ECorpLegal Services

ECorpLegal Services ECorpLegal Services, a full service & research-based law firm in Corporate & Company Laws, Secretarial Services, Compliances, and Legal Process Outsourcing

CorpLegal Services LLP, Law Offices (“the Firm”), a full service & research-based counselling law firm with legal practice in the areas of Corporate & Commercial (including Banking & Property matters), Infrastructure & Project Finance, Policy & Regulatory, Intellectual Property, Trade laws, Capital Market, Contract Management, Foreign Collaborations, Inbound & Outbound Investments, Litigation & Al

ternate Dispute Resolution Mechanisms. Our Focus, Values and quick turnaround time and attention to every matter makes us equal partner associates in the growth of our clients. What does CorpLegal have in Store for you:
> Corporate & Commercial Laws
> Cyber & Technology Laws
> Litigation, Arbitration & Mediation
> Legal Process Outsourcing

17/06/2019
08/05/2019

What are the differences between District Courts and Appellate Courts?

Answer:
District Courts are trial Courts, the Courts that you typically see in courtroom dramatizations, with a single judge, sometimes a jury, with opening and closing arguments, witnesses and evidence presented.

Appellate Courts are typically multi-Judge panels that receive briefs from attorneys appealing the district court ruling. They may or may not allow oral argument. They typically take less time to dispose of a case, since their primary purpose is to review the rulings of lower courts for legality, any abuse of discretion, and so forth.

08/05/2019

What is the difference between a Sessions Judge and a Civil Judge?

Answer:
A Judicial Officer starts his/her career as a Judicial Magistrate First Class and Civil Judge Junior Division.
The next higher level is Civil Judge Senior Division. Either concurently, or after some experience, the Officer will be designated as Aditional Sessions Judge, where the Judge will handle Criminal Case Trials. Independent Charge as the District and Sessions Judge would then follow.
Selection of HIgh Court Judges occurs from this level. [ Practising Lawyers of eminence at the District Courts and High Courts may also be elevated to the High Court Benches.]

08/05/2019

Who is a Sessions Judge?

Answer:
Session Judge is the Judge of session Court, and Session Court is most powerful Court in district for criminal cases.

Session Court is authorized to entertain only criminal cases and it can not entertained civil cases. Session Court is empowered to give all type of punishment to the offender even death penalty can also be given by this court with the prior approval of High Court.

If person is not satisfied by the decision of Session Court then he can make an appeal to High Court againat the decision

DJ (District Judge ) is the highest level of court for civil cases in district.

No arrests under Sec 66-A for social media posts, rules SC http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/no-arrests-under-sec-...
21/06/2017

No arrests under Sec 66-A for social media posts, rules SC
http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/no-arrests-under-sec-66-a-for-social-media-posts-rules-sc/57893.html

The Supreme Court struck down Section 66-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, on Tuesday.

Pronouncing their verdict on a PIL filed against the section in a packed courtroom, which empowers the police to arrest a person for allegedly posting ‘offensive materials' on social networking sites, a Bench of Justices J Chelameswar and RF Nariman said the section violated the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression and was therefore was illegal.

Terming liberty of thought and expression as "cardinal", the Bench said: “The public's right to know is directly affected by Section 66-A of the Information Technology Act."

"Section 66-A of the IT Act is struck down in its entirety," said the apex court bench of Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman.

"Our Constitution provides for liberty of thought, expression and belief. In a democracy, these values have to be provided within constitutional scheme," said Justice Nariman, pronouncing the verdict.

"There is no nexus between public order and discussion or causing annoyance by dissemination of information. Curbs under Section 66A of the IT Act infringes on the public right to know."

Calling the written word of the provision, which comprises terms such as ‘"annoying", "inconvenient" and "grossly offensive", vague, the apex court said: “What may be offensive to a person, may not be offensive to others".

The assurance given by one government was not binding on its successor, the Bench said. "Governments come and go but Section 66-A will remain forever," the bench said.

The SC, however, refused to strike down two other provisions of the IT Act that provide blocking of websites.

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court struck down Section 66-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, on Tuesday. Pronouncing their verdict on a PIL filed against the section, which empowers the police to arrest a person for allegedly posting ‘offensive materials'' on social networking sites, a Bench said…

Address

7, Knowledge Park/III
Greater Noida
201310

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when ECorpLegal Services posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to ECorpLegal Services:

Share