23/06/2025
š£ Anthony Sciberras et -vs- Angelo D'Amato et - App. Äiv. 176/2012 (Retrial) - 23 June 2025: Reaffirming Article 435 Civil Code
In a recent judgment delivered on 23 June 2025, the Court of Appeal definitively rejected an application for retrial (ritrattazzjoni) under Article 811(e) COCP, which sought to annul a prior judgment on the basis of alleged misapplication of the law.
The applicants (defendants in the case) had argued that in its judgment handed down on the 3rd of October 2024, the Court of Appeal had wrongly applied Article 435 of the Civil Code, asserting that this provision - which imposes a mandatory three-metre distance between buildings in certain circumstances - did not apply to boundary wall constructions. The Court, however, dismissed the argument, clarifying that Article 435 remains applicable even when the first building is constructed directly on the boundary, provided that the second builder chooses not to avail himself of the right to make the party wall common (which applicant's could not have done in this particular case).
The judgment revisits the historical foundations of Article 435 C.C., tracing its lineage through the Codice Albertino and Codice Civile Italiano, and affirming its public order function in preventing conflicts between neighbours by ensuring adequate separation. The Court rightly held that its earlier application of the law stemmed from correct legal reasoning and not from any manifest error as required by Article 811(e) for retrial to be admissible.
āļø The plaintiffs' position was thus upheld, and the retrial dismissed with costs against the applicants.
(N.B. The accompanying image is AI-Generated).