21 Legal

21 Legal [Advocates & Legal Strategists]

⚖️ Faith in Justice

🎯 Criminal Law || Constitutional Law

📍 New Delhi / J&K

28/09/2026
Muslim Personal Law Cannot Shield Sexual In*******se With Minor Wife From POCSO: Delhi HCNEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court...
27/09/2026

Muslim Personal Law Cannot Shield Sexual In*******se With Minor Wife From POCSO: Delhi HC

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has held that a marriage recognised under Muslim personal law does not grant immunity from prosecution under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) or the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), where the wife was below 18 years of age at the time of sexual in*******se.

Justice Sanjeev Narula observed that personal law cannot override statutory protections afforded to children under the POCSO Act and the BNS.

The Court held that a marriage claimed to be valid under Muslim personal law cannot, merely by virtue of that status, confer immunity from prosecution for sexual in*******se with a wife who was below 18 years at the relevant time.

“Any other view would create, through judicial decision, an exception which Parliament has expressly excluded,” the Court observed.

The ruling underscores that the statutory protection accorded to minors under the POCSO Act operates irrespective of the personal law under which a marriage is claimed to be valid.

"Grabbing a girl's breasts, breaking the drawstring of her pyjamas, and crushing her in one's arms cannot be considered ...
23/09/2026

"Grabbing a girl's breasts, breaking the drawstring of her pyjamas, and crushing her in one's arms cannot be considered a criminal offense." ___ "Justice " Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, Allahabad High Court

Although this is an old case, it has acquired renewed relevance in the wake of the horrific Jamui, Bihar incident, where a girl was allegedly molested and an attempt was made to sexually assault her on a public road—an incident captured on camera.

When a minor girl is groped, her pyjama string is broken and she is dragged towards a culvert, what more does a court need to see before recognising an attempt to r**e?

Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra of the Allahabad High Court held that the allegations “hardly constitute an offence of attempt to r**e”, while altering the charges to aggravated sexual assault under POCSO and assault with intent to disrobe.

The Supreme Court subsequently stayed the Allahabad High Court’s order.
The question is not whether judges should be harsh or lenient. The question is whether the law is being interpreted with adequate sensitivity to the dignity, bodily integrity and vulnerability of women and children.

When acts of sexual violence against a girl are interpreted so narrowly, it raises deeply disturbing questions about judicial sensitivity and the protection victims can expect from the justice system.

And that is precisely why this old judgment deserves to be remembered today.
Justice must protect the victim—not make society wonder how much more violence is required before the law recognises an attempted r**e.

22/09/2026

Address

New Delhi
110006

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when 21 Legal posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category