IndiaLaw LLP

22/05/2026

In New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Rekha Chaudhary & Others, the Supreme Court held that an insurer cannot be made liable for a penalty imposed due to the employer’s delay in paying compensation.

While compensation and interest may be covered under insurance, a penalty arises from the employer’s own fault and cannot be shifted to the insurer.

Insurance covers risk, not wrongdoing.

21/05/2026

In Union of India v. Larsen & Toubro Ltd., the Supreme Court held that an arbitrator cannot award pre-award or pendente lite interest if the contract expressly prohibits it.

The dispute arose from a railway modernization contract, where the arbitral tribunal granted interest despite a no-interest clause. The Court ruled that an arbitrator’s powers are bound by the contract and such clauses cannot be bypassed by labeling interest as compensation.

The takeaway: in arbitration, the contract sets the limits.

19/05/2026

In V. Ganesan v. State & Anr., the Supreme Court held that a failed business deal or investment loss does not automatically amount to cheating under Section 420 IPC.

The producer completed and released the film, so the dispute was civil in nature, not criminal. The Court clarified that criminal law punishes dishonest intention from the beginning, not failed business outcomes.

{failed investment criminal case, Supreme Court cheating law, Section 420 IPC, business loss fraud}

18/05/2026

In the Supreme Court held that earning interest on a fixed deposit does not amount to a commercial activity under the .

In Sant Rohidas Leather Industries’ dispute against Vijaya Bank, the Court clarified that even a company can qualify as a consumer if surplus funds are simply parked in a fixed deposit.

However, disputes involving fraud, forgery, and unauthorized pledging require a civil trial rather than consumer forum proceedings.

{fixed deposit consumer rights, Supreme Court banking dispute, Consumer Protection Act 1986, commercial purpose, banking fraud}

Fraud IndiaLaw

16/05/2026

In a case involving a misleading Facebook post about a minor, the Rajasthan High Court held that false online content can directly threaten a person’s safety, privacy, and dignity.

The post falsely claimed that the child was missing and announced a cash reward for finding her. In reality, the child was safe with her mother. But the post led strangers to visit her home, creating a serious risk to her safety. Because apparently the internet needed another reminder that “sharing” is not a substitute for thinking.

The Court held that spreading false information online can violate Article 21 of the Constitution, which protects life, dignity, and privacy. It also noted the duties of social media platforms under the Information Technology Rules, 2021 to address misleading, harmful, and privacy-invading content.

The ruling makes it clear: digital harm is real harm. Social media platforms cannot ignore false content when it puts a child’s safety at risk.

{misleading Facebook post, Rajasthan High Court, Meta takedown order, Article 21 privacy rights, IT Rules 2021}

16/05/2026

Where legal excellence met sporting passion!
The grounds were filled with energy, excitement, and incredible team spirit as we hosted our much-awaited IndiaLaw Premier League 2026 — a celebration that brought together our lawyers, partners, and teams beyond the world of law and into the true spirit of cricket.

From thrilling performances to unforgettable moments on the pitch, the tournament reflected the camaraderie, passion, and unity that define our culture at IndiaLaw LLP.

A heartfelt congratulations to Suresh Palav and the unstoppable Fearless Fighters for emerging as the champions of IPL 2026!

A big shoutout as well to our runners-up, Black Rangers, for their remarkable sportsmanship and fighting spirit throughout the tournament.
Special appreciation to Aaushi Doshi and the energetic Red Rebels, along with Rahul Vibidi and the spirited White Knights, for bringing unmatched enthusiasm and positivity to the field.

What made this edition truly special was the inspiring participation of our women team players, whose dedication, enthusiasm, and support elevated the spirit of the event and showcased the power of inclusivity and teamwork.

At IndiaLaw LLP, we believe the strongest teams are built not just in boardrooms and courtrooms, but also through shared experiences, collaboration, and moments that bring us together.

Here’s to sportsmanship, leadership, teamwork, and many more memorable seasons ahead!

13/05/2026

The Gujarat High Court has held that parties in mutual consent divorce cases may participate in conciliation proceedings through video conferencing when physical appearance is impractical.

In this case, the husband lived in the United States, and all disputes had already been settled. The Court ruled that insisting on physical presence would serve no purpose and that technology should be used to improve access to justice.

12/05/2026

A key safety rule in drug regulation may soon change.
The Government has proposed amendments under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, potentially removing mandatory final testing of certain biological products for HIV and Hepatitis B & C.

The shift aligns with global trends toward process-based safety checks during manufacturing instead of end-product testing.
But the draft lacks clarity on alternative safeguards, raising concerns about how safety will be ensured.

The amendment is still under consultation existing rules continue for now.
Bottom line: reform is welcome, but not at the cost of public health.

{ Lawyer, Drugs, Regulation, health, care, lab}

10/05/2026

On Mother's Day, IndiaLaw LLP celebrates the strength, care, and unwavering support of mothers who shape lives with love, resilience, and wisdom.

We honour their invaluable role in nurturing families and building a compassionate society, inspiring us every day through their dedication and selfless spirit.

09/05/2026

In Farzanabanu Mohammadhanif Shaikh v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation & Ors., the Gujarat High Court held that family pension cannot be denied due to incomplete marriage documents.

The Court ruled that under Muslim personal law, registration of a Nikah is not mandatory. Pension rights are statutory and cannot be defeated by technicalities when a valid marriage is established.

{family pension rights, Gujarat High Court, Muslim personal law, Nikah validity, second wife pension}

09/05/2026

The constitutional guarantee of personal liberty continues to shape India’s evolving bail jurisprudence. In a recent decision, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed that prolonged incarceration of an undertrial prisoner without conclusion of trial amounts to a serious violation of the fundamental right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution.

By granting bail to an accused who had remained in custody for nearly nine years, the Court underscored that procedural delays cannot justify indefinite deprivation of liberty, even in cases involving serious allegations. The judgment also serves as a reminder that constitutional courts must actively safeguard individual rights where systemic delays threaten to convert the criminal process itself into punishment.

Our latest article examines the Court’s reasoning and its implications for bail jurisprudence, undertrial detention, and the constitutional right to a speedy trial in India.

Read more: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/criminal/right-to-speedy-trial-undertrial/

The Supreme Court of India in Vaibhav Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh has once again drawn attention to a recurring and deeply concerning issue within the criminal justice system, namely the prolonged incarceration of undertrial prisoners. The case arose from a challenge to an order of the Allahabad...