Socio Juris- Advocates & Law Consultants

Socio Juris- Advocates & Law Consultants A Jaipur Based Law Firm dealing with matters related to Civil, Criminal, Service and Labor, Motor Accident Claims, Corporate, Consumer and Writ Petitions.

Socio Juris is a nascent law firm founded in 2011 which offers a variety of services in the field of law and litigation to individual as well as corporate clients. We have a dedicated team of highly qualified and experienced professionals at Socio Juris with overwhelming enthusiasm and commitment. We dealing with matters related to Civil, Criminal, Service and Labor, Motor Accident Claims, Corpora

te, Consumer and Writ Petitions. We are professionally skilled with a lot of experience to ensure that there is a smooth work arrangement that is established with the clients and customer satisfaction is guaranteed.

03/05/2017

Opportunity to work with office of Additional Solicitor General of India.

28/03/2016

Office of Additional Solicitor General of India, Rajasthan is looking for Smart, Dynamic and result oriented Assisting Counsels, preferably candidates having 5yrs LL.B. from National Law School. Candidates having 3 year law degree may also apply. Interested persons may send their resume at [email protected]

Socio Juris Impact --- Municipal Corporation directed to allot Flats to its Employees within a period of 6 Months. Hundr...
28/04/2014

Socio Juris Impact --- Municipal Corporation directed to allot Flats to its Employees within a period of 6 Months. Hundreds of Employees of MC, Jaipur will be benefitted from the Judgment.

27/09/2013

The Supreme COurt of India has directed election commission to provide necessary provision in the ballot papers/EVMs and another
button called “None of the Above” (NOTA) may be provided in EVMs so that the voters, who come to the polling booth and decide not to vote for any of the candidates in the fray, are able to exercise their right not to vote while maintaining their right of secrecy.

The text of the judgment is here:
http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=40835

10/08/2013

The Supreme Court in the matter of S. Iyyapan Vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. and Anr. has taken a view that in cases of Third Party Insurance, breach of condition of Insurance Policy by the policy holder could not be a ground for insurer to disown its liability to pay compensation to third party. Further the court observed, More so when third party has statutory right to recover compensation from insurer and it was for insurer to proceed against insured for recovery of amount paid to third party in case there was any breach of condition of insurance policy.

------------- (2013)7 SCC 62

10/08/2013

Union law minister Kapil Sibal's meeting with the statutory Bar Council of India members and other Bar leaders to discuss a issues ranging from judicial reforms to welfare measures for lawyers, was a damp squib on Saturday.

At the end of the meeting, the Bar Council of India (BCI) went to the extent of describing the exercise as 'waste of time' and totally unsatisfactory.

The meeting had serious issues on agenda though. It was to take up such hot topics as judicial reforms, use of IT tools to improve the functioning of Bar Council and Bar associations, measures to improve case disposals, infrastructure and welfare measures for lawyers in the country.

A total of 12 chairpersons of the State Bar Councils and 10 presidents of various Bar associations in high courts, besides members of Bar Councils, had come from various parts of the country to attend this meeting, said S Prabakaran, convenor and spokesperson of the BCI.

However, when the meeting began, Kapil Sibal made it clear that the meeting would discuss the proposed national judicial appointments bill. According to the BCI chairman Manan Kumar Mishra, the members had told the ministers in one voice that they were opposed to the Bill in its present form. Demanding a direct role for Bar council members and Bar leaders in the selection of judicial officers, Mishra had told the meeting that people and lawyers would not agree for changes in the existing collegium system of appointment of judges.

"The meeting, in fact, could not resolve anything," a statement of the BCI said, adding: "When presidents of Bar associations and chairmen of Bar Councils demanded fund for welfare of lawyers, the union law minister expressed his inability to do so. He asked lawyers' bodies to approach the finance minister for relief. A majority of participants expressed their displeasure on this issue. They reiterated that without the involvement of the Bar Councils and the Bar Council of India, the process of appointment of judges cannot be changed. Lawyers are not going to tolerate the replacement of the existing collegium system with the proposed commission, without the representation of Bar Councils and associations."

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Meeting-with-law-minister-Sibal-a-waste-of-time-says-Bar-Council/articleshow/21745447.cms

01/08/2013

Keral State Commission, in its Judgment has held that any cash memos issued by the traders and shopkeepers bearing the lettering ‘Goods once sold will not be taken back or exchanged’ are liable to face legal action. The judgment came to be passed in Appeal No. A/12/924 Arisen out of Order Dated 31/10/2012 in Case No. CC/12/432 of District Ernakulam Vs. Manohar & Ors. The commission observed:

"9. Next question for consideration is whether the condition printed in the cash bills issued in the first OP that goods once sold will not be taken back or exchanged has to be liable to be removed in the light of the Government Order, Ext.A1. I have found that Ext.A1 Government order is binding on the appellant. Therefore the above said condition printed in the cash bills issued by the first opposite party is against the said Government order. That being so first opposite party is bound to remove the same from their cash bills.


10. There is another aspect in this case. Printing such a condition in cash bills is in my view amounts to unfair trade practice. A customer who buys goods from the appellant would be under the impression that even if the goods are defective he may not be in a position to get it replaced. For all these reasons I am of the view that Forum is perfectly justified in ordering removal of the said condition from the cash bills of the appellant."

Address

66 Khadi Colony, Hatwara Road, Sodala
Jaipur
302006

Telephone

+919680636363

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Socio Juris- Advocates & Law Consultants posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share