SJLC - Sushrut Joshi Law Clinic

SJLC - Sushrut Joshi Law Clinic At our firm, we pride ourselves on providing unparalleled service to our clients. Trust us to be there for you every step of the way.

Sushrut Joshi Law Clinic (SJLC) is a multi-disciplinary law firm founded by the top lawyers of Indore in the year of 2021
Criminal Lawyer | Property Lawyer | Divorce Lawyer | Corporate Lawyer | Best Lawyer in Indore Our team of well qualified top lawyers from various eminent law schools of the country bring entrepreneurial energy to work together with shared values for greater standards of service

with a high degree of professionalism and responsiveness. We understand that legal issues can be stressful and overwhelming, and we're committed to providing the support and guidance you need throughout the legal process.

18/03/2026

Wishing everyone a prosperous Gudi Padwa.

Gudi Padwa marks the beginning of the Hindu New Year and symbolises new beginnings, growth, and renewal. It is a time to reflect on progress and move forward with clarity, purpose, and a renewed sense of direction.

At SJLC, we continue our commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring access to justice.

May this new year bring success, stability, and new opportunities for all.

Landmark Judgment – February 2026 ⚖️A recent landmark judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India highlights importan...
16/03/2026

Landmark Judgment – February 2026 ⚖️

A recent landmark judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India highlights important legal principles that continue to shape the interpretation of law and the protection of rights in India.

Such decisions strengthen constitutional values, judicial accountability, and fairness in the justice system, while guiding lawyers, law students, and citizens on evolving legal standards.

Stay informed about important developments in Indian law and Supreme Court judgments. 📚⚖️

Criminal Law Is Not a Tool for Personal Revenge ⚖️The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently reiterated an important princip...
14/03/2026

Criminal Law Is Not a Tool for Personal Revenge ⚖️

The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently reiterated an important principle of criminal law: the criminal justice system cannot be used to settle personal scores or private disputes.

The Court noted that criminal proceedings involve serious consequences such as investigation, arrest, and trial. Therefore, criminal complaints should not be used as pressure tactics in civil, matrimonial, commercial, or property disputes.

Indian courts have consistently held that when a complaint is filed with malicious intent or to harass the opposite party, courts may intervene and quash the proceedings to prevent abuse of the legal process.

This principle helps ensure that:
• individuals are protected from misuse of criminal complaints, and
• criminal courts remain focused on genuine offences affecting society.

💬 What do you think?
Should courts impose stricter penalties for filing malicious criminal complaints?

National Lok Adalat | 14 March 2026 ⚖️National Lok Adalat provides an opportunity for parties to resolve disputes throug...
11/03/2026

National Lok Adalat | 14 March 2026 ⚖️

National Lok Adalat provides an opportunity for parties to resolve disputes through amicable settlement and conciliation within the legal framework.

The upcoming National Lok Adalat will be held on 14 March 2026, including at the Madhya Pradesh High Court Bench at Indore and the District Court Indore.

Matters relating to civil disputes, matrimonial matters, motor accident claims, bank recovery matters, and other compoundable cases may be taken up for settlement where parties are willing to resolve disputes through mutual consent.

If you wish to explore dispute settlement through Lok Adalat, you may seek legal guidance.

📞 9589424156
📍 SJLC, 401 Asha Dilpasand Imperial, 6/3 South Tukoganj, Opposite Gate No. 3, High Court Campus, Indore – 452001

08/03/2026

Happy International Women’s Day 🌸⚖️

Today is a reminder that empowering women also means ensuring awareness of their rights, access to justice, and equal protection under the law. Strong legal frameworks and informed communities play a vital role in building a society where dignity, safety, and opportunity are available to every woman.

At SJLC, we support equality and the continued advancement of women’s rights.

Let us continue to support equality, respect, and justice — not just today, but every day.

Can someone challenge a court judgment even if they were not a party to the case? ⚖️The Supreme Court of India has clari...
07/03/2026

Can someone challenge a court judgment even if they were not a party to the case? ⚖️

The Supreme Court of India has clarified that if a judgment affects a person’s legal rights, that individual may seek review or challenge the decision, even if they were not originally part of the proceedings. This reinforces the principle of natural justice and the right to be heard.

Such rulings highlight how the Indian judiciary protects procedural fairness while balancing the finality of litigation.

Do you think courts should allow broader rights for affected third parties to challenge judgments?

03/03/2026

Wishing You a Joyful and Meaningful Holi !

Holi is more than a celebration of colours — it reflects renewal, harmony, and the triumph of positivity over adversity.

As we celebrate this festival, may it bring clarity in thought, strength in purpose, and vibrancy in both personal and professional journeys.

Wishing colleagues, clients, and the wider community a safe and prosperous Holi.

False promise of marriage = automatic criminal case? Not always.In February 2026, the Supreme Court of India made an imp...
02/03/2026

False promise of marriage = automatic criminal case? Not always.

In February 2026, the Supreme Court of India made an important observation during a bail hearing in a r**e case based on an alleged false promise of marriage.

The Court remarked that before marriage, a boy and a girl are “total strangers” and cautioned individuals to be careful before entering into physical relationships based on assurances of marriage.

Important clarification:
This was an oral observation during bail proceedings — not a binding judgment and not a change in law on live-in or consensual adult relationships.

In such cases, courts examine intention.
Was there dishonest intent from the beginning?
Or was it a consensual relationship that later failed?

The line between a failed relationship and criminal deception is thin — and fact-specific.

What do you think?
Should criminal law step in more strictly in such cases? Or should adult autonomy prevail?

Comment your view.

IBC is NOT a recovery shortcut 🚫On 7 February 2026, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) upheld the decis...
28/02/2026

IBC is NOT a recovery shortcut 🚫

On 7 February 2026, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) upheld the decision of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and refused to admit insolvency proceedings initiated by Akshay Kumar Bhatia against Cue Learn Private Limited.

The dispute arose from an endorsement agreement.
₹4.83 crore was claimed as unpaid endorsement fees.
Section 8 and Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 were invoked seeking initiation of CIRP.

But the tribunals found that a pre-existing contractual dispute existed.

And under Section 9 IBC, if the debt is disputed, insolvency cannot be triggered.

IBC is meant for insolvency resolution.
It is not a pressure mechanism for recovery of contested contractual dues.

For consultants, endorsers, vendors and operational creditors, this ruling is a practical reminder:

Before issuing a Section 8 notice, ask yourself
Is the debt truly undisputed?

What’s your view —
Has IBC jurisprudence clearly drawn the line between default and dispute?

Share your thoughts 👇

CIRP

Supreme Court Clarifies Landowner Liability in Construction Delay CasesThe Supreme Court of India has ruled that a lando...
25/02/2026

Supreme Court Clarifies Landowner Liability in Construction Delay Cases

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that a landowner cannot automatically be held liable for construction delays caused by a developer.

In a recent judgment dated 20 February 2026, the Court examined liability under a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) and proceedings under the Consumer Protection Act. The key principle laid down is clear: liability depends on contractual responsibility.

Key Legal Points:

• If the developer alone was responsible for construction, delay liability rests with the developer.
• Ex*****on of a Joint Development Agreement or General Power of Attorney does not create automatic joint liability.
• Consumer complaints for construction delay will be decided based on who controlled and undertook the project.
• Indemnity clauses in development agreements play a crucial role in determining financial responsibility.

This ruling is significant for landowners, developers, homebuyers, and anyone involved in real estate transactions. Clear drafting of Joint Development Agreements is essential to avoid future disputes relating to construction delay and compensation.

For legal guidance in real estate disputes, construction delay cases, and property litigation, consult an experienced property law advocate.

Did you know how Indian courts look at bail in financial crime cases?The Supreme Court of India recently explained an im...
20/02/2026

Did you know how Indian courts look at bail in financial crime cases?

The Supreme Court of India recently explained an important legal principle. Serious economic offences are treated differently because they can affect public trust, financial institutions, and even the country’s economic stability.

The Court clarified that while deciding bail in such cases, judges must carefully consider:
• the seriousness of the offence
• the role of the accused
• the overall impact on society

This means economic offences are not viewed as routine crimes. Courts are expected to apply stricter scrutiny before granting bail in cases involving large financial fraud or white-collar crime.

Understanding such rulings helps people stay aware of how criminal law evolves in India.

What are your thoughts on stricter bail scrutiny in economic offence cases?

The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently upheld the eviction of a 90-year-old tenant, reaffirming a key principle under re...
17/02/2026

The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently upheld the eviction of a 90-year-old tenant, reaffirming a key principle under rent control law, bona fide requirement of the landlord, when proven, is a valid ground for eviction.

Court held:

• A landlord can seek eviction for genuine business expansion, including for a family member’s adjoining shop.
• Long duration of tenancy or advanced age does not create a permanent right to occupy commercial premises.
• Concurrent findings of lower courts will not be interfered with in second appeal unless legally flawed.

The ruling clarifies that rent control laws protect tenants from arbitrary eviction but they do not override ownership rights where legitimate and evidence-based need is established.

Legal Insight:
In eviction matters, courts closely examine proof of genuine requirement, alternative accommodation, actual business use, and consistency in documentation.

In commercial tenancy disputes, evidence carries greater weight than sympathy.

Address

401, Asha Dilpasand Imperial 6/3, South Tukoganj Opposite Gate No. 3, High Court Campus
Indore
452001

Opening Hours

Tuesday 10:30am - 7:30pm
Wednesday 10:30am - 7:30pm
Thursday 10:30am - 7:30pm
Friday 10:30am - 7:30pm
Saturday 12pm - 4:30pm
Sunday 12pm - 4:30pm

Telephone

+919963826959

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when SJLC - Sushrut Joshi Law Clinic posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to SJLC - Sushrut Joshi Law Clinic:

Shortcuts

Share

Category