Libra Law Associates

Libra Law Associates We are a Legal firm based in Kolkata and we provide our legal services to empower people

Once you have met a     what are the procedures, legal methods and fines that come into play? If you wish to know in det...
12/08/2023

Once you have met a what are the procedures, legal methods and fines that come into play? If you wish to know in detail, read through the second part of the legal and insightful article of the facts to be known by a common man to assess road accidents.


WHAT ARE THE PROCEDURES WHEN AFTER A MOTOR ACCIDENT HAPPENED:-
A case is registered by the local police on complaining or either they will take cognizance on their own. (Registration of F.I.R). For this-
One should take pictures of the accident scene or even a video for use as evidence later on. Even just a passer-by can do this and provide the photos or videos to police for support in investigation and delivery of justice.
They should, however, call the 100 number (police hotline) and inform what the situation is in a clear and calm manner.
What is said on this call gets recorded and can be used as evidence later on.
A…After this, police has to register FIR, investigate and then charge-sheet the accused. After this, the judicial mechanism will set itself into motion.
B..Legal intricacies involving demand of proper compensation to be put forward before MACT tribunal.
Who Can Claim Compensation in Motor Accident Cases?:-
Section 165 (claim for compensation) can be made–
1..By the person who has sustained the injury.
2..By the owner of the property where death has resulted from the motor accident.
3..By all or any of the legal representatives of the deceased.
4..By any agent duly authorized by the person injured or all or any of the legal representatives of the deceased, as the case may be.

What Documents to be required in Death Cases:-
1. Death certificate
2. Proof of age of the deceased which may be in form of a) Birth Certificate; b) School Certificate; c)
Certificate from Gram Panchayat (in case of illiterate); d) Aadhar Card
3. Proof of Occupation and Income of the deceased which may be in form of a) Pay slip/salary certificate
(salaried employee); b) Bank statements of the last six months; c) Income tax Return; Balance Sheet
4. Proof of the legal representatives of the deceased (Names, Age, Address, Phone Number & Relationship)
5. Treatment record, medical bills and other expenditure
6. Bank Account no. of the legal representatives of the deceased with name and address of the bank
7. Any other document found relevant

What Documents to be required in Injury cases:-
1. Multi angle photographs of the injured
2. Proof of age of the deceased which may be in form of a) Birth Certificate; b) School Certificate; c)
Certificate from Gram Panchayat (in case of illiterate); d) Aadhar Card
3. Proof of Occupation and Income of the deceased which may be in form of a) Pay slip/salary certificate (salaried employee); b) Bank statements of the last six months; c) Income tax Return; Balance Sheet
4. Treatment record, medical bills and other expenditure.
5. Disability certificate (if available)
6. Proof of absence from work where loss of income on account of injury is being claimed, which may be in the form of a) Certificate from the employer; b) Extracts from the attendance register.
7. Proof of reimbursement of medical expenses by employer or under a Mediclaim policy, if taken
8. Any other document found relevant

COMPENSATION UNDER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT – AMENDMENT IN SECTION 163A—----
SECTION 163 A:
Third Party Motor Accident claims can be registered with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) under the following Sections of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Section 140 :– This is a No Fault Liability claim under which the compensation payable is as under:
• Rs.50000/- For Death And Rs.25000/- For Permanent Disablement. This Is Fixed Amount.No Need To Prove Wrongful Act/Negligence/Default Of The Owner Of The Vehicle.
Section 166: – This is a Fault Liability claim – Victim/Legal Heirs of victim have to prove in the Court of Law the wrongful act/negligence/default of the owner causing injury/death. Compensation is based on age/income/dependency etc.
Section 163 A :– Amendment was made in the MV Act in 1994 and introduced a new Section 163 A.
• This Also Is On No Fault Liability Basis. However, Payment Is On Structured Formula Basis. While Fixing The Compensation, The Following Parameters Are Taken Into Account
• Age And Income Of The Victim.
• For Calculation Of Compensation, The Maximum Annual Income Is Restricted To Rs.40000/-.
• Provision Has Been Made For Compensation For Non Fatal Accidents I.E., Permanent Disablement And Injury Claims On Formula Basis.
• Based On The Formula, The Maximum Compensation For Fatal Accident Claim Is Rs.537000/- And Minimum Is Rs.50000/-.Victim/Legal Heirs can claim under Section 140 on No Fault Liability basis and then can claim under Section 166 on Fault Liability Basis. If Award is passed under Section 166, compensation will be paid after reducing the amount received under Section 140.If Victim/Legal Heirs claim under Section 163 A, they cannot make a claim under Section 166.
Amendment in Section 163 A –
Now, vide Gazette Notification dated 22nd May, 2018, modification has been made by the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways in the provisions of Section 163 A. Compensation, on No Fault Liability basis, as per amended provisions, is as under:
(a) Fatal Accidents – Rs.5 Lacs (Fixed amount, irrespective of income and age)
(b) Permanent Disablement – Rs.500000/- X percentage disability as per Schedule I of the Employee’s Compension Act, 1923 (8 of 1923). However, minimum liability shall not be less than Rs.50000/-.
(c) Minor Injury – Fixed compensation of Rs.25000/-.
On and from the date of 1st day of Jan., 2019, the amount of compensation specified in clauses (a) to
(c) above shall stand increased by 5% annually.
Net effect of Amendment under Section 163 A, which is beneficial to the victim/legal heirs, is as under:
• Earlier, The Death Compensation Ranged From Rs.50000/- To Rs.537000/-. Not It Is Fixed Rs.5 Lacs.
Permanent Disablement, Now The % Calculation Is Based On The Amount Of Rs.500000/- (Fixed). Earlier It Used To Be On The Basis Of Yearly Income (Which Can Be Any Amount Less Than Rs.500000/-).
• For Injuries, The Minimum Amount Of Compensation Was Rs.1000/- And Onwards. Not It Is Fixed Compensation Of Rs.25000/.

All India Distribution of Road Accident Fatalities by Mode of Transport in 2021

Truck/Mini Truck-----------------14622
Bus--------------------4622
SUV/Car----------------------------------23531
Tractor--------------3899
Three Wheeler----------------------7685
Two Wheeler-------------------------------69240
Other Vehicles-------------------------5001
Bicycle---------------------------------3006
Hand Drawn-----------------------255
Animal Drawn—-------------------------260
Others----------------------------------4565
Pedestrian---------------------------------18936

Are you a common man who has met with a       in Indian Roads and want to be aware of certain important laws and section...
26/07/2023

Are you a common man who has met with a in Indian Roads and want to be aware of certain important laws and sections under the then read through this article. -

You can also get in touch with Libra Law Associates from Kolkata if you need any legal advice or case requirements!

LAWS AND PROCEDURES OF MOTOR ACCIDENT OR ROAD ACCIDENT CASES IN INDIA.

WHAT IS CALLED MOTOR ACCIDENT :-

A motor vehicle accident can also be termed “car accident” or “traffic collision.” While some motor vehicle accidents are caused due to collision with another vehicle, that is not always the case. A motor vehicle accident is the event in which a motor vehicle is involved in a collision amongst another motor vehicle, pedestrian, animal, or stationary object. Motor vehicle accidents can result in ranging severity of physical damage to the vehicle and bodily injuries of those involved.

LAWS RELATING TO MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CASES IN INDIA

Section 80 of IPC

The first mention for an accident in the IPC is in the form of a general exception in section 80 of the code, which can lead to escape from criminal punishment and liability if established fully before a court of law. It does not give any proper definition for the same. There are certain sections in IPC which give provisions for penalizing the acts done by negligence and rash driving.

Section 279 of IPC

Section 279 of IPC mentions rash driving or riding in a public way. It lays that: “Whoever drives any vehicle, or rides, on any public way in a manner so rash or negligent as to endanger human life, or to be likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person, shall be punished with im­prisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.”

This Section talks about endangering human life or causing hurt by driving. Taking an example, A, a college student drives a bike in a rash manner, and hits a school-going girl, B. B falls and gets a wound on her knee, A is said to have caused hurt and is liable under Section 279.

Taking another example, the same boy A does not hit anyone but is caught driving rashly on the streets, he will be liable under Section 279 only and the punishment too will be the same.

So, accordingly, whether the hurt is caused or is likely to be caused, the same provision for punishment exists. Also, the offence here is bailable, cognizable, and non-compoundable, which means, A can pay the penalty, get bail and can do the acts again and such cycle can go on.

Section 337 of IPC

Section 337 under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 provides for the provision on causing hurt by an act that endangers life or personal security of others. The section says, “Whoever causes hurt to any person by doing any act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life or the personal safety of others, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.”

This Section talks about endangering human life and the personal safety of others by doing any act negligently or rashly. The Section does not describe the nature of the act, so it includes a vast purview of the act, and hence driving on road can also be included. So, taking the example of the same boy A, suppose that he is driving rashly, and passes by an old man who is a heart patient. The old man being frightened by the sudden passing by of a speedy bike undergoes a heart attack and is said to have undergone hurt. Also, since he is a heart patient, A’s act has created a danger to the old man’s life thus, A is liable under Section 337.

The section is classified as bailable, cognizable, and compoundable with the permission of the court, by the person to whom the hurt is caused.

Section 338 of IPC

This Section provides for the provision on causing grievous hurt by an act that endangers life or personal security of others. The section says, “Whoever causes grievous hurt to any person by doing any act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life, or the personal safety of others, shall be punished with impris­onment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.”

This Section talks about endangering human life and the personal safety of others by doing any act negligently or rashly so that a grievous hurt is caused. Again here, the nature of the act is not defined, so driving can be included.

Suppose that a truck driver negligently takes a wrong turn and hits a rickshaw puller and the rickshaw puller gets very deep wounds on his body, the driver is said to have caused grievous hurt and is liable under Section 338.

Taking the same example again, this time the rickshaw puller gets visually impaired due to the accident, the truck driver will be liable again under Section 338.

The Section again is classified as bailable, cognizable, and compoundable with the permission of the court, by the person to whom the hurt is caused, which means that if the accused person gives grievous curable hurt or even incurable the same provision for punishment is followed.

Section 304A of IPC

This Section provides for the provisions for death by negligence. The Section says, “Whoever causes the death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.”

Now, if we look into the accidental death report released by NCRB, the number of accidental deaths increased by a ratio of 1.3. Also, since the act is an ‘accident’ the wrongdoer does not get as much strict punishment as he must get. And moreover, maximum accidents are ‘disguised murders’.

Most of the time, it is proved that the death was an outcome of negligence by the driver but as we all know, murder in this way is easy to manipulate. Also, if the death so caused is really an act of negligence, even then the penalty must be much bigger. Section 304A of the code is classified as bailable, cognizable and non-compoundable. There is a famous saying in Hindi “Jaan Hai To Jahan Hai ” but this saying loses its value when the punishment for taking life only extends to a maximum of two years and that too in a bailable form.

Cyber Crime Part - 2Did you know that cyber crime cases reported in 2013 were only 5693 cases and in 2022 the number of ...
13/07/2023

Cyber Crime Part - 2

Did you know that cyber crime cases reported in 2013 were only 5693 cases and in 2022 the number of cyber crime cases reported are - 13.9 lakh. Can you see the meteoric rise in the intensity of cases in ? This also makes u prone to be a victim of cyber crime.
Come let's find out from part 2 of our cyber crime series to learn and educate more on various sections and famous case laws.


PART-II

CYBER LAWS REGARDING CYBER CRIME AND CYBER SECURITY

CYBER CRIME REPORTED IN INDIA (2013–2022)

2013—---5,693

2014—-----9,622

2015—-------11,592

2016—---------12,317

2017—-------------21,593

2018—-----------------27,248

2019—--------------------44735

2020—------------------------50,035

2021—----------------------------52974

2022—----------------------------------13.9 Lakh

……As per NCRB Data

Cyber crime in India:-

Following are the sections under IT Act, 2000. :-

1. Section 65- Temping with the computers source documents.

Whoever intentionally or knowingly destroy, conceal or change any computer’s source code that is used for a computer, computer program, and computer system or computer network.

Punishment:

Any person who involves in such crimes could be sentenced upto 3 years imprisonment or with a fine of Rs.2 lakhs or with both.

2. Section 66- Hacking with computer system, data alteration etc.

Whoever with the purpose or intention to cause any loss, damage or to destroy, delete or to alter any information that resides in a public or any person’s computer. Diminish its utility, values or affects it injuriously by any means,commits hacking.

Punishment:-

Any person who involves in such crimes could be sentenced upto 3 years imprisonment, or with a fine that may extend upto 2 lakhs rupees, or both.

3. Section 66A- Sending offensive messages through any communication services.

Any information or message sent through any communication services this is offensive or has threatening characters.
Any information that is not true or is not valid and is sent with the end goal of annoying, inconvenience, danger, insult, obstruction, injury, criminal intention,
enmity, hatred or ill will.
Any electronic mail or email sent with the end goal of causing anger, difficulty or mislead or to deceive the address about the origin of the messages.

Punishment:-

Any individual found to commit such crimes under this section could be sentenced upto 3years of imprisonment
along with a fine.

4. Section 66B- Receiving stolen computer’s resources or communication devices dishonestly.

Receiving or retaining any stolen computer, computer’s resources or any communication devices knowingly or
having the reason to believe the same.

Punishment:-

Any person who involves in such crimes could be sentenced either description for a term that may extend upto 3 years of imprisonment or with a fine of rupee 1 lakh or both.

5. Section 66C- Identify theft.

Using of one’s digital or electronic signature or one’s password or any other unique identification of any person is a crime.

Punishment:-

Any person who involve in such crimes could be sentenced either with a description for a term which may extend
upto 3 years of imprisonment along with a fine that may extend upto rupee 1 lakh.

6. Section 66D- Cheating by personation by the use of computer’s resources.

Whoever tries to cheats someone by personating through any communication devices or computer’s resources shall be sentenced either with a description for a term that may extend upto 3 years of imprisonment along with a fine that may extend upto rupee 1 lakh.

7. Section 66E- Privacy or violation

Whoever knowingly or with an intention of publishing, transmitting or capturing images of private areas or private parts of any individual without his/her consent,
that violets the privacy of the individual shall be shall be sentenced to 3 years of imprisonment or with a fine not exceeding more than 2 lakhs rupees or both.

8. Section 66F- Cyber terrorism.

A. Whoever intentionally threatened the integrity, unity, sovereignty or security or strike terror among the people or among any group of people by-

I. Deny to any people to access computer’s resources.

II. Attempting to break in or access a computer resource without any authorization or to exceed authorized
access.

III. Introducing any computer’s contaminant, and through such conducts causes or is probable to cause any death
or injury to any individual or damage or any destruction of properties or disrupt or it is known that by such conduct it is probable to cause damage or disruptions of supply or services that are essential to the life of people or unfavorably affect the critical information’s infrastructure specified under the section 70 of the IT Act.

B. By intention or by knowingly tries to go through or tries to gain access to computer’s resources without the
authorization or exceeding authorized access, and by such conducts obtains access to the data, information or computer’s database which is limited or restricted for certain reason because of the security of the state or foreign relations, or any restricted database, data or any information with the reason to believe that those data or information or the computer’s database obtained may use to cause or probably use to cause injury to the interest of the independence and integrity of our country India.

Punishment:-

Whoever conspires or commits such cyber crime or cyber terrorism shall be sentenced to life time imprisonment.

9. Section 67- Transmitting or publishing obscene materials in electronic form.

Whoever transmits or publishes or cause to publish any obscene materials in electronics form. Any material that is vulgar or appeal to be lubricious or if its effect is for instance to tends to corrupt any individual who are likely to have regard to all relevant circumstances to read or to see or to hear the matter that contained in it, shall be sentenced on the first convict with either description for a
term that may extend upto five years of imprisonment along with a fine which may extend upto 1 lakh rupee and in the second or subsequent convict it can be sentenced either description for a term that may extend upto ten years along with a fine that may perhaps extend to two lakhs rupees.

10. Section 67A- Transmitting or publishing of materials that contains sexually explicit contents, acts etc in electronics form.

Whoever transmits or publishes materials that contains sexually explicit contents or acts shall be sentences for either description for a term which may extend upto 5 years or imprisonment along with a fine that could extend to 10 lakhs rupees in the first convict. And in the event of the second convict criminal could be sentenced for either description for a term that could extend upto 7 years of imprisonment along with a fine that may extend upto 20 lakhs rupees.

11. Section 67B- Transmitting or publishing of materials that depicts children in sexually explicit act etc in electronics form.

Whoever transmits or publishes any materials that depict children in sexually explicit act or conduct in any electronics form shall be sentenced for either description for a term which may extend to 5 years of imprisonment with a fine that could extend to rupees 10 lakhs on the first conviction. And in the event of second conviction criminals could be sentenced for either description for a term that could extend to 7 years along with a fine that could extend to rupees 10 lakhs.

12. Section 67C- Retention and preservation of information by intermediaries.

I. Intermediaries shall retain and preserve such information that might specify for such period and in such a format and manner that the Central Government may prescribe.

II. Any intermediaries knowingly or intentionally contravene the provision of the sub-section.

Punishment:-

Whoever commits such crimes shall be sentenced for a period that may extend upto 3 years of imprisonment and also liable to fine.

13. Section 69- Power to issue direction for monitor, decryption or interception of any information through computer’s resources.
I. Where the Central government’s or State government’s authorized officers, as the case may be in this behalf, if fulfilled that it is required or expedient to do in the interest of the integrity or the sovereignty, the security defence of our country India, state’s security, friendly relations with the foreign states for preventing any incident to the commission of any cognizable offences that is related to above or investigation of any offences that is subjected to the provision of sub-section (II). For reasons to be recorded writing, direct any agency of the appropriate government, by order, decrypt or monitor
or cause to be intercept any information that is generated or received or transmitted or is stored in any computer’s resources.

II. The safeguard and the procedure that is subjected to such decryption, monitoring or interception may carried out, shall be such as may be prescribed.

III. The intermediaries, the subscribers or any individual who is in the charge of the computer’s resources shall call upon by any agencies referred to the sub-section (I), extends all services and technical assistances to:

a) Providing safe access or access to computer’s resources receiving, transmitting, generating or to store such information or

b) Decrypting, intercepting or monitoring the information, as the case might be or

c) Providing information that is stored in computer.

IV. The intermediaries, the subscribes or any individual who fails to help the agency referred in the sub-section (III), shall be sentenced for a term that could extend to 7
years of imprisonment and also could be legally responsible to fine [17].

There are many other sections in the IT Act, 2000 .

Among them a few important sections one should know are as follows:

Table-2: A few important sections one should know :-

Offences Sec. under IT Act, 2000
Damage to Computer, Computer
System etc.---------------------------Section 43

Power to issue direction for
blocking from public access of
any information through any
computer’s resources.-----------Section 69A

Power to authorize to collect
traffic information or data and to monitor through any computer's resources for cyber security.---------------------Section 69B

Un-authorized access to protected system.--------------------------------Section 70

Penalty for misrepresentation.-- Section 71

Breach of confidentiality and privacy. —---------------------------------------Section 72

Publishing False digital signature certificates.---------------------------Section 73

Publication for fraudulent purpose.-------------------------------Section 74

Act to apply for contravention or offence that is committed outside India.-Section 75

Compensation, confiscation or penalties for not to interfere with other punishment.
—---------------------------------------Section 77

Compounding of Offences.---- Section 77A

Offences by Companies.--------- Section 85

Sending threatening messages by e-mail.
—--------------------------------Section 503 IPC

Sending defamatory messages by e-mail.
—--------------------------------Section 499 IPC

Bogus websites, Cyber Frauds. Section —-------------------------------------------420 IPC

E-mail Spoofing.------------ Section 463 IPC

Web Jacking.---------------- Section 383 IPC

E-mail Abuse.--------------- Section 500 IPC

Criminal intimidation by anonymous communications.------------Section 507 IPC

Online sale of Drugs.-------------- NDPS Act
Online sale of Arms.----------------- Arm Act.

IMPORTANT CASE LAWS REGARDING CYBER CRIME IN INDIA:-

Cyber Crime’s scenario in India(A Few Case study). :-

1….The Bank NSP Case:-

In this case a management trainee of a bank got engaged to a marriage. The couple used to exchange many emails
using the company’s computers. After some time they had broken up their marriage and the young lady created some
fake email ids such as “Indian bar associations” and sent mails to the boy‘s foreign clients. She used the banks computer to do this. The boy‘s company lost a huge number of clients and took the bank to court. The bank was held liable for the emails sent using the bank‘s system.

2…..Bazee.com case:-

In December 2004 the Chief Executive Officer of Bazee.com was arrested because he was selling a compact disk (CD) with offensive material on the website, and even CD was also conjointly sold-out in the market of Delhi. The Delhi police and therefore the Mumbai Police got into action and later the CEO was free on bail.

3……Parliament Attack Case:-

The Bureau of Police Research and Development, Hyderabad had handled this case. A laptop was recovered from the terrorist who attacked the Parliament. The laptop which was detained from the two terrorists, who were gunned down on 13th December 2001 when the Parliament was under siege, was sent to Computer
Forensics Division of BPRD. The laptop contained several proofs that affirmed the two terrorist’s motives, mainly the sticker of the Ministry of Home that they had created
on the laptop and affixed on their ambassador car to achieve entry into Parliament House and the fake ID card
that one of the two terrorists was carrying with a Government of India emblem and seal. The emblems (of the 3 lions) were carefully scanned and additionally the seal was also craftly created together with a residential address of Jammu and Kashmir. However careful detection proved that it was all forged and made on the laptop.

4……Andhra Pradesh Tax Case:-

The owner of the plastics firm in Andhra Pradesh was arrested and cash of Rs. 22 was recovered from his house by the Vigilance Department. They wanted evidence from him concerning the unaccounted cash. The suspected person submitted 6,000 vouchers to prove the legitimacy of trade, however when careful scrutiny the vouchers and contents of his computers it unconcealed that every one of them were made after the raids were conducted. It had been concealed that the suspect was running 5 businesses beneath the presence of 1 company and used fake and computerized vouchers to show sales records and save tax. So the dubious techniques of the businessman from the state were exposed when officials of the department got hold of computers utilized by the suspected person.

5……SONY.SAMBANDH.COM CASE:-

India saw its 1st cybercrime conviction. This is the case where Sony India Private Limited filed a complaint that runs a website referred to as www.sony-sambandh.com targeting the NRIs. The website allows NRIs to send Sony products to their friends and relatives in India after they pay for it online. The company undertakes to deliver the products to the involved recipients. In May 2002, somebody logged onto the web site underneath the identity of Barbara Campa and ordered a Sony colour television set and a cordless head phone. She requested to deliver the product to Arif Azim in Noida and gave the number of her credit card for payment. The payment was
accordingly cleared by the credit card agency and the transaction processed. After the related procedures of dues diligence and checking, the items were delivered to Arif Azim by the company. When the product was delivered, the company took digital pictures so as to
indicate the delivery being accepted by Arif Azim. The transaction closed at that, but after one and a half months the credit card agency informed the company that this was an unauthorized transaction as the real owner had denied having made the purchase. The company had filed a complaint for online cheating at the CBI that registered a case under the Section 418, Section 419 and Section 420 of the IPC (Indian Penal Code). Arif Azim was arrested after the matter was investigated. Investigations discovered that Arif Azim, whereas acting at a call centre in Noida didgain access to the number of the credit card of an American national which he misused on the company’s site. The CBI recovered the color television along with the cordless head phone. In this matter, the CBI had proof to prove their case so the accused admitted his guilt. The
court had convicted Arif Azim under the Section 418, Section 419 and Section 420 of the IPC, this being the first time that a cybercrime has been convicted. The court, felt that since the defendant was a boy of 24 years and a first-time convict, a compassionate view needed to be taken.
Thus, the court discharged the defendant on the probation for one year.

6……SHREYA SINGHAL VS UNION OF INDIA CASE :-

Two women were arrested under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act after posting offensive comments on Facebook regarding Mumbai’s total closure following the death of a political leader. Section 66A of the Information Technology Act presents consequences for the usage of laptop sources or communications, consisting of data this is offensive, fake, worrying, inconvenient, dangerous, offensive, repulsive, dangerous or malicious. The women responded to the arrest in a petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act because they violated freedom of speech and expression.
SUPREME COURT DECISION:-
The Supreme Court made its decision based on three concepts: deliberation, advocacy, and incitement. He pointed out that simply discussing or defending a case, no matter how popular, is at the heart of freedom of speech and expression. Section 66A may restrict any form of communication and does not appear to distinguish between the mere advocacy or discussion of a particular issue that is offensive to some people and the instigation of such words leading to a causal relationship to public disorder, safety, etc. When asked if Section 66A was intended to protect people from defamation, the court answered that Section 66A condemned abusive language that may annoy people but does not affect their reputation.

CONCLUSION:-
The rise and proliferation of newly developed technologies begin star to operate many cybercrimes in recent years. Cybercrime has become great threats to mankind. Protection against cybercrime is a vital part for social, cultural and security aspect of a country. The Government of India has enacted IT Act, 2000 to deal withcybercrimes. The Act further revise the IPC, 1860, the IEA (Indian Evidence Act), 1872, the Banker's Books Evidence Act 1891 and the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. Any part of the world cyber crime could be originated passing national boundaries over the internet creating both technical and legal complexities of investigating and prosecuting these crimes. The international harmonizing efforts, coordination and co-operation among various nations are required to take action towards the cyber crimes.Our main purpose of writing this paper is to spread the content of cyber crime among the common people. At the end of this paper “A brief study on Cyber Crime and Cyber Law’s of India” we want to say cyber crimes can never be acknowledged. If anyone falls in the prey of cyber attack, please come forward and register a case in your nearest police station. If the criminals won’t get punishment for their deed, they will never stop.

THE END

Address

Kolkata
700086

Telephone

+919051209283

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Libra Law Associates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share