26/11/2025
Today’s spotlight is on Supreme Court decision:
Title Deeds are Prima Facie Evidence but Not Conclusive Proof of Land Ownership
Harcharan Sehmi & another v Tarabana Company Limited & 5 others, Petition E033 of 2023; [2025] KESC 21 (KLR) eng@2025-04-11" rel="ugc" target="_blank">https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kesc/2025/21/eng@2025-04-11
Brief Facts The appellants were registered leasehold proprietors of land in Nairobi acquired in 1968. Before the lease expired in 2001, they applied for renewal but received no formal response. In 2009, the Government allocated the same land to the 2nd respondent, who later transferred it to the 1st respondent. The appellants remained in possession until their eviction in 2014. They filed a suit before the Environment and Land Court, which nullified the respondents’ titles and reinstated the appellants as owners. However, the Court of Appeal reversed the ELC’s judgment, holding that the 1st respondent was a bona fide purchaser. The Supreme Court considered whether such a purchaser’s title could withstand an illegal allocation and addressed the doctrine of legitimate
expectation in lease renewals. Issues
i. Whether the concept of indefeasibility of title under Section 23 of the repealed Registration of Titles Act was similarly applicable under Section 26 of the Land Registration Act.
ii. Whether a certificate of title is conclusive or prima facie evidence of ownership.
iii. The meaning, scope, and applicability of the doctrine of bona fide purchaser for value without notice.
iv. Whether a legitimate expectation arises in the context of lease renewal over public land. Holding
1. Under the repealed Registration of Titles Act, title was conclusive evidence of ownership. On the other hand, under the Land Registration Act, a certificate of title is only prima facie evidence of ownership and can be challenged for fraud, misrepresentation, or illegality.
2. A bona fide purchaser must prove (i) innocence, (ii) payment of value, and (iii) acquisition of a legal es