What are the opening hours?

Monday 9am - 7pm Tuesday 9am - 7pm Wednesday 9am - 7pm Thursday 9am - 7pm Friday 9am - 7pm Saturday 9am - 7pm

Bhuwan Jayant & Associates

Home
India
Delhi
Bhuwan Jayant & Associates

Advocates & Legal Consultants | Committed to Justice, Integrity, and Client Success. Expert legal Solutions Across Civil, Criminal & Corporate Law.

06/02/2026

Indian criminal law and constitutional safeguards strictly regulate the manner of arrest to prevent abuse of power and protect individual liberty.

Under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and Article 22 of the Constitution of India, an arrest cannot be made arbitrarily. Law-enforcement authorities are required to follow due process, including informing the person of the grounds of arrest, allowing communication with family or friends, and producing the accused before a magistrate within 24 hours.

Courts in Delhi and across India have consistently held that arrest is not mandatory in every case and must be justified by necessity, proportionality, and compliance with statutory safeguards. Awareness of these protections helps ensure accountability and prevents unlawful detention.

04/02/2026

Criminal Law & Legal Rights: What Every Individual Should Know

Criminal law is not only about offences—it is about procedure, fairness, and protection of legal rights. From the stage of investigation to trial and appeal, the law lays down safeguards to ensure that due process is followed and constitutional rights are preserved.

Understanding criminal procedure helps individuals make informed decisions, avoid procedural lapses, and seek timely legal guidance. Awareness of provisions relating to investigation, bail, and court proceedings often plays a decisive role in how a case progresses.

Legal awareness strengthens trust in the justice system and promotes informed participation in the legal process.

Build faster with Codex

01/02/2026

Understanding the 5 Writs of the Indian Constitution just got easier — and more memorable! ⚖️🇮🇳
These powerful legal tools protect our Fundamental Rights and ensure justice in the system. Law isn’t boring when you learn it the smart way!

Know your rights. Stay informed. Stay empowered.

16/01/2026

CONDONATION OF DELAY UNDER SECTION 5, LIMITATION ACT – KEY LEGAL INSIGHT

Condonation of delay is not a matter of right but a discretionary relief granted by courts when “sufficient cause” is shown. Section 5 of the Limitation Act requires an applicant to explain the delay with clarity, credibility, and supporting circumstances.

Courts have consistently held that vague or general explanations, such as financial difficulty or inability to engage counsel, are not by themselves sufficient grounds for condoning long delays. The burden lies on the applicant to explain the delay in a reasonable and convincing manner.

A cardinal principle governing condonation applications is that the delay must be explained day-by-day, particularly where the delay is substantial. The explanation should demonstrate due diligence and bona fide conduct throughout the period of delay.

This approach ensures procedural discipline and prevents misuse of limitation law, while balancing access to justice with the need for finality in litigation. Mere assertions without material particulars do not meet the threshold of “sufficient cause”.

14/01/2026

Let Makar Sankranti lift your spirits, open new doors, and help your dreams soar high. Wishing you happiness, growth, and prosperity this festive season. 🪁✨

11/01/2026

POCSO ACT & THE ROMEO–JULIET CLAUSE: A NECESSARY LEGAL BALANCE

The POCSO Act is a strict child protection legislation that criminalises all sexual activity involving persons below the age of eighteen, irrespective of consent. The law was enacted to address serious concerns of sexual abuse and exploitation of children and remains an essential protective framework.

However, in practice, the absence of any distinction based on age proximity has resulted in criminal proceedings against adolescents involved in consensual relationships. Such cases often arise not from exploitation, but from familial or social opposition, leading to disproportionate legal consequences.

The concept of a “Romeo–Juliet Clause” seeks to address this gap. It refers to a statutory safeguard that recognises consensual relationships between adolescents who are close in age and acting voluntarily. The objective is not to dilute child protection laws, but to introduce proportionality by distinguishing peer relationships from coercive or exploitative conduct.

A balanced approach ensures that the POCSO Act continues to protect children from abuse, while preventing its misuse in cases where criminal prosecution does not serve the ends of justice. Introducing such safeguards would align the law with social realities without compromising its core purpose.

10/01/2026

CONDONATION OF DELAY UNDER LIMITATION LAW – PRACTICAL LEGAL INSIGHTS

Condonation of delay is a recurring issue in appellate litigation. While the law of limitation is essential to bring certainty and discipline to legal proceedings, it is procedural in nature and is not meant to defeat substantive rights without examination on merits.

KEY ASPECTS OF LIMITATION LAW
• Limitation statutes regulate the time within which legal remedies must be pursued, but they do not extinguish rights automatically.
• The primary object of limitation law is to prevent stale claims, not to deny justice in deserving cases.

WHY DELAYS OCCUR IN PRACTICE
• Delays may arise due to illness, unavoidable personal circumstances, or lack of legal awareness.
• Procedural complexities, administrative delays, or delayed legal advice also contribute to late filing of appeals.
• Such delays are often genuine and not deliberate.

JUDICIAL APPROACH TO CONDONATION OF DELAY
• Courts are required to examine whether sufficient cause has been shown for the delay.
• Greater emphasis must be placed on whether the matter raises arguable or substantial issues.
• A rigid or mechanical approach defeats the purpose of adjudication.

HIGH COURT CLARIFICATION
In Ravinder Kumar vs State of Punjab (2025), the Punjab and Haryana High Court reiterated that delay, even if substantial, should not by itself be a ground to reject an appeal. The Court emphasised that where a case appears meritorious, a liberal and justice-oriented approach must be adopted so that the dispute is decided on merits rather than being dismissed on technical grounds.

CORE LEGAL PRINCIPLE
Procedural law is a handmaid of justice. Limitation rules must advance the cause of justice and should not be applied in a manner that shuts the doors of adjudication in deserving cases.

09/01/2026

Important Judgment | Enforcement of Injunction Orders

In Umed Singh vs Pardeep Kumar (2025), the Punjab & Haryana High Court has clarified a crucial aspect of Order 39 CPC.

The Court held that grant of police help for enforcing an injunction is distinct from punitive action under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC. Courts are not required to wait for actual violation of an injunction to maintain the sanctity of judicial orders.

This judgment strengthens the rights of litigants who face obstruction despite having injunction orders in their favour.

A significant ruling for civil litigation and property dispute matters.

08/01/2026

Appeal in Criminal Cases – Understanding the Right to Challenge a Judgment

An appeal in a criminal case is a statutory legal remedy that allows an aggrieved party to challenge a conviction, acquittal, or sentence passed by a lower court. The right to appeal is governed by the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and plays a vital role in ensuring fairness and correction of judicial errors.

A convicted person may file an appeal against conviction or sentence, while the prosecution may appeal against an acquittal in certain circumstances. Criminal appeals are typically filed before the Sessions Court or the High Court, depending on the court that passed the original judgment. Appellate courts review the trial court record to assess whether there has been any misapplication of law, procedural irregularity, or improper appreciation of evidence.

An appeal is not a fresh trial; rather, it is a judicial review based on the existing record. Appellate courts have the power to confirm, modify, or set aside the judgment, order retrial, or alter the sentence where justified. The appellate mechanism strengthens public confidence in the criminal justice system by providing a structured process to address legal errors.

07/01/2026

Difference Between Bail and Anticipatory Bail in Criminal Law

In criminal proceedings, the terms bail and anticipatory bail are often used interchangeably, but legally they apply at very different stages of a case under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).

Bail is sought after arrest. Once an individual is taken into custody, the court may grant bail depending on whether the offence is bailable or non-bailable. In bailable offences, bail is a statutory right. In non-bailable offences, courts consider the seriousness of allegations, conduct of the accused, and the likelihood of interference with investigation.

Anticipatory bail, provided under Section 438 CrPC, is a preventive remedy available before arrest. It protects individuals who have a reasonable apprehension of arrest in non-bailable offences, ensuring personal liberty while requiring cooperation with investigating authorities.

Both remedies reflect the balance between individual freedom and the interests of justice, a foundational principle of criminal jurisprudence.

06/01/2026

Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) provides legal protection to a person who apprehends arrest in a non-bailable criminal case. It allows an individual to seek bail before arrest, ensuring liberty while cooperating with the investigation.

In Delhi NCR, anticipatory bail applications are commonly filed in cases involving criminal complaints, matrimonial disputes, economic offences, false FIRs, domestic disputes, NDPS cases, and white-collar crimes. The court examines factors such as the nature of allegations, prior criminal record, possibility of misuse of arrest, and cooperation with investigation.

Courts in Patiala House Court, District Courts of Delhi, Delhi High Court, and other competent courts exercise discretion while granting anticipatory bail with appropriate conditions, such as joining investigation, not tampering with evidence, and appearing before authorities when required.

Understanding the procedure, jurisdiction, and legal safeguards under Section 438 CrPC is essential for protecting constitutional rights and preventing unnecessary arrest.

04/09/2025

📌 WhatsApp screenshots cannot be admissible as evidence without a mandatory certificate under the Evidence Act & Consumer Protection Act.

🔎 Court Emphasized:
✅ Proper certification is essential for digital evidence
✅ Strict adherence to evidentiary procedures
✅ Importance of procedural compliance in consumer disputes

🚨 Key Takeaway:
Non-certified WhatsApp chats will not hold in court. Always ensure legal compliance with digital documents.

Read full content : https://tinyurl.com/25pb8886

🔎 Court Emphasised:alUpdate #

Address

AD Block, 48D, Block AD, Dakshini Pitampura, Pitampura, New Delhi, 110034
Delhi
110001

Opening Hours

Monday	9am - 7pm
Tuesday	9am - 7pm
Wednesday	9am - 7pm
Thursday	9am - 7pm
Friday	9am - 7pm
Saturday	9am - 7pm

Website

https://jayantandassociates.com/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Bhuwan Jayant & Associates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Want your practice to be the top-listed Law Practice in Delhi?