SpotLaw: Lawyers & litigants find Supreme Court Of India judgements easily

04/02/2021

Composite Reading of Sections 5 and 6 of the 1946 Act makes it evident that the grant or withdrawal of consent by the State Government, though valid for other territories in the State, does not

20/01/2021

We crossed 1 million
judgement views (total to date)
through SpotLaw App!

20/01/2021

SpotLaw App newsletter brings you the judgements delivered by Hon'ble Supreme Court.

'11' judgements were delivered between '11-Jan-21' and '15-Jan-21'

Click here to read them: https://spotlawapp.com/spotlawLetter.php

23/01/2019

SpotLaw crosses 27,000 downloads... thanks to all the users... Coming soon with SpotLaw 4.0 with the first Legal Artificial Intelligence (AI) Application - Justice Dristi Vishwas, a Chatbot who never stops talking and answers all your questions about Supreme Court and others...

15/11/2018

Get Live Updates on Statistics from Judgments of Supreme Court:

05/04/2017

Breaking News...

04/11/2016

Reaching 10,000 downloads... and about 40,000 queries... fastest spreading mobile app of 2016... great going... a unique way of doing legal research...

19/10/2016

Congratulations for amazing response from advocates, judges, academicians, litigants and other users... 8,700 downloads and 34,000 queries and judgment views... establishes great potentiality and user friendliness...

04/07/2016

India declined to vote in the appointment of a United Nations committee to oversee the rights of LGBT people all over the world.

In the wake of the June 12 Orlando Massacre, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) passed a resolution appointing an independent committee to ensure that LGBT people across the world do not face discrimination.

While all European and Latin American countries accepted the resolution, India, in the company of China, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan either voted against the resolution or abstained.


http://www.livelaw.in/india-abstains-voting-un-independent-expert-check-discrimination-sexual-preferences/

India on Friday abstained from voting on the appointment of a United Nations watchdog against discrimination based on sexual preferences.

30/06/2016

State of Uttar Pradesh vs Raj Narain

The case that began an Emergency. An act of law that began a defining period in a Country's life.

In 1975, Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha found Indira Gandhi guilty of Electoral Malpractice that made her unable to hold any political office.

In danger of losing her position, Gandhi had the President declare a State of Emergency, arresting and silencing all opposition with draconian law and police excess. The Emergency lasted two years before the Congress decided it was safe to hold elections.

The Janata Dal trounced the Congress in the 1977 elections and Raj Narain, the man with the courage to file for action, that began India's darkest period, beat Indira Gandhi in her constituency of Rae Bareilly.

It all began with a case.

27/06/2016

!

Kill the Monday Blues with the best way possible - by checking out something new and exciting!

Visit our SpotLaw Youtube page today!

Get a dose of your favourite topics, learn laws you never knew about and stay updated with all the legal news of our country (and beyond!)

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRcHsvvj0udUWLSmClund1Q

20/06/2016

When we consider the increasing rise of Police Brutality in our country, we need strong and stern action from our Courts in order to stem this threat to our freedoms.

The Jharkand High Court has initiated Suo Moto proceedings to punish the concerned Policemen who physically assaulted a minor girl under the pretext of interrogation.

http://www.livelaw.in/police-atrocity-guise-interrogation-jharkhand-h-c-initiates-suo-motu-proceedings/

Court also directed the State to pay a compensation of Rs 50,000 to the father of the victim minor girl on or before next date of posting i.e 22/06/16. The High Court of Jharkhand, has initiated suo motu proceedings against the state police machinery and others concerned, into an incident pertaining...