Swayambhu Law Firm

Swayambhu Law Firm Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Swayambhu Law Firm, Legal Service, Delhi.

Swayambhu Law Firm Is a multi- speciality Law Firm with best lawyers serving individuals, businesses, government entities throughout the Delhi NCR, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana Chandigarh and Uttrakhand.

01/04/2022



सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कैदियों की रिहाई की प्रक्रिया तेज करने के लिए बड़ा कदम उठाया है। मुख्य न्यायाधीश एनवी रमना ने गुरुवार को ‘Fast and Secured Transmission of Electronic Records’ (FASTER) साफ्टवेयर लान्च किया है।

दरअसल, अभी कैदियों को जमानत मिलने के बाद आदेश की कापी जेल प्रशासन तक पहुंचने में काफी समय लग जाता है, जिस वजह से कैदियों की रिहाई में 2-3 दिन की देरी हो जाती है। 'फास्टर' के जरिए आदेश की कापी को जल्दी और सुरक्षित तरीके से इल्केट्रानिक मोड में भेजा जाएगा। जिससे कैदियों की रिहाई में ज्यादा वक्त नहीं लगेगा।

01/02/2022

08/08/2021

Delhi High Court backs  . Read last pata of the judgement by Justice Pratibha M Singh
09/07/2021

Delhi High Court backs . Read last pata of the judgement by Justice Pratibha M Singh

The Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Rohinton Fali will hear the petition challenging the provisions dealing with  ...
06/07/2021

The Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Rohinton Fali will hear the petition challenging the provisions dealing with .

The Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Rohinton Fali will hear the petition challenging the provisions dealing with restitution of conjugal rights.The Public Interest Litigation filed by Ojaswa...

09/06/2021


05/06/2021


03/01/2021

14 (Right to Equality), 19 (Right to Freedom) and 21 (Right to Life and Liberty) are popularly known as the 'golden triangle' of the Indian Constitution. ... The golden triangle provides full protection to individuals from any encroachment upon their rights.

29/12/2020

Petition and its Proposition Under Criminal Law.

In an age where police or prosecution are not capable of protecting all the interests of victim, the remedies like the protest petition empowers the common man to quest for real justice.

Under the criminal law the term Protest Petition is not defined. Protest Petition is an opportunity granted to the victim to raise objections against the conclusions of the investigation made by the police, commonly it is filed when police presented the final report under section 173 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 wherein the police concludes the allegation are not made out against the accused.

What is a Protest Petition?

When an aggrieved person or complainant is not satisfied with the police report which filed before the concerned court, such person may move the petition against the negative police report which is called the Protest Petition. In simple words, Protest Petition is a representation made by the victim to the court during or after the completion of investigation by the police. Such petition is treated as Complaint under Section 190 of Criminal Procedure Code before the concerned court.

How to File a Protest Petition?

Before or after filing of police report victim or informant can file protest petition in the court where said case is pending to meet the goals of justice. Victim can go with this remedy where previous investigation had wrongly acquitted the accused. Once the Magistrate establishes that this was not a false complaint and the victim is rightly unsatisfied, he/she can conduct the inquiry by himself/herself, or order an investigation by an officer-in-charge, to whom the complaint is forwarded.

However the essential ingredients of the Complaint must be satisfy in the Protest Petition before Magistrate takes cognizance under section 190(1) (a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. There are three options available to the Magistrate, when the final report is submitted by the police and the Protest Petition is filed.

*Firstly, Magistrate may accept the final report and may also reject the Protest Petition.

*Secondly, he may accept the final report but treat the Protest Petition as a Complaint and proceed in accordance with Section 200 and 202 of the Code.

*Lastly, he may accept the Protest Petition and reject the final report and take cognizance under Section 190 (1) (b) of the code.

The correct legal position is that Magistrate is not bound to accept the final report submitted by the police officials. The Magistrate can disagree with that report and take the cognizance even on the basis of police papers, if any submitted along with the police report. Hence, where the Protest Petition is filed, the procedure prescribed for trial of the complaint case has to be followed and Protest Petition has required to be dealt accordingly as per law.

The significance of the Protest Petition for a victim’s right is elusive since, apart from its non-existence in statutory literature, it also suffers from lack of certainty due to the limited number of case laws available to discern it from its ambiguities. Since the Protest Petition can be sent directly to the Magistrate without any police intervention, it expands a victim’s remedies in law, since the Magistrate need not even look at the shoddy police report to decide whether to go forward with the complaint or not.

15/12/2020

SC- Criminal complaint can be quashed once settlement reaches between parties in matrimonial disputes.

Rajiv Kumar Sharma and Anr. Versus State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
Cr. Appeal no 1599 of 2019

05/12/2020

- face Criminal Prosecution for Emissions Fudge

On Thursday, the Apex Court said Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Ltd, which sells cars under the brands Skoda, Volkswagen, Audi, Porsche & Lamborghini, will face investigation by Uttar Pradesh Police in a criminal complaint, lodged after global outrage against it for allegedly installing cheat devices in vehicles to suppress noxious emission levels.

A bench of CJI S A Bobde & Justice A S Bopanna & Justice V Ramasubramanian dismissed a plea filed by Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Ltd seeking quashing of FIRs lodged by Gautam Budh Nagar police on the basis of a complainant who alleged that though the company assured him that there were no cheat devices installed in the seven Volkswagen vehicles bought by him, the authorities found that nitrogen oxide emission levels from the vehicles were much higher.

Appearing for the complainant, Senior Lawyer Maninder Singh said after the NGT imposed fine on the company, the complainant realised he had been duped by the auto major.

The High Court of Allahabad had refused to quash the FIR against Skoda Auto Volkswagen, which alleged to be the amalgamation of 3 companies. It had appealed against the High Court decision in the Top Court.

Writing the judgment, Justice Ramasubramanian said mere delay of two & a half years for filing the complaint against the company for fudging emission levels of their vehicles could not be a ground for quashing the FIR.

Address

Delhi
110201

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 7pm
Tuesday 9am - 7pm
Wednesday 9am - 7pm
Thursday 9am - 7pm
Friday 9am - 7pm
Saturday 9am - 7pm
Sunday 11am - 4pm

Telephone

+919675916495

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Swayambhu Law Firm posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Swayambhu Law Firm:

Share

Category