金协议上地继续交付?

Force Majure Clause
之前也有些文章讨论租金协议或租约在行动管制令期间应该是如何处理,相信很多人都会看到这些字眼,比如Force Majure Clause等,Force Majure Clause 通常会出现在租约/租金协议上的其中一个条款,而且只有租约/租金协议上有列明这个条款的才可以启用这个Force Majure Clause。

简单来说,Force Majure Clause 是因为某种事情/情况的发生,而这类情况并不是因为屋主或是租客的行为所导致的或造成的,然而因为这种情况导致了屋主或是租客无法继续进行租约/租金协议,比如租客没有办法定时缴付租金。

Force Majure Clause概括的一些情况比如天灾或不可预测和抵抗的情况(Act of God),或由政府颁布的一些政策和命令,例如當下的行动管制令,它的原理就在于因为这些不可预测事情的发生,而导致租约的条款无法进行,比如因为政府的行动管制令,无法工作或收入来源被切断而无法缴付租金等。

如果实在无法交付租金,我们又有什么方法去解决? 我们会在接下来的部分跟大家继续讨论。(待续)

Note:以上的信息属于基本法律常识和资讯,不属于法律咨询和意见,若有任何法律咨询欢迎联络我们,谢谢大家。

黄雪仪律师 曾成源律师

Address

MESSRS OOI'S CHAMBERS, Jalan 1/17, Fadason Business Centre
Kuala Lumpur
52000

Telephone

+60123148012

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when OOI'S Chambers - 黄雪仪律师事务所 posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to OOI'S Chambers - 黄雪仪律师事务所:

Share