Joshi & Associates

Joshi & Associates Our objective is to make legal services efficient, effective, affordable and hassle free. We focus on providing practical and innovative legal solutions.

Our aim is to provide pragmatic, solution-oriented and technically feasible advice to our clients.

19/02/2020

Prospective grooms of well-to-do families, who are weak in reading and writing, are being cheated regularly by women after marriage. Read Details

15/02/2020

The Bombay High Court rejected anticipatory bail applications filed by journalist Gautam Navlakha and academician/scholar Anand Teltumbde, accused in the case regarding caste based violence that took...

15/02/2020

The Additional Sessions Court, Pune on Friday allowed National Investigation Agency's application seeking transfer of the trial in Bhima Koregaon case to Special NIA Court Mumbai. Firstly, the...

15/02/2020

Lawyers entering the court premises will soon have to swipe their electronic identity (ID) cards, issued by the Bar Council & Bar Association, on the ID card scanners installed at the gates of courts, a state govt official said.

Litigants will have to submit copies of Aadhaar card or any other identity proof for entering the courts, he said.

On the direction of the Allahabad HC, the state govt is preparing a comprehensive security plan will for the courts in the 75 districts of the state.

After the killing of an accused inside a courtroom in Bijnore in December last year, the HC had directed the state govt to prepare a plan for security of courts.

Additional chief secretary (home) Awanish Kumar Awasthi on Thursday said a detailed plan for security of the courts is being prepared. The district magistrates & superintendents of police of all the districts have directed to submit their work-plan regarding courts’ security in respective districts.

Preparations for courts’ security in various districts were reviewed through video conferencing. The state govt has ordered installation of CCTVs, security gadgets, construction of the boundary wall & separate entry gates for litigants, checking of passes of litigants, removal of encroachments & enlisting of vendors on the court premises, Awasthi said.

Speaking on Thursday’s bomb attack on the Lucknow court premises, Awasthi said it was a fallout of rivalry between two groups of lawyers.

Also, on the direction of the HC, district administration officers were directed to hold meetings with judges, lawyers & office-bearers of bar associations & brief them about the security arrangements. The suggestions of the bar associations will be included in the security plan, he said.

Read also : अमरोहा में हाईकोर्ट बेंच की स्थापना को गरजे अधिवक्ता
Principal secretary, law, JP Singh said chairman of the UP Bar Council has given his nod to the security plan of the state govt.

The complete security plan will be implemented in all UP courts within two to three months, he said.

Law minister Brijesh Pathak said the security plan of the court was being reviewed by chief secretary, additional chief secretary (home) & principal secretary, law.

The HC order on courts’ security will be implemented as per schedule, Pathak said.

13/02/2020

Last week, the Supreme Court has reiterated that when an accused is unrepresented before a Court, it has to either appoint an Amicus Curiae or to refer the matter to the Legal Services Committee requesting it to appoint an Advocate.

The order of the Court was passed in a case titled as SHAIK MUKTHAR vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH.

CASE BACKGROUND

In this case, the High Court of the State of Telangana had confirmed the conviction of the accused of the offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code while during the hearing they were unrepresented before the Court.

The Top Court in clear words disapproved of their approach and accordingly observed:

Read also : SC Collegium recommends to make 09 Addl. Judges of Madras HC, 01 Addl. Judge of Allahabad HC, permanent
It is by now well settled by a catena of judgments such as the decision of this Court in Rakesh & Anr V. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2011(12) SCC 512, that it is in the interest of justice to appoint an amicus curiae to assist the court where the accused is unrepresented. The Court may also refer the matter to the Legal Services Committee, which may appoint an advocate to represent the accused. The High Court, unfortunately, has not chosen to either appoint an Amicus curiae or to refer the matter to the Legal Services Committee requesting it to appoint an Advocate.
The Apex Court mentioned that it didn't take into account the fact that the incident occurred in the year 2011 and that the accused have been in custody for about 8 months and still observed that the matter is fit to be remitted to the High Court.

It referred to the evidence on record and confirmed the conviction but reduced their sentence to the period already undergone.

The order has been passed by Justice Mohan M. Shanthanagoudar and Justice R.Subhash Reddy on 04-02-2020.

12/02/2020

A Delhi Court on Tuesday hearing a plea by 2012 gang-r**e and murder victim Nirbhaya’s parents for issuance of fresh death warrant against the four death-row convicts, adjourned the hearing till tomorrow.

The court offered Pawan Gupta, one of the four death row convicts in the Nirbhaya gang r**e and murder case, legal aid after the defence lawyer AP Singh said that he doesn’t represent convict Pawan Gupta anymore.

The court directed AP Singh to immediately provide Pawan’s file to the new counsel. The judge asked the court staff to fetch the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DLSA) list of empanelled legal aid lawyers.

Pawan’s father informed the court that he’s not willing to engage a government lawyer. Assuring the father of legal aid, Additional Sessions Judge Dharmendra Rana asked the court staff to fetch the DLSA list of empanelled legal aid lawyers.

Public Prosecutor Irfan Ahmed requested the court to turn down the request of providing new legal counsel to Pawan as he has exhausted all his legal remedies and none of his petitions are pending before any authority. To this, the judge responded by saying that even if convicts are engaging in delay tactics, we can only deal with it in accordance with the law. Even till his last breath, the convict is entitled to audi alteram partem (the other side be heard), the judge said.

Nirbhaya’s father submitted before the court that giving a lawyer to Pawan at this stage would be a betrayal to Nirbhaya.

Nirbhaya’s mother Asha Devi broke down in the courtroom and left.

She said, “I am wandering here and there to get justice for my daughter and these convicts are using delaying tactics. I don’t know why the Court is not able to understand this.”

“What about my rights? I am standing with folded hands. Please issue the death warrant. I am also human. It’s been more than 7 years,” said Devi.

Yesterday the court asked the convicts to respond to the plea.

In their application, Nirbhaya’s parents submitted that the condemned prisoners were making a mockery of the law and frustrating the ex*****on of the sentence.

The application was filed after the Supreme Court gave liberty to the authorities to approach the trial court for a fresh date for the hanging of the convicts.

On January 31, the trial court had stayed “till further orders” the ex*****on of the four convicts in the case — Mukesh Kumar Singh (32), Pawan Gupta (25), Vinay Kumar Sharma (26) and Akshay Kumar (31), who are lodged in Delhi’s Tihar jail.

A 23-year-old physiotherapy intern, who came to be known as ”Nirbhaya”, was gang-r**ed and savagely assaulted on the night of December 16, 2012, in a moving bus in South Delhi. She died of her injuries a fortnight later in a Singapore hospital.

Six people, including the four convicts, Ram Singh and a juvenile — were named as accused.

Ram Singh, the prime accused, allegedly committed su***de by hanging himself in Tihar jail days after the trial began. The juvenile, who was said to be the most brutal of the attackers, was put in a correctional home for three years.

The juvenile was released in 2015 and sent to an undisclosed location amid concerns over a threat to his life. He, when released, was 20 years old.

The trial of the four adults began in a special fast-track court in March 2013 and they were sentenced to death in September 2013 by the trial court.

Meanwhile on Tuesday, convict Sharma approached the Supreme Court against the rejection of his mercy petition by the President.

Sharma, through his counsel A P Singh, also pleaded for the commutation of death sentence to life imprisonment.

President Ram Nath Kovind had on February 1 dismissed the mercy plea of Sharma

12/02/2020

When this Bengalurean visited a multiplex & was overcharged for a half litre bottle of water from an outlet at the complex, he didn't keep quiet. And just as well. The consumer court has ruled in his favour & granted him Rs 7,000 as compensation & Rs 20 as refund.

Appreciating the ‘will’ of one Om Hegde Uratota, a resident of Shrinagar, to fight back against a multiplex for the unfair trade practice, the 3rd Additional Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redresaal Forum has directed the authorities of Bengaluru Royal Meenakshi Mall, Bannerghatta Road, to refund Rs 20 with 12 per cent interest & also pay Rs 5,000 for causing mental agony & Rs 2,000 for the cost of litigation within 30 days.

“What has to be appreciated is the ‘will’ of the consumer (complainant) in bringing such things to light & his determination to fight. He didn't become a silent spectator as most of the people do by looking at the illegalities committed time & again by such outlets. No doubt, for one person paying Rs 20 extra may appear to be small & ignorable but when it is calculated from the perspective of the seller one can imagine the amount of income he derives by selling the product at a higher price,” noted a bench President Venkatasudarshan D. R. & Member L. Mamatha. The complainant stated that he had purchased a half litre drinking water bottle (Kinley) from a shop when he visited the multiplex on June 7, 2017.

He was asked to pay Rs 40 for the said bottle, when the MRP is only Rs 20. “The opposite party collected Rs 40 for half litre & thus committed an act of deficiency in service & also adopted an unfair trade practice,” said the complainant. He then issued a notice to the Manager of the outlet & demanded a refund of ? 20, but did not receive any reply following which he filed a case in the Consumer Court & sought refund along with the compensation.

The multiplex’s authorities contended that they were operating & running the facility after obtaining permission from the Govt of India & they provide a good ambience along with various amenities & a good viewing experience to movie goers/customers.

The defense advocate didn't deny that that the bottle was sold for Rs 40 from the outlet situated in the premises of the multiplex & the contentions made by the complainant.

12/02/2020

Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan is yet again in talks, this time due to the defamation case filed against him by IndiaBulls Venture Capital Management Co. Ltd.

Bhushan wanted the transfer of the case from where it was originally filled in Rohtak to Delhi for which he filed in the Supreme Court. The Top Court ultimately allowed the appeal on Monday.

The petition was allowed in by the Bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde on the ground that the Respondent hasn't objected to the petition.

Bhushan has claimed that the defamation filed against him is only a "vindictive legal tactic" against him, to silence him from highlighting the illegalities committed by the Company, in conducting its business.

Indiabulls had filed a criminal defamation case against him before the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rohtak, Haryana, for publishing allegedly defamatory content against the company via his Social Media handles namely, Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook, causing substantial damage to their goodwill.

Read also : SC rules, Anticipatory Bail u/s 438 CrPC has no Application in SC/ST Cases but there can be exceptions. [Read the Judgement]
Bhushan, in his transfer petition, has contended that the criminal proceedings have been initiated only to harass him since he is the signing authority and Secretary of Citizens Whistle Blowers Forum, that has filed a PIL (WPC 9887/2019) before the Delhi High Court, seeking an in-depth and time-bound investigation into the various illegalities and violations of law committed by the promoters of IndiaBulls.

Bhushan has further submitted that he is a practicing Advocate in Delhi and traveling to Haryana to attend hearings will cause him "undue difficulty". It is thus alleged that the company has used this very fact as leverage to silence him, by filing the case in Haryana.

In his submission, he went onto highlight various instances, where Indiabulls has used such "intimidatory legal tactics to overawe and silence those who highlight the illegalities and irregularities in the conduct of its business, so as to dissuade scrutiny.

Read also : SC on Sec.482 CrPC: HCs not justified in using inherent powers by relying on Sec.161 CrPC Statements. [Read the Judgement]
He brought in the notice of the Court that he hadn't made the statements without any evidence, rather relied on documents, balance sheets and ROC records that are available in the public domain and are available for anyone to see, study and conduct an analysis.

He remarked before the Company should rather have no trouble if the case is transferred to Delhi since the company has its registered offices in Delhi.

12/02/2020

Circulation Of Sexual Videos Online: SC Asks Centre To File Status Report On Meeting With Stakeholders
Read more: https://bit.ly/37gxaC1

Address

Panvel
410206

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 9pm
Tuesday 9am - 9pm
Wednesday 9am - 9pm
Thursday 9am - 9pm
Friday 9am - 9pm
Saturday 9am - 9pm
Sunday 9am - 1pm

Telephone

+919082142249

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Joshi & Associates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Joshi & Associates:

Share

Category