Civil Lawyer in Delhi

Civil Lawyer in Delhi Civil Cases Lawyers in Delhi,Civil Suit,Money Recovery Suit,Civil Injunction Suit,Partition Suit of Property,Will & Probate Cases,Civil Revision,Civilwrit

11/05/2015

suit for declaration and permanent injunction,

The respondent herein filed the suit against the appellants seeking for
the relief of declaration of his title to the suit property and for
consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the appellants
herein from interfering with his physical possession. Briefly the case of
the plaintiff is that the suit property belonged to Guramma wife of the
first defendant and the mother of the plaintiff and on her death the first
defendant had given declaration before the revenue authorities to change
the Katha in the name of the plaintiff in respect of the suit schedule
property and mutation was effected accordingly and the revenue record stood
in the name of the plaintiff for a long period of time. It is the further
case of the plaintiff that the first defendant entered into second
marriage with one Jayamma and defendants 2 to 5 are their children and they
denied the ownership of the plaintiff in the suit property and therefore,
the suit came to be filed.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 3725-3726 OF 2015
[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 3377-3378 of2011]

H. Lakshmaiah Reddy & Ors. .. Appellants

-vs-

L. Venkatesh Reddy .. Respondent

J U D G M E N T

C. NAGAPPAN, J.

Leave granted.

11/05/2015

suit for declaration possession and damages on basis of will.

In the instant case, the suspicious circumstance appears to be that
when the Will was being executed, the thumb impression over the alleged
Will was also taken by the beneficiaries and the document-writer was shown
to be scribe of the document, whereas the document was not scribed by him.
However, late Phoolbasa Bai although filed written statement before her
death, but she did not whisper anything about the Will in the written
statement. Admittedly, the Will was allegedly executed in 1977 whereas the
written statement was filed some time in 1987. Taking into consideration
all these facts, we do not filed any error in the conclusion arrived at by
the High Court. The said finding, therefore, needs no interference by this
Court.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Civil Appeal No.3410 of 2007

DHANNULAL AND OTHERS …..Appellant(s)

versus

GANESHRAM AND ANOTHER …..Respondent(s)

WITH

Civil Appeal No.3411 of 2007
GANESHRAM …..Appellant(s)

versus

DHANNULAL AND OTHERS …..Respondent(s)

JUDGMENT

M. Y. EQBAL, J.

Address

A-381, Defence Colony
Delhi
110024

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Civil Lawyer in Delhi posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Civil Lawyer in Delhi:

Share