Ozg Lawyers, Thane

Ozg Lawyers, Thane Ozg Lawyers - Simply a Click Away || 24hrs Support || Cost Effective Services || Easy Steps for Complex Cases || Zero Time Waste.

Police Raid on Call Center engaged in   🟣 Domestic 🟢 International 🟡 MNCWhatsApp Chat @ WA.ME/918779696580DM📱Ozg legal c...
14/04/2023

Police Raid on Call Center engaged in 🟣 Domestic 🟢 International 🟡 MNC

WhatsApp Chat @ WA.ME/918779696580

DM📱

Ozg legal compliance reporting can help OSPs clearly define, assess, and communicate their approach and control environment to their clients. Since the circumstances around each OSP relationship are unique, a leading OSP process leverages a tailored reporting approach that uses multiple reporting methods. By taking the necessary steps to identify the need for our assurance reporting and the appropriate reporting type, the OSP (and the associated users) can determine whether their risk and compliance needs are addressed.



conducts the following independent assessments of an organization’s tech infrastructure to establish if existing controls/processes meet management objectives and to demonstrate controls to customers and their auditors through reporting and integrated requirements.

📌 01. Telecom Compliance Advisory Services.

📌 02. Enterprise Voice & Unified Communications Design Review - Voice, Data & Network.

📌 03. Cloud and Foreign EPABX.

📌 04. Data Privacy Regulations.

📌 05. Telecom Compliance Solution Recommendations.

📌 06. OSP Intimation Services.

📌 07. Work from Home (WFH).

📌 08. Regulatory Updates.

📌 09. CRM Audit Services.

📌 10. Telecom Service Provider - Audit Services.

📌 11. DoT Audit Support Services.

📌 12. WPC compliance.

OSP Advisory Team

Website: ospcompliance.com

24/7 Support 📲 8779696580

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Get OSP Compliance subscription for your BPO or Call Center to avoid any incidental risk or legal trouble.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

ECB Restriction List -WhatsApp Chat ☎️ WA.me/918779696580👩🏻‍💼👨🏽‍💼 If you are a practicing professional then you can also...
06/11/2022

ECB Restriction List -

WhatsApp Chat ☎️ WA.me/918779696580

👩🏻‍💼👨🏽‍💼 If you are a practicing professional then you can also join to Ozg RBI Compliance Group having 4000+ registered members across the country. Fee: ₹192/Year.

Follow 💗 DM

💬 Support
Ozgian 24/7

👨‍⚖️ Litigation
Ozg Lawyers

📂 Filings
Ozg Documentation Centre

🏦 AD Bank
Ozg Finance (NBFC: ask @ ozgfinance.com) has service level association with 20+ top ranked pvt banks.

Link: Learn more @ ecb.fema.in

Ozg Lawyers: The #1 FEMA Advisory

**************************************

 ,   &  In 2007, the promoters of New Delhi Television (NDTV), Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy made an offer to buy back sha...
27/08/2022

, &

In 2007, the promoters of New Delhi Television (NDTV), Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy made an offer to buy back shares from their existing investors. At first, the plan was to buy a 7.73% stake from another entity GA Global Investments. But this immediately triggered something called an open offer.

What is an open offer?

Well, according to capital market regulations, promoters (or any investor in general) have to abide by a few rules when they’re buying large chunks of a publicly listed company. One rule relates to minority shareholders.

If you’re a minority shareholder in a company holding a few hundred stocks, then you have every right to exit an investment if you believe a massive change in ownership structure could have an impact on the company’s future. This is why the regulator asks promoters (or investors) to make an additional open offer to minority shareholders when they buy a sizeable part of the company from certain select investors. The open offer will then allow you to sell your shares at a certain price and walk away from the investment if you so desire.

So when the Roy's bought back 7.73% of the company, they had to make an open offer to consummate this transaction. Unfortunately, they didn’t have the money. So to come good on the cash, they borrowed around ₹540 crores from Indiabulls Financial Services Limited by pledging NDTV shares as collateral.

But then, the global financial crisis changed the whole landscape. The value of NDTV shares collapsed and the collateral backing the loan lost most of its value. It’s likely that Indiabulls demanded to be repaid in full. So in October 2008, the promoters took another loan of ₹375 crores from Limited, in order to repay Services.

But the ICICI loan carried an interest rate of about 19%. It was getting desperate. This is when an unusual hero appears in the background— A lender by the name of Commercial Pvt. Ltd. (or VCPL). This company made out a loan to NDTV worth ₹350 crores on an interest-free basis, for the duration of 10 years. In return, NDTV had to offer VCPL something called a convertible warrant.

A convertible warrant is a financial instrument that will allow you to buy shares at a fixed price if certain clauses are met. So by owning the warrants, VCPL had an avenue to own a sizeable chunk of NDTV.

As we noted, these were desperate times and the promoters of NDTV didn’t have much of a choice. So they obliged. They held a ~29% stake in NDTV through a firm called RRPR Pvt Ltd. And they told VCPL that they would hand over the entire stake of RRPR in the form of warrants.

So in summary, the mystery entity VCPL came to own warrants in — and through it an avenue to own a 29% stake in NDTV.

But wait, who is VCPL — this mystery lender?

Okay, this is where things get interesting. See, VCPL was only set up in 2008. They don’t have a track record and it doesn’t seem as if they were dabbling with much else, except this one transaction — the loan made out to NDTV promoters.

But to get here, VCPL had to first borrow money from another entity — . And guess who owned ?

Reliance ( )!

So it meant that one of India’s largest conglomerates had a hand in NDTV (indirectly) all these years. But outside of that, not much has changed this past decade. Granted, Reliance washed its hands off VCPL and two other entities — and came to own the company. But the rumour is that the new owners still had some indirect ties to Reliance.

Until this week, when Adani went ahead and bought VCPL for ₹113 crores. And within minutes of announcing the deal, it dropped another bombshell. It noted that VCPL was exercising the warrants, which translated to a full ownership of RRPR. And a 29% stake in NDTV as a consequence.

Now if you are wondering why the people that once owned VCPL decided to sell to Adani, that's anybody’s guess. But what we do know is that this one transaction will now induce a chain reaction.

Remember how we said — “When somebody comes to own a massive chunk in a publicly listed company, that triggers an open offer?”

Well, Adani has to make an open offer of its own. Since they’re acquiring more than 29% of NDTV, they are mandated to make an offer to buy an additional 26% of the company from the other shareholders. This would give them a controlling stake of at least 51%.

So far Adani has stuck to the script. They made an open offer for ₹294 per share. But NDTV isn’t taking this indignity lying down. The company is fighting back.

On Thursday it filed a letter with the stock exchange detailing two very important points.

First, the company said that could only exercise the warrant after obtaining explicit consent from the promoters (which in this case never happened, according to the promoters).

Second, there’s a ban in place preventing NDTV’s founders from dealing in financial securities. A ban that was imposed in November 2020 because the promoters were found guilty of (buying or selling shares on the basis of privileged information that the general public didn’t have access to) under . But the ban will only be lifted by 26 November 2022. So NDTV believes that VCPL can only acquire the shares by overriding the ban. Which would require the regulator's approval.

But lawyers contend that it’s just a delaying tactic. And on Friday, Adani filed a counter suggesting that they acquired shares of NDTV by dealing with RRPR and not the promoters. They’re basically saying — “RRPR isn’t the entity being barred from dealing in securities. It’s Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy."

So it doesn’t see any reason why the deal shouldn’t be executed.

So what’s the option for NDTV?

The founders can still come to control NDTV if they made an open offer of their own. But to do this, they’d have to stump up several hundred crores and it’s unlikely Roys have this kind of money — unless another “Mystery lender” appears from out of nowhere.

Now bear in mind, Adani still hasn’t come to own a controlling stake in NDTV. The open offer is still open. And considering they made an offer at a discount, to the current market price, shareholders may not be tempted to sell their holding to . However, Adani may have a trump card.

There’s a foreign shareholder in — an entity that goes by the name LTS Investment Fund Ltd. They hold nearly 10% of the company.

But this fund has an unusual relationship with Adani. It seems almost 98% of the fund’s monies are invested in only 4 . So some reports argue that Adani could still come to own a controlling stake by buying out these large institutional holders at a bargain price.

So yeah, the saga isn’t over by any stretch of the imagination. But hopefully, now you have a better idea of what’s happening around you.



Go to: facebook.com/sebicompliance

Can an Admin be held liable for objectionable content posted by a member in a Whatsapp/Facebook group?WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA...
14/08/2022

Can an Admin be held liable for objectionable content posted by a member in a Whatsapp/Facebook group?

WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA.me/918779696580

Appointment Link - ozglaw.com/appointment

Let's understand it from following 3 cases came before Hon’ble Bombay, Delhi & Kerala High Court for adjudication -

1) ⛔ In Kishor v. State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCCOnLine Bom 654 case, an application under of the CrPC was filed before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging the charge-sheet that named the applicant as an accused. The applicant was charged for being a WhatsApp admin (a position that many of us have occupied) of a group in which one of the members allegedly used filthy language including sexual coloured remarks against another member of the same group.

The charges levelled against the admin were serious- ‘sexual harassment and punishment for sexual harassment ( , IPC), ‘words, gestures or acts intended to outrage the modesty of a woman’ ( ), ‘punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form’ ( IT Act) and ‘abetment of a thing’ ( , IPC).

If you are wondering whether these allegations are a little too drastic to be levelled against an admin of a group, let us clear the air and inform you that this was not a one-off incident.

According to the Bombay High Court-

“A group administrator cannot be held vicariously liable for an act of a member of the group, who posts objectionable content, unless it is shown that there was common intention or pre-arranged plan acting in concert pursuant to such plan by such member of a Whatsapp group and the administrator.”

In other words, WhatsApp admin does not incur liability solely on the ground that he holds such a position within the group. Thus, even if the admin does not remove the member who posted objectionable content on the group, he would still not be liable.

What do our clients say?

"I received a call from and my problem get sorted out! I couldn't believe it - my legal plan just saved me from a huge loss."

WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA.me/918779696580

Appointment Link - ozglaw.com/appointment

2) ⛔ Similarly, while determining a civil defamation case, the Delhi High Court in Ashish Bhalla v. Suresh Chowdhary, (2016 SCCOnLine Del 6329) observed that an admin of a group cannot be held liable. According to the Delhi High Court –

“When an online platform is created, the creator thereof cannot expect any of the members thereof to indulge in defamation and defamatory statements made by any member of the group cannot make the Administrator liable therefore. It is not as if without the Administrator’s approval of each of the statements, the statements cannot be posted by any of the members of the Group on the said platform.”

Another aspect in these cases which is worth examining is the routine invocation of the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000. In this context, the Bombay High Court clarified that an admin, by merely creating a group does not publish or transmit material over the internet. Thus, the Court drew a distinction between a mere group admin and an intermediary under the Act.

The term intermediary refers to any person who, on behalf of another person, receives, stores or transmits an electronic record or provides any service with respect to that record. Generally, the admin of a group does not store or receive electronic records on behalf of another. Rather, it it is WhatsApp itself which is arguably an intermediary as it acts as medium between two or more persons.

WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA.me/918779696580

Appointment Link - ozglaw.com/appointment

3) ⛔ Recently in a similar matter Kerala HC in Manual v. State of Kerala, 2022 SCC OnLine Ker 990, held that -

“In the absence of a special penal law creating vicarious liability, an Admin of a WhatsApp group cannot be held liable for the objectionable post by a group member.”

Hon’ble Court further added that-

There is no master-servant or a principal-agent relationship between the Admin of a WhatsApp group and its members. It goes against basic principles of criminal law to hold an Admin liable for a post published by someone else in the group.

According to the Courts, the only privilege that an admin enjoys is to add or delete members from the group, apart from creating the group itself.

However, in many cases, the current admin may not even be the person who created the group. For instance, Junaid Khan, an admin of a WhatsApp group was arrested and charged with sedition as well as other offences under the IT Act. However, Junaid had not created the group but became the admin by default when the original creator exited.

Of course, there are limits to what one can say on a public platform and there must be consequences, in certain cases, but a narrowly focussed defamation action against the maker of the statement may be enough to address that mischief. It is high time that law enforcement agencies learn from the above decisions and refrain from making an artificial distinction between the members and the admin and initiating frivolous prosecutions.

WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA.me/918779696580

Ozg Documentation Centre
fb.com/documentationcentre

Support
Ozgian 24x7

Litigation
Ozg Lawyers



WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA.me/918779696580

Social Stock Exchange in India Go to: https://sebicompliance.ozg.in On 25-07-2022, the Securities and Exchange Board of ...
28/07/2022

Social Stock Exchange in India

Go to: https://sebicompliance.ozg.in

On 25-07-2022, the Securities and Exchange Board of India has issued SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Third Amendment) Regulations, 2022 to amend the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018.

The amendment inserts a Chapter X-A dealing with (‘SSE’).

Key Points:

Applicablilty:

To a Not-for-profit Organization seeking to get registered and raise funds through a SSE.

To a Not-for-profit Organization seeking to get registered and raise funds through a SSE.

For Profit Social Enterprise seeking to be identified as a under the provisions of this Chapter.

SSE will be accessible only to and non-institutional investors.

Every SSE will constitute a Social Stock Exchange Governing Council to have an oversight on its functioning.

This chapter also covers the eligibility conditions for being identified as a Social Enterprise.

A Not-for-Profit organization must mandatorily seek registration with a SSE before it raises funds through a SSE.

Other features covered under this chapter are:
Fund raising by social enterprise;

👁️‍🗨️ Ineligibility for raising of funds;

👁️‍🗨️ Issuance of Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments;

👁️‍🗨️ Eligibility for issuance of Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments;

👁️‍🗨️ Procedure for public issuance of Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments by a Not-for-Profit Organization;

👁️‍🗨️ Procedure for private issuance of Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments by a Not-for-Profit Organization;

👁️‍🗨️ Contents of the fund-raising document;
Deemed compliance with Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957;

👁️‍🗨️ Termination of listing of Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments from the Social Stock Exchange.

Follow @ instagram/sebicompliance

Follow @ twitter.com/sebicompliance

Failed in Online  ?Are you violating FEMA due to Ignorance?Schedule your Tele-Appointment with   to save your precious t...
25/07/2022

Failed in Online ?

Are you violating FEMA due to Ignorance?

Schedule your Tele-Appointment with to save your precious time and hard-earned money on unwanted legal costs for your / RBI and Enforcement Directorate related matters.



Learn more at ☎️ FEMA.ozg.in

₹3780 ☎️ ozglaw.com/appointment

Legal ☎️ [email protected]

Ozg Support Desk ☎️ WA.me/918779696580



📲 instagr.am/FEMAconsultant

📲 facebook.com/forextradingadvisory

The Enforcement Directorate has filed a prosecution complaint (charge sheet) against   India Private Limited (AIIPL), In...
09/07/2022

The Enforcement Directorate has filed a prosecution complaint (charge sheet) against India Private Limited (AIIPL), Indians for Amnesty International Trust (IAIT) and others in a case.

The money laundering case is based on the First Information Report (FIR) registered by the (CBI) against the accused entities for alleged violation of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act ( ).

AIIPL is an umbrella entity under Amnesty International Ltd, UK, which was declared to be set up for the cause of social activities in India.

According to the , in 2011-12, Amnesty International India Foundation Trust (AIIFT) had been granted permission under the FCRA for receiving foreign contribution from Amnesty International-United Kingdom. However, the permission was subsequently revoked on the basis of adverse inputs received from security agencies. Then, two new entities — Amnesty International India Private Limited (AIIPL), Indians for Amnesty International Trust (IAIT) — were formed in 2013-14 and 2012-13 allegedly to escape the FCRA route and receive overseas funds in the guise of service export and (FDI).

The Enforcement Directorate issued a show-cause notice to International Pvt Ltd (AIIPL) and it's CEO for contravention of the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act ( ), 1999 and imposed a penalty of Rs 51.72 crore and Rs 10 crore respectively in 2019.

The show cause notice issued by ED:

📌 1) Charged that during the period between November 2013 and June 2018, remittance which was received by AIIPL and claimed as a receipt for Business and Management Consultancy and Public Relation Services for export of services to the foreign beneficiary is nothing but the amount borrowed from overseas remitter, thereby violating the FEMA provisions.

📌 2) All contentions and submission from AIIPL regarding the claim of the remittance towards the export of services to Amnesty International have been dismissed, in the absence of concrete evidence.

📌 3) Funds that have arrived to the hands of AIIPL through inward remittances to the tune of Rs 51,72,78,111.87 is nothing but the fund lent by Amnesty International to AIIPL to ensure its objectives in the territorial jurisdiction of India, which is not accordance with the provisions of Regulation 3 of Foreign Exchange Management (borrowing and lending in Foreign Exchange) Regulations, 2000.

📌 To get consultation on your case, please schedule a tele-appointment with Ozg Lawyers at link below.





☎️ ozglaw.com/appointment

📲 WA.me/918779696580

Fill up following form to book an appointment with Ozgian – Ozg Rep. at your nearby location. Note: Ozg Appointments usually takes at-least 30-45 minutes depending on case. Consultation tea…

Divorce by Mutual Consent -WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA.me/918779696580After lockdown, the world goes digital. The   brought a new...
18/06/2022

Divorce by Mutual Consent -

WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA.me/918779696580

After lockdown, the world goes digital. The brought a new ace in our lengthy litigation system.

₹₹₹₹₹₹ Nominal Fee

What do our clients say?

"I received a call from Ozg Lawyers and my problem get sorted out! I couldn't believe it - my legal plan just saved me from a huge loss."

Simply, WhatsApp / Email / Call to connect with us.

Appointment Link - ozglaw.com/appointment

Case Winning Doc.
Ozg Documentation Centre

Support
Ozgian 24x7

Litigation
Ozg Lawyers



WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA.me/918779696580

WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA.me/918779696580After lockdown, the world goes digital. The   brought a new ace in our lengthy litigat...
16/06/2022

WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA.me/918779696580

After lockdown, the world goes digital. The brought a new ace in our lengthy litigation system.

₹₹₹₹₹₹ Nominal Fee

What do our clients say?

"I received a call from Ozg Lawyers and my problem get sorted out! I couldn't believe it - my legal plan just saved me from a huge loss."

Simply, WhatsApp / Email / Call to connect with us.

Appointment Link - ozglaw.com/appointment

Ozg Documentation Centre
fb.com/documentationcentre

Support
Ozgian 24x7

Litigation
Ozg Lawyers



WhatsApp Chat 📲 WA.me/918779696580

Address

Thane

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ozg Lawyers, Thane posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Ozg Lawyers, Thane:

Share

WhatsApp #

24hrs WhatsApp # 8779696580

Email: [email protected]