What are the opening hours?

Monday 9am - 5pm Tuesday 9am - 5pm Wednesday 9am - 5pm Thursday 9am - 5pm Friday 9am - 5pm Saturday 9am - 5pm

Lawyers Kingdom

Home
India
Noida
Lawyers Kingdom

Get legal assistance from top rated lawyers across country to file for various issues related to legal problems.

We offer transparent and simplified legal service.

22/03/2026

Supreme Court Justice N Kotiswar Singh on Saturday said judges often suffer from high blood pressure and other ailments due to intense work-related stress. Recalling his own experience, he said he was physically fit as a lawyer but developed a paunch and hypertension after joining the bench. “It’s a disease peculiar to judges,” he remarked, adding that many judges don’t disclose their health issues though doctors routinely check their BP. Speaking at the SCBA’s first National Conference on “Reimagining Judicial Governance,” Justice Singh said the public is largely unaware of judges’ working conditions, especially in district courts. He described the district judiciary as functioning in “pathetic conditions” and noted that trial courts hesitate to impose meaningful costs for delays. He also claimed lower court judges are often scared of lawyers, typically imposing only ₹50–₹100 as costs, reflecting pressure within the system.

21/03/2026

Amid protests by journalists, Delhi Police on Friday evening sealed the United News of India (UNI) office at Rafi Marg, hours after the Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of UNI’s land allotment in Central Delhi. Justice Sachin Datta dismissed UNI’s petition challenging the Land & Development Office (L&DO) letter dated March 29, 2023, which cancelled the 1979 allotment of 2,024 sq metres at 9, Rafi Marg, and directed authorities to take immediate possession. The Court noted the land was allotted for a composite media office complex but remained largely undeveloped for over four decades, despite revised allotment terms and inclusion of co-allottees like the Press Council of India. UNI cited policy shifts and coordination issues with agencies such as CPWD and NBCC, but the Court rejected this as an afterthought, holding UNI had effectively occupied valuable public land without fulfilling obligations for 45+ years.

20/03/2026

The Bombay High Court has ruled that charitable trusts in Maharashtra cannot be denied Income Tax registration or renewal under Section 12AB merely because their trust deeds lack an express “irrevocability” or “dissolution” clause (The Chamber of Tax Consultants & Ors. v. CIT(E)). The Bench of Justices BP Colabawalla and Firdosh P Pooniwalla held that a public charitable trust is presumed irrevocable by operation of law unless the trust instrument specifically provides a power of revocation. Since Section 12AB requires satisfaction only about the trust’s objects, genuineness of activities, and legal compliance, authorities cannot import additional conditions not found in the statute. The Court struck down the department’s practice of rejecting applications based solely on the missing clause and criticized the online Form 10AB system that effectively forced applicants to answer “Yes” to proceed, only to be penalized later. Rejection orders against six trusts were quashed, and pending applications must be reconsidered within six weeks. The Income Tax Department was directed to modify its portal accordingly.

20/03/2026

Bombay High Court has ruled that charitable trusts in Maharashtra cannot be denied income-tax registration/renewal under Section 12AB merely because their trust deeds do not expressly contain an “irrevocability” clause (The Chamber of Tax Consultants & Ors. v. CIT(E)). The Division Bench (Justices BP Colabawalla and Firdosh P Pooniwalla) held that a public charitable trust is presumed irrevocable by operation of law unless the trust instrument specifically provides a power of revocation. Hence, absence of an explicit irrevocability or dissolution clause is not a valid ground to reject Form 10AB applications. The Court struck down the departmental practice and directed authorities to refrain from such rejections, emphasising that Section 12AB requires satisfaction only about the trust’s objects, genuineness of activities, and legal compliance—not deed wording. It also faulted the online portal for forcing applicants to answer “Yes” on irrevocability and ordered the system to be corrected. Rejection orders against six Mumbai trusts were quashed; pending matters must be decided afresh within six weeks.

19/03/2026

The SRM School of Law, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, in collaboration with the National Foundation for Corporate Governance (under the aegis of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs), hosted the 11th Annual Moot Court Competition from March 2–7, 2026. The 2026 proposition centred on emerging regulatory challenges at the intersection of securities law, financial markets, and algorithm-based trading, requiring participants to address issues involving automated trading systems, high-frequency transactions, and regulatory oversight in advanced markets. The competition saw 36 universities participate nationwide and was inaugurated on March 5 by G Rajagopalan, who highlighted the role of legal research and advocacy, with a special address by V Venkatesan. A dedicated session on legal research methods and digital legal databases strengthened participants’ skills. After preliminary rounds judged by 36 academicians and practitioners, the top eight advanced to the knockouts. The final on March 7 was judged by Sharad Kumar Sharma, Satish Parasaran, Thriyambak J Kannan, Ashtawadh Balan, and Kesavamoorthy R. KLE Law College, Bengaluru won; School of Excellence in Law, Chennai were runners-up. PES Faculty of Law won Best Memorial; Nithyasree (Saveetha) Best Researcher; S Princy (Madurai) Best Speaker.

13/03/2026

The Supreme Court on Friday took suo motu cognisance of illegal sand mining in the National Chambal Sanctuary, flagging the grave threat it poses to endangered aquatic wildlife, including the critically endangered gharial. A Bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta said it had noted recent newspaper reports and a CSR submission indicating that protected areas under the gharial preservation programme are being “rampantly mined,” forcing gharials to relocate. The Court observed that such activity could severely damage breeding habitats and disrupt river ecology. The matter will now be placed before Chief Justice of India Surya Kant’s Bench for further directions. The Chambal river region—spanning parts of Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh—has long battled organised sand mafia networks despite periodic crackdowns and seizures. Reports also highlight attacks on officials attempting enforcement, reflecting the scale and persistence of the illegal mining business.

12/03/2026

Delhi High Court has upheld an interim injunction restraining Kent RO Systems Ltd from manufacturing or selling fans under the trademark “KENT” in **Kent RO Systems v Kent Cables**. A Division Bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Madhu Jain found **Kent Cables** to be the **prior adopter/user** of the mark, noting its adoption in 1984 and registration in 1986, along with material showing use of “KENT” for fans since at least 2009 (invoices, approvals, certifications and ads). The Court held fans were a **natural extension** of Kent Cables’ electrical business, and rejected Kent RO’s “allied goods” argument, reiterating that trademark classification is not decisive of similarity. The Bench also noted Kent RO’s **delay**—despite opposing applications and issuing a notice earlier—amounting to acquiescence. The Court clarified findings are **prima facie** and subject to trial.

11/03/2026

India’s Supreme Court on Wednesday permitted the plea for passive euthanasia for Harish Rana (31), who has been in a permanent vegetative state since a 2013 fall from a building. A Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan noted that Rana shows sleep–wake cycles but no meaningful interaction, remains fully dependent for self-care, and has been receiving clinically assisted nutrition through a PEG tube with no improvement. The Court held that the concerned medical board may, using its clinical discretion, consider withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in line with the 2018 Constitution Bench ruling in *Common Cause v. Union of India*, which recognised passive euthanasia and advance directives as part of dignity under Article 21. The parents had earlier been denied relief by the Delhi High Court, which held Rana was not terminally ill and not on mechanical support. The Supreme Court’s order may be among the first case-specific directions applying *Common Cause* guidelines.

10/03/2026

Legal technology platform CaseMine has launched **AMICUS AI – Advanced**, the most powerful version of its AI assistant for legal professionals to date. CaseMine will now offer two models: **AMICUS AI – Standard** (still available for existing users) and the newly introduced **Advanced** model, built to deliver major gains in depth, accuracy, and output quality. After extensive internal testing and benchmarking across legal research, document analysis, drafting, issue spotting, and complex legal reasoning, CaseMine reports AMICUS AI – Advanced outperformed every model previously deployed on its platform. AMICUS AI functions as a general-purpose conversational legal assistant—helping with research, analysing case materials, summarising documents, drafting replies and arguments, and identifying key issues. The Advanced model adds stronger reasoning, better multi-document comprehension, and improved drafting for complex matters. CaseMine also emphasised affordability and accessibility for India’s wider legal ecosystem. Learn more: https://www.casemine.com/chat

09/03/2026

A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court has upheld an interim order allowing Dr Reddy’s Laboratories to manufacture Semaglutide in India solely for export to jurisdictions where Novo Nordisk has no patent protection. Justices Hari Shankar and Om Prakash Shukla declined to interfere with the single-judge ruling dated December 2, 2025, which found Novo Nordisk’s 2014 species patent prima facie vulnerable to revocation under Section 64 of the Patents Act, 1970, citing lack of novelty and inventive step in light of prior art, including Novo’s earlier genus patent (expired in 2024) and scientific literature. The Court reiterated that domestic sale is not permitted under the interim arrangement. Novo Nordisk’s appeal against the export-only permission was dismissed, while the patent’s validity will be examined in detail at the final stage. Novo was represented by Hemant Singh and Mamta Rani Jha; Dr Reddy’s by Gopal Subramanium and J Sai Deepak.

06/03/2026

TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation is hiring a **Senior Research Fellow (Legal)** in **Delhi** (1 position). The role sits within TrustBridge’s **ADR Policy Research** initiative and is ideal for a policy researcher with strong experience in **institutional reform, regulatory processes, or think-tank research**. You will help **set the research agenda** on arbitration reform and develop **credible, evidence-backed recommendations**, working closely with **government stakeholders, arbitral institutions, and industry bodies** through consultations and partnerships.

**PQE:** 4–6 years
**Qualification:** Master’s in Law/Policy or PhD
**Core focus areas:** PSU arbitration culture; enforcement delays (post-award intervention/execution); institutional arbitration uptake.
**Remuneration:** ₹12–₹13 LPA

Interested candidates can send their CV/application to **[email protected]**.

Address

D 215
Noida
110092

Opening Hours

Monday	9am - 5pm
Tuesday	9am - 5pm
Wednesday	9am - 5pm
Thursday	9am - 5pm
Friday	9am - 5pm
Saturday	9am - 5pm

Telephone

+918076557815

Website

http://www.lawyerskingdom.com/, http://www.lawyerskingdom.in/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Lawyers Kingdom posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.