Aaa rty

Aaa rty Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Aaa rty, Lawyer & Law Firm, Jaipur.

Permanently closed.
11/10/2021
08/07/2021

Money received by Nominee has to be distributed among Legal heirs of the deceased person.

Rajasthan High Court Judgement

Apexlegalconsultants.in Our official website launced today.
05/07/2021

Apexlegalconsultants.in
Our official website launced today.

Apex Legal Consultants Lawyers Chamber Steadfastly guiding our clients through their most life-changing moments and helping them to deal with the things that matter most…

05/07/2021

करियर के लिए पत्नी का विदेश में रहना पति के प्रति 'क्रूरता' या 'पति का परित्याग' नहींः बॉम्बे हाईकोर्ट

Apex Legal Consultants, Jaipur

05/07/2021

'धूम्रपान COVID-19 से बचाता है; धूम्रपान करने वालों को कोरोना वायरस से कोई खतरा नहीं':

तंबाकू व्यापारियों ने बॉम्बे हाईकोर्ट के समक्ष दावा किया

05/07/2021

एक विवाहित महिला को अपने माता-पिता के घर में रहने के लिए मजबूर करना क्रूरता के समानः

मध्यप्रदेश हाईकोर्ट

05/07/2021

फिरौती के लिए अपहरण :

364 ए के तहत दोषसिद्धि के लिए मौत या चोट पहुंचाने का खतरा साबित करना अनिवार्य

The Allahabad High court Granted a bail to a man arrested under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religion Conve...
03/06/2021

The Allahabad High court Granted a bail to a man arrested under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religion Conversion Act, 2020 , and charge of r**e.

"The first informant/victim were in relationship since long and she used to
spend time with the applicant and used to travel with him and went to a
room of a hotel on her own sweet-will, observed a single judge bench of of Justice Samit Gopal.

What was the matter:

Sonu Rajpoot @ Zubair filed bail application in connection with offences under 376, 420, 506 I.P.C. and 3/5 U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Religion Conversion Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant has been
falsely implicated in the present case. The victim who is the first informant herself has not
disclosed her age but she has stated that she is a working person. in the Chik FIR, her year of birth has been mentioned
as 1995 which goes to show that she is major.

The FIR had been filed after delay of more than one month the same is unexplained.

On the other hand, victim stated that initially she did not know that the
applicant was a Muslim but when she saw his name written in the
register of the hotel where she had gone with the applicant and physical
relation was established between them as Zubair, S/o Chand then she came to know that he was a Muslim and then dispute arose between
them.

Court's order:

Looking at the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, the Court ordered that the applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16315 of 2021

Sonu Rajpoot @ Zubair
vs State of U.P.































03/02/2021

The approach of the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Barmer in denying bail to the petitioners even though similarly situated accused has been granted bail in the very samecase is deprecated as such an approach not only tantamounts to a total disregard of this Court’s order but also increases this Court’s dockets flooding it with unwarranted bail applications and also prolongs the custody of the accused without any justification. It is hence forth expected from all the Subordinate Courts in the State of Rajasthan that where similarly situated co-accused has been
granted bail by this Court and the bail application of other accused comes up for consideration, this Court’s order/s shall not only be referred to while deciding such bail application/s but shall be followed unless exceptional/distinguishable features exist.

Reportable Judgement by Honble Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench

Justice Sandeep Mehta

Judgement Date - 25.01.2021

Title - Khet Singh & And Vs State

03/02/2021

Any child born after 1.6.2002 to a couple already having two children cannot be denied ACP by applying the memorandum by a blanket order. The
circumstances need to be examined and exceptions to be taken into consideration.

Reportable Judgement by Honble Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench

Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Judgement Date - 13.01.2021

Title - Dr. Rajeev Sharma Vs State & Ors

Address

Jaipur
302001

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Aaa rty posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share