Gaur's LAW FIRM

Gaur's LAW FIRM Our aim is to provide pragmatic, solution-oriented and technically feasible advice to our clients.

Deals in Delhi & NCR, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Uttrakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra etc.

⚖️ Legal Update | Supreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya S...
11/09/2026

⚖️ Legal Update | Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).

In Kunal Rameshbhai Kalyani v. State of Gujarat & Anr., the Court held that a genuine promise to marry, subsequently not fulfilled, does not by itself constitute “deceitful means” under Section 69 BNS. The prosecution must indicate that the promise was made without any intention of fulfilling it from the very beginning.

The Court accordingly quashed the FIR, finding the complaint indicative of a consensual relationship rather than deceitful inducement.

Key takeaway:
Section 69 punishes deception—not a genuine relationship that subsequently fails to culminate in marriage.

FalsePromiseToMarry PromiseToMarry CriminalLaw CriminalJustice IndianJudiciary IndianLaw LegalUpdate LegalNews SupremeCourtJudgment LandmarkJudgment JudicialPrecedent MatrimonialLaw FamilyLaw Consent LegalAwareness LawAndJustice CriminalLawyer Advocates LawyersOfIndia LegalProfession IndianLegalSystem GaurLawFirm GaurSLawFirm YogeshGaur

⚖️ Legal Update | Supreme Court of India“A child should not be treated as a criminal.”The Supreme Court has set aside a ...
04/09/2026

⚖️ Legal Update | Supreme Court of India

“A child should not be treated as a criminal.”

The Supreme Court has set aside a 21-year-old conviction after accepting the appellant’s claim of juvenility at the time of the offence.

The Court reaffirmed that juvenility can be raised at any stage, and procedural finality cannot override the substantive protection afforded to a child in conflict with law.

Key Takeaway: Juvenile justice is founded on reformation, rehabilitation and reintegration—not permanent stigmatization.

CriminalLaw IndianJudiciary LegalUpdate IndianLaw CriminalJustice LawAndJustice LegalNews Advocates LawyersOfIndia GaurLawFirm YogeshGaur

⚖️ Legal Update | Karnataka High CourtA daughter-in-law is not automatically liable to maintain her mother-in-law merely...
02/09/2026

⚖️ Legal Update | Karnataka High Court

A daughter-in-law is not automatically liable to maintain her mother-in-law merely because her husband—the son—has died.

In _S. Sheela v. State of Karnataka & Ors., W.P. No. 12878/2026, Justice Suraj Govindaraj held that under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, the Tribunal must examine the statutory conditions attached to the transfer of property. The son’s death, by itself, cannot create a fresh maintenance obligation where no such condition existed in the transfer.

Importantly, the Court clarified that Section 23 is concerned with property transfers made subject to a condition of providing basic amenities and physical needs; it cannot be used to retrospectively create an obligation that was never part of the transfer.

👉 Senior Citizens Act is a protective legislation, but its statutory powers must still be exercised within the framework of the Act.

Legal developments should always be understood in light of the facts and specific terms of the judgment.

GiftDeed DaughterInLaw MaintenanceLaw FamilyLaw IndianJudiciary IndianLaw LegalUpdate JudicialPrecedent HighCourt LawyersOfIndia Advocates LegalProfession LegalNews LawAndJustice SupremeCourt Justice GaursLawFirm GaurLawFirm YogeshGaur DelhiLawyer LinkedInLawyers

⚖️ Legal Update | Supreme Court of IndiaPendency of a criminal case, by itself, cannot be treated as a valid ground to d...
23/08/2026

⚖️ Legal Update | Supreme Court of India

Pendency of a criminal case, by itself, cannot be treated as a valid ground to discharge a public servant from service, particularly when there is no conviction and the employee has not been afforded an opportunity to defend himself.

In SPO/Constable IRB, Patiala v. State of Punjab & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (SC) 845, the Supreme Court held that removal based solely on the pendency of an FIR/criminal case, without conviction, could not be justified. The Court also awarded ₹5 lakh compensation instead of reinstatement, exercising its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution.

The ruling reinforces an important principle of fair procedure, natural justice and protection against arbitrary administrative action. However, pendency of a criminal case does not create an absolute immunity from disciplinary proceedings; the applicable service rules and facts of each case remain relevant.

A criminal allegation is not, by itself, equivalent to a judicial finding of guilt.

ServiceLaw PublicServant GovernmentEmployee NaturalJustice Article142 ConstitutionalLaw DueProcess RuleOfLaw FundamentalRights IndianJudiciary LawAndJustice LegalAwareness Advocate DelhiAdvocate CriminalLawyer ServiceMatter GAURSLAW FIRM GaursLawFirm YogeshGaur GaurLawFirm LawFirmDelhi

⚖️ Legal Update | Supreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court has modified its earlier three-year practice requirement for d...
21/08/2026

⚖️ Legal Update | Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court has modified its earlier three-year practice requirement for direct recruitment to the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division).

The Court has now prescribed one year of active legal practice as the eligibility requirement after the transition period, while introducing one year of judicial training and one year of structured clerkship after selection.

Importantly, candidates covered by notifications issued between 20 May 2025 and 31 March 2027 have been given transitional relief from the practice requirement, subject to the prescribed trainee arrangements.

The underlying principle remains significant: practical exposure to the legal profession is considered essential for developing judicial maturity, but the Supreme Court has sought to balance that objective with the interests of young law graduates and judicial aspirants.

A noteworthy development for the legal profession, judicial aspirants and the future of India’s subordinate judiciary.

A useful legal perspective here is that AI should be treated as an assistive legal technology, not as a substitute for l...
17/08/2026

A useful legal perspective here is that AI should be treated as an assistive legal technology, not as a substitute for legal reasoning, professional judgment or ethical responsibility. Justice Surya Kant has previously emphasized that AI can assist with research, drafting and identifying inconsistencies, but human oversight must remain central because AI can produce inaccuracies, hallucinations and bias.

AI in Legal Education: Tool, Not Substitute

The future of legal education is not about prohibiting Artificial Intelligence—it is about learning to use it responsibly.

AI can assist law students and lawyers in legal research, drafting, document analysis and identifying inconsistencies, but it cannot replace the core attributes of the legal profession: independent reasoning, ethical judgment, advocacy and accountability.

The real challenge before law schools is therefore to equip future lawyers with AI literacy, verification skills, data privacy awareness and professional ethics.

Technology may accelerate legal work—but the responsibility for the law remains with the human professional.

«AI should augment legal intelligence, not replace it.»

FutureOfLaw LegalProfession LegalResearch LegalInnovation AIandLaw LawAndTechnology LegalEthics LegalTechnology SupremeCourt IndianJudiciary Justice RuleOfLaw ConstitutionalLaw LawyersOfLinkedIn LegalCommunity Advocacy IndianLaw LegalAwareness LinkedInIndia TrendingNow GaursLawFirm AdvocateYogeshGaur DelhiLawyer

15/08/2026

🇮🇳 Independence Day | A Constitutional Perspective

On 15th August, we celebrate India’s independence—not merely as freedom from colonial rule, but as a continuing commitment to the values of the Constitution.

For the legal fraternity, independence carries a deeper responsibility: to uphold the Rule of Law, Fundamental Rights, equality, justice and constitutional governance.

Freedom becomes meaningful when every citizen can access justice, exercise their rights without fear, and live with dignity.

As members of the legal profession, our duty is not only to interpret the law, but also to strengthen public faith in justice and constitutional democracy.

Freedom is our right.
Justice is our responsibility.
The Constitution is our guiding principle.

🇮🇳 Wishing everyone a proud and meaningful Independence Day.

Yogesh Gaur, Advocate
Founder & Managing Partner
Gaur’s Law Firm

⚖️ Supreme Court Stays Madras HC Judgment on Karur Victims’ Compassionate AppointmentsThe Supreme Court, on 14 August 20...
14/08/2026

⚖️ Supreme Court Stays Madras HC Judgment on Karur Victims’ Compassionate Appointments

The Supreme Court, on 14 August 2026, stayed the Madras High Court judgment that had quashed the Tamil Nadu Government’s decision to provide government employment to eligible family members of those who died in the 2025 Karur stampede. The Bench comprising Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran issued notice while hearing the State’s challenge.

The Madras High Court had earlier held that such appointments raised serious concerns under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, particularly because public employment ordinarily has to comply with the constitutional requirement of equality and equal opportunity. It had also expressed concern that such appointments could create a precedent for similar claims arising from other tragedies.

The Supreme Court’s interim intervention brings an important constitutional question into focus:

Can the State, as a matter of policy and humanitarian relief, provide public employment to families affected by an extraordinary tragedy, even where such appointments fall outside the ordinary compassionate-appointment framework?

The Court’s observations indicate that the State’s power to provide relief to victims’ families cannot be examined solely from the perspective of conventional compassionate appointment schemes. However, the stay is an interim order and does not finally determine the constitutional validity of the policy.

Key Legal Issues

• Article 14 — Equality before law
• Article 16 — Equality of opportunity in public employment
• Article 162 — Executive power of the State
• Scope and limits of compassionate appointment
• Whether extraordinary humanitarian relief can justify deviation from ordinary recruitment norms
• Balancing constitutional equality with social justice and rehabilitation

The Supreme Court’s present order is interim in nature; the final determination remains pending.

⚖️ Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Amaravati Land-Pooling FIRThe Supreme Court has affirmed the quashing of the FIR ag...
14/08/2026

⚖️ Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Amaravati Land-Pooling FIR

The Supreme Court has affirmed the quashing of the FIR against Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu and former Minister P. Narayana concerning alleged irregularities in the Amaravati Land Pooling Scheme.

The case arose from allegations that G.O.Ms.No.41 dated 17.02.2016 unlawfully extended benefits under the land-pooling framework to certain categories of assigned lands and allegedly caused wrongful gain to private individuals.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the allegations did not disclose the necessary ingredients of the alleged criminal offences and that the prosecution was unsustainable. A significant aspect of the judgment was the statutory protection under Section 146 of the APCRDA Act, which barred prosecution for acts done or purportedly done under the Act or the rules made thereunder.

The Court also reiterated an important principle of criminal jurisprudence: a governmental policy decision, legislative/executive action or administrative decision cannot ordinarily be converted into a criminal prosecution merely because a subsequent government or political establishment disagrees with it. Criminal liability requires the statutory ingredients of the alleged offence to be prima facie established.

The decision is therefore significant for the jurisprudence concerning abuse of criminal process, judicial scrutiny of policy decisions, statutory immunity and the distinction between administrative irregularity and criminal culpability.

Key takeaway: Policy disagreement is not, by itself, criminality; criminal prosecution must rest upon legally sustainable allegations disclosing the essential ingredients of an offence.

⚖️ Legal Update | Alibi & Section 498A IPCThe Supreme Court has reiterated an important principle concerning the plea of...
11/08/2026

⚖️ Legal Update | Alibi & Section 498A IPC

The Supreme Court has reiterated an important principle concerning the plea of alibi in criminal proceedings: there is no inflexible rule that an alibi can be established only at the stage of trial.

In appropriate circumstances, the defence of alibi and the material supporting it may be relevant even at the pre-trial stage, particularly when the material placed before the Court substantially undermines the prosecution's case.

The broader principle remains that criminal proceedings should not be permitted to continue mechanically where the material on record demonstrates that the prosecution is fundamentally unsustainable. At the same time, disputed questions requiring detailed appreciation of evidence ordinarily remain matters for trial.

Alibi is a question of evidence, but there is no universal procedural embargo requiring every plea of alibi to await trial. The Court must examine the nature and quality of the material available in the particular case.

Address

Chamber No. G-707, Lawyers' Chambers Block, Karkardooma Courts
Delhi
110032

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm
Saturday 9am - 5pm

Telephone

+919871434271

Website

,

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Gaur's LAW FIRM posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Gaur's LAW FIRM:

Shortcuts

Share

Category