AS Law Office

Home
India
Delhi
AS Law Office

Comprehensive legal services across 15+ practice areas including commercial law, family matters, criminal defense, and more.

Reach us : +91-8929327500 | [email protected]
📍 B-37/4, 1st Floor, Ramesh Nagar, New Delhi - 110015

21/09/2026

Online fraud demands swift action. Here is a structured guide to protecting your rights and recovering losses.

online scam, cyber fraud, what to do after being scammed, cybercrime.gov.in, 1930 helpline, National Cyber Crime Helpline, UPI fraud, bank transaction block, preserve digital evidence, file FIR for cyber fraud, cyber cell complaint, platform negligence, data security liability, legal remedies for online fraud, India cyber law

19/09/2026

In a clarification on the law of attempt to murder, the Supreme Court has held that the grievousness of an injury, or its potential to cause death, is not a necessary ingredient for invoking Section 307 IPC. A Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran emphasised that the test lies in the intention or knowledge to cause death, coupled with an overt act, irrespective of the nature of hurt caused.
However, the Court declined to add the charge at a belated stage, noting that no such intention had been alleged.
The ruling reinforces the primacy of mens rea.

Section 307 IPC, attempt to murder, Supreme Court judgment, grievous hurt, intention and knowledge, mens rea, overt act, Justice J.B. Pardiwala, Justice K. Vinod Chandran, alteration of charge, criminal law India, Section 109 BNS

18/09/2026

A legal perspective on a wife’s rights when asked to leave her marital residence.

FamilyLaw DomesticRights IndianLaw LegalEducation WomenEmpowerment MaritalRights LegalHelp AdvocateAdvice RightsAwareness LegalTips
women's legal r’ghts, matrimonial home rights, husband forcing wife out of house, family law India, domestic legal advice, legal awareness for women, marital rights, advocate explains law, legal recourse for wives, women’s property rights in marriage

17/09/2026

The Supreme Court has held that financiers cannot repossess hypothecated vehicles through force, deceit, or in violation of loan agreement terms, ruling that recovery of loans and seizure of vehicles must be carried out only through lawful means.
A bench of Justice PS Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe set aside an Allahabad High Court order and awarded Rs 10 lakh compensation to a truck owner whose vehicle was forcibly repossessed at 1 am by breaking its steering lock, without prior notice.
The Court also directed the RBI to ensure genuine compliance with its guidelines against coercive recovery practices.

Supreme Court judgment, forcible repossession of vehicles, financiers, hypothecation, RBI guidelines, Fair Practices Code, NBFC recovery practices, banking regulation, loan default, compensation, Article 14, Article 21, right to livelihood, ICICI Bank v Prakash Kaur, Cholamandalam Investment and Finance, Justice PS Narasimha, Justice Alok Aradhe, Allahabad High Court, unlawful seizure, self-help repossession clause

16/09/2026

In a significant development in the Gurgaon hit-and-run case, police have arrested Kalyan Bainsla, the driver accused of ramming his car into a woman biker's motorcycle on Golf Course Road.
The incident, captured on video and widely circulated on social media, occurred while the victim, identified as Sia, was riding with a group of bikers who had earlier asked the vehicle's occupants to maintain distance.
The accused was apprehended in Rajgarh, Rajasthan, with authorities escalating charges to include attempt to murder.
The case has reignited concerns over road rage and safety for women riders in the NCR.

Gurgaon hit-and-run, Golf Course Road accident, Kalyan Bainsla arrest, woman biker attacked, road rage NCR, attempt to murder charge, Aprilia RS 457, Gurugram police arrest, viral hit-and-run video, women rider safety, Rajgarh Rajasthan arrest, NCR road safety

15/09/2026

The Supreme Court has reaffirmed a fundamental principle of contract law:
a suit for recovery of money is not maintainable where the amount sought to be recovered is found to have been paid or advanced for an illegal purpose.
The Court held that no party can invoke judicial process to enforce a claim arising out of an unlawful transaction, as courts of law cannot lend their aid to give effect to illegality.
This ruling reinforces the doctrine that agreements founded on illegal consideration are void and unenforceable, ensuring that judicial remedies remain unavailable to those seeking to profit from transactions tainted by illegality.

Supreme Court judgment, suit for recovery, illegal purpose, unenforceable contract, void agreement, ex turpi causa, in pari delicto, civil suit maintainability, Indian Contract Act, illegal consideration, recovery of money suit, judicial precedent, case law update, contract enforceability, Indian judiciary ruling

14/09/2026

Understanding desertion:
Breaking down its legal implications in matrimonial and divorce proceedings

IndianLaw

LegalRights KnowYourRights ASLaw AdvocateSaluja LegalEducation DivorceInIndia MarriageLaw LegalAwarenessIndia LawyerExplains Desertion in law, grounds for divorce, matrimonial law India, Hindu Marriage Act, family law advocate, legal rights awareness, divorce proceedings India, AS Law firm, legal consultation, marriage dissolution

12/09/2026

The Supreme Court has dismissed Abu Salem's plea seeking premature release in the 1993 Bombay Blasts case.
A Bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta held that jail-earned remission cannot be used to advance his release from the 25-year imprisonment period arising from the sovereign assurance given by India to Portugal at the time of his extradition.
The Court clarified that its 2022 judgment never converted his life sentence into a fixed-term sentence, and that Salem's computation wrongly double-counted overlapping periods of undertrial and post-conviction custody.
His release, therefore, remains governed strictly by the 25-year extradition assurance, expiring only in November 2030.

Supreme Court, Abu Salem, 1993 Mumbai Bomb Blasts, extradition treaty, Portugal, premature release, life imprisonment, sovereign assurance, jail remission, Section 432 CrPC, Maharashtra Prisons (Remission System) Rules 1962, Article 21, Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta, Bombay High Court, TADA Court, undertrial custody, 25-year cap

Address

B-37/4, 1st Floor Ramesh Nagar
Delhi
110015

Website

http://aslawoffice.in/, https://aslawoffice.in/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when AS Law Office posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.